[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GC
From: |
Richard M. Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: GC |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Jun 2005 18:42:36 -0400 |
So, gc-cons-threshold serves as the lower bound, and
gc-cons-percentage itself is the upper.
I think I see a misunderstanding here about the meaning of upper
limit. This doc string does not suggest there is any upper limit.
We could implement this feature, and add our own upper limit,
perhaps called gc-cons-max-threshold.
- Re: GC (was: lists.texi), (continued)
- Re: GC (was: lists.texi), Miles Bader, 2005/06/24
- Re: GC (was: lists.texi), Eli Zaretskii, 2005/06/25
- Re: GC, Adrian Aichner, 2005/06/25
- Re: GC, Miles Bader, 2005/06/25
- Re: GC, Adrian Aichner, 2005/06/25
- Re: GC, Miles Bader, 2005/06/25
- Re: GC, Adrian Aichner, 2005/06/26
- Re: GC, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/06/26
- Re: GC, Juri Linkov, 2005/06/26
- Re: GC, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/06/27
- Re: GC,
Richard M. Stallman <=
- Re: GC (was: lists.texi), Miles Bader, 2005/06/25
- Re: GC, Gaƫtan LEURENT, 2005/06/25
- Re: GC, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/06/25
- Re: GC (was: lists.texi), Eli Zaretskii, 2005/06/25
- Re: GC (was: lists.texi), Richard M. Stallman, 2005/06/25
- Re: GC, Stefan Monnier, 2005/06/28
- Re: GC, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/06/28
Re: lists.texi, Luc Teirlinck, 2005/06/18