[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/philosophy free-software-even-more-importan...
|
From: |
GNUN |
|
Subject: |
www/philosophy free-software-even-more-importan... |
|
Date: |
Wed, 21 Apr 2021 16:59:26 -0400 (EDT) |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: GNUN <gnun> 21/04/21 16:59:26
Modified files:
philosophy : free-software-even-more-important.nl.html
philosophy/po : free-software-even-more-important.nl-en.html
free-software-even-more-important.nl.po
Log message:
Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/free-software-even-more-important.nl.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.15&r2=1.16
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/free-software-even-more-important.nl-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.9&r2=1.10
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/free-software-even-more-important.nl.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.38&r2=1.39
Patches:
Index: free-software-even-more-important.nl.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/free-software-even-more-important.nl.html,v
retrieving revision 1.15
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -b -r1.15 -r1.16
--- free-software-even-more-important.nl.html 17 Dec 2020 21:01:32 -0000
1.15
+++ free-software-even-more-important.nl.html 21 Apr 2021 20:59:25 -0000
1.16
@@ -1,12 +1,7 @@
-<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
- value='<a href="/philosophy/po/free-software-even-more-important.nl.po">
- https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/free-software-even-more-important.nl.po</a>'
- --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE"
value="/philosophy/free-software-even-more-important.html"
- --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE"
value="/philosophy/po/free-software-even-more-important.nl-diff.html"
- --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2020-10-05" -->
+<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE"
value="/philosophy/free-software-even-more-important.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.nl.html" -->
-<!-- Parent-Version: 1.90 -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.94 -->
<!-- This file is automatically generated by GNUnited Nations! -->
<title>Vrije software is juist tegenwoordig nog belangrijker - GNU project -
Free
@@ -14,15 +9,18 @@
<!--#include
virtual="/philosophy/po/free-software-even-more-important.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.nl.html" -->
-<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.nl.html" -->
<h2>Vrije software is juist tegenwoordig nog belangrijker</h2>
-<p class="byline">door <a href="http://www.stallman.org/";>Richard
Stallman</a></p>
+<address class="byline">door <a href="http://www.stallman.org/";>Richard
Stallman</a></address>
<p><em>Een sterk bewerkte versie van dit artikel is eerder gepubliceerd in <a
href="http://www.wired.com/opinion/2013/09/why-free-software-is-more-important-now-than-ever-before";>
Wired</a>.</em></p>
+<p><em>Bekijk deze <a
+href="https://www.fsf.org/blogs/rms/20140407-geneva-tedx-talk-free-software-free-society/";>
+video presentatie van 14 minuten</a> over de ideeën.</em></p>
+
<div class="announcement">
<p>
<a href="/help/help.html">Tips om de vrijesoftwarebeweging te helpen</a>
@@ -34,11 +32,11 @@
computergebruikers—zodat die gebruikers zeggenschap hebben over de
software die ze gebruiken, in plaats van andersom. Als een programma de
vrijheid en gemeenschap van computergebruikers respecteert, noemen we dat
-“vrije software”.</p>
+“vrije software.”</p>
<p>We noemen het soms ook “libre software” om te benadrukken dat we
praten over vrijheid, niet over prijs. Sommige private (niet-vrije)
-programma's, zoals Photoshop, zijn erg duur; anderen, zoals Flash Player,
+programma's, zoals Photoshop, zijn erg duur; anderen, zoals de Uber app,
zijn gratis beschikbaar—maar dat zijn slechts details. Voor beide
geldt dat ze de ontwikkelaar van het programma macht geven over de
gebruikers, macht die niemand zou moeten hebben.</p>
@@ -47,9 +45,9 @@
<em>malware</em>. Dat betekent dat ze functies hebben die zijn ontworpen om
de gebruiker te misbruiken. Niet-vrije software is tegenwoordig vaak malware
omdat <a href="/proprietary/proprietary.html">de macht van de ontwikkelaar
-misbruik in de hand werkt</a>. Dat overzicht bevat (anno januari 2020)
-ongeveer 400 gevallen van kwaadaardige functionaliteit, maar dat is slechts
-het topje van de ijsberg.</p>
