www/philosophy europes-unitary-patent.pl.html p...

[GNUN]

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     GNUN <gnun>     21/09/30 08:02:37

Modified files:
        philosophy     : europes-unitary-patent.pl.html 
        philosophy/po  : europes-unitary-patent.pl-en.html 
                         europes-unitary-patent.pl.po 

Log message:
        Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/europes-unitary-patent.pl.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.28&r2=1.29
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/europes-unitary-patent.pl-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.20&r2=1.21
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/europes-unitary-patent.pl.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.21&r2=1.22

Patches:
Index: europes-unitary-patent.pl.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/europes-unitary-patent.pl.html,v
retrieving revision 1.28
retrieving revision 1.29
diff -u -b -r1.28 -r1.29
--- europes-unitary-patent.pl.html      30 Dec 2019 12:08:30 -0000      1.28
+++ europes-unitary-patent.pl.html      30 Sep 2021 12:02:35 -0000      1.29
@@ -1,7 +1,10 @@
 <!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/europes-unitary-patent.en.html" 
-->
 
 <!--#include virtual="/server/header.pl.html" -->
-<!-- Parent-Version: 1.90 -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.96 -->
+<!-- This page is derived from /server/standards/boilerplate.html -->
+<!--#set var="TAGS" value="essays laws patents" -->
+<!--#set var="DISABLE_TOP_ADDENDUM" value="yes" -->
 
 <!-- This file is automatically generated by GNUnited Nations! -->
 <title>&bdquo;Jednolity patent&rdquo; mógłby znaczyć nieograniczone patenty
@@ -10,14 +13,17 @@
 
 <!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/europes-unitary-patent.translist" -->
 <!--#include virtual="/server/banner.pl.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/ph-breadcrumb.pl.html" -->
+<!--GNUN: OUT-OF-DATE NOTICE-->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/top-addendum.pl.html" -->
+<div class="article reduced-width">
 <h2>&bdquo;Jednolity patent&rdquo; mógłby znaczyć nieograniczone patenty
 na&nbsp;oprogramowanie w&nbsp;Europie</h2>
-<p>Richard Stallman<br />Pierwotnie opublikowane w&nbsp;<a
-href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/aug/22/european-unitary-patent-software-warning";>The
-Guardian</a></p>
+
+<address class="byline">Richard Stallman</address>
 
 <p>Kiedy rynek oprogramowania w&nbsp;USA doświadcza <a
-href="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/tal-when-patents-attack";>długo
+href="https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/tal-when-patents-attack";>długo
 oczekiwane wojny patentów na&nbsp;oprogramowanie</a>, których się
 spodziewaliśmy, Unia Europejska ma w&nbsp;planie podążyć tą samą drogą. 
Mimo
 raportu Hargreaves nalegającego na&nbsp;Wielką Brytanię aby&nbsp;unikała
@@ -28,12 +34,13 @@
 oprogramowania ponieważ&nbsp;narzucają monopole na&nbsp;pomysły
 w&nbsp;oprogramowaniu. Nie jest ani&nbsp;praktyczne, ani&nbsp;bezpieczne
 pisać nietrywialne programy jeśli trzeba manewrować przez labirynt
-patentów. Zobacz &bdquo;Software Patents and Literary Patents&rdquo;,
-Guardian, 20. czerwca 2005 r.</p>
+patentów. Zobacz &bdquo;<a
+href="/philosophy/software-literary-patents.html">Software Patents and
+Literary Patents</a>&rdquo;.</p>
 
