Re: invisible

[Luc Teirlinck]

Stefan Monnier wrote:

   The main reason for extending the code to the `invisible' property was
   precisely so as to make `intangible' less often necessary since
   `intangible' tends to introduce significant problems when interacting with
   code not specifically written with the `intangible' property in mind.

Yes, but that code not specifically written with the `intangible'
property in mind will still cause problems in those cases where the
`intangible' property is necessary and hence still should be rewritten
with the `intangible' property specifically in mind, regardless.

Sincerely,

Luc.