[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
GROUPWARE
From: |
Lloyd Llewellyn |
Subject: |
GROUPWARE |
Date: |
08 Feb 2001 11:20:00 -0500 |
I don't think it would make sense to try to morph an existing end-to-end
system like phpGroupWare into an open groupware standard (OGS) project
itself.
phpGW seems like a product designed to get the job done. An OGS would
have to be designed from the ground up to be flexible enough for any
number of client developers to use. The important element of such a
project is that it's open and reusable, client-friendly, comprehensive
while being flexible, and based upon standards.
- GROUPWARE,
Lloyd Llewellyn <=
- Re: [discuss] GROUPWARE, Sander Vesik, 2001/02/08
- Re: [discuss] GROUPWARE - what is it, anyways?, Sander Vesik, 2001/02/08
- Re: [Evolution] Re: [discuss] GROUPWARE - what is it, anyways?, Lloyd Llewellyn, 2001/02/08
- Re: [discuss] Re: [Evolution] Re: [discuss] GROUPWARE - what is it, anyways?, Sander Vesik, 2001/02/08
- Re: [Evolution] Re: [discuss] GROUPWARE - what is it, anyways?, Dan Kuykendall, 2001/02/08
- Re: [Evolution] Re: [discuss] GROUPWARE - what is it, anyways?, Lloyd Llewellyn, 2001/02/08
- Re: [Evolution] Re: [discuss] GROUPWARE - what is it, anyways?, Dan Kuykendall, 2001/02/08
- Re: [discuss] Re: [Evolution] Re: [discuss] GROUPWARE - what is it, anyways?, Sander Vesik, 2001/02/08