 <p>Każdy program łączy wiele pomysłów; duży program implementuje ich
 tysiące. Google ostatnio oszacowało, <a
-href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/aug/04/apple-patents-android-expensive-google";>że&nbsp;w
+href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2011/aug/04/apple-patents-android-expensive-google";>że&nbsp;w
 smartfonie może być 250 000 opatentowanych pomysłów</a>. Uważam tę 
liczbę
 za&nbsp;prawdopodobną, gdyż w&nbsp;2004 r. oszacowałem, że&nbsp;system
 GNU/Linux implementuje około 100 000 faktycznie opatentowanych pomysłów. (W
@@ -102,7 +109,7 @@
 na&nbsp;oprogramowanie, bądź&nbsp;jakikolwiek inny kontrowersyjny rodzaj
 patentów. Na&nbsp;przykład, jeśli zechce uznać, że&nbsp;naturalne geny
 podlegają patentowaniu, jak <a
-href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110729/16573515324/appeals-court-says-genes-are-patentable-because-theyre-separate-your-dna.shtml";>niedawno
+href="https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110729/16573515324/appeals-court-says-genes-are-patentable-because-theyre-separate-your-dna.shtml";>niedawno
 zrobił to sąd apelacyjny USA</a>, nikt, być może z&nbsp;wyjątkiem
 Europejskiego Sądu Sprawiedliwości, nie będzie mógł cofnąć tej 
decyzji.</p>
 
@@ -133,14 +140,14 @@
 jest złym celem, jeśli oznacza robienie rzeczy źle wszędzie.</p>
 
 <p>Rząd Wielkiej Brytanii wygląda jakby życzył sobie katastrofy odkąd <a
-href="http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140603093549/http://www.ipo.gov.uk/commissairebarnier.pdf";>oświadczył
+href="https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20140603093549/http://www.ipo.gov.uk/commissairebarnier.pdf";>oświadczył
 w&nbsp;grudniu 2010 [zarchiwizowane]</a> że&nbsp;chce, aby&nbsp;ECJ nie miał
 głosu ponad systemem. Czy&nbsp;rząd posłucha Hargreaves i&nbsp;zmieni swoje
 zdanie na&nbsp;ten temat? Brytyjczycy muszą na&nbsp;to nalegać.</p>
 
 <p>Więcej informacji na&nbsp;temat wad i&nbsp;błędów prawnych tego planu 
można
 znaleźć na&nbsp;stronie <a
-href="http://unitary-patent.eu";>unitary-patent.eu</a>.</p>
+href="https://www.unitary-patent.eu/";>unitary-patent.eu</a>.</p>
 
 <p>Zauważycie, że&nbsp;termin &bdquo;własność intelektualna&rdquo; nie 
został
 użyty w&nbsp;tym artykule. Ten termin wprowadza zamieszanie
@@ -152,6 +159,14 @@
 rozłącznych prawach, nigdy nie używam terminu &bdquo;własność
 intelektualna&rdquo;. I&nbsp;mi go nie brakuje.</p>
 
+<div class="infobox extra" role="complementary">
+<hr />
+<p>Pierwotnie opublikowane w&nbsp;<a
+href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2011/aug/22/european-unitary-patent-software-warning";><cite>The
+Guardian</cite></a></p>
+</div>
+</div>
+
 <div class="translators-notes">
 
 <!--TRANSLATORS: Use space (SPC) as msgstr if you don't have notes.-->
@@ -160,7 +175,7 @@
 
 <!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
 <!--#include virtual="/server/footer.pl.html" -->
-<div id="footer">
+<div id="footer" role="contentinfo">
 <div class="unprintable">
 
 <p>Wszelkie pytania dotyczące GNU i&nbsp;FSF prosimy kierować na&nbsp;adres 
<a
@@ -182,7 +197,7 @@
 
         &lt;web-translators@gnu.org&gt;</a>.</p>
 
-        <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+        <p>For information on coordinating and contributing translations of
         our web pages, see <a
         href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
         README</a>. -->
@@ -212,7 +227,7 @@
      
      There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
      Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright &copy; 2011, 2019 Richard Stallman</p>
+<p>Copyright &copy; 2011, 2021 Richard Stallman</p>
 
 <p>Ta strona jest dostępna na&nbsp;<a rel="license"
 href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/deed.pl";>licencji
@@ -229,11 +244,12 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 Aktualizowane:
 
-$Date: 2019/12/30 12:08:30 $
+$Date: 2021/09/30 12:02:35 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>
 </div>
+<!-- for class="inner", starts in the banner include -->
 </body>
 </html>

