[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Research questions
From: |
P.L.Hayes |
Subject: |
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Research questions |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Jul 2004 10:42:19 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.6.1 |
On Tuesday 27 July 2004 08:38, Ian Lynch wrote:
> I thin kyou need some concrete examples where these patents have been
> enforced to the detriment of some group of people otherwise it will be
> seen as just paranoia and hysteria.
> Equally they won't be convinced unless you show them actual cases where
> such patents have been enforced to the detrimnet of an average computer
> user.
Enforcement isn't necessary though is it? - The mere threat is enough and
quite frankly I don't give a damn whether someone decides to enforce their
'rights' to exclude others from using software ideas or not. The mere fact
that they can is an outrage but I suppose that won't make the news until it's
too late - if then.
I expect the Bromcom farce would make a fine subject for Gavin's news story if
it needs a concrete U.K. example but I just don't think it can properly
illustrate the full menace and obscenity of software idea patents. Bromcom
may well be more appropriate for a short news item than any 'hypothetical'
issues and like I said, I think a full documentary is required to present the
whole shabby tale but I won't hold my breath.
Don't take any notice of what I say - I'm just exasperated by the media
silence while fundamental rights are eroded for the convenience of a few
'special interest groups' but I suppose this thievish proprietarisation of
intellectual freedom is of no concern to the general public.
Paul.
Re: [Fsfe-uk] Research questions, MJ Ray, 2004/07/27