denemo-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Denemo-devel] latest git compile error


From: Bric
Subject: Re: [Denemo-devel] latest git compile error
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 09:19:33 -0400 (EDT)


> On September 11, 2013 at 7:46 AM Richard Shann <address@hidden>
> wrote:
>
>
> OK, I have pushed a fix for that.
> It was, in fact, the pixbuf thing and it was indeed the icon for denemo
> itself, denemo.png which it is expecting to find. There was no
> protection against it not being found in the right place. The
> implication is that there is still something wrong with the
> installation.
> Let me know if it shows further problems, but at least it should start
> now.



OK, I did the pull, the segfault went away.  I got the error "denemoui.xml could
not be found, exiting aborting..."

so, I recompiled with a distinct local prefix, and installed there.

denemo runs. 

this problem is fixed.

thanks!

PS: had an angry talk with 1and1 tech support, again, as I was ready to post
this reply an hour ago, but started getting their "session expired" pop-ups,
again, immediately upon log-in

>
> Richard
>
> On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 06:50 -0400, Bric wrote:
> >
> > > On September 11, 2013 at 6:15 AM Richard Shann <address@hidden>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 04:42 -0400, Bric wrote:
> > > >
> > > > (denemo:5467): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: gdk_pixbuf_new_from_file:
> > > > assertion
> > > > `filename != NULL' failed
> > > >
> > > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> > > > 0x007a0bae in ?? () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
> > > > (gdb)
> > >
> > > Thanks for this - not an easy one. When it gets to this prompt can you
> > > issue the command
> > >
> > > where
> > >
> >
> > <snip>
> > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> > 0x007a0bae in ?? () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
> > (gdb) where
> > #0  0x007a0bae in ?? () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
> > #1  0x007a1672 in gtk_window_set_default_icon_from_file () from
> > /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
> > #2  0x080bdcc8 in create_window (files=0x0) at view.c:10593
> > #3  inner_main (files=0x0) at view.c:6855
> > #4  0x00159e02 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libguile.so.17
> > #5  0x001cfc43 in scm_c_catch () from /usr/lib/libguile.so.17
> > #6  0x0015a3e2 in scm_i_with_continuation_barrier () from
> > /usr/lib/libguile.so.17
> > #7  0x0015a4c3 in scm_c_with_continuation_barrier () from
> > /usr/lib/libguile.so.17
> > #8  0x001ce7b9 in scm_i_with_guile_and_parent () from
> > /usr/lib/libguile.so.17
> > #9  0x001ce8ae in scm_with_guile () from /usr/lib/libguile.so.17
> > #10 0x0808a8c0 in main (argc=1, argv=0xbffff404) at main.c:339
> > (gdb)
> >
> >
> > > and send the printout from that? That will at least show which bit of
> > > the program was involved (well, hopefully).
> > >
> > > Richard
> > >
> > >
>
>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]