Index: po/europes-unitary-patent.pl-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/europes-unitary-patent.pl-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.20
retrieving revision 1.21
diff -u -b -r1.20 -r1.21
--- po/europes-unitary-patent.pl-en.html        30 Dec 2019 12:08:31 -0000      
1.20
+++ po/europes-unitary-patent.pl-en.html        30 Sep 2021 12:02:35 -0000      
1.21
@@ -1,17 +1,23 @@
 <!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
-<!-- Parent-Version: 1.90 -->
-<title>Europe's &ldquo;unitary patent&rdquo; Could Mean Unlimited
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.96 -->
+<!-- This page is derived from /server/standards/boilerplate.html -->
+<!--#set var="TAGS" value="essays laws patents" -->
+<!--#set var="DISABLE_TOP_ADDENDUM" value="yes" -->
+<title>Europe's &ldquo;Unitary Patent&rdquo; Could Mean Unlimited
 Software Patents - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
 <!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/europes-unitary-patent.translist" -->
 <!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
-<h2>Europe's &ldquo;unitary patent&rdquo; could mean unlimited
-software patents</h2>
-<p>by Richard Stallman<br />First published in <a
-href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/aug/22/european-unitary-patent-software-warning";>
-The Guardian</a></p>
+<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/ph-breadcrumb.html" -->
+<!--GNUN: OUT-OF-DATE NOTICE-->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/top-addendum.html" -->
+<div class="article reduced-width">
+<h2>Europe's &ldquo;Unitary Patent&rdquo; Could Mean Unlimited
+Software Patents</h2>
+
+<address class="byline">by Richard Stallman</address>
 
 <p>Just as the US software industry is experiencing <a
-href="http://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/tal-when-patents-attack";>the
+href="https://www.fsf.org/blogs/community/tal-when-patents-attack";>the
 long anticipated all-out software patent wars</a> that we have
 anticipated, the European Union has a plan to follow the same course.
 When the Hargreaves report urged the UK to avoid software patents, the
@@ -20,12 +26,12 @@
 <p>Software patents are dangerous to software developers because they
 impose monopolies on software ideas. It is not feasible or safe to
 develop nontrivial software if you must thread a maze of patents. See
-&ldquo;Software Patents and Literary Patents&rdquo;, Guardian, June 20,
-2005.</p>
+&ldquo;<a href="/philosophy/software-literary-patents.html">Software
+Patents and Literary Patents</a>.&rdquo;</p>
 
 <p>Every program combines many ideas; a large program implements thousands
 of them. Google recently estimated there <a
-href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/aug/04/apple-patents-android-expensive-google";>might
+href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2011/aug/04/apple-patents-android-expensive-google";>might
 be 250,000 patented ideas</a> in a smartphone. I find that figure
 plausible because in 2004 I estimated that the GNU/Linux operating
 system implemented around 100,000 actually patented ideas. (Linux, the
@@ -42,8 +48,8 @@
 <p>The Commission's text was written in a sneaky way: when read by
 laymen, it appeared to forbid patents on pure software ideas, because it
 required a patent application to have a physical aspect.  However, it
-did not require the &ldquo;inventive step&rdquo;, the advance that
-constitutes a patentable &ldquo;invention&rdquo;, to be physical.</p>
+did not require the &ldquo;inventive step,&rdquo; the advance that
+constitutes a patentable &ldquo;invention,&rdquo; to be physical.</p>
 
 <p>This meant that a patent application could present the required physical
 aspect just by mentioning the usual physical elements of the computer on
@@ -86,7 +92,7 @@
 courts) removed, the EPO could impose software patents, or any other
 controversial kind of patents. For instance, if it chooses to decide
 that natural genes are patentable, as <a
-href="http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110729/16573515324/appeals-court-says-genes-are-patentable-because-theyre-separate-your-dna.shtml";>a
+href="https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110729/16573515324/appeals-court-says-genes-are-patentable-because-theyre-separate-your-dna.shtml";>a
 US appeals court just did</a>, no one could reverse that decision except
 perhaps the European Court of Justice.</p>
 
