[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AUCTeX] fontification question
From: |
Arash Esbati |
Subject: |
Re: [AUCTeX] fontification question |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Apr 2017 18:40:10 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 |
Mosè Giordano <address@hidden> writes:
> I think that start writing tests for fontification may be a good idea
> at some point ;-)
True, I started with it sometimes ago as I was playing with
fontification of verb macros:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/auctex.git/tree/tests/latex/fontification-verb-macros.tex
> Fontification tends to be often broken and it's hard to understand
> what was actually broken and what's the status-quo that we want to
> preserve.
You're right about "how do we want to have it in the first place?" I
put my idea behind my patch in the document attached.
Comments welcome.
Best, Arash
fontification-general.tex
Description: TeX document
- Re: [AUCTeX] fontification question, (continued)
- Re: [AUCTeX] fontification question, Arash Esbati, 2017/04/24
- Re: [AUCTeX] fontification question, Arash Esbati, 2017/04/25
- Re: [AUCTeX] fontification question, Tassilo Horn, 2017/04/25
- Re: [AUCTeX] fontification question, Arash Esbati, 2017/04/25
- Re: [AUCTeX] fontification question, Tassilo Horn, 2017/04/27
- Re: [AUCTeX] fontification question, Arash Esbati, 2017/04/27
- Re: [AUCTeX] fontification question, Tassilo Horn, 2017/04/27
- Re: [AUCTeX] fontification question, Arash Esbati, 2017/04/27
- Re: [AUCTeX] fontification question, Arash Esbati, 2017/04/28
- Re: [AUCTeX] fontification question, Mosè Giordano, 2017/04/28
- Re: [AUCTeX] fontification question,
Arash Esbati <=