[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Add more convenient condition object const
From: |
Peter Bex |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Add more convenient condition object constructor [was: Re: [PATCH] Turn chicken.condition into a module, with syntax exports!] |
Date: |
Thu, 25 May 2017 14:00:04 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 08:58:46AM +0200, Peter Bex wrote:
> That's requires more keystrokes, but at the same time it's more readable.
> Of course one reason to add the constructor is to have an API that's
> less verbose, and this adds back a little bit more verbosity. On the
> other hand, the constructor is new so it's less hassle for users if we
> changed that rather than the ->list that already exists.
I just checked, there are exactly 3 eggs in the henrietta cache
that even use condition->list: fuse, condition-utils and missbehave.
The fuse egg's use is an example program that only uses the procedure
for displaying the error, but condition-utils and missbehave actually make
use of the structure of the list (but could be easily changed, I think).
Cheers,
Peter
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Turn chicken.condition into a module, with syntax exports!, Peter Bex, 2017/05/07
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Turn chicken.condition into a module, with syntax exports!, Peter Bex, 2017/05/07
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Turn chicken.condition into a module, with syntax exports!, Evan Hanson, 2017/05/18
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Turn chicken.condition into a module, with syntax exports!, Peter Bex, 2017/05/19
- [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Add more convenient condition object constructor [was: Re: [PATCH] Turn chicken.condition into a module, with syntax exports!], Peter Bex, 2017/05/20
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Add more convenient condition object constructor [was: Re: [PATCH] Turn chicken.condition into a module, with syntax exports!], Evan Hanson, 2017/05/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Add more convenient condition object constructor [was: Re: [PATCH] Turn chicken.condition into a module, with syntax exports!], Peter Bex, 2017/05/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Add more convenient condition object constructor [was: Re: [PATCH] Turn chicken.condition into a module, with syntax exports!],
Peter Bex <=
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Add more convenient condition object constructor [was: Re: [PATCH] Turn chicken.condition into a module, with syntax exports!], Evan Hanson, 2017/05/26
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Add more convenient condition object constructor [was: Re: [PATCH] Turn chicken.condition into a module, with syntax exports!], Peter Bex, 2017/05/27
- [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix types of condition manipulation procedures [was: Re: [PATCH] Add more convenient condition object constructor [was: Re: [PATCH] Turn chicken.condition into a module, with syntax exports!]], Peter Bex, 2017/05/27
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix types of condition manipulation procedures [was: Re: [PATCH] Add more convenient condition object constructor [was: Re: [PATCH] Turn chicken.condition into a module, with syntax exports!]], Evan Hanson, 2017/05/29