[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-tar] Possible tar bug
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-tar] Possible tar bug |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Dec 2010 23:24:44 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 |
On 12/26/2010 05:07 PM, address@hidden wrote:
> I used -cMf for the very first tape, than I continued with -rMf for adding
> new files, shouldn't this make the whole huge archive in correct format?
Yes, it should. However, we need to be able to reproduce the problem.
I can reproduce it if I don't use -cMf for the very first tape, or
if I use an unusual option like -o or -H ustar (possibly in TAR_OPTIONS).
I can also "reproduce" it if we assume that you have a bad tape, that
somehow passed the checksum tests. But I can't reproduce it otherwise.
So it sounds like we are still at a loss as to why you are observing
the symptoms that you do.
Re: [Bug-tar] Possible tar bug, bocek . pavel, 2010/12/27
- Re: [Bug-tar] Possible tar bug, Paul Eggert, 2010/12/28
- Re: [Bug-tar] Possible tar bug, bocek . pavel, 2010/12/29
- Re: [Bug-tar] Possible tar bug, Paul Eggert, 2010/12/30
- Re: [Bug-tar] Possible tar bug, bocek . pavel, 2010/12/30
- Re: [Bug-tar] Possible tar bug, Paul Eggert, 2010/12/30
- Re: [Bug-tar] Possible tar bug, bocek . pavel, 2010/12/31
- Re: [Bug-tar] Possible tar bug, Joerg Schilling, 2010/12/31
- Re: [Bug-tar] Possible tar bug, Paul Eggert, 2010/12/31