www-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

www/philosophy/po stallman-mec-india.fr.po stal...


From: GNUN
Subject: www/philosophy/po stallman-mec-india.fr.po stal...
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2018 06:30:26 -0500 (EST)

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     GNUN <gnun>     18/11/04 06:30:26

Modified files:
        philosophy/po  : stallman-mec-india.fr.po stallman-mec-india.pot 
                         stallman-mec-india.ru.po 

Log message:
        Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/stallman-mec-india.fr.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.45&r2=1.46
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/stallman-mec-india.pot?cvsroot=www&r1=1.23&r2=1.24
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/stallman-mec-india.ru.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.16&r2=1.17

Patches:
Index: stallman-mec-india.fr.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/stallman-mec-india.fr.po,v
retrieving revision 1.45
retrieving revision 1.46
diff -u -b -r1.45 -r1.46
--- stallman-mec-india.fr.po    3 Nov 2018 21:44:02 -0000       1.45
+++ stallman-mec-india.fr.po    4 Nov 2018 11:30:25 -0000       1.46
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
 msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 "Project-Id-Version: stallman-mec-india.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2015-08-18 16:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2018-11-04 11:27+0000\n"
 "PO-Revision-Date: 2018-11-03 22:24+0100\n"
 "Last-Translator: Thérèse Godefroy <godef.th AT free.fr>\n"
 "Language-Team: French <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
 "MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
 "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
 "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"X-Outdated-Since: 2018-11-04 11:27+0000\n"
 "Plural-Forms: \n"
 "X-Generator: Gtranslator 2.91.5\n"
 
@@ -29,23 +30,19 @@
 msgid "The Danger of Software Patents (2001)"
 msgstr "Le danger des brevets logiciels (2001)"
 
-#. type: Content of: <p><em>
-msgid "<em>Speech by Richard M. Stallman"
-msgstr "<em>Conférence de Richard M. Stallman"
-
 #. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid "at Model Engineering College, Government of Kerala, India, 2001</em>"
-msgstr ""
-"au </em>Model Engineering College<em> du Gouvernement du Kerala, Inde, en "
-"2001</em>"
+# | [-by-]<strong>Richard Stallman</strong>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid "by <strong>Richard Stallman</strong>"
+msgid "<strong>Richard Stallman</strong>"
+msgstr "par <strong>Richard Stallman</strong>"
 
 #. type: Content of: <p>
 msgid ""
-"(An <a href=\"http://audio-video.gnu.org/audio/rms-mec-india.ogg\";> audio "
-"recording</a> of this talk is available.)"
+"<em>Speech given at Model Engineering College, Government of Kerala, India, "
+"2001</em> (<a href=\"http://audio-video.gnu.org/audio/rms-mec-india.ogg";
+"\">audio recording</a>)"
 msgstr ""
-"(Un <a href=\"http://audio-video.gnu.org/audio/rms-mec-india.ogg";
-"\">enregistrement audio</a> de cette conférence est disponible.)"
 
 #. type: Content of: <div><h3>
 msgid "Summary"
@@ -416,13 +413,30 @@
 "application."
 
 #. type: Content of: <div><ul><li>
-msgid ""
-"Now, copyrights have to do with copying.  If you wrote something that was "
-"word for word the same as some famous novel, and you could prove that you "
-"did this while you were locked up in a room and you have never seen that "
-"novel, this would not be copyright violation because it's not copying.  But "
-"a patent is an absolute monopoly on using a particular idea.  And even if "
-"you could show that you thought of it on your own, that would be considered "
+# | [-Now, copyrights-]{+Copyrights+} have to do with copying.  If you wrote
+# | something that was word for word the same as some famous novel, and you
+# | could prove that you did this while you were locked up in a room and you
+# | have never seen that novel, this would not be copyright violation because
+# | it's not copying.  But a patent is an absolute monopoly on using a
+# | particular idea.  And even if you could show that you thought of it on
+# | your own, that would be considered totally irrelevant.  It doesn't help
+# | you.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Now, copyrights have to do with copying.  If you wrote something that was "
+#| "word for word the same as some famous novel, and you could prove that you "
+#| "did this while you were locked up in a room and you have never seen that "
+#| "novel, this would not be copyright violation because it's not copying.  "
+#| "But a patent is an absolute monopoly on using a particular idea.  And "
+#| "even if you could show that you thought of it on your own, that would be "
+#| "considered totally irrelevant.  It doesn't help you."
+msgid ""
+"Copyrights have to do with copying.  If you wrote something that was word "
+"for word the same as some famous novel, and you could prove that you did "
+"this while you were locked up in a room and you have never seen that novel, "
+"this would not be copyright violation because it's not copying.  But a "
+"patent is an absolute monopoly on using a particular idea.  And even if you "
+"could show that you thought of it on your own, that would be considered "
 "totally irrelevant.  It doesn't help you."
 msgstr ""
 "Les copyrights ont à voir avec le plagiat ; si vous aviez écrit quelque "
@@ -435,8 +449,34 @@
 "absolument non pertinent. Cela ne vous aiderait pas."
 