+misbruik in de hand werkt</a>. Dat overzicht bevat (anno januari 2021)
+ongeveer 500 verschillende gevallen van kwaadaardige functionaliteit, maar
+dat is slechts het topje van de ijsberg.</p>
<p>Met vrije software hebben de gebruikers controle over het programma, zowel
individueel als collectief. Dus zij bepalen wat hun computers doen (er
@@ -120,8 +118,8 @@
lesboeken, referentieteksten zoals woordenboeken en encyclopedieën,
lettertypes om tekstparagrafen weer te geven, schakeling-ontwerpen om
elektronica te maken, en patronen om nuttige (niet-decoratieve) objecten met
-een 3D-printer te maken. Omdat dit geen software is, zegt de
-vrije-softwarebeweging strikt genomen niets hierover; maar dezelfde
+een 3D-printer te maken. Omdat dit geen software is, gaat de
+vrije-softwarebeweging strikt genomen niet hierover; maar dezelfde
redenering is van toepassing en leidt tot dezelfde conclusie: ook deze
werken zouden de vier vrijheden moeten hebben.</p>
@@ -143,10 +141,10 @@
een juk, een instrument met onrechtvaardige macht.</p>
<p>In buitensporige gevallen (hoewel deze gevallen vrij gebruikelijk zijn
-geworden) zijn <a href="/proprietary/proprietary.html">private programma's
-ontworpen om gebruikers te bespioneren, hen te beperken, te censureren, en
-te misbruiken</a>. Bijvoorbeeld, het besturingssysteem van de Apple <a
-href="/philosophy/why-call-it-the-swindle.html">iDingen</a> doen al deze
+geworden) zijn <a href="/malware">private programma's ontworpen om
+gebruikers te bespioneren, hen te beperken, te censureren, en te
+misbruiken</a>. Bijvoorbeeld, het besturingssysteem van Apple <a
+href="/philosophy/why-call-it-the-swindle.html">iDingen</a> doet al deze
zaken, alsmede Windows op mobiele apparaten met ARM-chips. Windows, firmware
van mobiele telefoons, en Google Chrome voor Windows bevatten een universele
achterdeur die één of ander bedrijf toelaat het programma op afstand te
@@ -155,7 +153,7 @@
<p>Het gebruik van niet-vrije software in het “internet van dingen”
zou het veranderen in het <a
-href="http://ieet.org/index.php/IEET/more/rinesi20150806";>“internet
+href="https://archive.ieet.org/articles/rinesi20150806.html";>“internet
van telemarketers”</a> alsmede in het “internet van
afluisteraars”.</p>
@@ -185,7 +183,7 @@
server gebruiken om je eigen computertaken te doen.</p>
<p>SaaSS betekent niet dat de programma's op de server niet-vrij zijn (hoewel
-ze dat wel vaak zijn). Het gebruiken van SaaSS resulteert in dezelfde
+ze dat wel vaak zijn). Het gebruik van SaaSS resulteert in dezelfde
onrechtvaardigheden als het gebruiken van een niet-vrij programma: het zijn
beide wegen naar hetzelfde slechte doel. Neem het voorbeeld van SaaSS als
vertaaldienst: de gebruiker verzendt tekst naar de server, en de server
@@ -279,8 +277,8 @@
<p>Private ontwikkelaars zouden ons studenten laten straffen die software
willen delen, en diegenen tegenwerken die nieuwsgierig genoeg zijn om het te
willen veranderen. Dit resulteert in slecht onderwijs. Zie <a
-href="/education/">www.gnu.org/education</a> voor een verdere discussie over
-het gebruik van vrije software in scholen.</p>
+href="/education/education.html">het gebruik van vrije software op
+scholen</a> voor een verdere discussie hierover.</p>
<h3>Vrije software: meer dan “voordelen”</h3>
@@ -314,14 +312,24 @@
<h3>Conclusie</h3>
-<p>We verdienen het om controle te hebben over onze eigen computeractiviteiten;
-hoe kunnen we deze controle krijgen? Door het verwerpen van niet-vrije
-software op de computers die we bezitten of regelmatig gebruiken, en door
-het verwerpen van SaaSS. Door <a
-href="/licenses/license-recommendations.html"> vrije software te
-ontwikkelen</a> (voor diegenen onder ons die programmeurs zijn). Door te
-weigeren niet-vrije software en SaaSS te ontwikkelen of promoten. Door <a
-href="/help/help.html">deze ideeën te verspreiden</a>.</p>
+<p>We verdienen het om zelf te kunnen bepalen hoe we computers gebruiken. Hoe
+kunnen we die controle verkrijgen?</p>
+
+<ul>
+ <li>Door niet-vrije software te weren op computers die we regelmatig
gebruiken
+en geen SaaSS te gebruiken.</li>
+
+ <li>Door <a href="/licenses/license-recommendations.html"> zelf vrije
software
+te ontwikkelen</a> (voor de programmeurs onder ons.)</li>
+
+ <li>Door geen SaaSS of niet-vrije software te ontwikkelen.</li>
+
+ <li>Door <a href="/help/help.html">deze tips door te geven</a></li>
+
+ <li>Door <a href="/philosophy/saying-no-even-once.html">nee te zeggen en het
+waarom daarvan uit te leggen</a> wanneer ons gevraagd wordt een niet-vrij
