www-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

www/philosophy lessig-fsfs-intro.fa.html po/les...


From: GNUN
Subject: www/philosophy lessig-fsfs-intro.fa.html po/les...
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2017 16:58:48 -0400 (EDT)

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     GNUN <gnun>     17/06/24 16:58:48

Modified files:
        philosophy     : lessig-fsfs-intro.fa.html 
Added files:
        philosophy/po  : lessig-fsfs-intro.fa-diff.html 

Log message:
        Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/lessig-fsfs-intro.fa.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.5&r2=1.6
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/lessig-fsfs-intro.fa-diff.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1

Patches:
Index: lessig-fsfs-intro.fa.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/lessig-fsfs-intro.fa.html,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -b -r1.5 -r1.6
--- lessig-fsfs-intro.fa.html   7 Apr 2015 17:58:26 -0000       1.5
+++ lessig-fsfs-intro.fa.html   24 Jun 2017 20:58:48 -0000      1.6
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/lessig-fsfs-intro.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/philosophy/po/lessig-fsfs-intro.fa.po">
+ https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/lessig-fsfs-intro.fa.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/lessig-fsfs-intro.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" 
value="/philosophy/po/lessig-fsfs-intro.fa-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2017-04-25" --><!--#set 
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/lessig-fsfs-intro.en.html" -->
 
 <!--#include virtual="/server/header.fa.html" -->
 <!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -8,6 +13,7 @@
 
 <!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/lessig-fsfs-intro.translist" -->
 <!--#include virtual="/server/banner.fa.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.fa.html" -->
 <h2>مقدمه‌ای بر <a
 href="http://shop.fsf.org/product/free-software-free-society/";><i>نرم
‌افزار
 آزاد، جامعه آزاد: منتخبی از مقالات ریچارد 
استالمن</i></a></h2>
@@ -255,7 +261,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 آخرین به روز رسانی:
 
