www-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

www/licenses why-not-lgpl.html


From: Pavel Kharitonov
Subject: www/licenses why-not-lgpl.html
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2016 05:54:36 +0000 (UTC)

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     Pavel Kharitonov <ineiev>       16/11/13 05:54:35

Modified files:
        licenses       : why-not-lgpl.html 

Log message:
        Don't refer to proprietary software as 'alternative' RT #1163901.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/why-not-lgpl.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.43&r2=1.44

Patches:
Index: why-not-lgpl.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/why-not-lgpl.html,v
retrieving revision 1.43
retrieving revision 1.44
diff -u -b -r1.43 -r1.44
--- why-not-lgpl.html   19 Dec 2015 19:11:36 -0000      1.43
+++ why-not-lgpl.html   13 Nov 2016 05:54:35 -0000      1.44
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 <!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
-<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.79 -->
 <title>Why you shouldn't use the Lesser GPL for your next library
 - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
 <!--#include virtual="/licenses/po/why-not-lgpl.translist" -->
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@
 Using the ordinary GPL is not advantageous for every library.  There
 are reasons that can make it better to use the Lesser GPL in certain
 cases.  The most common case is when a free library's features are
-readily available for proprietary software through other alternative
+readily available for proprietary software through other
 libraries.  In that case, the library cannot give free software any
 particular advantage, so it is better to use the Lesser GPL for that
 library.</p>
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@
 much more if we stand together.  We free software developers should
 support one another.  By releasing libraries that are limited to free
 software only, we can help each other's free software packages outdo
-the proprietary alternatives.  The whole free software movement will
+the proprietary counterparts.  The whole free software movement will
 have more popularity, because free software as a whole will stack up
 better against the competition.</p>
 
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@
      There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
      Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
 
-<p>Copyright &copy; 1999, 2007, 2013, 2014, 2015 Free Software Foundation, 
Inc.</p>
+<p>Copyright &copy; 1999, 2007, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016 Free Software 
Foundation, Inc.</p>
 
 <p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
 href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/";>Creative
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2015/12/19 19:11:36 $
+$Date: 2016/11/13 05:54:35 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]