www gnu/rms-lisp.es.html gnu/po/rms-lisp.es-en....

[GNUN]

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     GNUN <gnun>     20/07/07 13:59:37

Modified files:
        gnu            : rms-lisp.es.html 
        gnu/po         : rms-lisp.es-en.html rms-lisp.es.po 
        philosophy     : danger-of-software-patents.es.html 
                         words-to-avoid.es.html 
        philosophy/po  : danger-of-software-patents.es-en.html 
                         danger-of-software-patents.ru-en.html 
                         danger-of-software-patents.ru.po 
                         words-to-avoid.es-en.html 

Log message:
        Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/gnu/rms-lisp.es.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.45&r2=1.46
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/gnu/po/rms-lisp.es-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.28&r2=1.29
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/gnu/po/rms-lisp.es.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.42&r2=1.43
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/danger-of-software-patents.es.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.7&r2=1.8
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/words-to-avoid.es.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.151&r2=1.152
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/danger-of-software-patents.es-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.2&r2=1.3
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/danger-of-software-patents.ru-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.15&r2=1.16
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/danger-of-software-patents.ru.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.20&r2=1.21
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.es-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.95&r2=1.96

Patches:
Index: gnu/rms-lisp.es.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/gnu/rms-lisp.es.html,v
retrieving revision 1.45
retrieving revision 1.46
diff -u -b -r1.45 -r1.46
--- gnu/rms-lisp.es.html        3 Jul 2020 10:00:38 -0000       1.45
+++ gnu/rms-lisp.es.html        7 Jul 2020 17:59:36 -0000       1.46
@@ -228,8 +228,8 @@
 operación. Los ordenadores normales típicamente le forzaban a elegir entre
 velocidad de ejecución y buena validación de tipos. O sea que sí, podía
 tener un compilador de Lisp y ejecutar sus programas con velocidad, pero
-cuando sus programas intentaban tomar <tt>car</tt> de un número, obtenían
-resultados absurdos y terminaban por fallar o bloquearse.</p>
+cuando sus programas intentaban tomar <code>car</code> de un número,
+obtenían resultados absurdos y terminaban por fallar o bloquearse.</p>
 
 <p>La máquina Lisp podía ejecutar instrucciones aproximadamente a la misma
 velocidad que esas otras máquinas, pero cada instrucción validaría los tipos
@@ -619,7 +619,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 Última actualización:
 
-$Date: 2020/07/03 10:00:38 $
+$Date: 2020/07/07 17:59:36 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: gnu/po/rms-lisp.es-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/gnu/po/rms-lisp.es-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.28
retrieving revision 1.29
diff -u -b -r1.28 -r1.29
--- gnu/po/rms-lisp.es-en.html  3 Jul 2020 10:00:39 -0000       1.28
+++ gnu/po/rms-lisp.es-en.html  7 Jul 2020 17:59:36 -0000       1.29
@@ -215,7 +215,7 @@
 in every operation as well. Ordinary computers typically forced you to
 choose between execution speed and good typechecking.  So yes, you could
 have a Lisp compiler and run your programs fast, but when they tried to
-take <tt>car</tt> of a number, it got nonsensical results and eventually
+take <code>car</code> of a number, it got nonsensical results and eventually
 crashed at some point.</p>
 
 <p>The Lisp machine was able to execute instructions about as fast as
@@ -583,7 +583,7 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2020/07/03 10:00:39 $
+$Date: 2020/07/07 17:59:36 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>

Index: gnu/po/rms-lisp.es.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/gnu/po/rms-lisp.es.po,v
retrieving revision 1.42
retrieving revision 1.43
diff -u -b -r1.42 -r1.43
--- gnu/po/rms-lisp.es.po       7 Jul 2020 17:49:18 -0000       1.42
+++ gnu/po/rms-lisp.es.po       7 Jul 2020 17:59:36 -0000       1.43
@@ -733,9 +733,9 @@
 "Incorporated, and the two companies went on. But, I didn't want to spend "
 "years and years punishing someone, just thwarting an evil deed. I figured "
 "they had been punished pretty thoroughly because they were stuck with "
-"competition that was not leaving or going to disappear <a href="
-"\"#foot-7\">(7)</a>. Meanwhile, it was time to start building a new "
-"community to replace the one that their actions and others had wiped out."
+"competition that was not leaving or going to disappear <a href=\"#foot-7\">"
+"(7)</a>. Meanwhile, it was time to start building a new community to replace "
+"the one that their actions and others had wiped out."
 msgstr ""
 "De esta manera, durante dos años evité que acabaran con Lisp Machines "
 "Incorporated, y las dos empresas siguieron adelante. Pero no quería pasarme "

