[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-tar] Possible tar bug
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-tar] Possible tar bug |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Dec 2010 13:17:48 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Thunderbird/3.1.7 |
Well, I have to admit, I'm at a loss as to why you're
experiencing the bug. Perhaps if you run 'tar' under
GDB you can see why it thinks the tar file is ustar format
rather than GNU format. I expect that it's some unanticipated
confusion between -r (which needs to guess the tar format from
the existing tape) and -M (which allows for multiple tapes,
some of which may be of different formats!).
One thing that strikes me is this one:
sudo tar -rMf /dev/st0 /path/G* (tape 7, 8)
Was tape 8 initialized before this tar -rM command was run
the first time? It could be that you need to initialize
the trailing tapes as well.
- Re: [Bug-tar] Possible tar bug, (continued)
Re: [Bug-tar] Possible tar bug, bocek . pavel, 2010/12/27
- Re: [Bug-tar] Possible tar bug, Paul Eggert, 2010/12/28
- Re: [Bug-tar] Possible tar bug, bocek . pavel, 2010/12/29
- Re: [Bug-tar] Possible tar bug, Paul Eggert, 2010/12/30
- Re: [Bug-tar] Possible tar bug, bocek . pavel, 2010/12/30
- Re: [Bug-tar] Possible tar bug,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: [Bug-tar] Possible tar bug, bocek . pavel, 2010/12/31
- Re: [Bug-tar] Possible tar bug, Joerg Schilling, 2010/12/31
- Re: [Bug-tar] Possible tar bug, Paul Eggert, 2010/12/31