Re: [Xlog-discussion] Any further integration between Xdx and Xlog?

[Ed]

Chris Story wrote:
> Joop,
>
> That is great news!  One point to consider is that many dx cluster users 
> simply just monitor the cluster and use another logger.  They might not 
> make the connection that xlog is now xlog/xdx, And loose "customers", If 
> your intention is to reduce management overhead by merging,  it is well 
> understood ( I also am a Linux developer, and have a full time 
> development job, time is a premium).  Maybe just show xdx as frozen
>
> If you need any assistance, please let me know.
>
> Chris story
> K6RWJ


I agree, please consider freezing XDX. One feature I discovered by 
accident is of great use to me in a RTTY contest. I use fldigi as my 
digital modem and I found if I enable hamlib in XDX and dble-click the 
spot it will move fldigi to the QRG as well as the rig. XDX has been 
around a long time and other than colrdx there just is not a stand alone 
cluster client available for Linux.

On another note, can you or anyone else tell me why I keep dropping a 
connection with clordx ? This is via an internet connection not rf.

I have to set the keep alive in XDX or the same thing happens there.

I see this in Debian as well as Ubuntu.

Thanks for all of your work Joop.

73

Ed W3NR

fldigi alpha tester
linuxham moderator