 #. type: Content of: <div><ul><li>
+# | [-Now, copyrights-]{+Copyrights+} exist automatically.  Whenever anything
+# | is written, it's copyrighted.  Patents are issued through an expensive
+# | application process.  There is an expensive fee and even more expense in
+# | paying lawyers, which of course tends to be good for big companies.  And
+# | the patent office says that it only issues patents for things that are
+# | unobvious.  However, practically speaking, in many patent offices the
+# | criterion is unobvious to somebody with an IQ of fifty.  And they have all
+# | sorts of excuses to ignore the fact that whenever any programmer looks at
+# | it, his first statement is &ldquo;this is absurd, it's obvious.&rdquo;
+# | They say &ldquo;well, this is hindsight.&rdquo; So they just have an
+# | excuse to completely ignore the judgment of everybody who really is a
+# | programmer.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Now, copyrights exist automatically.  Whenever anything is written, it's "
+#| "copyrighted.  Patents are issued through an expensive application "
+#| "process.  There is an expensive fee and even more expense in paying "
+#| "lawyers, which of course tends to be good for big companies.  And the "
+#| "patent office says that it only issues patents for things that are "
+#| "unobvious.  However, practically speaking, in many patent offices the "
+#| "criterion is unobvious to somebody with an IQ of fifty.  And they have "
+#| "all sorts of excuses to ignore the fact that whenever any programmer "
+#| "looks at it, his first statement is &ldquo;this is absurd, it's obvious."
+#| "&rdquo; They say &ldquo;well, this is hindsight.&rdquo; So they just have "
+#| "an excuse to completely ignore the judgment of everybody who really is a "
+#| "programmer."
 msgid ""
-"Now, copyrights exist automatically.  Whenever anything is written, it's "
+"Copyrights exist automatically.  Whenever anything is written, it's "
 "copyrighted.  Patents are issued through an expensive application process.  "
 "There is an expensive fee and even more expense in paying lawyers, which of "
 "course tends to be good for big companies.  And the patent office says that "
@@ -462,11 +502,21 @@
 "excuse facile pour ignorer complètement le jugement de tout vrai 
programmeur."
 
 #. type: Content of: <div><ul><li>
-msgid ""
-"Now, copyrights last an extremely long time.  In the US today it's possible "
-"for copyrights to last for 150 years, which is absurd. Patents don't last "
-"that long; they merely last for a long time &mdash; 20 years, which in the "
-"field of software, as you can imagine, is a long time."
+# | [-Now, copyrights-]{+Copyrights+} last an extremely long time.  In the US
+# | today it's possible for copyrights to last for 150 years, which is absurd.
+# | Patents don't last that long; they merely last for a long time &mdash; 20
+# | years, which in the field of software, as you can imagine, is a long time.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Now, copyrights last an extremely long time.  In the US today it's "
+#| "possible for copyrights to last for 150 years, which is absurd. Patents "
+#| "don't last that long; they merely last for a long time &mdash; 20 years, "
+#| "which in the field of software, as you can imagine, is a long time."
+msgid ""
+"Copyrights last an extremely long time.  In the US today it's possible for "
+"copyrights to last for 150 years, which is absurd. Patents don't last that "
+"long; they merely last for a long time &mdash; 20 years, which in the field "
+"of software, as you can imagine, is a long time."
 msgstr ""
 "Le copyright dure extrêmement longtemps. Aux États-Unis de nos jours, les "
 "copyrights peuvent durer près de 150 ans, ce qui est absurde. Les brevets, "
@@ -474,8 +524,21 @@
 "ans, ce qui dans le monde du logiciel est long, vous l'imaginez bien."
 
