freetype-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ft-devel] Supporting OT-SVG out of the box


From: Vincent Torri
Subject: Re: [ft-devel] Supporting OT-SVG out of the box
Date: Sun, 12 May 2019 19:30:11 +0200

hello

just fyi, the enlightenment project has a SVG parser and we use
freetype for the rendering

regards

Vincent Torri

On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 6:34 PM Moazin Khatri <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Hi Werner,
>
> As I start researching about SVG rendering libraries, one thing I'll be 
> concerned with will be the dependency tree and the size of those libraries.
>
> Thinking about the sizes, brought me to the question of how will we be 
> linking the default SVG Rendering library. For the sake of this question, 
> let's ASSUME we choose to use `svgnative' with its `cairo' backend. Which of 
> the following would be our case:
>
> 1. We specify `svgnative' and `cairo' as a dependency, just like 'libpng' is 
> defined currently (provided it is configured to be `yes' in ./configure 
> step). `libpng' is NOT directly a part of `libfreetype.a', rather it's 
> supposed to be already installed in the system and is dynamically linked 
> within `libfreetype.so'. The same goes for `harfbuzz' and `graphite2'. Am I 
> correct? Is this exactly what we will be doing with the `svgnative' and 
> `cairo'?
>
> 2. We make `svgnative' a part of our codebase. Take the responsibility of 
> compiling it within our build system. At the same time, we specify `cairo' as 
> an external dependency and dynamically link it within `libfreetype.so'.
>
> 3. We make everything a part of our codebase. Including `svgnative' and 
> `cairo' and all of their major dependencies. Sounds like a really horrible 
> idea given the size of these things. But I wanted to make sure I list 
> everything that I have in my mind.
>
> Which one is it going to be? Some variation of any one of these? None of 
> these?
>
> My understanding about linking had been really weak. I have learned a lot 
> more about it with my recent experiences with compiling `svgnative' with its 
> `skia' port (which I have now successfully done). So, if I have got any major 
> concept wrong or if I am unaware of common practices, I apologize, please 
> point it out and I'll read about it.
>
> Regards,
> Moazin
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freetype-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]