[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/licenses why-not-lgpl.html
From: |
Pavel Kharitonov |
Subject: |
www/licenses why-not-lgpl.html |
Date: |
Sun, 13 Nov 2016 05:54:36 +0000 (UTC) |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: Pavel Kharitonov <ineiev> 16/11/13 05:54:35
Modified files:
licenses : why-not-lgpl.html
Log message:
Don't refer to proprietary software as 'alternative' RT #1163901.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/why-not-lgpl.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.43&r2=1.44
Patches:
Index: why-not-lgpl.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/why-not-lgpl.html,v
retrieving revision 1.43
retrieving revision 1.44
diff -u -b -r1.43 -r1.44
--- why-not-lgpl.html 19 Dec 2015 19:11:36 -0000 1.43
+++ why-not-lgpl.html 13 Nov 2016 05:54:35 -0000 1.44
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
-<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.79 -->
<title>Why you shouldn't use the Lesser GPL for your next library
- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
<!--#include virtual="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.translist" -->
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
Using the ordinary GPL is not advantageous for every library. There
are reasons that can make it better to use the Lesser GPL in certain
cases. The most common case is when a free library's features are
-readily available for proprietary software through other alternative
+readily available for proprietary software through other
libraries. In that case, the library cannot give free software any
particular advantage, so it is better to use the Lesser GPL for that
library.</p>
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@
much more if we stand together. We free software developers should
support one another. By releasing libraries that are limited to free
software only, we can help each other's free software packages outdo
-the proprietary alternatives. The whole free software movement will
+the proprietary counterparts. The whole free software movement will
have more popularity, because free software as a whole will stack up
better against the competition.</p>
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@
There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright © 1999, 2007, 2013, 2014, 2015 Free Software Foundation,
Inc.</p>
+<p>Copyright © 1999, 2007, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 Free Software
Foundation, Inc.</p>
<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2015/12/19 19:11:36 $
+$Date: 2016/11/13 05:54:35 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- www/licenses why-not-lgpl.html,
Pavel Kharitonov <=