Re: Why is FUNC in cl-callf not allowed to be an expression?

[Michael Heerdegen]

Andy Moreton <address@hidden> writes:

> The documentation for `cl-callf' says:
>
>     Set PLACE to (FUNC PLACE ARGS...).
>     FUNC should be an unquoted function name.  PLACE may be a symbol,
>     or any generalized variable allowed by ‘setf’.
>
> Please update this (and `cl-callf2') to show that FUNC can be a lambda.

Done in a564d6e8bb (master).  I didn't touch cl-callf2 because its
docstring only relegates to that of cl-callf.

The manual already lists all cases.  Actually it also explicitly
mentions macro names.  I guess I should add that to the doc string as
well?

Michael.