Index: philosophy/danger-of-software-patents.es.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/danger-of-software-patents.es.html,v
retrieving revision 1.7
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -b -r1.7 -r1.8
--- philosophy/danger-of-software-patents.es.html       7 Jul 2020 09:59:54 
-0000       1.7
+++ philosophy/danger-of-software-patents.es.html       7 Jul 2020 17:59:37 
-0000       1.8
@@ -499,14 +499,14 @@
 
 <p>Si alguien ha confeccionado una máquina que hace algo una vez, y otro 
diseña
 una máquina que hace eso mismo pero N veces, para nosotros eso es un bucle
-<tt>for</tt>, pero para la Oficina de Patentes es una invención. Si hay
+<code>for</code>, pero para la Oficina de Patentes es una invención. Si hay
 máquinas que pueden hacer A, y máquinas que pueden hacer B, y alguien diseña
 una máquina que puede hacer A o B, para nosotros eso es una declaración
-<tt>if-then-else</tt>, pero para la Oficina de Patentes es una invención. De
-manera que tienen unos criterios muy laxos, y esos son los criterios que
-siguen. El resultado es que hay patentes que nos resultan absurdas y
-triviales. No puedo decir si son legalmente válidas o no, pero cualquier
-programador que las vea se echará a reír.</p>
+<code>if-then-else</code>, pero para la Oficina de Patentes es una
+invención. De manera que tienen unos criterios muy laxos, y esos son los
+criterios que siguen. El resultado es que hay patentes que nos resultan
+absurdas y triviales. No puedo decir si son legalmente válidas o no, pero
+cualquier programador que las vea se echará a reír.</p>
 
 <p>De todos modos, no pude sugerirle nada que le fuera de ayuda, y tuvo que
 cerrar su negocio. Pero la mayoría de los titulares de patentes ofrecen una
@@ -1457,7 +1457,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 Última actualización:
 
-$Date: 2020/07/07 09:59:54 $
+$Date: 2020/07/07 17:59:37 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: philosophy/words-to-avoid.es.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/words-to-avoid.es.html,v
retrieving revision 1.151
retrieving revision 1.152
diff -u -b -r1.151 -r1.152
--- philosophy/words-to-avoid.es.html   7 Jul 2020 09:59:54 -0000       1.151
+++ philosophy/words-to-avoid.es.html   7 Jul 2020 17:59:37 -0000       1.152
@@ -1014,7 +1014,7 @@
 privativo que sirve para realizar presentaciones. Para salvaguardar su
 libertad, utilice únicamente software libre para realizar sus presentaciones
 (lo que significa, <em>no PowerPoint</em>). Hay varias opciones que se
-pueden recomendar, por ejemplo la clase <tt>beamer</tt> de LaTeX y el
+pueden recomendar, por ejemplo la clase <code>beamer</code> de LaTeX y el
 Impress de LibreOffice.org.</p>
 
 <!-- GNUN-SORT-NEXT-ITEM -->
@@ -1438,7 +1438,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 Última actualización:
 
-$Date: 2020/07/07 09:59:54 $
+$Date: 2020/07/07 17:59:37 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: philosophy/po/danger-of-software-patents.es-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/danger-of-software-patents.es-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -b -r1.2 -r1.3
--- philosophy/po/danger-of-software-patents.es-en.html 7 Jul 2020 09:59:54 
-0000       1.2
+++ philosophy/po/danger-of-software-patents.es-en.html 7 Jul 2020 17:59:37 
-0000       1.3
@@ -510,10 +510,10 @@
 
 <p>You see, if somebody has made a machine that does something once,
 and somebody else designs a machine that will do the same thing, but N
-times, for us that's a <tt>for</tt>-loop, but for the Patent Office
+times, for us that's a <code>for</code>-loop, but for the Patent Office
 that's an invention.  If there are machines that can do A, and there
 are machines that can do B, and somebody designs a machine that can do
-A or B, for us that's an <tt>if-then-else</tt> statement, but for the
+A or B, for us that's an <code>if-then-else</code> statement, but for the
 Patent Office that's an invention.  So they have very low standards,
 and they follow those standards; and the result is patents that look
 absurd and trivial to us.  Whether they're legally valid I can't say.
@@ -1463,7 +1463,7 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2020/07/07 09:59:54 $
+$Date: 2020/07/07 17:59:37 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>