-$Date: 2015/04/07 17:58:26 $
+$Date: 2017/06/24 20:58:48 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: po/lessig-fsfs-intro.fa-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: po/lessig-fsfs-intro.fa-diff.html
diff -N po/lessig-fsfs-intro.fa-diff.html
--- /dev/null   1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ po/lessig-fsfs-intro.fa-diff.html   24 Jun 2017 20:58:48 -0000      1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,292 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+    "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
+<!-- Generated by GNUN -->
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
+<title>/philosophy/lessig-fsfs-intro.html-diff</title>
+<style type="text/css">
+span.removed { background-color: #f22; color: #000; }
+span.inserted { background-color: #2f2; color: #000; }
+</style></head>
+<body><pre>
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" --&gt;
+&lt;!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 --&gt;
+&lt;title&gt;Introduction to Free Software, Free Society
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation&lt;/title&gt;
+
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/lessig-fsfs-intro.translist" --&gt;
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" --&gt;
+   
+&lt;h2&gt;Introduction
+to &lt;a 
href="http://shop.fsf.org/product/free-software-free-society/"&gt;&lt;i&gt;Free
+Software, Free Society: The Selected Essays of Richard
+M. Stallman&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h2&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;
+by Lawrence Lessig, Professor of Law, Stanford Law School
+&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;
+Every generation has its philosopher &mdash; a writer or an artist who
+captures the imagination of a time. Sometimes these philosophers are
+recognized as such; often it takes generations before the connection
+is made real. But recognized or not, a time gets marked by the people
+who speak its ideals, whether in the whisper of a poem, or the blast
+of a political movement.
+&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;
+Our generation has a philosopher. He is not an artist, or a
+professional writer. He is a programmer. Richard Stallman began his
+work in the labs of &lt;abbr title="Massachusetts Institute of 
Technology"&gt;MIT&lt;/abbr&gt;, 
+as a programmer and architect building operating system software. He
+has built his career on a stage of public life, as a programmer and an
+architect founding a movement for freedom in a world increasingly
+defined by &ldquo;code.&rdquo;
+&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;
+&ldquo;Code&rdquo; is the technology that makes computers run. Whether
+inscribed in software or burned in hardware, it is the collection of
+instructions, first written in words, that directs the functionality
+of machines. These machines &mdash; computers &mdash; increasingly
+define and control our life. They determine how phones connect, and
+what runs on TV. They decide whether video can be streamed across a
+broadband link to a computer. They control what a computer reports
+back to its manufacturer. These machines run us. Code runs these
+machines.
+&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;
+What control should we have over this code? What understanding? What
+freedom should there be to match the control it enables? What power?
+&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;
+These questions have been the challenge of Stallman's life. Through
+his works and his words, he has pushed us to see the importance of
+keeping code &ldquo;free.&rdquo; Not free in the sense that code
+writers don't get paid, but free in the sense that the control coders
+build be transparent to all, and that anyone have the right to take
+that control, and modify it as he or she sees fit. This is &ldquo;free
+software&rdquo;; &ldquo;free software&rdquo; is one answer to a world
+built in code.
+&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;
+&ldquo;Free.&rdquo; Stallman laments the ambiguity in his own
+term. There's nothing to lament. Puzzles force people to think, and
+this term &ldquo;free&rdquo; does this puzzling work quite well. To
+modern American ears, &ldquo;free software&rdquo; sounds utopian,
+impossible. Nothing, not even lunch, is free. How could the most
+important words running the most critical machines running the world
+be <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>&ldquo;free.&rdquo;</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>&ldquo;free&rdquo;?</em></ins></span> How could a 
sane society aspire to such an
+ideal?
+&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;
+Yet the odd clink of the word &ldquo;free&rdquo; is a function of us,
+not of the term. &ldquo;Free&rdquo; has different senses, only one of
+which refers to &ldquo;price.&rdquo; A much more fundamental sense of
+&ldquo;free&rdquo; is the &ldquo;free,&rdquo; Stallman says, in the
+term &ldquo;free speech,&rdquo; or perhaps better in the term
+&ldquo;free labor.&rdquo; Not free as in costless, but free as in
+limited in its control by others. Free software is control that is
+transparent, and open to change, just as free laws, or the laws of a
+&ldquo;free society,&rdquo; are free when they make their control
+knowable, and open to change. The aim of Stallman's &ldquo;free
+software movement&rdquo; is to make as much code as it can
+transparent, and subject to change, by rendering it
+&ldquo;free.&rdquo;
+&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;
+The mechanism of this rendering is an extraordinarily clever device
+called &ldquo;copyleft&rdquo; implemented through a license called
+GPL. Using the power of copyright law, &ldquo;free software&rdquo; not
+only assures that it remains open, and subject to change, but that
+other software that takes and uses &ldquo;free software&rdquo; (and
+that technically counts as a &ldquo;derivative work&rdquo;) must also
+itself be free.  If you use and adapt a free software program, and
+then release that adapted version to the public, the released version
+must be as free as the version it was adapted from. It must, or the
+law of copyright will be violated.
+&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;
+&ldquo;Free software,&rdquo; like free societies, has its
+enemies. Microsoft has waged a war against the GPL, warning whoever
+will listen that the GPL is a &ldquo;dangerous&rdquo; license. The
+dangers it names, however, are largely illusory. Others object to the
+&ldquo;coercion&rdquo; in GPL's insistence that modified versions are
+also free. But a condition is not coercion. If it is not coercion for
+Microsoft to refuse to permit users to distribute modified versions of
+its product Office without paying it (presumably) millions, then it is
+not coercion when the GPL insists that modified versions of free
+software be free too.
+&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;
+And then there are those who call Stallman's message too extreme. But
+extreme it is not. Indeed, in an obvious sense, Stallman's work is a
+simple translation of the freedoms that our tradition crafted in the
+world before code. &ldquo;Free software&rdquo; would assure that the
+world governed by code is as &ldquo;free&rdquo; as our tradition that
+built the world before code.
+&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;
+For example: A &ldquo;free society&rdquo; is regulated by law. But
+there are limits that any free society places on this regulation
+through law: No society that kept its laws secret could ever be called
+free. No government that hid its regulations from the regulated could
+ever stand in our tradition. Law controls.  But it does so justly only
+when visibly. And law is visible only when its terms are knowable and
+controllable by those it regulates, or by the agents of those it
+regulates (lawyers, legislatures).
+&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;
+This condition on law extends beyond the work of a legislature. Think
+about the practice of law in American courts. Lawyers are hired by
+their clients to advance their clients' interests. Sometimes that
