www-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

www home.zh-cn.html philosophy/luispo-rms-inter...


From: GNUN
Subject: www home.zh-cn.html philosophy/luispo-rms-inter...
Date: Sat, 25 May 2019 21:29:23 -0400 (EDT)

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     GNUN <gnun>     19/05/25 21:29:23

Modified files:
        .              : home.zh-cn.html 
        philosophy     : luispo-rms-interview.zh-cn.html 
        philosophy/po  : luispo-rms-interview.zh-cn-en.html 
                         luispo-rms-interview.zh-cn.po 
        po             : home.zh-cn-en.html home.zh-cn.po 

Log message:
        Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/home.zh-cn.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.223&r2=1.224
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/luispo-rms-interview.zh-cn.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.3&r2=1.4
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/luispo-rms-interview.zh-cn-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.1&r2=1.2
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/luispo-rms-interview.zh-cn.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.3&r2=1.4
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/po/home.zh-cn-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.22&r2=1.23
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/po/home.zh-cn.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.327&r2=1.328

Patches:
Index: home.zh-cn.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/home.zh-cn.html,v
retrieving revision 1.223
retrieving revision 1.224
diff -u -b -r1.223 -r1.224
--- home.zh-cn.html     25 May 2019 11:04:30 -0000      1.223
+++ home.zh-cn.html     26 May 2019 01:29:22 -0000      1.224
@@ -327,15 +327,14 @@
 <h3>采取行动</h3>
 
 <ul>
-<li><strong>Support the efforts on net neutrality <a
+<li><strong>支持<a
 href="https://www.freepress.net/issues/free-open-internet/net-neutrality";
-title="Net neutrality in the United States of America">in the
-USA</a></strong>, and in your home country.</li>
+title="Net neutrality in the United States of
+America">在美国</a></strong>以及在你
的祖国进行的争取网络中立的活动。</li>
 
-<li>Defend <a href="https://www.laquadrature.net/en/personnal-data/";>
-privacy</a>, and support <a
-href="https://www.laquadrature.net/en/?s=copyright";> global copyright
-reform</a> with <a href="https://www.laquadrature.net/en/";>LQDN</a>.</li>
+<li>捍卫<a 
href="https://www.laquadrature.net/en/personnal-data";>隐私</a>,到<a
+href="https://www.laquadrature.net/en/";>LQDN</a>去支持<a
+href="https://www.laquadrature.net/en/?s=copyright";>å…
¨çƒç‰ˆæƒæ”¹é©</a>。</li>
 
 <li><strong><a 
href="http://www.fsf.org/campaigns";>支持正在进行的FSF行动</a></strong>。</li>
 
@@ -480,7 +479,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 最后更新:
 
-$Date: 2019/05/25 11:04:30 $
+$Date: 2019/05/26 01:29:22 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: philosophy/luispo-rms-interview.zh-cn.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/luispo-rms-interview.zh-cn.html,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -b -r1.3 -r1.4
--- philosophy/luispo-rms-interview.zh-cn.html  14 Apr 2018 13:01:27 -0000      
1.3
+++ philosophy/luispo-rms-interview.zh-cn.html  26 May 2019 01:29:22 -0000      
1.4
@@ -5,6 +5,13 @@
 
 <!-- This file is automatically generated by GNUnited Nations! -->
 <title>访谈:Richard M. Stallman - GNU工程 - 自由软件基金会</title>
+<style type="text/css" media="screen"><!--
+blockquote {
+   font-style: italic;
+   margin-top: 2em;
+}
+-->
+</style>
 
 <!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/luispo-rms-interview.translist" -->
 <!--#include virtual="/server/banner.zh-cn.html" -->
@@ -13,12 +20,13 @@
 <p>
 <i>[这是一场Louis Suarez-Potts对Richard M. Stallman访谈。]</i>
 </p>
+<hr class="thin" />
 