@@ -95,7 +101,7 @@
 thousands of software patents, in contempt for the treaty that
 established it. (See &ldquo;<a
 
href="https://web.archive.org/web/20190120193501/https://webshop.ffii.org/";>Your
-web shop is patented</a>&rdquo;.) At present, though, each state decides
+web shop is patented</a>.&rdquo;) At present, though, each state decides
 whether those patents are valid. If the unitary patent system is adopted
 and the EPO gets unchecked power to decide, Europe will get US-style
 patent wars.</p>
@@ -116,13 +122,13 @@
 doing things wrong everywhere.</p>
 
 <p>The UK government seems to wish for the disaster, since <a
-href="http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140603093549/http://www.ipo.gov.uk/commissairebarnier.pdf";>it
 stated in
+href="https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20140603093549/http://www.ipo.gov.uk/commissairebarnier.pdf";>it
 stated in
 December 2010 [archived]</a> that it wanted the ECJ not have a say over the 
system.
 Will the government listen to Hargreaves and change its mind about this
 plan? Britons must insist on this.</p>
 
 <p>More information about the drawbacks and legal flaws of this plan can be
-found in <a href="http://unitary-patent.eu";>unitary-patent.eu</a>.</p>
+found in <a href="https://www.unitary-patent.eu/";>unitary-patent.eu</a>.</p>
 
 <p>You will note that the term &ldquo;intellectual property&rdquo; has not
 been used in this article. That term spreads confusion because it is
@@ -131,11 +137,19 @@
 effects that generalizing about the two is a mistake. Absolutely
 nothing in this article pertains to copyright law. To avoid leading
 people to generalize about disparate laws, I never use the term
-&ldquo;intellectual property&rdquo;, and I never miss it either.</p>
+&ldquo;intellectual property,&rdquo; and I never miss it either.</p>
+
+<div class="infobox extra" role="complementary">
+<hr />
+<p>First published in <a
+href="https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2011/aug/22/european-unitary-patent-software-warning";>
+<cite>The Guardian</cite></a></p>
+</div>
+</div>
 
 </div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
 <!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
-<div id="footer">
+<div id="footer" role="contentinfo">
 <div class="unprintable">
 
 <p>Please send general FSF &amp; GNU inquiries to
@@ -153,13 +167,13 @@
         to <a href="mailto:web-translators@gnu.org";>
         &lt;web-translators@gnu.org&gt;</a>.</p>
 
-        <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+        <p>For information on coordinating and contributing translations of
         our web pages, see <a
         href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
         README</a>. -->
 Please see the <a
 href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
-README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
+README</a> for information on coordinating and contributing translations
 of this article.</p>
 </div>
 
@@ -180,7 +194,7 @@
      There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
      Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
 
-<p>Copyright &copy; 2011, 2019 Richard Stallman</p>
+<p>Copyright &copy; 2011, 2021 Richard Stallman</p>
 
 <p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
 href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/";>Creative
@@ -190,10 +204,10 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2019/12/30 12:08:31 $
+$Date: 2021/09/30 12:02:35 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>
-</div>
+</div><!-- for class="inner", starts in the banner include -->
 </body>
 </html>

Index: po/europes-unitary-patent.pl.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/europes-unitary-patent.pl.po,v
retrieving revision 1.21
retrieving revision 1.22
diff -u -b -r1.21 -r1.22
--- po/europes-unitary-patent.pl.po     30 Sep 2021 11:47:09 -0000      1.21
+++ po/europes-unitary-patent.pl.po     30 Sep 2021 12:02:35 -0000      1.22
@@ -16,7 +16,6 @@
 "MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
 "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
 "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
-"X-Outdated-Since: 2021-09-14 16:25+0000\n"
 "Plural-Forms: nplurals=3; plural=(n==1 ? 0 : n%10>=2 && n%10<=4 && (n%100<10 "
 "|| n%100>=20) ? 1 : 2);\n"
 "X-Generator: Virtaal 0.7.0\n"