[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Add more convenient condition object construct
From: |
Peter Bex |
Subject: |
[Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Add more convenient condition object constructor [was: Re: [PATCH] Turn chicken.condition into a module, with syntax exports!] |
Date: |
Sat, 20 May 2017 14:35:48 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 01:10:03PM +1200, Evan Hanson wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On 2017-05-07 21:45, Peter Bex wrote:
> > The core-library-reorganization page has "(chicken condition)" under
> > "undecided", but I think it's fine the way it is. The attached patches
> > add this module.
>
> These have been applied. Excellent work, it looks like these were tricky
> changes.
Attached is a patch to introduce the more convenient constructor for
condition objects we talked about on IRC. It's heavily inspired by
Kon Lovett's make-condition+ from his condition-utils egg.
It can be used like this:
(signal (condition '(exn location "foo" message "hi") '(file bar 1)))
which is equivalent to:
(signal (make-composite-condition
(make-property-condition 'exn 'location 1 'message "hi")
(make-property-condition 'file 'bar 2)))
It also improves make-property-condition by giving a better error
message when you pass in an invalid list length, something like
(make-property-condition 'exn 'location) would give an error message
like "(cadr) bad argument type: ()", which doesn't really help.
Cheers,
Peter
0001-Add-a-more-convenient-way-of-constructing-condition-.patch
Description: Text Data
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Turn chicken.condition into a module, with syntax exports!, Peter Bex, 2017/05/07
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Turn chicken.condition into a module, with syntax exports!, Peter Bex, 2017/05/07
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Turn chicken.condition into a module, with syntax exports!, Evan Hanson, 2017/05/18
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Turn chicken.condition into a module, with syntax exports!, Peter Bex, 2017/05/19
- [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Add more convenient condition object constructor [was: Re: [PATCH] Turn chicken.condition into a module, with syntax exports!],
Peter Bex <=
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Add more convenient condition object constructor [was: Re: [PATCH] Turn chicken.condition into a module, with syntax exports!], Evan Hanson, 2017/05/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Add more convenient condition object constructor [was: Re: [PATCH] Turn chicken.condition into a module, with syntax exports!], Peter Bex, 2017/05/24
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Add more convenient condition object constructor [was: Re: [PATCH] Turn chicken.condition into a module, with syntax exports!], Peter Bex, 2017/05/25
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Add more convenient condition object constructor [was: Re: [PATCH] Turn chicken.condition into a module, with syntax exports!], Evan Hanson, 2017/05/26
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Add more convenient condition object constructor [was: Re: [PATCH] Turn chicken.condition into a module, with syntax exports!], Peter Bex, 2017/05/27
- [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix types of condition manipulation procedures [was: Re: [PATCH] Add more convenient condition object constructor [was: Re: [PATCH] Turn chicken.condition into a module, with syntax exports!]], Peter Bex, 2017/05/27
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] [PATCH] Fix types of condition manipulation procedures [was: Re: [PATCH] Add more convenient condition object constructor [was: Re: [PATCH] Turn chicken.condition into a module, with syntax exports!]], Evan Hanson, 2017/05/29