 #. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | [-Now there-]{+There+} are many other differences as well.  In fact every
+# | detail is different.  So the worst thing you should ever do is learn
+# | something about copyrights and suppose that the same is true of patents.
+# | No, more likely it's not true of patents.  If it's true of copyrights,
+# | it's not true for patents.  That would be a better guideline if you have
+# | to guess.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Now there are many other differences as well.  In fact every detail is "
+#| "different.  So the worst thing you should ever do is learn something "
+#| "about copyrights and suppose that the same is true of patents. No, more "
+#| "likely it's not true of patents.  If it's true of copyrights, it's not "
+#| "true for patents.  That would be a better guideline if you have to guess."
 msgid ""
-"Now there are many other differences as well.  In fact every detail is "
+"There are many other differences as well.  In fact every detail is "
 "different.  So the worst thing you should ever do is learn something about "
 "copyrights and suppose that the same is true of patents. No, more likely "
 "it's not true of patents.  If it's true of copyrights, it's not true for "
@@ -656,16 +719,36 @@
 "les trouverez pas <em>tous</em>."
 
 #. type: Content of: <div><p>
-msgid ""
-"Now, a few years ago somebody had a US patent &mdash; maybe it's expired by "
-"now &mdash; on natural order recalculation in spreadsheets.  Now, what does "
-"this mean? It means the original spreadsheets did the recalculation always "
-"from top to bottom.  Which meant that if a cell ever depended on a lower "
-"cell, then it wouldn't get recalculated the first time; you'd have to do "
-"another recalculation to get that one.  Clearly it's better to do the "
-"recalculation in the order, you know.  If A depends on B, then do B first "
-"and then do A.  This way a single recalculation will make everything "
-"consistent.  Well, that's what the patent covered."
+# | [-Now, a-]{+A+} few years ago somebody had a US patent &mdash; maybe it's
+# | expired by now &mdash; on natural order recalculation in spreadsheets. 
+# | Now, what does this mean? It means the original spreadsheets did the
+# | recalculation always from top to bottom.  Which meant that if a cell ever
+# | depended on a lower cell, then it wouldn't get recalculated the first
+# | time; you'd have to do another recalculation to get that one.  Clearly
+# | it's better to do the recalculation in the order, you know.  If A depends
+# | on B, then do B first and then do A.  This way a single recalculation will
+# | make everything consistent.  Well, that's what the patent covered.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Now, a few years ago somebody had a US patent &mdash; maybe it's expired "
+#| "by now &mdash; on natural order recalculation in spreadsheets.  Now, what "
+#| "does this mean? It means the original spreadsheets did the recalculation "
+#| "always from top to bottom.  Which meant that if a cell ever depended on a "
+#| "lower cell, then it wouldn't get recalculated the first time; you'd have "
+#| "to do another recalculation to get that one.  Clearly it's better to do "
+#| "the recalculation in the order, you know.  If A depends on B, then do B "
+#| "first and then do A.  This way a single recalculation will make "
+#| "everything consistent.  Well, that's what the patent covered."
+msgid ""
+"A few years ago somebody had a US patent &mdash; maybe it's expired by now "
+"&mdash; on natural order recalculation in spreadsheets.  Now, what does this "
+"mean? It means the original spreadsheets did the recalculation always from "
+"top to bottom.  Which meant that if a cell ever depended on a lower cell, "
+"then it wouldn't get recalculated the first time; you'd have to do another "
+"recalculation to get that one.  Clearly it's better to do the recalculation "
+"in the order, you know.  If A depends on B, then do B first and then do A.  "
+"This way a single recalculation will make everything consistent.  Well, "
+"that's what the patent covered."
 msgstr ""
 "Il y a quelques années, quelqu'un avait un brevet américain – peut-être 
a-t-"
 "il expiré depuis – sur le « recalcul<a id=\"TransNote4-rev\" href="
@@ -4974,8 +5057,14 @@
 "README.translations.html\">guide de traduction</a>."
 
