[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gdb 5.1 dumped core on me [was: Emacs abort under gdb]
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: gdb 5.1 dumped core on me [was: Emacs abort under gdb] |
Date: |
Sun, 27 Jan 2002 10:31:00 +0200 (IST) |
> From: Francesco Potorti` <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2002 17:22:23 +0100
>
> As far as I can tell, the backtrace of gdb's core looks like the
> backtrace of a dumped Emacs, but it is different from the real backtrace
> of the Emacs that was being debugged.
Sorry, I don't understand what do you mean. Can you show the GDB
backtrace from this crash?
> Maybe that's normal, I don't have
> any idea of what should a crashed gdb's backtrace look like.
It should show functions which appear in GDB sources, not the ones in
Emacs sources ;-)
- gdb 5.1 dumped core on me [was: Emacs abort under gdb], Francesco Potorti`, 2002/01/22
- Re: gdb 5.1 dumped core on me [was: Emacs abort under gdb], Richard Stallman, 2002/01/22
- Re: gdb 5.1 dumped core on me [was: Emacs abort under gdb], Eli Zaretskii, 2002/01/24
- Re: gdb 5.1 dumped core on me [was: Emacs abort under gdb], Andrew Cagney, 2002/01/24
- Re: gdb 5.1 dumped core on me [was: Emacs abort under gdb], Francesco Potorti`, 2002/01/26
- Re: Bug#131033: gdb 5.1 dumped core on me [was: Emacs abort under gdb], Daniel Jacobowitz, 2002/01/26
- Re: gdb 5.1 dumped core on me [was: Emacs abort under gdb],
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: gdb 5.1 dumped core on me [was: Emacs abort under gdb], Francesco Potorti`, 2002/01/27
- Re: Bug#131033: gdb 5.1 dumped core on me [was: Emacs abort under gdb], Daniel Jacobowitz, 2002/01/27
- Re: Bug#131033: gdb 5.1 dumped core on me [was: Emacs abort under gdb], Francesco Potorti`, 2002/01/28
- Re: Bug#131033: gdb 5.1 dumped core on me [was: Emacs abort under gdb], Eli Zaretskii, 2002/01/28
Re: gdb 5.1 dumped core on me [was: Emacs abort under gdb], Michael Snyder, 2002/01/25