+programma te gebruiken.</li>
+</ul>
<p>Wij en duizenden gebruikers met ons hebben dit gedaan sinds 1984: dit is
waarom we nu het vrije GNU/Linux-besturingssysteem hebben dat
@@ -385,7 +393,7 @@
There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright © 2015, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 Richard Stallman</p>
+<p>Copyright © 2015, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021 Richard Stallman</p>
<p>Deze pagina is uitgebracht onder een <a rel="license"
href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/deed.nl";>Creative
@@ -401,7 +409,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Bijgewerkt:
-$Date: 2020/12/17 21:01:32 $
+$Date: 2021/04/21 20:59:25 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: po/free-software-even-more-important.nl-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file:
/web/www/www/philosophy/po/free-software-even-more-important.nl-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.9
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -b -r1.9 -r1.10
--- po/free-software-even-more-important.nl-en.html 22 Jun 2020 10:01:52
-0000 1.9
+++ po/free-software-even-more-important.nl-en.html 21 Apr 2021 20:59:26
-0000 1.10
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
-<!-- Parent-Version: 1.90 -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.94 -->
<title>Free Software Is Even More Important Now
- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
<!--#include
virtual="/philosophy/po/free-software-even-more-important.translist" -->
@@ -7,16 +7,21 @@
<h2>Free Software Is Even More Important Now</h2>
-<p class="byline">by <a href="http://www.stallman.org/";>Richard
-Stallman</a></p>
+<address class="byline">by <a href="http://www.stallman.org/";>Richard
+Stallman</a></address>
<p><em>A substantially edited version of this article was published in <a
href="http://www.wired.com/opinion/2013/09/why-free-software-is-more-important-now-than-ever-before";>
Wired</a>.</em></p>
+<p><em>Watch a <a
+href="https://www.fsf.org/blogs/rms/20140407-geneva-tedx-talk-free-software-free-society/";>
+14-min video presentation</a> of these ideas.</em></p>
+
<div class="announcement">
<p>
-<a href="/help/help.html">Suggested ways you can help the free software
movement</a>
+<a href="/help/help.html">Suggested ways you can help the free software
+movement</a>
</p>
</div>
<hr class="thin" />
@@ -29,17 +34,17 @@
<p>We also sometimes call it “libre software” to emphasize
that we're talking about liberty, not price. Some proprietary
(nonfree) programs, such as Photoshop, are very expensive; others,
-such as Flash Player, are available gratis—but that's a minor
+such as the Uber app, are available gratis—but that's a minor
detail. Either way, they give the program's developer power
over the users, power that no one should have.</p>
<p>Those two nonfree programs have something else in common: they are
both <em>malware</em>. That is, both have functionalities designed to
mistreat the user. Proprietary software nowadays is often malware
-because <a href="/proprietary/proprietary.html">the developers' power
-corrupts them</a>. That directory lists around 450 different
-malicious functionalities (as of January, 2020), but it is surely just the
-tip of the iceberg.</p>
+because <a href="/malware">the developers' power
+corrupts them</a>. That directory lists around 500 different
+malicious functionalities (as of January, 2021), but it is surely just
+the tip of the iceberg.</p>
<p>With free software, the users control the program, both individually
and collectively. So they control what their computers do (assuming
@@ -49,8 +54,8 @@
<p>With proprietary software, the program controls the users, and some
other entity (the developer or “owner”) controls the
program. So the proprietary program gives its developer power over
-its users. That is unjust in itself; moreover, it tempts the developer to
-mistreat the users in other ways.</p>
+its users. That is unjust in itself; moreover, it tempts the developer
+to mistreat the users in other ways.</p>
<p>Even when proprietary software isn't downright malicious, its
developers have an incentive to make it
@@ -72,7 +77,8 @@
</p>
<div class="important">
-<p>(0) The freedom to run the program as you wish, for whatever purpose.</p>
+<p>(0) The freedom to run the program as you wish, for whatever
+purpose.</p>
<p>(1) The freedom to study the program's “source code”,
and change it, so the program does your computing as you wish.