 #. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | Copyright &copy; 2001, 2008, 2009, 2012, 2013, [-2015-] {+2015, 2018+}
+# | Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Copyright &copy; 2001, 2008, 2009, 2012, 2013, 2015 Free Software "
+#| "Foundation, Inc."
 msgid ""
-"Copyright &copy; 2001, 2008, 2009, 2012, 2013, 2015 Free Software "
+"Copyright &copy; 2001, 2008, 2009, 2012, 2013, 2015, 2018 Free Software "
 "Foundation, Inc."
 msgstr ""
 "Copyright &copy; 2001, 2008, 2009, 2012, 2013, 2015 Free Software "
@@ -5003,3 +5092,18 @@
 #. type: Content of: <div><p>
 msgid "Updated:"
 msgstr "Dernière mise à jour :"
+
+#~ msgid "<em>Speech by Richard M. Stallman"
+#~ msgstr "<em>Conférence de Richard M. Stallman"
+
+#~ msgid "at Model Engineering College, Government of Kerala, India, 2001</em>"
+#~ msgstr ""
+#~ "au </em>Model Engineering College<em> du Gouvernement du Kerala, Inde, en "
+#~ "2001</em>"
+
+#~ msgid ""
+#~ "(An <a href=\"http://audio-video.gnu.org/audio/rms-mec-india.ogg\";> audio "
+#~ "recording</a> of this talk is available.)"
+#~ msgstr ""
+#~ "(Un <a href=\"http://audio-video.gnu.org/audio/rms-mec-india.ogg";
+#~ "\">enregistrement audio</a> de cette conférence est disponible.)"

Index: stallman-mec-india.pot
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/stallman-mec-india.pot,v
retrieving revision 1.23
retrieving revision 1.24
diff -u -b -r1.23 -r1.24
--- stallman-mec-india.pot      18 Aug 2015 16:29:51 -0000      1.23
+++ stallman-mec-india.pot      4 Nov 2018 11:30:25 -0000       1.24
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-# LANGUAGE translation of http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/stallman-mec-india.html
+# LANGUAGE translation of 
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/stallman-mec-india.html
 # Copyright (C) YEAR Free Software Foundation, Inc.
 # This file is distributed under the same license as the original article.
 # FIRST AUTHOR <address@hidden>, YEAR.
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
 msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 "Project-Id-Version: stallman-mec-india.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2015-08-18 16:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2018-11-04 11:27+0000\n"
 "PO-Revision-Date: YEAR-MO-DA HO:MI+ZONE\n"
 "Last-Translator: FULL NAME <address@hidden>\n"
 "Language-Team: LANGUAGE <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -26,18 +26,16 @@
 msgid "The Danger of Software Patents (2001)"
 msgstr ""
 
-#. type: Content of: <p><em>
-msgid "<em>Speech by Richard M. Stallman"
-msgstr ""
-
 #. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid "at Model Engineering College, Government of Kerala, India, 2001</em>"
+msgid "<strong>Richard Stallman</strong>"
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Content of: <p>
 msgid ""
-"(An <a href=\"http://audio-video.gnu.org/audio/rms-mec-india.ogg\";> audio "
-"recording</a> of this talk is available.)"
+"<em>Speech given at Model Engineering College, Government of Kerala, India, "
+"2001</em> (<a "
+"href=\"http://audio-video.gnu.org/audio/rms-mec-india.ogg\";>audio "
+"recording</a>)"
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Content of: <div><h3>
@@ -281,18 +279,18 @@
 
 #. type: Content of: <div><ul><li>
 msgid ""
-"Now, copyrights have to do with copying.  If you wrote something that was "
-"word for word the same as some famous novel, and you could prove that you "
-"did this while you were locked up in a room and you have never seen that "
-"novel, this would not be copyright violation because it's not copying.  But "
-"a patent is an absolute monopoly on using a particular idea.  And even if "
-"you could show that you thought of it on your own, that would be considered "
+"Copyrights have to do with copying.  If you wrote something that was word "
+"for word the same as some famous novel, and you could prove that you did "
+"this while you were locked up in a room and you have never seen that novel, "
+"this would not be copyright violation because it's not copying.  But a "
+"patent is an absolute monopoly on using a particular idea.  And even if you "
+"could show that you thought of it on your own, that would be considered "
 "totally irrelevant.  It doesn't help you."
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Content of: <div><ul><li>
 msgid ""
-"Now, copyrights exist automatically.  Whenever anything is written, it's "
+"Copyrights exist automatically.  Whenever anything is written, it's "
 "copyrighted.  Patents are issued through an expensive application process.  "
 "There is an expensive fee and even more expense in paying lawyers, which of "
 "course tends to be good for big companies.  And the patent office says that "
@@ -307,15 +305,15 @@
 
 #. type: Content of: <div><ul><li>
 msgid ""
-"Now, copyrights last an extremely long time.  In the US today it's possible "
-"for copyrights to last for 150 years, which is absurd. Patents don't last "
-"that long; they merely last for a long time &mdash; 20 years, which in the "
-"field of software, as you can imagine, is a long time."
+"Copyrights last an extremely long time.  In the US today it's possible for "
+"copyrights to last for 150 years, which is absurd. Patents don't last that "
+"long; they merely last for a long time &mdash; 20 years, which in the field "
+"of software, as you can imagine, is a long time."
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Content of: <div><p>
 msgid ""
-"Now there are many other differences as well.  In fact every detail is "
+"There are many other differences as well.  In fact every detail is "
 "different.  So the worst thing you should ever do is learn something about "
 "copyrights and suppose that the same is true of patents. No, more likely "
 "it's not true of patents.  If it's true of copyrights, it's not true for "
@@ -420,15 +418,15 @@
 
 #. type: Content of: <div><p>
 msgid ""
-"Now, a few years ago somebody had a US patent &mdash; maybe it's expired by "
-"now &mdash; on natural order recalculation in spreadsheets.  Now, what does "
-"this mean? It means the original spreadsheets did the recalculation always "
-"from top to bottom.  Which meant that if a cell ever depended on a lower "
-"cell, then it wouldn't get recalculated the first time; you'd have to do "
-"another recalculation to get that one.  Clearly it's better to do the "
-"recalculation in the order, you know.  If A depends on B, then do B first "
-"and then do A.  This way a single recalculation will make everything "
-"consistent.  Well, that's what the patent covered."
+"A few years ago somebody had a US patent &mdash; maybe it's expired by now "
+"&mdash; on natural order recalculation in spreadsheets.  Now, what does this "
+"mean? It means the original spreadsheets did the recalculation always from "
+"top to bottom.  Which meant that if a cell ever depended on a lower cell, "
+"then it wouldn't get recalculated the first time; you'd have to do another "
+"recalculation to get that one.  Clearly it's better to do the recalculation "
+"in the order, you know.  If A depends on B, then do B first and then do A.  "
+"This way a single recalculation will make everything consistent.  Well, "
+"that's what the patent covered."
 msgstr ""
 
 #. type: Content of: <div><p>
@@ -3155,7 +3153,7 @@
 
 #. type: Content of: <div><p>
 msgid ""
-"Copyright &copy; 2001, 2008, 2009, 2012, 2013, 2015 Free Software "
+"Copyright &copy; 2001, 2008, 2009, 2012, 2013, 2015, 2018 Free Software "
 "Foundation, Inc."
 msgstr ""
 

Index: stallman-mec-india.ru.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/stallman-mec-india.ru.po,v
retrieving revision 1.16
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -u -b -r1.16 -r1.17
--- stallman-mec-india.ru.po    18 Aug 2015 17:58:59 -0000      1.16
+++ stallman-mec-india.ru.po    4 Nov 2018 11:30:25 -0000       1.17
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
 msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 "Project-Id-Version: stallman-mec-india.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2015-08-18 16:26+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2018-11-04 11:27+0000\n"
 "PO-Revision-Date: 2015-08-18 04:48+0000\n"
 "Last-Translator: Ineiev <address@hidden>\n"
 "Language-Team: Russian <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
 "MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
 "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
 "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"X-Outdated-Since: 2018-11-04 11:27+0000\n"
 
 #. type: Content of: <title>
 msgid ""
@@ -29,23 +30,19 @@
 msgstr "Опасность патентов на программы (2001)"
 
 # type: Content of: <p>
-#. type: Content of: <p><em>
-msgid "<em>Speech by Richard M. Stallman"
-msgstr "Речь Ричарда Столмена"
-
 #. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid "at Model Engineering College, Government of Kerala, India, 2001</em>"
-msgstr ""
-"в Образцовом инженерном колледже при 
правительстве Кералы в Индии, 2001&nbsp;"
-"год"
+# | [-by-]<strong>Richard Stallman</strong>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid "by <strong>Richard Stallman</strong>"
+msgid "<strong>Richard Stallman</strong>"
+msgstr "<strong>Ричард Столмен</strong>"
 
 #. type: Content of: <p>
 msgid ""
-"(An <a href=\"http://audio-video.gnu.org/audio/rms-mec-india.ogg\";> audio "
-"recording</a> of this talk is available.)"
+"<em>Speech given at Model Engineering College, Government of Kerala, India, "
+"2001</em> (<a href=\"http://audio-video.gnu.org/audio/rms-mec-india.ogg";
+"\">audio recording</a>)"
 msgstr ""
-"(Имеется также <a 
href=\"http://audio-video.gnu.org/audio/rms-mec-india.ogg";
-"\"> звукозапись</a> этой беседы.)"
 
 #. type: Content of: <div><h3>
 msgid "Summary"
@@ -387,13 +384,30 @@
 "&mdash; вот в чем вас мог бы ограничить 
патент."
 
 #. type: Content of: <div><ul><li>
-msgid ""
-"Now, copyrights have to do with copying.  If you wrote something that was "
-"word for word the same as some famous novel, and you could prove that you "
-"did this while you were locked up in a room and you have never seen that "
-"novel, this would not be copyright violation because it's not copying.  But "
-"a patent is an absolute monopoly on using a particular idea.  And even if "
-"you could show that you thought of it on your own, that would be considered "
+# | [-Now, copyrights-]{+Copyrights+} have to do with copying.  If you wrote
+# | something that was word for word the same as some famous novel, and you
+# | could prove that you did this while you were locked up in a room and you
+# | have never seen that novel, this would not be copyright violation because
+# | it's not copying.  But a patent is an absolute monopoly on using a
+# | particular idea.  And even if you could show that you thought of it on
+# | your own, that would be considered totally irrelevant.  It doesn't help
+# | you.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Now, copyrights have to do with copying.  If you wrote something that was "
+#| "word for word the same as some famous novel, and you could prove that you "
+#| "did this while you were locked up in a room and you have never seen that "
+#| "novel, this would not be copyright violation because it's not copying.  "
+#| "But a patent is an absolute monopoly on using a particular idea.  And "
+#| "even if you could show that you thought of it on your own, that would be "
+#| "considered totally irrelevant.  It doesn't help you."
+msgid ""
+"Copyrights have to do with copying.  If you wrote something that was word "
+"for word the same as some famous novel, and you could prove that you did "
+"this while you were locked up in a room and you have never seen that novel, "
+"this would not be copyright violation because it's not copying.  But a "
+"patent is an absolute monopoly on using a particular idea.  And even if you "
+"could show that you thought of it on your own, that would be considered "
 "totally irrelevant.  It doesn't help you."
 msgstr ""
 "Так вот, авторские права имеют отношение к 
копированию. Если бы вы написали "
@@ -406,8 +420,34 @@
 "Вам это не поможет."
 
