Re: Ripping out GLib bindings, depending on GLib

[Andreas Rottmann]

Rob Browning <address@hidden> writes:

>
> Unless anyone feels strongly, I've changed my mind (and due to a minor
> blunder I want to re-do the archive anyway).  I'm going to use
> explicit tags via "tla -i $(uuidgen) add FOO" tags for everything.
> That way we only have one rule: when you need to move files/dirs you
> use "tla mv".  That means that all files are handled the same way, and
> we don't have to worry about avoiding arch-tag duplication in derived
> files like Makefile.in, Makefile, etc.  Not that that's a big deal,
> but I haven't been able to think of any convincing reason *to* use
> arch-tag if you're ok with using "tla mv".
>
Well some argue you save a bit of disk space without all those
.arch-id/*.id files, but that's not too convincing. Also, it shouldn't
be a problem to switch to tagline from explicit tagging, if we ever
happen to change our minds.

Andy
-- 
Andreas Rottmann         | address@hidden      | address@hidden | address@hidden
http://yi.org/rotty      | GnuPG Key: http://yi.org/rotty/gpg.asc
Fingerprint              | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219  F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62

It's *GNU*/Linux dammit!