www/philosophy free-software-even-more-importan...

[GNUN]

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     GNUN <gnun>     20/10/26 08:29:07

Modified files:
        philosophy     : free-software-even-more-important.fr.html 
        philosophy/po  : free-software-even-more-important.fr-en.html 

Log message:
        Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/free-software-even-more-important.fr.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.28&r2=1.29
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/free-software-even-more-important.fr-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.27&r2=1.28

Patches:
Index: free-software-even-more-important.fr.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/free-software-even-more-important.fr.html,v
retrieving revision 1.28
retrieving revision 1.29
diff -u -b -r1.28 -r1.29
--- free-software-even-more-important.fr.html   6 Oct 2020 08:42:12 -0000       
1.28
+++ free-software-even-more-important.fr.html   26 Oct 2020 12:29:07 -0000      
1.29
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 <!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" 
value="/philosophy/free-software-even-more-important.en.html" -->
 
 <!--#include virtual="/server/header.fr.html" -->
-<!-- Parent-Version: 1.90 -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.94 -->
 
 <!-- This file is automatically generated by GNUnited Nations! -->
 <title>Le logiciel libre est encore plus essentiel maintenant - Free Software
@@ -161,9 +161,9 @@
 effacer des livres.</p>
 
 <p>L'utilisation de logiciels privateurs dans le cadre de « l'internet des
-objets » transformerait ce dernier en <a
-href="http://ieet.org/index.php/IEET/more/rinesi20150806";>« internet du
-télémarketing »</a> ainsi qu'en « internet des fouineurs ».</p>
+objets » transformerait ce dernier en « <a
+href="http://ieet.org/index.php/IEET/more/rinesi20150806";>internet du
+télémarketing</a> » ainsi qu'en « internet des fouineurs ».</p>
 
 <p>Pour en finir avec l'injustice des programmes non libres, le mouvement du
 logiciel libre développe des logiciels libres qui donnent aux utilisateurs
@@ -286,8 +286,8 @@
 <p>Si l'on en croit les développeurs de logiciel privateur, on devrait punir
 les étudiants assez généreux pour partager leurs logiciels ou assez curieux
 pour chercher à les modifier. Ce serait faire de la mauvaise éducation. Voir
-dans <a href="/education/">http://www.gnu.org/education/</a> une discussion
-plus poussée de l'usage des logiciels libres à l'école.</p>
+une discussion plus poussée de <a href="/education/education.html">l'usage
+des logiciels libres à l'école</a>.</p>
 
 <h3>Le logiciel libre : plus que des « avantages »</h3>
 
@@ -321,12 +321,25 @@
 
 <h3>Conclusion</h3>
 
-<p>Nous méritons de contrôler notre propre informatique. Comment y arriver 
? En
-refusant les logiciels privateurs sur les ordinateurs que nous possédons ou
-utilisons au quotidien et en rejetant les SaaSSÂ ; en <a
-href="/licenses/license-recommendations.html">développant des logiciels
-libres</a> (pour ceux d’entre nous qui sont programmeurs) ; en <a
-href="/help/help.html">partageant ces idées avec les autres</a>.</p>
+<p>Nous méritons d'avoir la maîtrise de notre informatique. Comment y
+parvenir ?</p>
+
+<ul>
+  <li>En refusant les logiciels privateurs sur les ordinateurs que nous 
possédons
+ou dont nous nous servons au quotidien et en rejetant les SaaSSÂ ;</li>  
+
+  <li>en <a href="/licenses/license-recommendations.html">développant des
+logiciels libres</a> (pour ceux d’entre nous qui sont programmeurs) ;</li> 
+
+  <li>en refusant de déveloper ou promouvoir des programmes non libres ou des
+SaaSS.</li>  
+
+  <li>en <a href="/help/help.html">partageant ces idées avec les autres</a> 
;</li>
+
+  <li>en <a href="/philosophy/saying-no-even-once.html">disant non et en
+expliquant pourquoi</a> lorsque nous sommes invités à faire tourner un
+programme non libre.</li>
+</ul>
 
 <p>Nous le faisons depuis 1984, ainsi que des milliers d'utilisateurs ; c'est
 pourquoi nous disposons maintenant du système d'exploitation libre GNU/Linux
@@ -417,7 +430,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 Dernière mise à jour :
 
-$Date: 2020/10/06 08:42:12 $
+$Date: 2020/10/26 12:29:07 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: po/free-software-even-more-important.fr-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: 
/web/www/www/philosophy/po/free-software-even-more-important.fr-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.27
retrieving revision 1.28
diff -u -b -r1.27 -r1.28
--- po/free-software-even-more-important.fr-en.html     6 Oct 2020 08:42:14 
-0000       1.27
+++ po/free-software-even-more-important.fr-en.html     26 Oct 2020 12:29:07 
-0000      1.28
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 <!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
-<!-- Parent-Version: 1.90 -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.94 -->
 <title>Free Software Is Even More Important Now
 - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
  <!--#include 
virtual="/philosophy/po/free-software-even-more-important.translist" -->
@@ -20,7 +20,8 @@
 
