Re: [Denemo-devel] latest git compile error

[Richard Shann]

OK, I have pushed a fix for that.
It was, in fact, the pixbuf thing and it was indeed the icon for denemo
itself, denemo.png which it is expecting to find. There was no
protection against it not being found in the right place. The
implication is that there is still something wrong with the
installation.
Let me know if it shows further problems, but at least it should start
now.

Richard

On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 06:50 -0400, Bric wrote:
> 
> > On September 11, 2013 at 6:15 AM Richard Shann <address@hidden>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 04:42 -0400, Bric wrote:
> > >
> > > (denemo:5467): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: gdk_pixbuf_new_from_file:
> > > assertion
> > > `filename != NULL' failed
> > >
> > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> > > 0x007a0bae in ?? () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
> > > (gdb)
> >
> > Thanks for this - not an easy one. When it gets to this prompt can you
> > issue the command
> >
> > where
> >
> 
> <snip>
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> 0x007a0bae in ?? () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
> (gdb) where
> #0  0x007a0bae in ?? () from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
> #1  0x007a1672 in gtk_window_set_default_icon_from_file () from
> /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
> #2  0x080bdcc8 in create_window (files=0x0) at view.c:10593
> #3  inner_main (files=0x0) at view.c:6855
> #4  0x00159e02 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libguile.so.17
> #5  0x001cfc43 in scm_c_catch () from /usr/lib/libguile.so.17
> #6  0x0015a3e2 in scm_i_with_continuation_barrier () from
> /usr/lib/libguile.so.17
> #7  0x0015a4c3 in scm_c_with_continuation_barrier () from
> /usr/lib/libguile.so.17
> #8  0x001ce7b9 in scm_i_with_guile_and_parent () from /usr/lib/libguile.so.17
> #9  0x001ce8ae in scm_with_guile () from /usr/lib/libguile.so.17
> #10 0x0808a8c0 in main (argc=1, argv=0xbffff404) at main.c:339
> (gdb)
> 
> 
> > and send the printout from that? That will at least show which bit of
> > the program was involved (well, hopefully).
> >
> > Richard
> >
> >