 <p>
 Richard M. Stallman是<a
 
href="/philosophy/free-sw.html">自由软件</a>最有力和最著名的实践家/理论家,他首创了这一词语。&ldquo;Free&rdquo;在此是&ldquo;言论自由,&rdquo;中的自由,而不是&ldquo;å
…è´¹å•¤é…’&rdquo;里的å…
è´¹ã€‚Stallman在&ldquo;自由软件&rdquo;运动中最著名的影响当属GNU通用å
…¬å…±è®¸å¯è¯ï¼ˆ<a
 href="/licenses/gpl.html">GPL</a>),它是Stallman在1985年左右创造
的一个可用于任何程序的通用许可证。该许可证定义了&ldquo;<a
-href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a>的概念&rdquo;,å…
¶&ldquo;中心思想&rdquo;,按Stallman的描述,是赋予&ldquo;任何人运行程序、复制程序、修改程序和发布修改版程序的权利,但是不å
…è®¸å…¶æ·»åŠ è‡ªå·±å¯¹ç¨‹åºçš„限制。因
此,它就保障了任何拥有软件拷贝的人同时拥有定义&lsquo;自由软件&rsquo;的å
…
³é”®è‡ªç”±ï¼›è¿™äº›æƒåˆ©æˆäº†ä¸å¯å‰¥å¤ºçš„权利&rdquo;。(Stallman,&ldquo;GNU操作系统和自由软件运动&rdquo;,DiBona,<cite>开源:开源革命的声音</cite><sup><a
+href="/licenses/copyleft.html">copyleft</a>的概念&rdquo;,å…
¶&ldquo;中心思想&rdquo;,按Stallman的描述,是赋予&ldquo;任何人运行程序、复制程序、修改程序和发布修改版程序的权利,但是不å
…è®¸å…¶æ·»åŠ è‡ªå·±å¯¹ç¨‹åºçš„限制。因
此,它就保障了任何拥有软件拷贝的人同时拥有定义&lsquo;自由软件&rsquo;的å
…
³é”®è‡ªç”±ï¼›è¿™äº›æƒåˆ©æˆäº†ä¸å¯å‰¥å¤ºçš„权利&rdquo;。(Stallman,&ldquo;GNU操作系统和自由软件运动&rdquo;,DiBona,<cite>开源:开源革命的声音</cite><sup><a
 href="#TransNote1">1</a></sup>)
 </p>
 <p>
@@ -31,14 +39,14 @@
 </p>
 <p>
 更多信息,我鼓励读者访问<a 
href="/home.html">GNU网站</a>,以及<a
-href="http://www.stallman.org";>Stallman的个人网站</a>。
+href="https://www.stallman.org";>Stallman的个人网站</a>。
 </p>
+<div class="column-limit"></div>
 
 <blockquote><p>
-       在这次访谈中,我主要想集中探讨你
当前的工作以及我们应该生活在何种社会的问题。你
现在&mdash;和至少最近17年&mdash;一直专注于让软件使用更加
道德化的社会构造。
-</p></blockquote>
-
-<blockquote><p>
+       在这次访谈中,我主要想集中探讨你
当前的工作以及我们应该生活在何种社会的问题。你
现在&mdash;和至少最近17年&mdash;一直专注于让软件使用更加
道德化的社会活动。
+</p>
+<p>
        但是,[简单地讲,]对我称之为更加道德的社会,你
的意思是什么? 
 </p></blockquote>
 
@@ -48,9 +56,8 @@
 
 <blockquote><p>
        这里有很重要的一点,我希望你能为读者澄清
这一点。你
愿意为该道德使用的术语是&ldquo;自由软件&rdquo;,在这个单词里的&ldquo;Free&rdquo;表示不受限制的自由而不是å
…
è´¹èŽ·å–。但是越来越多人使用的术语是&ldquo;开源&rdquo;,这是一个相当新的术语(始于1998年),就ä½
 çš„洞察力来看,它有明显的问题。二者
中,自由软件是一个内
含生活伦理的术语,并且承诺一个更加å…
¬å¹³çš„社会;而&ldquo;开源&rdquo;则不然。
-</p></blockquote>
-
-<blockquote><p>
+</p>
+<p>
        这是否是一个公平的论断?你
能否阐述这个问题,并为我们的读者澄清其中的区别吗?
 </p></blockquote>
 
@@ -59,7 +66,7 @@
 </p>
 <p>
 <a 
href="https://opensource.org";>开源运动</a>专注于说服商界相信可以通过尊重用户å
…±äº«å’Œä¿®æ”¹è½¯ä»¶çš„自由而获利。身处<a
-href="http://www.fsf.org/";>自由软件运动</a>的我们感谢他们的努力,但是我们相信这里有一个更重要的问题:所有的程序员都[负有]尊重他人自由的道德义务。获利本身并æ—
 é”™è¯¯ï¼Œä½†æ˜¯å®ƒå¹¶ä¸èƒ½ä¸ºè™å¾…他人做辩护。
+href="https://www.fsf.org/";>自由软件运动</a>的我们感谢他们的努力,但是我们相信这里有一个更重要的问题:所有的程序员都[负有]尊重他人自由的道德义务。获利本身并æ—
 é”™è¯¯ï¼Œä½†æ˜¯å®ƒå¹¶ä¸èƒ½ä¸ºè™å¾…他人做辩护。
 </p>
 