 <div class="announcement">
 <p>
-<a href="/help/help.html">Suggested ways you can help the free software 
movement</a>
+<a href="/help/help.html">Suggested ways you can help the free software 
+movement</a>
 </p>
 </div>
 <hr class="thin" />
@@ -42,8 +43,8 @@
 mistreat the user.  Proprietary software nowadays is often malware
 because <a href="/proprietary/proprietary.html">the developers' power
 corrupts them</a>.  That directory lists around 450 different
-malicious functionalities (as of January, 2020), but it is surely just the
-tip of the iceberg.</p>
+malicious functionalities (as of January, 2020), but it is surely just 
+the tip of the iceberg.</p>
 
 <p>With free software, the users control the program, both individually
 and collectively.  So they control what their computers do (assuming
@@ -53,8 +54,8 @@
 <p>With proprietary software, the program controls the users, and some
 other entity (the developer or &ldquo;owner&rdquo;) controls the
 program.  So the proprietary program gives its developer power over
-its users.  That is unjust in itself; moreover, it tempts the developer to
-mistreat the users in other ways.</p>
+its users.  That is unjust in itself; moreover, it tempts the developer 
+to mistreat the users in other ways.</p>
 
 <p>Even when proprietary software isn't downright malicious, its
 developers have an incentive to make it 
@@ -76,7 +77,8 @@
 </p>
 
 <div class="important">
-<p>(0) The freedom to run the program as you wish, for whatever purpose.</p>
+<p>(0) The freedom to run the program as you wish, for whatever 
+purpose.</p>
 
 <p>(1) The freedom to study the program's &ldquo;source code&rdquo;,
 and change it, so the program does your computing as you wish.
@@ -109,15 +111,15 @@
 If any of them is missing or inadequate, the program is proprietary
 (nonfree), and unjust.</p>
 
-<p>Other kinds of works are also used for practical activities, including
-recipes for cooking, educational works such as textbooks, reference
-works such as dictionaries and encyclopedias, fonts for displaying
-paragraphs of text, circuit diagrams for hardware for people to build,
-and patterns for making useful (not merely decorative) objects with a
-3D printer.  Since these are not software, the free software movement
-strictly speaking doesn't cover them; but the same reasoning applies
-and leads to the same conclusion: these works should carry the four
-freedoms.</p>
+<p>Other kinds of works are also used for practical activities, 
+including recipes for cooking, educational works such as textbooks, 
+reference works such as dictionaries and encyclopedias, fonts for 
+displaying paragraphs of text, circuit diagrams for hardware for people 
+to build, and patterns for making useful (not merely decorative) 
+objects with a 3D printer.  Since these are not software, the free 
+software movement strictly speaking doesn't cover them; but the same 
+reasoning applies and leads to the same conclusion: these works should 
+carry the four freedoms.</p>
 
 <p>A free program allows you to tinker with it to make it do what you
 want (or cease to do something you dislike).  Tinkering with software
@@ -139,18 +141,18 @@
 href="/proprietary/proprietary.html">proprietary programs are designed
 to spy on the users, restrict them, censor them, and abuse them</a>.
 For instance, the operating system of Apple <a
-href="/philosophy/why-call-it-the-swindle.html">iThings</a> does all of these,
-and so does Windows on mobile devices with ARM chips.  Windows, mobile
-phone firmware, and Google Chrome for Windows include a universal back
-door that allows some company to change the program remotely without
-asking permission. The Amazon Kindle has a back door that can erase
-books.</p>
+href="/philosophy/why-call-it-the-swindle.html">iThings</a> does all 
+of these, and so does Windows on mobile devices with ARM chips.  
+Windows, mobile phone firmware, and Google Chrome for Windows include 
+a universal back door that allows some company to change the program 
+remotely without asking permission. The Amazon Kindle has a back door 
+that can erase books.</p>
 
 <p>The use of nonfree software in the &ldquo;internet of things&rdquo;
-would turn it into
-the <a 
href="http://ieet.org/index.php/IEET/more/rinesi20150806";>&ldquo;internet
-of telemarketers&rdquo;</a> as well as the &ldquo;internet of
-snoopers&rdquo;.</p>
+would turn it into the <a 
+href="http://ieet.org/index.php/IEET/more/rinesi20150806";>
+&ldquo;internet of telemarketers&rdquo;</a> as well as the 
+&ldquo;internet of snoopers&rdquo;.</p>
 
