www/philosophy open-source-misses-the-point.es....

[GNUN]

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     GNUN <gnun>     20/01/10 07:59:31

Modified files:
        philosophy     : open-source-misses-the-point.es.html 
        philosophy/po  : open-source-misses-the-point.es-en.html 

Log message:
        Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.es.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.87&r2=1.88
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.es-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.47&r2=1.48

Patches:
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.es.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.es.html,v
retrieving revision 1.87
retrieving revision 1.88
diff -u -b -r1.87 -r1.88
--- open-source-misses-the-point.es.html        30 Dec 2019 12:08:30 -0000      
1.87
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.es.html        10 Jan 2020 12:59:30 -0000      
1.88
@@ -107,7 +107,10 @@
 <p>Nosotros, en el movimiento del software libre, no vemos el ámbito del 
código
 abierto como al enemigo; el enemigo es el software privativo, el que no es
 libre. Pero queremos que la gente sepa que defendemos la libertad, así que
-no aceptamos que se nos identifique como partidarios del código abierto. </p>
+no aceptamos que se nos identifique como partidarios del código abierto. Lo
+que nosotros defendemos no es el «código abierto», y lo que rechazamos no es
+el «código cerrado». Para dejar esto claro evitamos utilizar estos 
términos.
+</p>
 
 <h3>Diferencias prácticas entre software libre y código abierto</h3>
 
@@ -509,7 +512,7 @@
 el envío de traducciones de las páginas de este sitio web.</p>
 </div>
 
-<p>Copyright &copy; 2007, 2010, 2012, 2015, 2016, 2019 Richard Stallman</p>
+<p>Copyright &copy; 2007, 2010, 2012, 2015, 2016, 2019, 2020 Richard 
Stallman</p>
 
 <p>Esta página está bajo licencia <a rel="license"
 href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/deed.es_ES";>Creative
@@ -524,7 +527,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 Última actualización:
 
-$Date: 2019/12/30 12:08:30 $
+$Date: 2020/01/10 12:59:30 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: po/open-source-misses-the-point.es-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.es-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.47
retrieving revision 1.48
diff -u -b -r1.47 -r1.48
--- po/open-source-misses-the-point.es-en.html  30 Dec 2019 12:08:32 -0000      
1.47
+++ po/open-source-misses-the-point.es-en.html  10 Jan 2020 12:59:31 -0000      
1.48
@@ -102,9 +102,12 @@
 essential to speak of &ldquo;free software.&rdquo;</p>
 
 <p>We in the free software movement don't think of the open source
-camp as an enemy; the enemy is proprietary (nonfree) software.  But
-we want people to know we stand for freedom, so we do not accept being
-mislabeled as open source supporters.</p>
+camp as an enemy; the enemy is proprietary (nonfree) software.  But we
+want people to know we stand for freedom, so we do not accept being
+mislabeled as open source supporters.  What we advocate is not
+&ldquo;open source,&rdquo; and what we oppose is not &ldquo;closed
+source&rdquo;.  To make this clear, we avoid using those terms.
+</p>
 
 <h3>Practical Differences between Free Software and Open Source</h3>
 
@@ -478,7 +481,7 @@
 of this article.</p>
 </div>
 
-<p>Copyright &copy; 2007, 2010, 2012, 2015, 2016, 2019 Richard Stallman</p>
+<p>Copyright &copy; 2007, 2010, 2012, 2015, 2016, 2019, 2020 Richard 
Stallman</p>
 
 <p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
 href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/";>Creative
@@ -488,7 +491,7 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2019/12/30 12:08:32 $
+$Date: 2020/01/10 12:59:31 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>