Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Front page to wiki now modifiable again

[Cameron Patrick]

James Blackwell wrote:

| >> That's not what I'm saying, though.  I'm saying if a license fails to=20
| >> meet the DFSG, it must also fail to meet the OSD.
| >
| > This is empirically incorrect. There have been licenses which OSI have
| > officially approved as meeting the OSD which were rejected by Debian
| > for not meeting the DFSG. I already said that once. I don't know where
| > you got this idea from.

| I read his comment as "If its not DFSG free, then its not OSD
| compliant".

Yes, but the contrapositive of this would be "if it's OSD compliant,
it's DFSG free", not t'other way 'round as you ask in your next sentence:

| Do exampels exist of something that is DFSG free, but do not
| qualify for OSD?

Cameron.

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature