[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5 |
Date: |
Mon, 06 Jan 2003 12:13:06 -0500 |
2) a wider, non-localized change (_P and __P => P_)
Now that I understand the situation, I think that is best.
It is still a fairly localized change, localized to pop.c.
Would you like to do it?
- Re: [PATCHES] 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Joe Buehler, 2003/01/03
- Re: [PATCHES] 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/04
- Re: [PATCHES] 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Kim F. Storm, 2003/01/04
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Benjamin Riefenstahl, 2003/01/05
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Kim F. Storm, 2003/01/05
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Joe Buehler, 2003/01/07
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Kim F. Storm, 2003/01/07
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/07
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Kim F. Storm, 2003/01/08
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/09
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Kim F. Storm, 2003/01/10
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/01/10
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Kim F. Storm, 2003/01/10
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/12
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/10
- Re: [PATCHES] 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/05