[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point....
|
From: |
GNUN |
|
Subject: |
www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point.... |
|
Date: |
Fri, 01 Jan 2016 17:01:38 +0000 |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: GNUN <gnun> 16/01/01 17:01:38
Modified files:
philosophy/po : open-source-misses-the-point.ar-diff.html
open-source-misses-the-point.ar.po
open-source-misses-the-point.bg.po
open-source-misses-the-point.de.po
open-source-misses-the-point.el.po
open-source-misses-the-point.es.po
open-source-misses-the-point.fa.po
open-source-misses-the-point.fr.po
open-source-misses-the-point.hr-diff.html
open-source-misses-the-point.hr.po
open-source-misses-the-point.it.po
open-source-misses-the-point.ja.po
open-source-misses-the-point.lt.po
open-source-misses-the-point.ml.po
open-source-misses-the-point.nl-diff.html
open-source-misses-the-point.nl.po
open-source-misses-the-point.pl.po
open-source-misses-the-point.pot
open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br-diff.html
open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br.po
open-source-misses-the-point.ro.po
open-source-misses-the-point.ru.po
open-source-misses-the-point.sq.po
open-source-misses-the-point.tr.po
open-source-misses-the-point.uk.po
open-source-misses-the-point.zh-cn-diff.html
open-source-misses-the-point.zh-cn.po
who-does-that-server-really-serve.ar.po
who-does-that-server-really-serve.es.po
who-does-that-server-really-serve.fr.po
who-does-that-server-really-serve.hr-diff.html
who-does-that-server-really-serve.hr.po
who-does-that-server-really-serve.it.po
who-does-that-server-really-serve.ja.po
who-does-that-server-really-serve.ko-diff.html
who-does-that-server-really-serve.ko.po
who-does-that-server-really-serve.pl.po
who-does-that-server-really-serve.pot
who-does-that-server-really-serve.ro.po
who-does-that-server-really-serve.ru.po
who-does-that-server-really-serve.uk.po
Log message:
Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ar-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.16&r2=1.17
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ar.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.65&r2=1.66
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.bg.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.41&r2=1.42
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.de.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.76&r2=1.77
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.el.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.8&r2=1.9
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.es.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.88&r2=1.89
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.fa.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.50&r2=1.51
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.fr.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.87&r2=1.88
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.hr-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.7&r2=1.8
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.hr.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.27&r2=1.28
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.it.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.62&r2=1.63
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ja.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.58&r2=1.59
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.lt.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.6&r2=1.7
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ml.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.45&r2=1.46
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.nl-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.21&r2=1.22
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.nl.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.33&r2=1.34
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pl.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.61&r2=1.62
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pot?cvsroot=www&r1=1.39&r2=1.40
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.25&r2=1.26
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.26&r2=1.27
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ro.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.33&r2=1.34
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ru.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.80&r2=1.81
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.sq.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.59&r2=1.60
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.tr.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.34&r2=1.35
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.uk.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.28&r2=1.29
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.zh-cn-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.14&r2=1.15
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.zh-cn.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.38&r2=1.39
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/who-does-that-server-really-serve.ar.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.41&r2=1.42
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/who-does-that-server-really-serve.es.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.50&r2=1.51
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/who-does-that-server-really-serve.fr.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.52&r2=1.53
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/who-does-that-server-really-serve.hr-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.15&r2=1.16
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/who-does-that-server-really-serve.hr.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.13&r2=1.14
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/who-does-that-server-really-serve.it.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.17&r2=1.18
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/who-does-that-server-really-serve.ja.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.27&r2=1.28
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/who-does-that-server-really-serve.ko-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.22&r2=1.23
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/who-does-that-server-really-serve.ko.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.20&r2=1.21
