[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fsfe-uk] FDL and DRM, was: DRM, TPM, or what?
From: |
MJ Ray |
Subject: |
Re: [Fsfe-uk] FDL and DRM, was: DRM, TPM, or what? |
Date: |
Sat, 13 May 2006 07:27:05 +0100 |
Alex Hudson <address@hidden>
> On Thu, 2006-05-11 at 07:27 +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> > Are you claiming the FDL only covers the copying, not the
> > copyright (clearly nuts IMO: it's a copyright licence)
>
> Nope, I'm not claiming that. There are things other than copying that
> are covered by copyright. But that sentence above still stands: if I
> haven't given someone a copy of the document, I don't have an obligation
> to them.
As you know, your obligation under the FDL is to the licensor,
not people that you give a copy. You can argue that the
licensor will never find out, but that seems like advocating
jumping red lights late at night when no-one is around:
possibly justifiable and popularly accepted, but still illegal.
> > and that modifying a copy isn't partly making the modified copy
> > (possible, but I've never found any evidence for that)?
>
> It may come down to the process involved, but in general modifying a
> file isn't making a copy. I don't see any reason why it wouldn't be
> treated the same as modifying something physical: even if there were a
Exactly! The modification of the copy is part of its making. I do
not claim it is making another copy, but part of making that copy.
(This damned ambiguous language bites me again...)
> copy made in RAM or something while you modified it, it would be treated
> as temporary and "an integral and essential part of a technological
> process" (Copyright & Related Rights Act, 2003).
As such, still subject to copyright. Although maybe we have
non-licence permissions that would help us in England, I
don't think they are yet part of the Berne treaty or similar.
I doubt they'll be in the extremely hazardous WIPO one currently
making its way towards us. (For more on that, see past posts in
<http://lists.essential.org/pipermail/random-bits/> and help!)
> The file permissions thing is possibly a red herring, I don't think it
> would even count as modification of the work.
That's not true for all DRM, but it's not far from the Tivo trouble.
--
MJ Ray - personal email, see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html
Work: http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ irc.oftc.net/slef Jabber/SIP ask
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] DRM, TPM, or what? was: TV show about copyright, the Internet and DRM, (continued)
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] DRM, TPM, or what? was: TV show about copyright, the Internet and DRM, Shane M. Coughlan, 2006/05/09
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] DRM, TPM, or what? was: TV show about copyright, the Internet and DRM, Simon Waters, 2006/05/09
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] DRM, TPM, or what? was: TV show about copyright, the Internet and DRM, Alex Hudson, 2006/05/09
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] DRM, TPM, or what? was: TV show about copyright, the Internet and DRM, MJ Ray, 2006/05/10
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] DRM, TPM, or what? was: TV show about copyright, the Internet and DRM, Alex Hudson, 2006/05/10
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] DRM, TPM, or what? was: TV show about copyright, the Internet and DRM, Dave, 2006/05/10
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] DRM, TPM, or what? was: TV show about copyright, the Internet and DRM, Alex Hudson, 2006/05/10
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] DRM, TPM, or what? was: TV show about copyright, the Internet and DRM, Dave, 2006/05/10
- [Fsfe-uk] FDL and DRM, was: DRM, TPM, or what?, MJ Ray, 2006/05/11
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] FDL and DRM, was: DRM, TPM, or what?, Alex Hudson, 2006/05/11
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] FDL and DRM, was: DRM, TPM, or what?,
MJ Ray <=
- Re: [Fsfe-uk] FDL and DRM, was: DRM, TPM, or what?, Alex Hudson, 2006/05/15