@@ -105,15 +111,15 @@
If any of them is missing or inadequate, the program is proprietary
(nonfree), and unjust.</p>
-<p>Other kinds of works are also used for practical activities, including
-recipes for cooking, educational works such as textbooks, reference
-works such as dictionaries and encyclopedias, fonts for displaying
-paragraphs of text, circuit diagrams for hardware for people to build,
-and patterns for making useful (not merely decorative) objects with a
-3D printer. Since these are not software, the free software movement
-strictly speaking doesn't cover them; but the same reasoning applies
-and leads to the same conclusion: these works should carry the four
-freedoms.</p>
+<p>Other kinds of works are also used for practical activities,
+including recipes for cooking, educational works such as textbooks,
+reference works such as dictionaries and encyclopedias, fonts for
+displaying paragraphs of text, circuit diagrams for hardware for people
+to build, and patterns for making useful (not merely decorative)
+objects with a 3D printer. Since these are not software, the free
+software movement strictly speaking doesn't cover them; but the same
+reasoning applies and leads to the same conclusion: these works should
+carry the four freedoms.</p>
<p>A free program allows you to tinker with it to make it do what you
want (or cease to do something you dislike). Tinkering with software
@@ -132,21 +138,21 @@
nonfree program is a yoke, an instrument of unjust power.</p>
<p>In outrageous cases (though this outrage has become quite usual) <a
-href="/proprietary/proprietary.html">proprietary programs are designed
+href="/malware">proprietary programs are designed
to spy on the users, restrict them, censor them, and abuse them</a>.
For instance, the operating system of Apple <a
-href="/philosophy/why-call-it-the-swindle.html">iThings</a> does all of these,
-and so does Windows on mobile devices with ARM chips. Windows, mobile
-phone firmware, and Google Chrome for Windows include a universal back
-door that allows some company to change the program remotely without
-asking permission. The Amazon Kindle has a back door that can erase
-books.</p>
+href="/philosophy/why-call-it-the-swindle.html">iThings</a> does all
+of these, and so does Windows on mobile devices with ARM chips.
+Windows, mobile phone firmware, and Google Chrome for Windows include
+a universal back door that allows some company to change the program
+remotely without asking permission. The Amazon Kindle has a back door
+that can erase books.</p>
<p>The use of nonfree software in the “internet of things”
-would turn it into
-the <a
href="http://ieet.org/index.php/IEET/more/rinesi20150806";>“internet
-of telemarketers”</a> as well as the “internet of
-snoopers”.</p>
+would turn it into the <a
+href="https://archive.ieet.org/articles/rinesi20150806.html";>
+“internet of telemarketers”</a> as well as the
+“internet of snoopers”.</p>
<p>With the goal of ending the injustice of nonfree software, the free
software movement develops free programs so users can free themselves.
@@ -155,12 +161,12 @@
run GNU, mainly in the <a href="/gnu/gnu-linux-faq.html">GNU/Linux
combination</a>.</p>
-<p>Distributing a program to users without freedom mistreats those users;
-however, choosing not to distribute the program does not mistreat
-anyone. If you write a program and use it privately, that does no
-wrong to others. (You do miss an opportunity to do good, but that's
-not the same as doing wrong.) Thus, when we say all software must
-be free, we mean that every copy must come with the four freedoms,
+<p>Distributing a program to users without freedom mistreats those
+users; however, choosing not to distribute the program does not
+mistreat anyone. If you write a program and use it privately, that
+does no wrong to others. (You do miss an opportunity to do good, but
+that's not the same as doing wrong.) Thus, when we say all software
+must be free, we mean that every copy must come with the four freedoms,
but we don't mean that someone has an obligation to offer you a copy.</p>
<h3>Nonfree Software and SaaSS</h3>
@@ -170,12 +176,12 @@
a Software Substitute, or SaaSS. That means letting someone else's
server do your own computing tasks.</p>
-<p>SaaSS doesn't mean the programs on the server are nonfree (though they
-often are). Rather, using SaaSS causes the same injustices as using a
-nonfree program: they are two paths to the same bad place. Take the
-example of a SaaSS translation service: The user sends text to the
-server, and the server translates it (from English to Spanish, say)
-and sends the translation back to the user. Now the job of
+<p>SaaSS doesn't mean the programs on the server are nonfree (though
+they often are). Rather, using SaaSS causes the same injustices as
+using a nonfree program: they are two paths to the same bad place.