 <blockquote><p>
@@ -74,9 +81,9 @@
 <blockquote>
   <p>Pekka
 
Himanen在他最近的作品<cite>黑客伦理</cite>中,对这些声明进行了正确的还击。我想进一步讨论这个问题:ä½
 å»ºè®®çš„内容类似政治理论家,如<a
-href="http://web.archive.org/web/20010604041229/http://www.gwu.edu/~ccps/etzioni/index.html";>Amitai
+href="https://web.archive.org/web/20010604041229/http://www.gwu.edu/~ccps/etzioni/index.html";>Amitai
 Etzioni</a>所描述的共产主义(参见<a
-href="http://communitariannetwork.org/about";>http://communitariannetwork.org/about</a>)。而且å
…±äº§ä¸»ä¹‰å¯¹å¤§å¤šæ•°äººè°ˆåŠçš„资本主义市场经济绝无
敌意。事实恰恰相反。你能否谈谈你
的伦理体系的政治应该叫什么?</p>
+href="https://communitariannetwork.org/about";>https://communitariannetwork.org/about</a>)。而且å
…±äº§ä¸»ä¹‰å¯¹å¤§å¤šæ•°äººè°ˆåŠçš„资本主义市场经济绝无
敌意。事实恰恰相反。你能否谈谈你
的伦理体系的政治应该叫什么?</p>
 </blockquote>
 
 <p>
@@ -88,7 +95,7 @@
 </p>
 <p>
 
制订法律的权利正在由选举产生的立法机构向非民主的实体如<a
-href="http://www.fpif.org/reports/world_trade_organization";>世界贸易组织</a>转移,而它就是被设计出来<a
+href="https://www.fpif.org/reports/world_trade_organization";>世界贸易组织</a>转移,而它就是被设计出来<a
 
href="https://www.citizen.org/trade/wto/Qatar/seattle_mini/articles.cfm?ID=5468";>为了商业利益去控制å
…¬å…±è´¢å¯Œã€çŽ¯å¢ƒä¿æŠ¤ã€åŠ³åŠ¨æ ‡å‡†ã€ä»¥åŠç”Ÿæ´»æ ‡å‡†</a>。根据<a
 
href="https://www.citizen.org/trade/nafta/votes/articles.cfm?ID=6473";>NAFTA[北美自由贸易协定]</a>,一家å›
 åç«žäº‰è¡Œä¸ºè¢«å¯†è¥¿è¥¿æ¯”州判决有罪的加拿大å…
¬å¸æ­£åœ¨å‘联邦<a
 
href="https://www.citizen.org/trade/nafta/chapter11/articles.cfm?ID=1173";>提起上诉</a>,要求补偿该判决对å
…¶æ‰€é€ 
成的商业损失。他们声称北美自由贸易协定剥夺了各州制订法律防止反竞争行为的权利。
@@ -100,41 +107,39 @@
 </p>
 <p>
 <a
-href="http://web.archive.org/web/20130607095126/http://www.canadians.org/trade/issues/FTAA/Quebec/index.html";>魁北å
…‹çœåå¯¹ç¾Žæ´²è‡ªç”±è´¸æ˜“区(FTAA)的和平抗议者
受到警察的粗暴攻击</a>,警方之后指责抗议者
挑起打斗。一位当街的抗议者喉部被一颗在二十英尺距离内
发射的塑料子弹所击中。他因
此致残,并寻求谋杀未遂的控告&mdash;如果警察愿意透露谁是射击è€
…。
+href="https://web.archive.org/web/20130607095126/http://www.canadians.org/trade/issues/FTAA/Quebec/index.html";>魁北å
…‹çœåå¯¹ç¾Žæ´²è‡ªç”±è´¸æ˜“区(FTAA)的和平抗议者
受到警察的粗暴攻击</a>,警方之后指责抗议者
挑起打斗。一位当街的抗议者喉部被一颗在二十英尺距离内
发射的塑料子弹所击中。他因
此致残,并寻求谋杀未遂的控告&mdash;如果警察愿意透露谁是射击è€
…。
 </p>
 <p>
 一位抗议组织者被当街殴打,一伙人从面包
车里冲出来将他踢倒,然后进行毒打。当他的朋友去营救他时,这伙人表明自己是便衣警察,并将å
…¶å¸¦èµ°ã€‚
 </p>
 <p>
 无论民主拯救的是什么,全球化条约似乎都会被<a
-href="http://web.archive.org/web/20010515200253/http://stopftaa.org/";>镇压</a>反对方的活动所损害。
+href="https://web.archive.org/web/20010515200253/http://stopftaa.org/";>镇压</a>反对方的活动所损害。
 </p>
 <blockquote><p>
 对你
强调伦理的最直接批评就是自由软件的伦理是好的,不过它与现实的商业世界没有å
…³ç³»ã€‚
 </p></blockquote>
 <p>
 随著世界上超过一半的网站在运行GNU/Linux和<a
-href="http://www.apache.org";>Apache</a>,这显然只是FUD<sup><a
+href="https://www.apache.org";>Apache</a>,这显然只是FUD<sup><a
 href="#TransNote2">2</a></sup>。你不应该认真地对待
它们从而给予这种错误论断以支持。
 </p>
 <blockquote><p>
 
