Re: [Bug-gnupress] Some kind of TODO?

[James A. Morrison]

On Wed, 2003-03-26 at 11:34, Simon Law wrote:
> > >   I believe that Jim had grave concerns about the correctness of
> > > the GCC manual.  But I don't quite recall what they were.  Perhaps he
> > > could explain them.

 Actually I am more concerned about the fullness of the glibc manual,
I know a lot of functions are not documented.

> > 
> > Hmm. Last time I checked the manual was pretty up to date, at the
> > dinner on saturday I mentioned that some new features in GCC 3.2/3.3
> > have not been documented but Opus said there wasn't time for that
> > kind of work on the manuals, just simple fixes.
> 
>       We've eaten about two weeks into the two month deadline.  I
> expect that I'll be able to churn out galley proofs of the GCC 3.3
> manual by the end of next week, if all goes well.
> 
>       This should give us sufficient time to determine if that manual
> is good shape with the new reality of GCC:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.3/changes.html

 I believe the GCC manual is complete enough, it even has the 
-no-integrated-cpp option documented.

> > probably not ;) Being fairly new to TeX I did a little reading then
> > started butchering my system texinfo.tex.
> 
>       Ick.  I wouldn't want to have to hack texinfo.tex for every
> manual we put out.

 sed/perl scripts might work instead ;)
 
> Simon

Jim