Index: philosophy/po/danger-of-software-patents.ru-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/danger-of-software-patents.ru-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.15
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -b -r1.15 -r1.16
--- philosophy/po/danger-of-software-patents.ru-en.html 1 Jul 2020 17:03:01 
-0000       1.15
+++ philosophy/po/danger-of-software-patents.ru-en.html 7 Jul 2020 17:59:37 
-0000       1.16
@@ -510,10 +510,10 @@
 
 <p>You see, if somebody has made a machine that does something once,
 and somebody else designs a machine that will do the same thing, but N
-times, for us that's a <tt>for</tt>-loop, but for the Patent Office
+times, for us that's a <code>for</code>-loop, but for the Patent Office
 that's an invention.  If there are machines that can do A, and there
 are machines that can do B, and somebody designs a machine that can do
-A or B, for us that's an <tt>if-then-else</tt> statement, but for the
+A or B, for us that's an <code>if-then-else</code> statement, but for the
 Patent Office that's an invention.  So they have very low standards,
 and they follow those standards; and the result is patents that look
 absurd and trivial to us.  Whether they're legally valid I can't say.
@@ -1463,7 +1463,7 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2020/07/01 17:03:01 $
+$Date: 2020/07/07 17:59:37 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>

Index: philosophy/po/danger-of-software-patents.ru.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/danger-of-software-patents.ru.po,v
retrieving revision 1.20
retrieving revision 1.21
diff -u -b -r1.20 -r1.21
--- philosophy/po/danger-of-software-patents.ru.po      7 Jul 2020 17:27:45 
-0000       1.20
+++ philosophy/po/danger-of-software-patents.ru.po      7 Jul 2020 17:59:37 
-0000       1.21
@@ -16,7 +16,6 @@
 "MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
 "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
 "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
-"X-Outdated-Since: 2020-07-07 12:25+0000\n"
 
 #. type: Content of: <title>
 msgid "The Danger of Software Patents - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation"
@@ -1112,28 +1111,6 @@
 "результату."
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
-# | You see, if somebody has made a machine that does something once, and
-# | somebody else designs a machine that will do the same thing, but N times,
-# | for us that's a [-<tt>for</tt>-loop,-] {+<code>for</code>-loop,+} but for
-# | the Patent Office that's an invention.  If there are machines that can do
-# | A, and there are machines that can do B, and somebody designs a machine
-# | that can do A or B, for us that's an [-<tt>if-then-else</tt>-]
-# | {+<code>if-then-else</code>+} statement, but for the Patent Office that's
-# | an invention.  So they have very low standards, and they follow those
-# | standards; and the result is patents that look absurd and trivial to us. 
-# | Whether they're legally valid I can't say.  But every programmer who sees
-# | them laughs.
-#| msgid ""
-#| "You see, if somebody has made a machine that does something once, and "
-#| "somebody else designs a machine that will do the same thing, but N times, "
-#| "for us that's a <tt>for</tt>-loop, but for the Patent Office that's an "
-#| "invention.  If there are machines that can do A, and there are machines "
-#| "that can do B, and somebody designs a machine that can do A or B, for us "
-#| "that's an <tt>if-then-else</tt> statement, but for the Patent Office "
-#| "that's an invention.  So they have very low standards, and they follow "
-#| "those standards; and the result is patents that look absurd and trivial "
-#| "to us.  Whether they're legally valid I can't say.  But every programmer "
-#| "who sees them laughs."
 msgid ""
 "You see, if somebody has made a machine that does something once, and "
 "somebody else designs a machine that will do the same thing, but N times, "

Index: philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.es-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.es-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.95
retrieving revision 1.96
diff -u -b -r1.95 -r1.96
--- philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.es-en.html     7 Jul 2020 09:59:54 -0000       
1.95
+++ philosophy/po/words-to-avoid.es-en.html     7 Jul 2020 17:59:37 -0000       
1.96
@@ -1065,7 +1065,7 @@
 one particular proprietary program to make presentations.  For your
 freedom's sake, you should use only free software to make your
 presentations&mdash;which means, <em>not PowerPoint</em>.  Recommended
-options include LaTeX's <code>beamer</code> class and LibreOffice.org's
+options include LaTeX's <code>beamer</code> class and LibreOffice
 Impress.</p>
 
 <!-- GNUN-SORT-NEXT-ITEM -->
@@ -1410,7 +1410,7 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2020/07/07 09:59:54 $
+$Date: 2020/07/07 17:59:37 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>