+interest is advanced through litigation. In the course of this
+litigation, lawyers write briefs. These briefs in turn affect opinions
+written by judges. These opinions decide who wins a particular case,
+or whether a certain law can stand consistently with a constitution.
+&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;
+All the material in this process is free in the sense that Stallman
+means.  Legal briefs are open and free for others to use. The
+arguments are transparent (which is different from saying they are
+good) and the reasoning can be taken without the permission of the
+original lawyers. The opinions they produce can be quoted in later
+briefs. They can be copied and integrated into another brief or
+opinion. The &ldquo;source code&rdquo; for American law is by design,
+and by principle, open and free for anyone to take. And take lawyers
+do &mdash; for it is a measure of a great brief that it achieves its
+creativity through the reuse of what happened before. The source is
+free; creativity and an economy is built upon it.
+&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;
+This economy of free code (and here I mean free legal code) doesn't
+starve lawyers. Law firms have enough incentive to produce great
+briefs even though the stuff they build can be taken and copied by
+anyone else. The lawyer is a craftsman; his or her product is
+public. Yet the crafting is not charity.  Lawyers get paid; the public
+doesn't demand such work without price. Instead this economy
+flourishes, with later work added to the earlier.
+&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;
+We could imagine a legal practice that was different &mdash; briefs
+and arguments that were kept secret; rulings that announced a result
+but not the reasoning.  Laws that were kept by the police but
+published to no one else. Regulation that operated without explaining
+its rule.
+&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;
+We could imagine this society, but we could not imagine calling it
+&ldquo;free.&rdquo; Whether or not the incentives in such a society
+would be better or more efficiently allocated, such a society could
+not be known as free. The ideals of freedom, of life within a free
+society, demand more than efficient application.  Instead, openness
+and transparency are the constraints within which a legal system gets
+built, not options to be added if convenient to the leaders. Life
+governed by software code should be no less.
+&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;
+Code writing is not litigation. It is better, richer, more
+productive. But the law is an obvious instance of how creativity and
+incentives do not depend upon perfect control over the products
+created. Like jazz, or novels, or architecture, the law gets built
+upon the work that went before. This adding and changing is what
+creativity always is. And a free society is one that assures that its
+most important resources remain free in just this sense.
+&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;
+For the first time, this book collects the writing and lectures of
+Richard Stallman in a manner that will make their subtlety and power
+clear. The essays span a wide range, from copyright to the history of
+the free software movement.  They include many arguments not well
+known, and among these, an especially insightful account of the
+changed circumstances that render copyright in the digital world
+suspect. They will serve as a resource for those who seek to
+understand the thought of this most powerful man &mdash; powerful in
+his ideas, his passion, and his integrity, even if powerless in every
+other way. They will inspire others who would take these ideas, and
+build upon them.
+&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;
+I don't know Stallman well. I know him well enough to know he is a
+hard man to like. He is driven, often impatient. His anger can flare
+at friend as easily as foe. He is uncompromising and persistent;
+patient in both.
+&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;
+Yet when our world finally comes to understand the power and danger of
+code &mdash; when it finally sees that code, like laws, or like
+government, must be transparent to be free &mdash; then we will look
+back at this uncompromising and persistent programmer and recognize
+the vision he has fought to make real: the vision of a world where
+freedom and knowledge survives the compiler. And we will come to see
+that no man, through his deeds or words, has done as much to make
+possible the freedom that this next society could have.
+&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;p&gt;
+We have not earned that freedom yet. We may well fail in securing
+it. But whether we succeed or fail, in these essays is a picture of
+what that freedom could be. And in the life that produced these words
+and works, there is inspiration for anyone who would, like Stallman,
+fight to create this freedom.
+&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;
+&lt;strong&gt;Lawrence Lessig&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
+&lt;strong&gt;Professor of Law, Stanford Law School.&lt;/strong&gt;
+&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;hr /&gt;
+&lt;blockquote id="fsfs"&gt;&lt;p class="big"&gt;Learn more about
+&lt;a 
href="http://shop.fsf.org/product/free-software-free-society/"&gt;&lt;cite&gt;Free
+Software, Free Society: The Selected Essays of Richard
+M. Stallman&lt;/cite&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
+
+&lt;/div&gt;&lt;!-- for id="content", starts in the include above --&gt;
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" --&gt;
+&lt;div id="footer"&gt;
+&lt;div class="unprintable"&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Please send general FSF &amp; GNU inquiries to
+&lt;a href="mailto:address@hidden"&gt;&lt;address@hidden&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.
+There are also &lt;a href="/contact/"&gt;other ways to contact&lt;/a&gt;
+the FSF.  Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to &lt;a 
href="mailto:address@hidden"&gt;&lt;address@hidden&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;&lt;!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+        replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+        We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+        translations.  However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+        Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+        to &lt;a href="mailto:address@hidden"&gt;
+        &lt;address@hidden&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+        &lt;p&gt;For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+        our web pages, see &lt;a
+        href="/server/standards/README.translations.html"&gt;Translations
+        README&lt;/a&gt;. --&gt;
+Please see the &lt;a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html"&gt;Translations
+README&lt;/a&gt; for information on coordinating and submitting translations
+of this article.&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;Copyright &copy; 2002, <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>2013</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>2013, 2017</em></ins></span> Free Software 
Foundation, Inc.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;p&gt;This page is licensed under a &lt;a rel="license"
+<span 
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/"&gt;Creative</strong></del></span>
+<span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/"&gt;Creative</em></ins></span>
+Commons <span class="removed"><del><strong>Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United 
States</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 
International</em></ins></span> License&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+
+&lt;!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" --&gt;
+
+&lt;p class="unprintable"&gt;Updated:
+&lt;!-- timestamp start --&gt;
+$Date: 2017/06/24 20:58:48 $
+&lt;!-- timestamp end --&gt;
+&lt;/p&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;
+&lt;/div&gt;
+&lt;/body&gt;
+&lt;/html&gt;
+</pre></body></html>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]