www/philosophy/po danger-of-software-patents.fr.po

[Therese Godefroy]

CVSROOT:        /webcvs/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     Therese Godefroy <th_g> 20/07/07 08:44:26

Modified files:
        philosophy/po  : danger-of-software-patents.fr.po 

Log message:
        Update.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/danger-of-software-patents.fr.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.32&r2=1.33

Patches:
Index: danger-of-software-patents.fr.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /webcvs/www/www/philosophy/po/danger-of-software-patents.fr.po,v
retrieving revision 1.32
retrieving revision 1.33
diff -u -b -r1.32 -r1.33
--- danger-of-software-patents.fr.po    7 Jul 2020 12:30:00 -0000       1.32
+++ danger-of-software-patents.fr.po    7 Jul 2020 12:44:26 -0000       1.33
@@ -8,14 +8,13 @@
 msgstr ""
 "Project-Id-Version: danger-of-software-patents.html\n"
 "POT-Creation-Date: 2020-07-07 12:25+0000\n"
-"PO-Revision-Date: 2020-07-01 18:13+0200\n"
+"PO-Revision-Date: 2020-07-07 14:44+0200\n"
 "Last-Translator: Thérèse Godefroy <godef.th AT free.fr>\n"
 "Language-Team: French <trad-gnu@april.org>\n"
 "Language: fr\n"
 "MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
 "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
 "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
-"X-Outdated-Since: 2020-07-07 12:25+0000\n"
 "Plural-Forms:  \n"
 "X-Generator: Gtranslator 2.91.5\n"
 
@@ -1125,29 +1124,6 @@
 "et que ces règles aboutissent à ce résultat."
 
 #. type: Content of: <dl><dd><p>
-# | You see, if somebody has made a machine that does something once, and
-# | somebody else designs a machine that will do the same thing, but N times,
-# | for us that's a [-<tt>for</tt>-loop,-] {+<code>for</code>-loop,+} but for
-# | the Patent Office that's an invention.  If there are machines that can do
-# | A, and there are machines that can do B, and somebody designs a machine
-# | that can do A or B, for us that's an [-<tt>if-then-else</tt>-]
-# | {+<code>if-then-else</code>+} statement, but for the Patent Office that's
-# | an invention.  So they have very low standards, and they follow those
-# | standards; and the result is patents that look absurd and trivial to us. 
-# | Whether they're legally valid I can't say.  But every programmer who sees
-# | them laughs.
-#, fuzzy
-#| msgid ""
-#| "You see, if somebody has made a machine that does something once, and "
-#| "somebody else designs a machine that will do the same thing, but N times, "
-#| "for us that's a <tt>for</tt>-loop, but for the Patent Office that's an "
-#| "invention.  If there are machines that can do A, and there are machines "
-#| "that can do B, and somebody designs a machine that can do A or B, for us "
-#| "that's an <tt>if-then-else</tt> statement, but for the Patent Office "
-#| "that's an invention.  So they have very low standards, and they follow "
-#| "those standards; and the result is patents that look absurd and trivial "
-#| "to us.  Whether they're legally valid I can't say.  But every programmer "
-#| "who sees them laughs."
 msgid ""
 "You see, if somebody has made a machine that does something once, and "
 "somebody else designs a machine that will do the same thing, but N times, "
@@ -1162,13 +1138,13 @@
 msgstr ""
 "Vous voyez, si quelqu'un a construit une machine qui fait quelque chose une "
 "seule fois et que quelqu'un d'autre construit une machine qui fait la même "
-"chose, mais NÂ fois, pour nous il s'agit juste d'une boucle <tt>for</tt>, "
+"chose, mais NÂ fois, pour nous il s'agit juste d'une boucle <code>for</code>, 
"
 "mais pour l'Office des brevets il s'agit d'une invention. S'il y a des "
 "machines qui peuvent faire A et des machines qui peuvent faire B, et que "
 "quelqu'un conçoit une machine qui peut faire A ou B, pour nous il s'agit "
-"d'une condition <tt>if-then-else</tt> (si-alors-sinon), mais pour l'Office "
-"des brevets, il s'agit d'une invention. Ils ont des conditions très peu "
-"restrictives et ils s'en tiennent à ces conditions, et il en découle des "
+"d'une condition <code>if-then-else</code> (si-alors-sinon), mais pour "
+"l'Office des brevets, il s'agit d'une invention. Ils ont des conditions très 
"
+"peu restrictives et ils s'en tiennent à ces conditions, et il en découle 
des "
 "brevets qui, pour nous, semblent absurdes et triviaux. Qu'ils soient "
 "juridiquement valides, je n'en sais rien. Mais n'importe quel programmeur "
 "rigole en les voyant."