On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 11:34:42AM -0400, George Nychis wrote:
As Frank mentioned, he has not-so-mature code which can be useful to
others, but not primetime for the GR repo. It's a good example of
something that would go to CGRAN.
Agreed.
In direct reponse to Greg, I think CGRAN is more than just for people
who aren't FSF assignment. Some people don't want to go through the
hassle of following the GR conventions, writing the QA code, cleaning up
the code, and actually trying to integrate it.
Oh, you mean really making it work, and making it work on more than
just your current architecture, OS and version :-)