[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Frameworks integration
From: |
Brent Fulgham |
Subject: |
Re: Frameworks integration |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Feb 2004 09:36:41 -0800 (PST) |
--- Nicolas Roard <nicolas@roard.com> wrote:
> The proposal is to put skyrix-xml and Tryst in the
> cvs (dev-libs), and
> possibly change
> their name to be more developer-friendly (ie a
> descriptive name
> followed by "kit" --
> RendezvousKit or ServiceDiscoveryKit for Tryst for
> example).
I think this is a great idea. If there aren't any
"trademark" problems with the Rendezvous name I'd vote
to be consistent with the Mac OS X name so that we're
clear what it does.
> Adding them in the cvs isn't perhaps needed, but at
> least we should
> point them as
> "official" solutions...
I'd vote to put them in CVS so that the archive
contains a complete set of 'core' components such that
you could build a complete working system from them.
-Brent
- Re: Application register (Was: Re: Frameworks integration), (continued)
- Re: Frameworks integration, Chris B. Vetter, 2004/02/27
- Re: Frameworks integration, Adam Fedor, 2004/02/27
- Re: Frameworks integration, Chris B. Vetter, 2004/02/27
- Re: Frameworks integration, Helge Hess, 2004/02/27
- Re[2]: Frameworks integration, Manuel Guesdon, 2004/02/28
- Re: Frameworks integration, nicolas, 2004/02/28
- Re: Frameworks integration, Helge Hess, 2004/02/28
- Re: Frameworks integration, Quentin Mathé, 2004/02/28
- Re: Frameworks integration, Adam Fedor, 2004/02/28
Re: Frameworks integration,
Brent Fulgham <=
Re: Frameworks integration, S.J.Chun, 2004/02/28