[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5
From: |
Benjamin Riefenstahl |
Subject: |
Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5 |
Date: |
05 Jan 2003 17:45:16 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
Pardon me for butting in.
address@hidden (Kim F. Storm) writes:
> We already use P_ in most cases (under src/), and __P in a few other
> cases (mostly under lib-src/ and lwlib/).
>
> So it seems a bit odd that pop.c (as the only file) uses _P.
>
> I suggest we simply change pop.c to use __P like the other files in
> lib-src.
Both "__P" and "_P" are both firmly and totally in the compiler domain
(anything matching the regexp /^_[_A-Z]/ is). Compilers can use these
symbols however they see fit. "P_" OTOH is free for use in user
programs. So if a change is needed anyway, it should be to "P_"
(IMO).
so long, benny
- Re: [PATCHES] 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Joe Buehler, 2003/01/03
- Re: [PATCHES] 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/04
- Re: [PATCHES] 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Kim F. Storm, 2003/01/04
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5,
Benjamin Riefenstahl <=
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Kim F. Storm, 2003/01/05
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Joe Buehler, 2003/01/07
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/07
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Kim F. Storm, 2003/01/07
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/07
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Kim F. Storm, 2003/01/08
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Richard Stallman, 2003/01/09
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Kim F. Storm, 2003/01/10
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/01/10
- Re: 21.3.50 for Cygwin: patch 5, Kim F. Storm, 2003/01/10