[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs Lisp's future
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs Lisp's future |
Date: |
Sat, 08 Oct 2016 11:39:43 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2.50 (gnu/linux) |
> Why is it that nobody mentions Racket when talking about lisp or scheme?
I guess because we still need to run existing Elisp.
The assumption being that Guile can run existing Elisp, and that it
wouldn't be too hard to make an existing Common-Lisp system run existing
Elisp as well.
Stefan
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Lars Brinkhoff, 2016/10/07
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Helmut Eller, 2016/10/08
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2016/10/08
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Nicolas Petton, 2016/10/08
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Helmut Eller, 2016/10/08
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2016/10/10
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Richard Stallman, 2016/10/10
- Re: Emacs Lisp's future, Helmut Eller, 2016/10/11