[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AUCTeX] fontification question
From: |
Arash Esbati |
Subject: |
Re: [AUCTeX] fontification question |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Apr 2017 19:57:59 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 |
Tassilo Horn <address@hidden> writes:
> Well, you did not succeed in fixing the bug I've introduced. ;-)
I'm not that much on top of the game ;-)
> Are those valid commands? When I try to define them using
>
> \newcommand{\"o}{tüddelchen o}
> \newcommand{\^o}{dach o}
> \newcommand{\~o}{tilde o}
Yes, they are. Probably not interesting in UTF era any more, but valid
code:
\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}
\`o \'o \^o \"o \~o \=o \.o \t oo \o\ \oe\ \~o
\S \P
\end{document}
Best, Arash
- [AUCTeX] fontification question, François Patte, 2017/04/14
- Re: [AUCTeX] fontification question, Tassilo Horn, 2017/04/17
- Re: [AUCTeX] fontification question, Mosè Giordano, 2017/04/21
- Re: [AUCTeX] fontification question, Tassilo Horn, 2017/04/21
- Re: [AUCTeX] fontification question, Arash Esbati, 2017/04/24
- Re: [AUCTeX] fontification question, Arash Esbati, 2017/04/25
- Re: [AUCTeX] fontification question, Tassilo Horn, 2017/04/25
- Re: [AUCTeX] fontification question, Arash Esbati, 2017/04/25
- Re: [AUCTeX] fontification question, Tassilo Horn, 2017/04/27
- Re: [AUCTeX] fontification question,
Arash Esbati <=
- Re: [AUCTeX] fontification question, Tassilo Horn, 2017/04/27
- Re: [AUCTeX] fontification question, Arash Esbati, 2017/04/27
- Re: [AUCTeX] fontification question, Arash Esbati, 2017/04/28
- Re: [AUCTeX] fontification question, Mosè Giordano, 2017/04/28
- Re: [AUCTeX] fontification question, Arash Esbati, 2017/04/28