 #. type: Content of: <div><ul><li>
+# | [-Now, copyrights-]{+Copyrights+} exist automatically.  Whenever anything
+# | is written, it's copyrighted.  Patents are issued through an expensive
+# | application process.  There is an expensive fee and even more expense in
+# | paying lawyers, which of course tends to be good for big companies.  And
+# | the patent office says that it only issues patents for things that are
+# | unobvious.  However, practically speaking, in many patent offices the
+# | criterion is unobvious to somebody with an IQ of fifty.  And they have all
+# | sorts of excuses to ignore the fact that whenever any programmer looks at
+# | it, his first statement is &ldquo;this is absurd, it's obvious.&rdquo;
+# | They say &ldquo;well, this is hindsight.&rdquo; So they just have an
+# | excuse to completely ignore the judgment of everybody who really is a
+# | programmer.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Now, copyrights exist automatically.  Whenever anything is written, it's "
+#| "copyrighted.  Patents are issued through an expensive application "
+#| "process.  There is an expensive fee and even more expense in paying "
+#| "lawyers, which of course tends to be good for big companies.  And the "
+#| "patent office says that it only issues patents for things that are "
+#| "unobvious.  However, practically speaking, in many patent offices the "
+#| "criterion is unobvious to somebody with an IQ of fifty.  And they have "
+#| "all sorts of excuses to ignore the fact that whenever any programmer "
+#| "looks at it, his first statement is &ldquo;this is absurd, it's obvious."
+#| "&rdquo; They say &ldquo;well, this is hindsight.&rdquo; So they just have "
+#| "an excuse to completely ignore the judgment of everybody who really is a "
+#| "programmer."
 msgid ""
-"Now, copyrights exist automatically.  Whenever anything is written, it's "
+"Copyrights exist automatically.  Whenever anything is written, it's "
 "copyrighted.  Patents are issued through an expensive application process.  "
 "There is an expensive fee and even more expense in paying lawyers, which of "
 "course tends to be good for big companies.  And the patent office says that "
@@ -434,11 +474,21 @@
 "является программистом."
 
 #. type: Content of: <div><ul><li>
-msgid ""
-"Now, copyrights last an extremely long time.  In the US today it's possible "
-"for copyrights to last for 150 years, which is absurd. Patents don't last "
-"that long; they merely last for a long time &mdash; 20 years, which in the "
-"field of software, as you can imagine, is a long time."
+# | [-Now, copyrights-]{+Copyrights+} last an extremely long time.  In the US
+# | today it's possible for copyrights to last for 150 years, which is absurd.
+# | Patents don't last that long; they merely last for a long time &mdash; 20
+# | years, which in the field of software, as you can imagine, is a long time.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Now, copyrights last an extremely long time.  In the US today it's "
+#| "possible for copyrights to last for 150 years, which is absurd. Patents "
+#| "don't last that long; they merely last for a long time &mdash; 20 years, "
+#| "which in the field of software, as you can imagine, is a long time."
+msgid ""
+"Copyrights last an extremely long time.  In the US today it's possible for "
+"copyrights to last for 150 years, which is absurd. Patents don't last that "
+"long; they merely last for a long time &mdash; 20 years, which in the field "
+"of software, as you can imagine, is a long time."
 msgstr ""
 "Так вот, срок действия авторских прав 
чрезвычайно велик. Сегодня в США срок "
 "действия авторских прав может быть 
150&nbsp;лет, что абсурдно. Срок действия "
@@ -446,8 +496,21 @@
 "для программирования, как вы можете себе 
представить, является долгим сроком."
 
 #. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | [-Now there-]{+There+} are many other differences as well.  In fact every
+# | detail is different.  So the worst thing you should ever do is learn
+# | something about copyrights and suppose that the same is true of patents.
+# | No, more likely it's not true of patents.  If it's true of copyrights,
+# | it's not true for patents.  That would be a better guideline if you have
+# | to guess.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Now there are many other differences as well.  In fact every detail is "
+#| "different.  So the worst thing you should ever do is learn something "
+#| "about copyrights and suppose that the same is true of patents. No, more "
+#| "likely it's not true of patents.  If it's true of copyrights, it's not "
+#| "true for patents.  That would be a better guideline if you have to guess."
 msgid ""
-"Now there are many other differences as well.  In fact every detail is "
+"There are many other differences as well.  In fact every detail is "
 "different.  So the worst thing you should ever do is learn something about "
 "copyrights and suppose that the same is true of patents. No, more likely "
 "it's not true of patents.  If it's true of copyrights, it's not true for "
@@ -620,16 +683,36 @@
 "с тем, что вы делаете. Вы не найдете их 
<em>все</em>."
 
