Re: BK-like functionality (was Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch/subversion comparison question)

[Denys Duchier]

Tom Lord <address@hidden> writes:

> One idea is to work out how to store your personal arch project trees
> in a Subversion archive.   The intention of the idea is that
> minute-to-minute, you can have a CVS-like experience but then, when
> you want to coordinate with others, you have arch.
>
> Now, to be sure -- for some of us this an absurdity.   The idea of
> running a Subversion archive is not attractive.   This combination
> idea is horribly bloated and so forth.

I don't know: if we are just talking about a SVN fs, then it doesn't
seem entirely absurd to use just that to provide smart revlib
support.

Cheers,

-- 
Dr. Denys Duchier - Équipe Calligramme - LORIA, Nancy, FRANCE
AIM: duchierdenys