+Take the example of a SaaSS translation service: The user sends text
+to the server, and the server translates it (from English to Spanish,
+say) and sends the translation back to the user. Now the job of
translating is under the control of the server operator rather than
the user.</p>
@@ -187,12 +193,12 @@
<h3>Primary And Secondary Injustices</h3>
-<p>When you use proprietary programs or SaaSS, first of all you do wrong
-to yourself, because it gives some entity unjust power over you. For
-your own sake, you should escape. It also wrongs others if you make a
-promise not to share. It is evil to keep such a promise, and a lesser
-evil to break it; to be truly upright, you should not make the promise
-at all.</p>
+<p>When you use proprietary programs or SaaSS, first of all you do
+wrong to yourself, because it gives some entity unjust power over you.
+For your own sake, you should escape. It also wrongs others if you
+make a promise not to share. It is evil to keep such a promise, and a
+lesser evil to break it; to be truly upright, you should not make the
+promise at all.</p>
<p>There are cases where using nonfree software puts pressure directly
on others to do likewise. Skype is a clear example: when one person
@@ -258,9 +264,9 @@
<p>Proprietary developers would have us punish students who are good
enough at heart to share software and thwart those curious enough to
-want to change it. This means a bad education. See
-<a href="/education/">http://www.gnu.org/education/</a>
-for more discussion of the use of free software in schools.</p>
+want to change it. This means a bad education. See more discussion
+about <a href="/education/education.html">the use of free software in
+schools</a>.</p>
<h3>Free Software: More Than “Advantages”</h3>
@@ -293,13 +299,26 @@
<h3>Conclusion</h3>
-<p>We deserve to have control of our own computing; how can we win
-this control? By rejecting nonfree software on the computers we own
-or regularly use, and rejecting SaaSS. By <a
+<p>We deserve to have control of our own computing. How can we win
+this control?</p>
+
+<ul>
+ <li>By rejecting nonfree software on the computers we own or
+regularly use, and rejecting SaaSS.</li>
+
+ <li>By <a
href="/licenses/license-recommendations.html"> developing free
-software</a> (for those of us who are programmers.) By refusing to
-develop or promote nonfree software or SaaSS. By <a
-href="/help/help.html">spreading these ideas to others</a>.</p>
+software</a> (for those of us who are programmers.)</li>
+
+ <li>By refusing to develop or promote nonfree software or SaaSS.</li>
+
+ <li>By <a
+href="/help/help.html">spreading these ideas to others</a>.</li>
+
+ <li>By <a
+href="/philosophy/saying-no-even-once.html">saying no and stating our
+reasons</a> when we are invited to run a nonfree program.</li>
+</ul>
<p>We and thousands of users have done this since 1984, which is how
we now have the free GNU/Linux operating system that
@@ -353,7 +372,7 @@
There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright © 2015, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 Richard Stallman</p>
+<p>Copyright © 2015, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021 Richard Stallman</p>
<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/";>Creative
@@ -363,7 +382,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2020/06/22 10:01:52 $
+$Date: 2021/04/21 20:59:26 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: po/free-software-even-more-important.nl.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/free-software-even-more-important.nl.po,v
retrieving revision 1.38
retrieving revision 1.39
diff -u -b -r1.38 -r1.39
--- po/free-software-even-more-important.nl.po 21 Apr 2021 20:29:30 -0000
1.38
+++ po/free-software-even-more-important.nl.po 21 Apr 2021 20:59:26 -0000
1.39
@@ -15,7 +15,6 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
-"X-Outdated-Since: 2020-10-05 09:25+0000\n"
"X-Generator: Poedit 2.3\n"
#. type: Content of: <title>
@@ -75,12 +74,6 @@
"vrijheid en gemeenschap van computergebruikers respecteert, noemen we dat "
"“vrije software.”"
-# | We also sometimes call it “libre software” to emphasize that
-# | we're talking about liberty, not price. Some proprietary (nonfree)
-# | programs, such as Photoshop, are very expensive; others, such as [-Flash
-# | Player,-] {+the Uber app,+} are available gratis—but that's a minor
-# | detail. Either way, they give the program's developer power over the
-# | users, power that no one should have.
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
"We also sometimes call it “libre software” to emphasize that "
@@ -97,13 +90,6 @@
"geldt dat ze de ontwikkelaar van het programma macht geven over de "
"gebruikers, macht die niemand zou moeten hebben."
