[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www philosophy/not-ipr.es.html philosophy/po/no...
|
From: |
GNUN |
|
Subject: |
www philosophy/not-ipr.es.html philosophy/po/no... |
|
Date: |
Fri, 11 Nov 2016 09:29:18 +0000 (UTC) |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: GNUN <gnun> 16/11/11 09:29:18
Modified files:
philosophy : not-ipr.es.html
philosophy/po : not-ipr.es-en.html
proprietary : proprietary.es.html
proprietary/po : proprietary.es-en.html
Log message:
Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/not-ipr.es.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.44&r2=1.45
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.es-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.27&r2=1.28
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/proprietary.es.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.12&r2=1.13
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/po/proprietary.es-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.8&r2=1.9
Patches:
Index: philosophy/not-ipr.es.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/not-ipr.es.html,v
retrieving revision 1.44
retrieving revision 1.45
diff -u -b -r1.44 -r1.45
--- philosophy/not-ipr.es.html 5 Jun 2015 12:06:46 -0000 1.44
+++ philosophy/not-ipr.es.html 11 Nov 2016 09:29:17 -0000 1.45
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/not-ipr.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.es.html" -->
-<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.79 -->
<!-- This file is automatically generated by GNUnited Nations! -->
<title>¿Ha dicho «propiedad intelectual»? Es solo un espejismo seductor -
Proyecto
@@ -257,6 +257,10 @@
href="http://torrentfreak.com/language-matters-framing-the-copyright-monopoly-so-we-can-keep-our-liberties-130714/";>
Rickard Falkvinge apoya el rechazo de esta expresión</a>.</p>
+<p><a
+href="http://www.locusmag.com/Perspectives/2016/11/cory-doctorow-sole-and-despotic-dominion/";>
+Cory Doctorow también rechaza</a> el término «propiedad intelectual».</p>
+
<div class="translators-notes">
<!--TRANSLATORS: Use space (SPC) as msgstr if you don't have notes.-->
@@ -304,7 +308,7 @@
<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
- be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US. Please do NOT change or remove this
+ be under CC BY-ND 4.0. Please do NOT change or remove this
without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
@@ -318,11 +322,11 @@
There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright © 2004, 2006, 2010, 2013, 2015 Richard M. Stallman</p>
+<p>Copyright © 2004, 2006, 2010, 2013, 2015, 2016 Richard M. Stallman</p>
<p>Esta página está bajo licencia <a rel="license"
-href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/deed.es_ES";>Creative
-Commons Reconocimiento-SinObraDerivada 3.0 Estados Unidos de América</a>.</p>
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/deed.es_ES";>Creative
+Commons Reconocimiento-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional</a>.</p>
<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.es.html" -->
<div class="translators-credits">
@@ -333,7 +337,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Ãltima actualización:
-$Date: 2015/06/05 12:06:46 $
+$Date: 2016/11/11 09:29:17 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: philosophy/po/not-ipr.es-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.es-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.27
retrieving revision 1.28
diff -u -b -r1.27 -r1.28
--- philosophy/po/not-ipr.es-en.html 22 Apr 2015 09:30:33 -0000 1.27
+++ philosophy/po/not-ipr.es-en.html 11 Nov 2016 09:29:18 -0000 1.28
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
-<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.79 -->
<title>Did You Say “Intellectual Property”? It's a Seductive
Mirage
- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/not-ipr.translist" -->
@@ -241,6 +241,11 @@
<a
href="http://torrentfreak.com/language-matters-framing-the-copyright-monopoly-so-we-can-keep-our-liberties-130714/";>
Rickard Falkvinge supports rejection of this term</a>.</p>
+<p><a
+href="http://www.locusmag.com/Perspectives/2016/11/cory-doctorow-sole-and-despotic-dominion/";>
+Cory Doctorow also condemns</a> the term “intellectual
+property.”</p>
+
</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
<div id="footer">
@@ -273,7 +278,7 @@
<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
- be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US. Please do NOT change or remove this
+ be under CC BY-ND 4.0. Please do NOT change or remove this
without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
@@ -288,17 +293,17 @@
There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright © 2004, 2006, 2010, 2013, 2015 Richard M. Stallman</p>
+<p>Copyright © 2004, 2006, 2010, 2013, 2015, 2016 Richard M. Stallman</p>
<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
-href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/";>Creative
-Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>.</p>