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/who-does-that-server-really-serve.pl.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.62&r2=1.63
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/who-does-that-server-really-serve.pot?cvsroot=www&r1=1.35&r2=1.36
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/who-does-that-server-really-serve.ro.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.24&r2=1.25
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/who-does-that-server-really-serve.ru.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.48&r2=1.49
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/who-does-that-server-really-serve.uk.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.14&r2=1.15
Patches:
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.ar-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ar-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.16
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -u -b -r1.16 -r1.17
--- open-source-misses-the-point.ar-diff.html 1 Jan 2016 06:06:08 -0000
1.16
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.ar-diff.html 1 Jan 2016 17:01:33 -0000
1.17
@@ -106,14 +106,14 @@
<h3>Practical Differences between Free Software and Open
Source</h3>
-<p>In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than
-those of free software. As far as we know, all existing free software
-would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software is free
-software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source licenses
-are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>For
-example, “Open Watcom” is nonfree because its license does
-not allow making a modified version and using it privately.</em></ins></span>
-Fortunately, few programs use <span
class="removed"><del><strong>those</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>such</em></ins></span> licenses.</p>
+<p>In practice, open source stands for criteria a little <span
class="removed"><del><strong>weaker</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>looser</em></ins></span> than
+those of free software. As far as we know, all existing <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>released</em></ins></span> free
+software <span class="inserted"><ins><em>source code</em></ins></span> would
qualify as open source. Nearly all open
+source software is free software, but there are exceptions. First,
+some open source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify
+as free licenses. <span class="inserted"><ins><em>For example, “Open
Watcom” is nonfree
+because its license does not allow making a modified version and using
+it privately.</em></ins></span> Fortunately, few programs use <span
class="removed"><del><strong>those</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>such</em></ins></span> licenses.</p>
<p>Second, and more <span
class="removed"><del><strong>important,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>important in practice,</em></ins></span> many
products containing
computers
@@ -478,7 +478,7 @@
<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p
class="unprintable">Updated:</em></ins></span>
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2016/01/01 06:06:08 $
+$Date: 2016/01/01 17:01:33 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.ar.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ar.po,v
retrieving revision 1.65
retrieving revision 1.66
diff -u -b -r1.65 -r1.66
--- open-source-misses-the-point.ar.po 1 Jan 2016 06:06:08 -0000 1.65
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.ar.po 1 Jan 2016 17:01:33 -0000 1.66
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 05:56+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 16:55+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2014-09-27 17:26+0100\n"
"Last-Translator: Rafik E. Younan <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Arabic <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -236,14 +236,14 @@
#| "too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. Fortunately, "
#| "few programs use those licenses."
msgid ""
-"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those of "
-"free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would qualify "
-"as open source. Nearly all open source software is free software, but there "
-"are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so "
-"they do not qualify as free licenses. For example, “Open "
-"Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not allow making a "
-"modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such "
-"licenses."
+"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of "
+"free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
+"source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software "
+"is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source "
+"licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For "
+"example, “Open Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not "
+"allow making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few "
+"programs use such licenses."
msgstr ""
"عÙ
ÙÙاÙØ ØªÙ
Ø«Ù Ù
ÙتÙØØ© اÙÙ
صدر Ù
عاÙÙر أضع٠Ù
Ù
اÙبرÙ
جÙات اÙØرة. عÙÙ Øد عÙÙ
ÙØ§Ø ÙÙ "
"اÙبرÙ
جÙات اÙØرة Ù
ؤÙÙØ© Ùأ٠تعتبر Ù
ÙتÙØØ© اÙÙ
صدر. تÙرÙبا٠Ù٠اÙبرÙ
جÙات Ù
ÙتÙØØ© "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.bg.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.bg.po,v
retrieving revision 1.41
retrieving revision 1.42
diff -u -b -r1.41 -r1.42
--- open-source-misses-the-point.bg.po 1 Jan 2016 06:06:09 -0000 1.41
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.bg.po 1 Jan 2016 17:01:33 -0000 1.42
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 05:56+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 16:55+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2009-10-28 14:55+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Yavor Doganov <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Bulgarian <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -257,14 +257,14 @@
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
-"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those of "
-"free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would qualify "
-"as open source. Nearly all open source software is free software, but there "
-"are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so "
-"they do not qualify as free licenses. For example, “Open "
-"Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not allow making a "
-"modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such "
-"licenses."
