fab-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Fab-user] Re: module -> package


From: Christian Vest Hansen
Subject: Re: [Fab-user] Re: module -> package
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2008 13:58:37 +0100

I pushed a fix to another latent reference to a wrong `env` and bumped
up the version number.

I wonder what people think. Is it good enough to merge? Are we close
to a release with this?

On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 11:31 PM, Christian Vest Hansen
<address@hidden> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 12:53 PM, Niklas Lindström <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Hi Christian,
>>
>> this looks great! Do you plan to merge this soon? I've tried it out
>> with my current deployment files. There were some issues which I've
>> fixed in my tracking branch at
>> <http://github.com/niklasl/fabric/tree/as-package>.
>
> Excellent!
>
> I have merged this with some additional modifications of my own, and
> pushed. I also think I found and fixed a threading problem.
>
>>
>> I did this quickly to fix apparent import problems and references to
>> fab (where the old ENV was used) where it *seemed* proper. But e.g.
>> passing fab to HostConnection and start_outputter might not be how you
>> intend this to be coupled?
>
> I didn't like this part, so i modified it to pass `fab.env` in as a
> `global_env` parameter instead.
>
>> (Also ENV is still mentioned in two places
>> in the docs which I didn't reformulate).
>
> I found one of these. Chances are, that if its in "user facing"
> documentation then what is really meant is `config`.
>
>>
>> Anyway, thanks for the progress!
>>
>> (I'm sorry I just disappeared after my initial activity; been quite swamped.)
>
> I was wondering about that.
>
>>
>> ----
>>
>> Oh, btw; it seems while prompting for a password, Fabric CPU usage
>> goes up to around 100%. I saw this earlier too, so I think it's an old
>> issue. Has anyone else seen this?
>
> I have not noticed this, but I found some other strange things; it
> seemed that when the outputter-threads never detected when their
> channels got closed, so they might have been spinning in tight
> loops... or blocked on a read (I never found out which).
>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Niklas
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 7:49 PM, Christian Vest Hansen
>> <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> And here we go:
>>>
>>> http://github.com/karmazilla/fabric/tree/as-package
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 6:50 PM, Christian Vest Hansen
>>> <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>> Just for your information.
>>>>
>>>> I'm working on refactorig the fabric.py module into a package, in a
>>>> local branch. When I get the basics up and running again, I will make
>>>> the branch public.
>>>>
>>>> It's a relatively big and risky change, so I hope people will give the
>>>> tires a good kicking, as I'd like to merge it into master sooner
>>>> rather than later (because merging patches & changes between the two
>>>> is troublesome).
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Venlig hilsen / Kind regards,
>>>> Christian Vest Hansen.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Venlig hilsen / Kind regards,
>>> Christian Vest Hansen.
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Fab-user mailing list
>>> address@hidden
>>> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fab-user
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Venlig hilsen / Kind regards,
> Christian Vest Hansen.
>



-- 
Venlig hilsen / Kind regards,
Christian Vest Hansen.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]