-# | Those two nonfree programs have something else in common: they are both
-# | <em>malware</em>. That is, both have functionalities designed to mistreat
-# | the user. Proprietary software nowadays is often malware because <a
-# | [-href=\"/proprietary/proprietary.html\">the-] {+href=\"/malware\">the+}
-# | developers' power corrupts them</a>. That directory lists around [-450-]
-# | {+500+} different malicious functionalities (as of January,
-# | 202[-0-]{+1+}), but it is surely just the tip of the iceberg.
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
"Those two nonfree programs have something else in common: they are both "
@@ -261,7 +247,6 @@
"programma. Als één van deze vrijheden ontbreekt of onvolledig is, is het "
"programma privaat (niet-vrij) en onrechtvaardig."
-# || No change detected. The change might only be in amounts of spaces.
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
"Other kinds of works are also used for practical activities, including "
@@ -318,16 +303,6 @@
"constructie macht uitoefent over zijn gebruikers. Een onvrij programma is "
"een juk, een instrument met onrechtvaardige macht."
-# | In outrageous cases (though this outrage has become quite usual) <a
-# | [-href=\"/proprietary/proprietary.html\">proprietary-]
-# | {+href=\"/malware\">proprietary+} programs are designed to spy on the
-# | users, restrict them, censor them, and abuse them</a>. For instance, the
-# | operating system of Apple <a
-# | href=\"/philosophy/why-call-it-the-swindle.html\">iThings</a> does all of
-# | these, and so does Windows on mobile devices with ARM chips. Windows,
-# | mobile phone firmware, and Google Chrome for Windows include a universal
-# | back door that allows some company to change the program remotely without
-# | asking permission. The Amazon Kindle has a back door that can erase books.
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
"In outrageous cases (though this outrage has become quite usual) <a href=\"/"
@@ -351,12 +326,6 @@
"toestemming voor te vragen. De Amazon Kindle heeft een achterdeur die boeken "
"kan wissen."
-# | The use of nonfree software in the “internet of things” would
-# | turn it into the <a
-# |
[-href=\"http://ieet.org/index.php/IEET/more/rinesi20150806\";>“internet-]
-# | {+href=\"https://archive.ieet.org/articles/rinesi20150806.html\";>
-# | “internet+} of telemarketers”</a> as well as the
-# | “internet of snoopers”.
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
"The use of nonfree software in the “internet of things” would "
@@ -420,7 +389,6 @@
"Engels: Service as a Software Substitute). Dit betekent iemand anders' "
"server gebruiken om je eigen computertaken te doen."
-# || No change detected. The change might only be in amounts of spaces.
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
"SaaSS doesn't mean the programs on the server are nonfree (though they often "
@@ -615,12 +583,6 @@
"toegestaan, behalve als je het gaat gebruiken voor <em>reverse engineering</"
"em>.”"
-# | Proprietary developers would have us punish students who are good enough
-# | at heart to share software and thwart those curious enough to want to
-# | change it. This means a bad education. See [-<a
-# | href=\"/education/\">http://www.gnu.org/education/</a> for-] more
-# | discussion [-of the-] {+about <a href=\"/education/education.html\">the+}
-# | use of free software in [-schools.-] {+schools</a>.+}
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
"Proprietary developers would have us punish students who are good enough at "
@@ -730,9 +692,6 @@
msgid "By refusing to develop or promote nonfree software or SaaSS."
msgstr "Door geen SaaSS of niet-vrije software te ontwikkelen."
-# | {+By+} <a [-href=\"/help/help.html\">Suggested ways you can help the free
-# | software movement</a>-] {+href=\"/help/help.html\">spreading these ideas
-# | to others</a>.+}
#. type: Content of: <ul><li>
msgid "By <a href=\"/help/help.html\">spreading these ideas to others</a>."
msgstr "Door <a href=\"/help/help.html\">deze tips door te geven</a>"
@@ -800,10 +759,7 @@
"href=\"/server/standards/README.translations.html\"> Translations README</a> "
"voor informatie over het onderhoud van vertalingen op deze website."
-# | Copyright © 2015, 2017, 2018, 2019, [-2020-] {+2020, 2021+} Richard
-# | Stallman
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-#| msgid "Copyright © 2015, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 Richard Stallman"
msgid "Copyright © 2015, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021 Richard Stallman"
msgstr "Copyright © 2015, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021 Richard Stallman"
| [Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- www/philosophy free-software-even-more-importan...,
GNUN <=