a2ps
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: HTML to PS: No netscape here


From: TBlittlefoot
Subject: Re: HTML to PS: No netscape here
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 21:26:44 -0700
User-agent: Mutt/1.3.24i

On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 06:09:01PM +0000, address@hidden wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> > On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 05:13:54PM +0000, address@hidden wrote:
> > > > You know, Ed, HTML-to-PS is the heart of this, to my mind.
> > > > 
> > > > It's the current universal markup language and can be extremely simple
> > > > to extremely complex.
> > > > 
> > > > I write HTML source with vanilla vi...
> > > > 
> > > > You only need to do text and static graphics. Sound and video, etc, 
> > obviously
> > > > don't translate to paper.
> > > > 
> > > > Any thoughts?
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > -- 
> > > >     PLEASE mail me in PLAIN TEXT ----------- THANK YOU 
> > >
> > > The HTML rendering engines in web browsers are quite complex.
> > > The concept of delegating in a2ps is a good choice in my mind.
> > 
> > I agree. But the docs/config files need to include directions
> > for *all* browsers currently in use by any significant number
> > of people.
> > 
> > > 
> > > That being said, have you looked at this link:
> > > 
> > > http://user.it.uu.se/~jan/html2ps.html
> > > 
> > 
> > Yes. Don't like perl. Don't have it on my box.
> > 
> > Perhaps we could 'just' convert that to C....
> > 
> > Seriously. There may even be a utility that does that.
> > 
> > > You want the final output in postscript, not the actual HTML
> > > code highlighted, right?
> > > 
> > 
> > I want the *.ps file to look like the original webpage does in
> > a browser when printed or previewed.
> > 
> > 
> > > I'm surprised people still use vi. 
> > 
> > Millions.
> > 
> > > I'm an emacs man myself.
> > 
> > Nobody's perfect.
> > 
> > :-))
> > 
> > > I can't live without color highlighting/multiple buffers/etc.
> > 
> > I guess I can.
> 
> possibly my last mail before vaca.
> 
> don't ge me wrong, i use linux at work on many many servers
> but it was too much of a chore at home to be a system manager.
> 

I can understand that. Suggest you try Debian.


> perl does suck but i've been writing a lot in it lately.
> 
> anyway, get perl installed and use that script, how bad could it be?
> 

Takes too much hdd space and other system resources for what it does, 
which is redundant.


> /ed
> 
> 


Have a good vacation, Ed. 

And thanks for everything.

Tom

-- 
    PLEASE mail me in PLAIN TEXT ----------- THANK YOU 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]