我认为不回答潜在的谎言比直接讨论它们更糟糕。我论证的要点是例如微软之类的å
…¬å¸ä¼šå¹¶ä¸”已经宣称自由软件无
法赚钱而只是损失金钱。它们争论说它æ 
¹æœ¬å°±æ˜¯ä¸€ä¸ªåä¸»æ„ã€‚我认为微软不应该被忽略,正如世界贸易组织不应该被忽略一æ
 ·ã€‚但是:我的问题是反驳这些自证的FUD,而不是去赞扬å…
¶ä»–人的错误。
-</p></blockquote>
-
-<blockquote><p>
+</p>
+<p>
        
那么,我就重新表达一下我的问题:微软攻击GPL在商业上很愚è
 ¢ï¼Œè€Œä¸”也对&ldquo;美国&rdquo;有害(无
论是什么意思)。它们不在乎社区伦理。那么你
如何反击它们的FUD,或者
那些在这件事上和微软穿一条裤子的FUD呢?
 </p></blockquote>
 
-<blockquote><p>
+<p>
        
Stallman并没有明确的回答这个问题,但是正如已经发生的,他最近在纽约大学进行的一次<a
 href="/events/rms-nyu-2001-transcript.txt">演讲</a>对微软的宣传
作出了回应。自由软件基金会也对自由软件作出了<a
 href="/press/2001-05-04-GPL.html">辩护</a>。
-</p></blockquote>
+</p>
 
-<blockquote><p>
+<p>
     [回到访谈&hellip;]
-</p></blockquote>
-
+</p>
 <blockquote><p>
        在更加个人的层次上,你
如何评论某些人的批评:她要想遵从你的道德伦理æ 
‡å‡†ï¼Œä½†æ˜¯å› ä¸ºæƒ³ä»Žè„‘力劳动中获利,她又而感到无法遵从?
 </p></blockquote>
@@ -155,7 +160,7 @@
 
 <p>
 在印刷出版的年代,这是正确的:<a
-href="http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140603093549/http://www.ipo.gov.uk/types/copy/c-about/c-history.htm";>版权</a>是对出版商的一项工业限制,要求他们付é
…¬ç»™ä¹¦çš„作者。它并没有限制读者,因
为它所限制的行为是只有出版商才力所能为的。
+href="https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140603093549/http://www.ipo.gov.uk/types/copy/c-about/c-history.htm";>版权</a>是对出版商的一项工业限制,要求他们付é
…¬ç»™ä¹¦çš„作者。它并没有限制读者,因
为它所限制的行为是只有出版商才力所能为的。
 </p>
 <p>
 但这不再是实际情
况了。现在版权是一种为了出版商而对大众的束缚,它给了作è€
…一笔小的报酬来购买他们对反对大众的支持。
@@ -184,13 +189,13 @@
 <blockquote><p>
        
