[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A more modest proposal
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: A more modest proposal |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Jul 2010 18:00:28 +0900 |
David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
> Arguably similar expectations would hold for C-s, C-v, C-q, C-u, so I am
> not sure that this argument should prevail, even though C-z has a
> slightly different quality, being slightly useful as a working panic
> exit for the completely new user.
Not to mention "C-c"...!
-Miles
--
((lambda (x) (list x x)) (lambda (x) (list x x)))
- Re: A more modest proposal (Was: Emacs learning curve), (continued)
- Re: A more modest proposal (Was: Emacs learning curve), Jan Djärv, 2010/07/23
- Re: A more modest proposal (Was: Emacs learning curve), Daniel Colascione, 2010/07/23
- Re: A more modest proposal, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2010/07/23
- Re: A more modest proposal (Was: Emacs learning curve), Jan Djärv, 2010/07/23
- Re: A more modest proposal, Miles Bader, 2010/07/23
- Re: A more modest proposal, Jan Djärv, 2010/07/23
- RE: A more modest proposal (Was: Emacs learning curve), Drew Adams, 2010/07/23
- Re: A more modest proposal (Was: Emacs learning curve), Alfred M. Szmidt, 2010/07/23
- Re: A more modest proposal, Miles Bader, 2010/07/23
- Re: A more modest proposal, David Kastrup, 2010/07/23
- Re: A more modest proposal,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: A more modest proposal, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2010/07/23
- Re: A more modest proposal, Stefan Monnier, 2010/07/23
- Re: A more modest proposal, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/07/23
- Re: A more modest proposal, Andreas Schwab, 2010/07/23
- Re: A more modest proposal (Was: Emacs learning curve), Stephen Eilert, 2010/07/23
- Re: A more modest proposal, Chong Yidong, 2010/07/23
- Re: Emacs learning curve, Miles Bader, 2010/07/17
- Omi[cs]iroi! (was: Emacs learning curve), Drew Adams, 2010/07/17
- RE: Omi[cs]iroi! (was: Emacs learning curve), Drew Adams, 2010/07/17
- Re: Omi[cs]iroi! (was: Emacs learning curve), Deniz Dogan, 2010/07/17