[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug#131033: gdb 5.1 dumped core on me [was: Emacs abort under gdb]
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Bug#131033: gdb 5.1 dumped core on me [was: Emacs abort under gdb] |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Jan 2002 19:09:29 +0200 (IST) |
On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, Francesco Potorti` wrote:
> The most probable cause should be trying to access something out of the
> user space.
As others pointed out, GDB should not crash when it reads the debuggee's
memory, even if the pointer is invalid. The debug interface should
return a failure indication, and GDB should have said ``cannot access
memory at addres 12345678''. If the debug interface didn't return a
failure indication, it can be due to a kernel bug, but I doubt that this
is what happened.
- gdb 5.1 dumped core on me [was: Emacs abort under gdb], Francesco Potorti`, 2002/01/22
- Re: gdb 5.1 dumped core on me [was: Emacs abort under gdb], Richard Stallman, 2002/01/22
- Re: gdb 5.1 dumped core on me [was: Emacs abort under gdb], Eli Zaretskii, 2002/01/24
- Re: gdb 5.1 dumped core on me [was: Emacs abort under gdb], Andrew Cagney, 2002/01/24
- Re: gdb 5.1 dumped core on me [was: Emacs abort under gdb], Francesco Potorti`, 2002/01/26
- Re: Bug#131033: gdb 5.1 dumped core on me [was: Emacs abort under gdb], Daniel Jacobowitz, 2002/01/26
- Re: gdb 5.1 dumped core on me [was: Emacs abort under gdb], Eli Zaretskii, 2002/01/27
- Re: gdb 5.1 dumped core on me [was: Emacs abort under gdb], Francesco Potorti`, 2002/01/27
- Re: Bug#131033: gdb 5.1 dumped core on me [was: Emacs abort under gdb], Daniel Jacobowitz, 2002/01/27
- Re: Bug#131033: gdb 5.1 dumped core on me [was: Emacs abort under gdb], Francesco Potorti`, 2002/01/28
- Re: Bug#131033: gdb 5.1 dumped core on me [was: Emacs abort under gdb],
Eli Zaretskii <=
Re: gdb 5.1 dumped core on me [was: Emacs abort under gdb], Michael Snyder, 2002/01/25