要进一步了解Stallman在软件领域之外的版权问题上的观点,恳请读è€
…访问<a
 href="/home.html">GNU网站</a>以及Stallman的<a
-href="http://www.stallman.org";>个人网站</a>。读者可能特别要阅
读一下2001年4月19日他在马萨储塞州剑桥的麻省理工所展示的&ldquo;<a
+href="https://www.stallman.org";>个人网站</a>。读者可能特别要阅
读一下2001年4月19日他在马萨储塞州剑桥的麻省理工所展示的&ldquo;<a
 
href="/philosophy/copyright-and-globalization.html">计算机网络时代的版权和å
…
¨çƒåŒ–</a>&rdquo;。当讨论他在非计算机领域的版权观点时,Stallman在访谈中谈到,&ldquo;那些是我在自由软件领域工作多年之后的一些想法。人们问我&lsquo;将这些想法延伸到å
…¶ä»–信息领域会怎么æ 
·&rsquo;,所以在90年代我开始思考这个问题。这次演讲表达了我对这个问题的思考。&rdquo;
 </p></blockquote>
 
 <p>
 另外一点:最近,阿æ 
¹å»·æˆä¸ºç¬¬ä¸€ä¸ªè€ƒè™‘要求所有的政府办å…
¬å®¤éƒ½ä½¿ç”¨è‡ªç”±è½¯ä»¶çš„国家(参见<a
-href="http://archive.wired.com/techbiz/media/news/2001/05/43529";>
+href="https://archive.wired.com/techbiz/media/news/2001/05/43529";>
 http://archive.wired.com/techbiz/media/news/2001/05/43529</a>)。
 </p>
 <p>
@@ -268,7 +273,7 @@
      
      There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
      Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright &copy; 2001, 2007, 2013, 2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+<p>Copyright &copy; 2001, 2007, 2013, 2016, 2019 Free Software Foundation, 
Inc.</p>
 
 <p>本页面采用<a rel="license"
 href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/";>Creative Commons
@@ -281,12 +286,12 @@
 <b>翻译</b>:梁萌,2007。<a
 href="mailto:address@hidden";>&lt;address@hidden&gt;</a><br></br>
 <b>翻译团队</b>:<a rel="team"
-href="https://savannah.gnu.org/projects/www-zh-cn/";>&lt;CTT&gt;</a>,2018。</div>
+href="https://savannah.gnu.org/projects/www-zh-cn/";>&lt;CTT&gt;</a>,2018-2019。</div>
 
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 最后更新:
 
-$Date: 2018/04/14 13:01:27 $
+$Date: 2019/05/26 01:29:22 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: philosophy/po/luispo-rms-interview.zh-cn-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/luispo-rms-interview.zh-cn-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -b -r1.1 -r1.2
--- philosophy/po/luispo-rms-interview.zh-cn-en.html    14 Apr 2018 13:01:27 
-0000      1.1
+++ philosophy/po/luispo-rms-interview.zh-cn-en.html    26 May 2019 01:29:22 
-0000      1.2
@@ -2,14 +2,21 @@
 <!-- Parent-Version: 1.79 -->
 <title>Interview: Richard M. Stallman
 - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
+<style type="text/css" media="screen"><!--
+blockquote {
+   font-style: italic;
+   margin-top: 2em;
+}
+--></style>
 <!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/luispo-rms-interview.translist" -->
 <!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
 <h2>Interview: Richard M. Stallman</h2>
 
 <p>
-<i>[ This is an interview between Louis Suarez-Potts and Richard
-M. Stallman. ]</i>
+<i>This is an interview between Louis Suarez-Potts and Richard
+M. Stallman.</i>
 </p>
+<hr class="thin" />
 
 <p>
 Richard M. Stallman is the most forceful and famous
@@ -22,7 +29,7 @@
 License (<a href="/licenses/gpl.html">GPL</a>), which
 Stallman created around 1985 as a general license that could be
 applied to any program. The license codifies the concept of
-&ldquo;<a href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a>,&rdquo;
+&ldquo;<a href="/licenses/copyleft.html">copyleft</a>,&rdquo;
 the &ldquo;central idea&rdquo; of which Stallman has described as
 giving &ldquo;everyone permission to run the program, copy the
 program, modify the program, and distribute modified versions, but not
@@ -60,8 +67,9 @@
 <p>
 For more information, readers are encouraged to visit the
 <a href="/home.html">GNU website</a>, as well as
-<a href="http://www.stallman.org";>Stallman's personal site</a>.
+<a href="https://www.stallman.org";>Stallman's personal site</a>.
 </p>
+<div class="column-limit"></div>
 
 <blockquote><p>
        I would like, in this interview, to focus on your current
@@ -69,9 +77,8 @@
        like to live in. Your focus now&mdash;and for at least the
        last seventeen years&mdash;has been on working to make the
        social arrangements for using software more ethical.
-</p></blockquote>
-
-<blockquote><p>
+</p>
+<p>
        But, [briefly,] what do you mean by the notion of a what I call here
        a more ethical society?
 </p></blockquote>
@@ -93,9 +100,8 @@
        problems. Of the two, free software is a term that implies an
        ethic of living and holds out the promise of a more just
        society; the other, &ldquo;open source,&rdquo; does not.
-</p></blockquote>
-
-<blockquote><p>
+</p>
+<p>
        Is that a fair statement? Would you address that issue, and clarify
        the distinctions for our readers?
 </p></blockquote>
@@ -109,7 +115,7 @@
 The <a href="https://opensource.org";>open source movement</a> focuses
 on convincing business that it can profit by respecting the users'
 freedom to share and change software. We in the
-<a href="http://www.fsf.org/";>free software movement</a> appreciate those
+<a href="https://www.fsf.org/";>free software movement</a> appreciate those
 efforts, but we believe that there is a more important issue at stake:
 all programmers [owe] an ethical obligation to respect those freedoms
 for other people. Profit is not wrong in itself, but it can't justify
@@ -136,9 +142,9 @@
   <p>Pekka Himanen, in his recent work, the <cite>Hacker Ethic</cite>, has
   rightly countered these claims. I would go further: that what you suggest is
   close to what political theorists such as <a
-  
href="http://web.archive.org/web/20010604041229/http://www.gwu.edu/~ccps/etzioni/index.html";>Amitai
-  Etzioni</a> would describe as a communitarianism (see, for instance, <a
-  
href="http://communitariannetwork.org/about";>http://communitariannetwork.org/about</a>).
+  
href="https://web.archive.org/web/20010604041229/http://www.gwu.edu/~ccps/etzioni/index.html";>
+  Amitai Etzioni</a> would describe as a communitarianism (see, for instance, 
<a
+  
href="https://communitariannetwork.org/about";>https://communitariannetwork.org/about</a>).
   And communitarianism is by no means hostile to the market economy that most
   people associate with capitalism. Quite the opposite. Would you speak to what
   could be called the politics of your ethical system?</p>
@@ -158,18 +164,18 @@
 <p>
 The power to make laws is being transferred from elected legislatures to
 nondemocratic bodies such as the <a
-href="http://www.fpif.org/reports/world_trade_organization";>
+href="https://www.fpif.org/reports/world_trade_organization";>
 World Trade Organization</a>, 
 which was designed <a
-href="https://www.citizen.org/trade/wto/Qatar/seattle_mini/articles.cfm?ID=5468";>
+href="https://web.archive.org/web/20090210222102/https://www.citizen.org/trade/wto/Qatar/seattle_mini/articles.cfm?ID=5468";>
 to subordinate public health,
 environmental protection, labor standards, and the general standard of
 living to the interests of business</a>. Under
-<a href="https://www.citizen.org/trade/nafta/votes/articles.cfm?ID=6473";>
+<a 
href="https://web.archive.org/web/20140328210905/http://www.citizen.org/trade/article_redirect.cfm?ID=6473";>
 NAFTA [North
 American Free Trade Associtation]</a>, a Canadian company which was
 convicted in Mississippi of anticompetitive practices is
-<a 
href="https://www.citizen.org/trade/nafta/chapter11/articles.cfm?ID=1173";>suing</a>
+<a 
href="https://web.archive.org/web/20051229084719/http://www.citizen.org:80/trade/nafta/chapter11/articles.cfm?ID=1173";>suing</a>
 for Federal compensation for its lost business due to the
 conviction. They claim that NAFTA takes away states' right to make laws
 against anticompetitive practices.
@@ -184,7 +190,7 @@
 track</a>&rdquo; authority to push through.
 </p>
 <p>
-<a 
href="http://web.archive.org/web/20130607095126/http://www.canadians.org/trade/issues/FTAA/Quebec/index.html";>
+<a 
href="https://web.archive.org/web/20130607095126/http://www.canadians.org/trade/issues/FTAA/Quebec/index.html";>
 Peaceful protestors against the FTAA in Quebec were violently
 attacked by police</a>,
 who then blamed the fighting on the protestors. One protestor
@@ -201,7 +207,7 @@
 <p>
 Whatever democracy survives the globalization treaties is likely to be
 crushed by the efforts to suppress <a 
-href="http://web.archive.org/web/20010515200253/http://stopftaa.org/";>
+href="https://web.archive.org/web/20010515200253/http://stopftaa.org/";>
 opposition to them</a>.
 </p>
 <blockquote><p>
@@ -211,7 +217,7 @@
 </p></blockquote>
 <p>
 With over half the world's Web sites running on GNU/Linux and
-<a href="http://www.apache.org";>Apache</a>, that is evidently just FUD.
+<a href="https://www.apache.org";>Apache</a>, that is evidently just FUD.
 You should not give such falsehoods credibility by appearing to take them
 seriously yourself.
 </p>
@@ -223,9 +229,8 @@
 think that Microsoft is to be ignored, just as the WTO should not be
 ignored. But: my question was to suggest a rebuttal this self-evident
 FUD, not to credit the errors of others.
-</p></blockquote>
-
-<blockquote><p>
+</p>
+<p>
        So, I'll rephrase my question: Microsoft has attacked the GPL
        as business foolishness that is also bad for
        &ldquo;America&rdquo; (whatever that means). They don't care
@@ -233,19 +238,18 @@
        for that matter, the FUD of those who share Microsoft's views?
 </p></blockquote>
 