+"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of "
+"free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
+"source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software "
+"is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source "
+"licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For "
+"example, “Open Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not "
+"allow making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few "
+"programs use such licenses."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <p>
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.de.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.de.po,v
retrieving revision 1.76
retrieving revision 1.77
diff -u -b -r1.76 -r1.77
--- open-source-misses-the-point.de.po 1 Jan 2016 06:06:09 -0000 1.76
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.de.po 1 Jan 2016 17:01:33 -0000 1.77
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: address@hidden"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 05:56+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 16:55+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2015-09-02 22:00+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Jоегg Kоhпе <joeko (AT) online [PUNKT] de>\n"
"Language-Team: www-de <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -229,15 +229,33 @@
"Software</em>"
#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid ""
-"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those of "
-"free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would qualify "
-"as open source. Nearly all open source software is free software, but there "
-"are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so "
-"they do not qualify as free licenses. For example, “Open "
-"Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not allow making a "
-"modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such "
-"licenses."
+# | In practice, open source stands for criteria a little [-weaker-]
+# | {+looser+} than those of free software. As far as we know, all existing
+# | {+released+} free software {+source code+} would qualify as open source.
+# | Nearly all open source software is free software, but there are
+# | exceptions. First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so they
+# | do not qualify as free licenses. For example, “Open Watcom”
+# | is nonfree because its license does not allow making a modified version
+# | and using it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such licenses.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those "
+#| "of free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would "
+#| "qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software is free "
+#| "software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are "
+#| "too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For example, "
+#| "“Open Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not allow "
+#| "making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few "
+#| "programs use such licenses."
+msgid ""
+"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of "
+"free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
+"source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software "
+"is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source "
+"licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For "
+"example, “Open Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not "
+"allow making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few "
+"programs use such licenses."
msgstr ""
"In der Praxis steht Open Source für Kriterien, die ein wenig schwächer als "
"Freie Software sind. Soweit wir wissen, würde sämtliche Freie Software die "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.el.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.el.po,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -b -r1.8 -r1.9
--- open-source-misses-the-point.el.po 1 Jan 2016 06:06:09 -0000 1.8
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.el.po 1 Jan 2016 17:01:33 -0000 1.9
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 05:56+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 16:55+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: YEAR-MO-DA HO:MI+ZONE\n"
"Last-Translator: FULL NAME <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: LANGUAGE <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -297,14 +297,14 @@
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
-"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those of "
-"free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would qualify "
-"as open source. Nearly all open source software is free software, but there "
-"are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so "
-"they do not qualify as free licenses. For example, “Open "
-"Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not allow making a "
-"modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such "
-"licenses."
+"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of "
+"free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
+"source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software "
+"is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source "
+"licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For "
+"example, “Open Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not "
+"allow making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few "
+"programs use such licenses."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <p>
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.es.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.es.po,v
retrieving revision 1.88
retrieving revision 1.89
diff -u -b -r1.88 -r1.89
--- open-source-misses-the-point.es.po 1 Jan 2016 06:06:09 -0000 1.88
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.es.po 1 Jan 2016 17:01:33 -0000 1.89
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 05:56+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 16:55+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: \n"
"Last-Translator: Dora Scilipoti <dora AT gnu DOT org>\n"
"Language-Team: Spanish <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -242,15 +242,33 @@
msgstr "Diferencias prácticas entre software libre y código abierto"
#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid ""
-"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those of "
-"free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would qualify "
-"as open source. Nearly all open source software is free software, but there "
-"are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so "
-"they do not qualify as free licenses. For example, “Open "
-"Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not allow making a "
-"modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such "
-"licenses."
+# | In practice, open source stands for criteria a little [-weaker-]
+# | {+looser+} than those of free software. As far as we know, all existing
+# | {+released+} free software {+source code+} would qualify as open source.
+# | Nearly all open source software is free software, but there are
+# | exceptions. First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so they
+# | do not qualify as free licenses. For example, “Open Watcom”
+# | is nonfree because its license does not allow making a modified version
+# | and using it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such licenses.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those "
+#| "of free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would "
+#| "qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software is free "
+#| "software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are "
+#| "too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For example, "
+#| "“Open Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not allow "
+#| "making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few "
+#| "programs use such licenses."
