www/philosophy danger-of-software-patents.html

[Therese Godefroy]

CVSROOT:        /webcvs/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     Therese Godefroy <th_g> 20/07/07 08:25:06

Modified files:
        philosophy     : danger-of-software-patents.html 

Log message:
        Change <tt> to <code>.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/danger-of-software-patents.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.33&r2=1.34

Patches:
Index: danger-of-software-patents.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /webcvs/www/www/philosophy/danger-of-software-patents.html,v
retrieving revision 1.33
retrieving revision 1.34
diff -u -b -r1.33 -r1.34
--- danger-of-software-patents.html     1 Jul 2020 15:25:23 -0000       1.33
+++ danger-of-software-patents.html     7 Jul 2020 12:25:06 -0000       1.34
@@ -510,10 +510,10 @@
 
 <p>You see, if somebody has made a machine that does something once,
 and somebody else designs a machine that will do the same thing, but N
-times, for us that's a <tt>for</tt>-loop, but for the Patent Office
+times, for us that's a <code>for</code>-loop, but for the Patent Office
 that's an invention.  If there are machines that can do A, and there
 are machines that can do B, and somebody designs a machine that can do
-A or B, for us that's an <tt>if-then-else</tt> statement, but for the
+A or B, for us that's an <code>if-then-else</code> statement, but for the
 Patent Office that's an invention.  So they have very low standards,
 and they follow those standards; and the result is patents that look
 absurd and trivial to us.  Whether they're legally valid I can't say.
@@ -1463,7 +1463,7 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2020/07/01 15:25:23 $
+$Date: 2020/07/07 12:25:06 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>