[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: HTML to PS: No netscape here
From: |
TBlittlefoot |
Subject: |
Re: HTML to PS: No netscape here |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Aug 2004 21:26:44 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.24i |
On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 06:09:01PM +0000, address@hidden wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 05:13:54PM +0000, address@hidden wrote:
> > > > You know, Ed, HTML-to-PS is the heart of this, to my mind.
> > > >
> > > > It's the current universal markup language and can be extremely simple
> > > > to extremely complex.
> > > >
> > > > I write HTML source with vanilla vi...
> > > >
> > > > You only need to do text and static graphics. Sound and video, etc,
> > obviously
> > > > don't translate to paper.
> > > >
> > > > Any thoughts?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > PLEASE mail me in PLAIN TEXT ----------- THANK YOU
> > >
> > > The HTML rendering engines in web browsers are quite complex.
> > > The concept of delegating in a2ps is a good choice in my mind.
> >
> > I agree. But the docs/config files need to include directions
> > for *all* browsers currently in use by any significant number
> > of people.
> >
> > >
> > > That being said, have you looked at this link:
> > >
> > > http://user.it.uu.se/~jan/html2ps.html
> > >
> >
> > Yes. Don't like perl. Don't have it on my box.
> >
> > Perhaps we could 'just' convert that to C....
> >
> > Seriously. There may even be a utility that does that.
> >
> > > You want the final output in postscript, not the actual HTML
> > > code highlighted, right?
> > >
> >
> > I want the *.ps file to look like the original webpage does in
> > a browser when printed or previewed.
> >
> >
> > > I'm surprised people still use vi.
> >
> > Millions.
> >
> > > I'm an emacs man myself.
> >
> > Nobody's perfect.
> >
> > :-))
> >
> > > I can't live without color highlighting/multiple buffers/etc.
> >
> > I guess I can.
>
> possibly my last mail before vaca.
>
> don't ge me wrong, i use linux at work on many many servers
> but it was too much of a chore at home to be a system manager.
>
I can understand that. Suggest you try Debian.
> perl does suck but i've been writing a lot in it lately.
>
> anyway, get perl installed and use that script, how bad could it be?
>
Takes too much hdd space and other system resources for what it does,
which is redundant.
> /ed
>
>
Have a good vacation, Ed.
And thanks for everything.
Tom
--
PLEASE mail me in PLAIN TEXT ----------- THANK YOU
- Re: HTML to PS: No netscape here, (continued)
- Re: HTML to PS: No netscape here, TBlittlefoot, 2004/08/19
- Re: HTML to PS: No netscape here, ed . arthur, 2004/08/19
- Re: HTML to PS: No netscape here, ed . arthur, 2004/08/19
- Re: HTML to PS: No netscape here, TBlittlefoot, 2004/08/20
- Re: HTML to PS: No netscape here, TBlittlefoot, 2004/08/20
- Re: HTML to PS: No netscape here, TBlittlefoot, 2004/08/20
- Re: HTML to PS: No netscape here, ed . arthur, 2004/08/20