 #. type: Content of: <div><p>
-msgid ""
-"Now, a few years ago somebody had a US patent &mdash; maybe it's expired by "
-"now &mdash; on natural order recalculation in spreadsheets.  Now, what does "
-"this mean? It means the original spreadsheets did the recalculation always "
-"from top to bottom.  Which meant that if a cell ever depended on a lower "
-"cell, then it wouldn't get recalculated the first time; you'd have to do "
-"another recalculation to get that one.  Clearly it's better to do the "
-"recalculation in the order, you know.  If A depends on B, then do B first "
-"and then do A.  This way a single recalculation will make everything "
-"consistent.  Well, that's what the patent covered."
+# | [-Now, a-]{+A+} few years ago somebody had a US patent &mdash; maybe it's
+# | expired by now &mdash; on natural order recalculation in spreadsheets. 
+# | Now, what does this mean? It means the original spreadsheets did the
+# | recalculation always from top to bottom.  Which meant that if a cell ever
+# | depended on a lower cell, then it wouldn't get recalculated the first
+# | time; you'd have to do another recalculation to get that one.  Clearly
+# | it's better to do the recalculation in the order, you know.  If A depends
+# | on B, then do B first and then do A.  This way a single recalculation will
+# | make everything consistent.  Well, that's what the patent covered.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Now, a few years ago somebody had a US patent &mdash; maybe it's expired "
+#| "by now &mdash; on natural order recalculation in spreadsheets.  Now, what "
+#| "does this mean? It means the original spreadsheets did the recalculation "
+#| "always from top to bottom.  Which meant that if a cell ever depended on a "
+#| "lower cell, then it wouldn't get recalculated the first time; you'd have "
+#| "to do another recalculation to get that one.  Clearly it's better to do "
+#| "the recalculation in the order, you know.  If A depends on B, then do B "
+#| "first and then do A.  This way a single recalculation will make "
+#| "everything consistent.  Well, that's what the patent covered."
+msgid ""
+"A few years ago somebody had a US patent &mdash; maybe it's expired by now "
+"&mdash; on natural order recalculation in spreadsheets.  Now, what does this "
+"mean? It means the original spreadsheets did the recalculation always from "
+"top to bottom.  Which meant that if a cell ever depended on a lower cell, "
+"then it wouldn't get recalculated the first time; you'd have to do another "
+"recalculation to get that one.  Clearly it's better to do the recalculation "
+"in the order, you know.  If A depends on B, then do B first and then do A.  "
+"This way a single recalculation will make everything consistent.  Well, "
+"that's what the patent covered."
 msgstr ""
 "Так вот, несколько лет назад у кого-то был 
патент США&nbsp;&mdash; может "
 "быть, сейчас срок его действия 
истек&nbsp;&mdash; на естественный порядок "
@@ -4792,8 +4875,14 @@
 
 # type: Content of: <div><p>
 #. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | Copyright &copy; 2001, 2008, 2009, 2012, 2013, [-2015-] {+2015, 2018+}
+# | Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Copyright &copy; 2001, 2008, 2009, 2012, 2013, 2015 Free Software "
+#| "Foundation, Inc."
 msgid ""
-"Copyright &copy; 2001, 2008, 2009, 2012, 2013, 2015 Free Software "
+"Copyright &copy; 2001, 2008, 2009, 2012, 2013, 2015, 2018 Free Software "
 "Foundation, Inc."
 msgstr ""
 "Copyright &copy; 2001, 2008, 2009, 2012, 2013, 2015 Free Software "
@@ -4824,3 +4913,19 @@
 #. type: Content of: <div><p>
 msgid "Updated:"
 msgstr "Обновлено:"
+
+# type: Content of: <p>
+#~ msgid "<em>Speech by Richard M. Stallman"
+#~ msgstr "Речь Ричарда Столмена"
+
+#~ msgid "at Model Engineering College, Government of Kerala, India, 2001</em>"
+#~ msgstr ""
+#~ "в Образцовом инженерном колледже при 
правительстве Кералы в Индии, "
+#~ "2001&nbsp;год"
+
+#~ msgid ""
+#~ "(An <a href=\"http://audio-video.gnu.org/audio/rms-mec-india.ogg\";> audio "
+#~ "recording</a> of this talk is available.)"
+#~ msgstr ""
+#~ "(Имеется также <a 
href=\"http://audio-video.gnu.org/audio/rms-mec-india.";
+#~ "ogg\"> звукозапись</a> этой беседы.)"



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]