+msgid ""
+"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of "
+"free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
+"source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software "
+"is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source "
+"licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For "
+"example, “Open Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not "
+"allow making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few "
+"programs use such licenses."
msgstr ""
"En la práctica, el código abierto sostiene criterios un poco más débiles
que "
"los del software libre. Por lo que sabemos, todo el software libre existente "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.fa.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.fa.po,v
retrieving revision 1.50
retrieving revision 1.51
diff -u -b -r1.50 -r1.51
--- open-source-misses-the-point.fa.po 1 Jan 2016 06:06:09 -0000 1.50
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.fa.po 1 Jan 2016 17:01:34 -0000 1.51
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 05:56+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 16:55+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2011-01-16 23:22+0330\n"
"Last-Translator: Mahyar Moghimi <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Persian <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -242,14 +242,14 @@
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
-"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those of "
-"free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would qualify "
-"as open source. Nearly all open source software is free software, but there "
-"are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so "
-"they do not qualify as free licenses. For example, “Open "
-"Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not allow making a "
-"modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such "
-"licenses."
+"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of "
+"free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
+"source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software "
+"is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source "
+"licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For "
+"example, “Open Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not "
+"allow making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few "
+"programs use such licenses."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <p>
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.fr.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.fr.po,v
retrieving revision 1.87
retrieving revision 1.88
diff -u -b -r1.87 -r1.88
--- open-source-misses-the-point.fr.po 1 Jan 2016 09:41:19 -0000 1.87
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.fr.po 1 Jan 2016 17:01:34 -0000 1.88
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 05:56+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 16:55+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2016-01-01 10:39+0100\n"
"Last-Translator: Thérèse Godefroy <godef.th AT free.fr>\n"
"Language-Team: French <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"X-Outdated-Since: 2016-01-01 16:55+0000\n"
"Plural-Forms: \n"
"X-Generator: Gtranslator 2.91.5\n"
@@ -231,15 +232,33 @@
msgstr "Différences pratiques entre logiciel libre et open source"
#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid ""
-"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those of "
-"free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would qualify "
-"as open source. Nearly all open source software is free software, but there "
-"are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so "
-"they do not qualify as free licenses. For example, “Open "
-"Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not allow making a "
-"modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such "
-"licenses."
+# | In practice, open source stands for criteria a little [-weaker-]
+# | {+looser+} than those of free software. As far as we know, all existing
+# | {+released+} free software {+source code+} would qualify as open source.
+# | Nearly all open source software is free software, but there are
+# | exceptions. First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so they
+# | do not qualify as free licenses. For example, “Open Watcom”
+# | is nonfree because its license does not allow making a modified version
+# | and using it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such licenses.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those "
+#| "of free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would "
+#| "qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software is free "
+#| "software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are "
+#| "too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For example, "
+#| "“Open Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not allow "
+#| "making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few "
+#| "programs use such licenses."
+msgid ""
+"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of "
+"free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
+"source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software "
+"is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source "
+"licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For "
+"example, “Open Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not "
+"allow making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few "
+"programs use such licenses."