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/";>Creative
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.</p>
<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2015/04/22 09:30:33 $
+$Date: 2016/11/11 09:29:18 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: proprietary/proprietary.es.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/proprietary.es.html,v
retrieving revision 1.12
retrieving revision 1.13
diff -u -b -r1.12 -r1.13
--- proprietary/proprietary.es.html 10 Sep 2016 11:28:25 -0000 1.12
+++ proprietary/proprietary.es.html 11 Nov 2016 09:29:18 -0000 1.13
@@ -22,26 +22,24 @@
<p>Software privativo, también llamado «software que no es libre», se
refiere
al software que <a href="/philosophy/free-sw.html">no respeta la libertad
-de los usuarios ni a su comunidad</a>. Esto significa que <a
-href="/philosophy/free-software-even-more-important.html">el desarrollador o
-propietario del programa tiene poder sobre los usuarios</a>. Tal poder es en
-sà mismo una injusticia.</p>
+de los usuarios ni a su comunidad</a>. Un programa privativo coloca a su
+desarrollador o propietario <a
+href="/philosophy/free-software-even-more-important.html"> en una posición
+de poder sobre sus usuarios</a>. Tal poder es en sà mismo una injusticia.</p>
<p>El objetivo de esta página es mostrar que la injusticia primordial del
software privativo a menudo conduce a otra injusticia: las funcionalidades
maliciosas.</p>
-<p>El poder corrompe, por lo que el desarrollador del programa privativo se
-siente tentado a introducir en el diseño del programa ciertas
-caracterÃsticas que maltratan a los usuarios, convirtiéndolo asà en
-<cite>malware</cite> («<cite>malware</cite>» se refiere al software cuyo
-funcionamiento maltrata al usuario). Por supuesto, el desarrollador no suele
-hacer esto por maldad, sino más bien para poner a los usuarios en
-desventaja. Eso no lo hace menos ruin o más legÃtimo.</p>
+<p>El poder corrompe. El desarrollador del programa privativo se ve tentado a
+diseñar el programa de un modo que maltrata a los usuarios (el software que
+maltrata a los usuarios se llama <cite>malware</cite>). Por supuesto, el
+desarrollador no suele hacer esto por maldad, sino más bien para obtener más
+beneficio a cota de los usuarios. Eso no lo hace menos ruin o más
legÃtimo.</p>
<p>Ceder a esta tentación se ha vuelto cada vez más frecuente, y es hoy en
dÃa
-una práctica habitual. ¡El software privativo moderno es software para
-papanatas!</p>
+una práctica habitual. El software privativo moderno es una manera habitual
+de ser engañado.</p>
<div class="toc">
<div class="companies">
@@ -172,7 +170,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Ãltima actualización:
-$Date: 2016/09/10 11:28:25 $
+$Date: 2016/11/11 09:29:18 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: proprietary/po/proprietary.es-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/po/proprietary.es-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -b -r1.8 -r1.9
--- proprietary/po/proprietary.es-en.html 10 Sep 2016 11:28:25 -0000
1.8
+++ proprietary/po/proprietary.es-en.html 11 Nov 2016 09:29:18 -0000
1.9
@@ -17,25 +17,25 @@
<p>Proprietary software, also called nonfree software,
means software that doesn't
<a href="/philosophy/free-sw.html">respect users' freedom and
-community</a>. This means that
+community</a>. A proprietary program puts its developer or owner
<a href="/philosophy/free-software-even-more-important.html">
-its developer or owner has power over its users.</a>
-This power is itself an injustice.</p>
+in a position of power over its users.</a>
+This power is in itself an injustice.</p>
<p>The point of this page is that the initial injustice of proprietary
software often leads to further injustices: malicious
functionalities.</p>
-<p>Power corrupts, so the proprietary program's developer is tempted
-to design the program to mistreat its users—that is, to make
-it <em>malware</em>. (Malware means software whose functioning
-mistreats the user.) Of course, the developer usually does not do
-this out of malice, but rather to put the users at a disadvantage.
-That does not make it any less nasty or more legitimate.</p>
+<p>Power corrupts; the proprietary program's developer is tempted to
+design the program to mistreat its users. (Software whose functioning
+mistreats the user is called <em>malware</em>.) Of course, the
+developer usually does not do this out of malice, but rather to profit
+more at the users' expense. That does not make it any less nasty or
+more legitimate.</p>
<p>Yielding to that temptation has become ever more frequent; nowadays
-it is standard practice. Modern proprietary software is software for
-suckers!</p>
+it is standard practice. Modern proprietary software is typically
+a way to be had.</p>
<div class="toc">
<div class="companies">
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2016/09/10 11:28:25 $
+$Date: 2016/11/11 09:29:18 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
| [Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- www philosophy/not-ipr.es.html philosophy/po/no...,
GNUN <=