-<blockquote><p>
+<p>
        Stallman did not respond to this query for clarification, but as it
        happened, a <a href="/events/rms-nyu-2001-transcript.txt">speech</a>
        he recently presented at New York University responded to
        Microsoft's propaganda. The Free Software Foundation has presented a
        <a href="/press/2001-05-04-GPL.html">defense</a>, of free software,
        as well.
-</p></blockquote>
+</p>
 
-<blockquote><p>
+<p>
     [To return to the interview&hellip;]
-</p></blockquote>
-
+</p>
 <blockquote><p>
        On a more individual level, how would you address the criticism of
        person who would like to follow your ethical standards but feels she
@@ -283,7 +287,7 @@
 
 <p>
 In the age of the printing press, that was true:
-<a 
href="http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140603093549/http://www.ipo.gov.uk/types/copy/c-about/c-history.htm";>copyright</a>
+<a 
href="https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140603093549/http://www.ipo.gov.uk/types/copy/c-about/c-history.htm";>copyright</a>
 was an industrial restriction on publishers, requiring them to pay the
 author of a book. It did not restrict the readers, because the actions
 it restricted were things only a publisher could do.
@@ -323,7 +327,7 @@
        For a more detailed accounting of Stallman's views regarding
        copyright as extended to fields outside of software, readers
        are urged to go to the <a href="/home.html">GNU web site</a>,
-       and to Stallman's <a href="http://www.stallman.org";>personal
+       and to Stallman's <a href="https://www.stallman.org";>personal
        site</a>. In particular, readers might want to look at
        &ldquo;<a href="/philosophy/copyright-and-globalization.html">Copyright
        and Globalization in the Age of Computer Networks</a>&rdquo;
@@ -342,8 +346,8 @@
 On another point: recently, Argentina became the first country to
 consider requiring all government offices to use free software (see,
 for instance,
-<a href="http://archive.wired.com/techbiz/media/news/2001/05/43529";>
-http://archive.wired.com/techbiz/media/news/2001/05/43529</a>).
+<a href="https://archive.wired.com/techbiz/media/news/2001/05/43529";>
+https://archive.wired.com/techbiz/media/news/2001/05/43529</a>).
 </p>
 <p>
 I think the regulation is still being discussed&mdash;not adopted yet.
@@ -424,7 +428,7 @@
      There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
      Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
 
-<p>Copyright &copy; 2001, 2007, 2013, 2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+<p>Copyright &copy; 2001, 2007, 2013, 2016, 2019 Free Software Foundation, 
Inc.</p>
 
 <p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
 href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/";>Creative
@@ -434,7 +438,7 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2018/04/14 13:01:27 $
+$Date: 2019/05/26 01:29:22 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>

Index: philosophy/po/luispo-rms-interview.zh-cn.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/luispo-rms-interview.zh-cn.po,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -b -r1.3 -r1.4
--- philosophy/po/luispo-rms-interview.zh-cn.po 26 May 2019 01:12:52 -0000      
1.3
+++ philosophy/po/luispo-rms-interview.zh-cn.po 26 May 2019 01:29:22 -0000      
1.4
@@ -15,7 +15,6 @@
 "MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
 "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
 "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
-"X-Outdated-Since: 2019-05-25 10:57+0000\n"
 