 <p>With the goal of ending the injustice of nonfree software, the free
 software movement develops free programs so users can free themselves.
@@ -159,12 +161,12 @@
 run GNU, mainly in the <a href="/gnu/gnu-linux-faq.html">GNU/Linux
 combination</a>.</p>
 
-<p>Distributing a program to users without freedom mistreats those users;
-however, choosing not to distribute the program does not mistreat
-anyone.  If you write a program and use it privately, that does no
-wrong to others.  (You do miss an opportunity to do good, but that's
-not the same as doing wrong.)  Thus, when we say all software must
-be free, we mean that every copy must come with the four freedoms,
+<p>Distributing a program to users without freedom mistreats those 
+users; however, choosing not to distribute the program does not 
+mistreat anyone.  If you write a program and use it privately, that 
+does no wrong to others.  (You do miss an opportunity to do good, but 
+that's not the same as doing wrong.)  Thus, when we say all software 
+must be free, we mean that every copy must come with the four freedoms,
 but we don't mean that someone has an obligation to offer you a copy.</p>
 
 <h3>Nonfree Software and SaaSS</h3>
@@ -174,12 +176,12 @@
 a Software Substitute, or SaaSS.  That means letting someone else's
 server do your own computing tasks.</p>
 
-<p>SaaSS doesn't mean the programs on the server are nonfree (though they
-often are).  Rather, using SaaSS causes the same injustices as using a
-nonfree program: they are two paths to the same bad place.  Take the
-example of a SaaSS translation service: The user sends text to the
-server, and the server translates it (from English to Spanish, say)
-and sends the translation back to the user.  Now the job of
+<p>SaaSS doesn't mean the programs on the server are nonfree (though 
+they often are).  Rather, using SaaSS causes the same injustices as 
+using a nonfree program: they are two paths to the same bad place.  
+Take the example of a SaaSS translation service: The user sends text 
+to the server, and the server translates it (from English to Spanish, 
+say) and sends the translation back to the user.  Now the job of
 translating is under the control of the server operator rather than
 the user.</p>
 
@@ -191,12 +193,12 @@
 
 <h3>Primary And Secondary Injustices</h3>
 
-<p>When you use proprietary programs or SaaSS, first of all you do wrong
-to yourself, because it gives some entity unjust power over you.  For
-your own sake, you should escape.  It also wrongs others if you make a
-promise not to share.  It is evil to keep such a promise, and a lesser
-evil to break it; to be truly upright, you should not make the promise
-at all.</p>
+<p>When you use proprietary programs or SaaSS, first of all you do 
+wrong to yourself, because it gives some entity unjust power over you.  
+For your own sake, you should escape.  It also wrongs others if you 
+make a promise not to share.  It is evil to keep such a promise, and a 
+lesser evil to break it; to be truly upright, you should not make the 
+promise at all.</p>
 
 <p>There are cases where using nonfree software puts pressure directly
 on others to do likewise.  Skype is a clear example: when one person
@@ -262,9 +264,9 @@
 
 <p>Proprietary developers would have us punish students who are good
 enough at heart to share software and thwart those curious enough to
-want to change it.  This means a bad education.  See
-<a href="/education/">http://www.gnu.org/education/</a>
-for more discussion of the use of free software in schools.</p>
+want to change it.  This means a bad education.  See more discussion 
+about <a href="/education/education.html">the use of free software in 
+schools</a>.</p>
 
 <h3>Free Software: More Than &ldquo;Advantages&rdquo;</h3>
 
@@ -297,13 +299,26 @@
 
 <h3>Conclusion</h3>
 
-<p>We deserve to have control of our own computing; how can we win
-this control?  By rejecting nonfree software on the computers we own
-or regularly use, and rejecting SaaSS.  By <a
+<p>We deserve to have control of our own computing. How can we win
+this control?</p>
+
+<ul>
+  <li>By rejecting nonfree software on the computers we own or 
+regularly use, and rejecting SaaSS.</li>  
+
+  <li>By <a
 href="/licenses/license-recommendations.html"> developing free
-software</a> (for those of us who are programmers.) By refusing to
-develop or promote nonfree software or SaaSS.  By <a
-href="/help/help.html">spreading these ideas to others</a>.</p>
+software</a> (for those of us who are programmers.)</li> 
+
+  <li>By refusing to develop or promote nonfree software or SaaSS.</li>  
+
+  <li>By <a
+href="/help/help.html">spreading these ideas to others</a>.</li>
+
+  <li>By <a
+href="/philosophy/saying-no-even-once.html">saying no and stating our
+reasons</a> when we are invited to run a nonfree program.</li>
+</ul>
 
 <p>We and thousands of users have done this since 1984, which is how
 we now have the free GNU/Linux operating system that
@@ -367,7 +382,7 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2020/10/06 08:42:14 $
+$Date: 2020/10/26 12:29:07 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>