[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tag --seal --fix ?
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tag --seal --fix ? |
Date: |
Fri, 2 Apr 2004 19:08:03 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 06:05:04PM -0500, James Blackwell wrote:
> > I think that that's a bit exaggerated -- it depends a bit on what
> > you're trying to do. But for many and maybe even most users, that is
> > a good rule of thumb.
>
> There's one overt thing that can be noticed. rbrowse interprets sealed
> versions as 'uninteresting in the usual case' and doesn't display
> sealed versions by default.
That's a bug in rbrowse (yes I know the rbrowse author intended it as a
feature).
-Miles
--
If you can't beat them, arrange to have them beaten. [George Carlin]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tag --seal --fix ?, Andrew Suffield, 2004/04/01
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tag --seal --fix ?, Tom Lord, 2004/04/01
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tag --seal --fix ?, James Blackwell, 2004/04/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tag --seal --fix ?,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tag --seal --fix ?, Dustin Sallings, 2004/04/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tag --seal --fix ?, Miles Bader, 2004/04/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tag --seal --fix ?, Tom Lord, 2004/04/03
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tag --seal --fix ?, Dustin Sallings, 2004/04/01