[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: vc-next-action not behaving
From: |
David Abrahams |
Subject: |
Re: vc-next-action not behaving |
Date: |
Thu, 26 May 2005 08:28:35 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (windows-nt) |
Andre Spiegel <address@hidden> writes:
> On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 21:10 -0400, David Abrahams wrote:
>
>> In recent CVS builds of emacs (on NT), when I do `C-x v v' on an
>> *unmodified* file under version control, and I get:
>>
>> File is edited but read-only; making it writable
>> File is under version-control; use C-x v v to check in/out
>
> When you visit the file initially, what version state does it show on
> the mode line? Does it show something like "CVS-1.1", or "CVS:1.1".
It's the latter.
> The latter would mean that Emacs already considers the file edited when
> you first visit it.
>
> Emacs considers the file edited if the time stamp in CVS/Entries and the
> mtime of the working file do not agree. You could check these time
> stamps for an unmodified file,
Emacs diredit:
-r--r--r-- 1 dave root 25944 05-25 20:28 index.htm
DIR /TW:
05/25/2005 08:28 PM 25,944
index.htm
CVS/Entries
/index.htm/1.216/Wed May 25 23:28:50 2005//
Hum. Nobody seems to agree about the hour!
I'm on EST, which is GMT-05:00. Even if one of these is supposed to
be a GMT time it doesn't agree with either of the others. I'm using
CVS from Cygwin, which I have installed with its bin directories in my
regular Windows PATH all the time.
> you could also try and step through vc-cvs-parse-entry, to see if
> the time stamps are properly analyzed.
>
> Maybe it's a timezone issue?
Apparently it is, but I haven't a clue how I'd correct it! Any ideas?
--
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com
- vc-next-action not behaving, David Abrahams, 2005/05/25
- Re: vc-next-action not behaving, Andre Spiegel, 2005/05/26
- Re: vc-next-action not behaving,
David Abrahams <=
- Re: vc-next-action not behaving, Andre Spiegel, 2005/05/26
- Re: vc-next-action not behaving, David Abrahams, 2005/05/26
- Re: vc-next-action not behaving, Andreas Schwab, 2005/05/26
- Re: vc-next-action not behaving, David Abrahams, 2005/05/26
- Re: vc-next-action not behaving, Andreas Schwab, 2005/05/26
- Re: vc-next-action not behaving, Stefan Monnier, 2005/05/26
- Re: vc-next-action not behaving, David Abrahams, 2005/05/26
- Re: vc-next-action not behaving, David Abrahams, 2005/05/26