msgstr ""
"En pratique, l'open source défend des critères un peu plus faibles que ceux
"
"du logiciel libre. Ã notre connaissance, tous les logiciels libres existants
"
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.hr-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.hr-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.7
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -b -r1.7 -r1.8
--- open-source-misses-the-point.hr-diff.html 1 Jan 2016 06:06:10 -0000
1.7
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.hr-diff.html 1 Jan 2016 17:01:34 -0000
1.8
@@ -106,20 +106,20 @@
<h3>Practical Differences between Free Software and Open
Source</h3>
-<p>In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than
-those of free software. As far as we know, all existing free software
-would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software is free
-software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source licenses
-are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>For
-example, “Open Watcom” is nonfree because its license does
-not allow making a modified version and using it privately.</em></ins></span>
-Fortunately, few programs use <span
class="removed"><del><strong>those</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>such</em></ins></span> licenses.</p>
+<p>In practice, open source stands for criteria a little <span
class="removed"><del><strong>weaker</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>looser</em></ins></span> than
+those of free software. As far as we know, all existing <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>released</em></ins></span> free
+software <span class="inserted"><ins><em>source code</em></ins></span> would
qualify as open source. Nearly all open
+source software is free software, but there are exceptions. First,
+some open source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify
+as free licenses. <span class="inserted"><ins><em>For example, “Open
Watcom” is nonfree
+because its license does not allow making a modified version and using
+it privately.</em></ins></span> Fortunately, few programs use <span
class="removed"><del><strong>those</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>such</em></ins></span> licenses.</p>
<p>Second, and more <span
class="removed"><del><strong>important,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>important in practice,</em></ins></span> many
products containing
computers
<span class="removed"><del><strong>(including many Android devices) come
with</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>check signatures on
their</em></ins></span> executable programs <span
class="removed"><del><strong>that
-correspond to free software source code, but the devices do not allow
-the user</strong></del></span> to <span class="removed"><del><strong>install
modified versions of those</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>block users
+correspond</strong></del></span> to <span class="removed"><del><strong>free
software source code, but the devices do not allow
+the user to install modified versions of those</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>block users
from installing different</em></ins></span> executables; only one
<span class="removed"><del><strong>special</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>privileged</em></ins></span> company <span
class="removed"><del><strong>has</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>can
make executables that can run in</em></ins></span> the <span
class="removed"><del><strong>power to modify them.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>device or can access its full
@@ -476,7 +476,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2016/01/01 06:06:10 $
+$Date: 2016/01/01 17:01:34 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.hr.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.hr.po,v
retrieving revision 1.27
retrieving revision 1.28
diff -u -b -r1.27 -r1.28
--- open-source-misses-the-point.hr.po 1 Jan 2016 06:06:10 -0000 1.27
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.hr.po 1 Jan 2016 17:01:34 -0000 1.28
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 05:56+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 16:55+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2014-02-06 22:11+0100\n"
"Last-Translator: Martina Bebek <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: GNU Croatian Translation Team <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -219,14 +219,15 @@
msgstr "PraktiÄne razlike izmeÄu slobodnog softvera i otvorenog izvornog
koda"
#. type: Content of: <p>
-# | In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those of
-# | free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would
-# | qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software is free software,
-# | but there are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are too
-# | restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. {+For example,
-# | “Open Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not allow
-# | making a modified version and using it privately.+} Fortunately, few
-# | programs use [-those-] {+such+} licenses.
+# | In practice, open source stands for criteria a little [-weaker-]
+# | {+looser+} than those of free software. As far as we know, all existing
+# | {+released+} free software {+source code+} would qualify as open source.
+# | Nearly all open source software is free software, but there are
+# | exceptions. First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so they
+# | do not qualify as free licenses. {+For example, “Open Watcom”
+# | is nonfree because its license does not allow making a modified version
+# | and using it privately.+} Fortunately, few programs use [-those-]
+# | {+such+} licenses.
#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those "
@@ -236,14 +237,14 @@
#| "too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. Fortunately, "
#| "few programs use those licenses."
msgid ""
-"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those of "
-"free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would qualify "
-"as open source. Nearly all open source software is free software, but there "
-"are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so "
-"they do not qualify as free licenses. For example, “Open "
-"Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not allow making a "
-"modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such "
-"licenses."
+"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of "
+"free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
+"source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software "
+"is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source "
+"licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For "
+"example, “Open Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not "
+"allow making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few "
+"programs use such licenses."
msgstr ""
"U praksi, otvoreni izvorni kod se zalaže za malo slabije kriterije od onih "
"slobodnog softvera. Koliko znamo, sav postojeÄi slobodan softver bi se "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.it.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.it.po,v
retrieving revision 1.62
retrieving revision 1.63
diff -u -b -r1.62 -r1.63
--- open-source-misses-the-point.it.po 1 Jan 2016 06:06:10 -0000 1.62
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.it.po 1 Jan 2016 17:01:34 -0000 1.63
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 05:56+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 16:55+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2015-09-08 09:37+0100\n"
"Last-Translator: Andrea Pescetti <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Italian\n"
@@ -226,15 +226,33 @@
msgstr "Differenze pratiche tra software libero e open source"
#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid ""
-"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those of "
-"free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would qualify "
-"as open source. Nearly all open source software is free software, but there "
-"are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so "
-"they do not qualify as free licenses. For example, “Open "
-"Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not allow making a "
-"modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such "
-"licenses."
