Re: Using Org as the source format to generate org.texi

[Bastien]

Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:

> If Org can convert manual.org into that,
> then it is ok as a source file.

Good.

> Can Org express all the constructs of Texinfo?

As far as I know, yes -- but we need to check this.

> But I think 'manual.org' is the wrong name for it.
> It isn't the one and only manual we distribute, and it
> may not be the only one written in org.  So
> it should be 'org-manual.org', right?

Agreed.  I'm in favor of renaming it to org.org to stick
to convention currently in use: [package-name].texi.

If more manuals are to be written in Org, then having
calc-manual.org, emacs-manual.org, etc. is redundant.

-- 
 Bastien