Re: [Xlog-discussion] Any further integration between Xdx and Xlog?

[Chris Story]

Joop,

That is great news!  One point to consider is that many dx cluster  
users simply just monitor the cluster and use another logger.  They  
might not make the connection that xlog is now xlog/xdx, And loose  
"customers", If your intention is to reduce management overhead by  
merging,  it is well understood ( I also am a Linux developer, and  
have a full time development job, time is a premium).  Maybe just show  
xdx as frozen

If you need any assistance, please let me know.

Chris story
K6RWJ

On Jul 2, 2009, at 1:38 PM, Joop Stakenborg <address@hidden> wrote:

> Op dinsdag 23-06-2009 om 20:21 uur [tijdzone -0500], schreef  
> Christopher
> Story:
> > i saw some posts back in 2007, but are there any hooks, or callbacks
> > between xdx and xlog?

> > I want a xdx to indicate if the call posted is needed by looking in
> > xlog...
>
> Hi Chris,
>
> I have decided to integrate a cluster client with xlog in version 2.1.
> xdx development will most probably stop because of this. Sending data
> back and forth between xlog and xdx is not very practical. The client
> will tell which spots are important for you.
>
> Xlog version 2.1 will also have a new hamlib frequency display which
> will show the dx-spots together with your current frequency.
>
> I hope this answers your questions...
>
> > Chris
> > K6RWJ
>
> Regards,
> Joop PG4I