[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator
From: |
Pete French |
Subject: |
Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:30:43 +0100 |
> From: "John C. Randolph" <jcr@nospam.idiom.com>
> Your definition of the word "normally" is rather bizarre. As you
> already know, nearly all Obj-C code that exists is based on the Cocoa
> framework. You may wish this were not the case, but it is.
Actually its fairly obvious that this kid doesnt know the difference
between a copiler and a library. To the best of my knowledge
theres nothing to stop you using Next/Apple ObjC without the autorelease
stuff as long as you dont use Foundation. Indeed I have doine so quite
happily.
*shrug*
-bat.
- POC destructors? (was Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator), (continued)
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, David Stes, 2004/04/23
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, John C. Randolph, 2004/04/23
- Defacto standards (was Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator), Gregory John Casamento, 2004/04/22
- Re: Defacto standards (was Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator), Riccardo Mottola, 2004/04/24
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, John C. Randolph, 2004/04/22
Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, David Stes, 2004/04/21
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, John C. Randolph, 2004/04/22
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator,
Pete French <=
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, David Stes, 2004/04/22
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, John C. Randolph, 2004/04/23
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, David Stes, 2004/04/23
- [stes'sism] Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, Helge Hess, 2004/04/23
- Re: [stes'sism] Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, Greg Parker, 2004/04/23
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, Markus Hitter, 2004/04/23
- Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, John C. Randolph, 2004/04/23
Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, David Stes, 2004/04/24
Re: bogus retain via NSEnumerator, Gregory John Casamento, 2004/04/24