 #. type: Content of: <title>
 msgid "Interview: Richard M. Stallman - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation"

Index: po/home.zh-cn-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/po/home.zh-cn-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.22
retrieving revision 1.23
diff -u -b -r1.22 -r1.23
--- po/home.zh-cn-en.html       11 May 2019 09:59:06 -0000      1.22
+++ po/home.zh-cn-en.html       26 May 2019 01:29:23 -0000      1.23
@@ -335,8 +335,8 @@
 <div class="second-column">
 
 <div id="Flashes" class="emph-box white">
-<h3><a href="http://planet.gnu.org/";>Planet GNU</a>
-<a href="http://planet.gnu.org/rss20.xml";><img src="/feed-icon-10x10.png"
+<h3><a href="https://planet.gnu.org/";>Planet GNU</a>
+<a href="https://planet.gnu.org/rss20.xml";><img src="/feed-icon-10x10.png"
 alt="RSS Feed" /></a></h3>
 <div class="ltr">
 <!--#include virtual="/planetfeeds.html" -->
@@ -351,15 +351,15 @@
 
 <ul>
 <li><strong>Support the efforts on net neutrality
-<a href="http://www.savetheinternet.com"; title="Net
+<a href="https://www.freepress.net/issues/free-open-internet/net-neutrality"; 
title="Net
 neutrality in the United States of America">in the USA</a></strong>,
 and in your home country.</li>
 
-<li>Defend <a href="http://www.laquadrature.net/en/Privacy";>
+<li>Defend <a href="https://www.laquadrature.net/en/personnal-data/";>
 privacy</a>, and support <a
-href="http://www.laquadrature.net/en/the-eu-commissions-outrageous-attempt-to-avoid-copyright-reform";>
+href="https://www.laquadrature.net/en/?s=copyright";>
 global copyright reform</a> with <a
-href="http://www.laquadrature.net/en/";>LQDN</a>.</li>
+href="https://www.laquadrature.net/en/";>LQDN</a>.</li>
 
 <li><strong><a href="http://www.fsf.org/campaigns";>Support current FSF
 campaigns</a></strong>.</li>
@@ -495,7 +495,7 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2019/05/11 09:59:06 $
+$Date: 2019/05/26 01:29:23 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>

Index: po/home.zh-cn.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/po/home.zh-cn.po,v
retrieving revision 1.327
retrieving revision 1.328
diff -u -b -r1.327 -r1.328
--- po/home.zh-cn.po    26 May 2019 01:13:23 -0000      1.327
+++ po/home.zh-cn.po    26 May 2019 01:29:23 -0000      1.328
@@ -16,7 +16,6 @@
 "MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
 "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
 "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
-"X-Outdated-Since: 2019-05-25 10:57+0000\n"
 
 #. type: Content of: <title>
 msgid "The GNU Operating System and the Free Software Movement"
@@ -129,8 +128,8 @@
 #. type: Attribute 'alt' of: <div><div><div><table><tr><td><a><img>
 msgid "&nbsp;[Screenshot of PureOS&nbsp;8 with GNOME&nbsp;3 desktop]&nbsp;"
 msgstr ""
-"&nbsp;[带有GNOME&nbsp;3&nbsp;桌面的PureOS&nbsp;8&nbsp;GNU/Linux发行版截"
-"图]&nbsp;"
+"&nbsp;[带有GNOME&nbsp;3&nbsp;桌面的PureOS&nbsp;8&nbsp;GNU/Linux发行版截图]"
+"&nbsp;"
 
 #. type: Content of: <div><div><div><p>
 msgid ""
@@ -630,8 +629,8 @@
 #~ msgid ""
 #~ "&nbsp;[Screenshot of Trisquel&nbsp;7 with Gnome Classic desktop]&nbsp;"
 #~ msgstr ""
-#~ "&nbsp;[带Gnome Classic桌面的Trisquel&nbsp;7&nbsp;GNU/Linux发行版截"
-#~ "图]&nbsp;"
+#~ "&nbsp;[带Gnome 
Classic桌面的Trisquel&nbsp;7&nbsp;GNU/Linux发行版截图]"
+#~ "&nbsp;"
 
 #~ msgid "<a href=\"/distros/screenshot.html\">"
 #~ msgstr "<a href=\"/distros/screenshot.html\">"



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]