[avr-chat] Illegal Instructions on ATmega128?

[Matthias Ringwald]

Thanks for the answer. At least my guessing was close.

matthias

On 21.09.2006, at 19:36, larry barello wrote:

> 0xFFFF is treated as a no-op, so your processor merrily walks up  
> memory
> until the program counter wraps and you are at 0x0000, or reset.
>
> It isn't a real reset, however, your peripherals are all still  
> doing their
> thing.
>
> | -----Original Message-----
> | From: address@hidden [mailto:avr- 
> chat-
> | address@hidden On Behalf Of Matthias Ringwald
> | Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 10:24 AM
> | To: address@hidden
> | Subject: [QUARANTINE] [avr-chat] Illegal Instructions on ATmega128?
> | Importance: Low
> |
> | Hi
> |
> | I'd like to ask a (dummy-looking) question:
> | Why does an ATmega128 restart in the case of a software error?
> |
..