+# | In practice, open source stands for criteria a little [-weaker-]
+# | {+looser+} than those of free software. As far as we know, all existing
+# | {+released+} free software {+source code+} would qualify as open source.
+# | Nearly all open source software is free software, but there are
+# | exceptions. First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so they
+# | do not qualify as free licenses. For example, “Open Watcom”
+# | is nonfree because its license does not allow making a modified version
+# | and using it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such licenses.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those "
+#| "of free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would "
+#| "qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software is free "
+#| "software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are "
+#| "too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For example, "
+#| "“Open Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not allow "
+#| "making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few "
+#| "programs use such licenses."
+msgid ""
+"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of "
+"free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
+"source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software "
+"is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source "
+"licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For "
+"example, “Open Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not "
+"allow making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few "
+"programs use such licenses."
msgstr ""
"In pratica, open source indica criteri leggermente più deboli di quelli "
"previsti per il software libero. Per quanto ne sappiamo, tutto il software "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.ja.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ja.po,v
retrieving revision 1.58
retrieving revision 1.59
diff -u -b -r1.58 -r1.59
--- open-source-misses-the-point.ja.po 1 Jan 2016 06:06:10 -0000 1.58
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.ja.po 1 Jan 2016 17:01:34 -0000 1.59
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 05:56+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 16:55+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2015-12-01 08:53+0900\n"
"Last-Translator: NIIBE Yutaka <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Japanese <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -212,15 +212,25 @@
msgstr "èªç±ã½ããã¦ã§ã¢ã¨ãªã¼ãã³ã½ã¼ã¹ã®ç¾å®çãªç¸é"
#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid ""
-"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those of "
-"free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would qualify "
-"as open source. Nearly all open source software is free software, but there "
-"are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so "
-"they do not qualify as free licenses. For example, “Open "
-"Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not allow making a "
-"modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such "
-"licenses."
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those "
+#| "of free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would "
+#| "qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software is free "
+#| "software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are "
+#| "too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For example, "
+#| "“Open Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not allow "
+#| "making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few "
+#| "programs use such licenses."
+msgid ""
+"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of "
+"free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
+"source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software "
+"is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source "
+"licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For "
+"example, “Open Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not "
+"allow making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few "
+"programs use such licenses."
msgstr ""
"å®éããªã¼ãã³ã½ã¼ã¹ã¯èªç±ã½ããã¦ã§ã¢ã®ãã®ãããå¼±ãåºæºã«ç«èãã¾ãããã"
"ããã¡ã®ç¥ãéããæ¢åã®ãã¹ã¦ã®èªç±ã½ããã¦ã§ã¢ã¯ãªã¼ãã³ã½ã¼ã¹ã¨ãã¦é©æ
¼ã§"
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.lt.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.lt.po,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -b -r1.6 -r1.7
--- open-source-misses-the-point.lt.po 1 Jan 2016 06:06:10 -0000 1.6
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.lt.po 1 Jan 2016 17:01:34 -0000 1.7
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 05:56+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 16:55+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2015-09-12 22:03+0300\n"
"Last-Translator: Donatas Klimašauskas <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Lithuanian <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -224,15 +224,25 @@
"Praktiniai skirtumai tarp laisvos programinÄs įrangos ir atviro Å¡altinio"
#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid ""
-"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those of "
-"free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would qualify "
-"as open source. Nearly all open source software is free software, but there "
-"are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so "
-"they do not qualify as free licenses. For example, “Open "
-"Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not allow making a "
-"modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such "
-"licenses."
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those "
+#| "of free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would "
+#| "qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software is free "
+#| "software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are "
+#| "too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For example, "
+#| "“Open Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not allow "
+#| "making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few "
+#| "programs use such licenses."
+msgid ""
+"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of "
+"free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
+"source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software "
+"is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source "
+"licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For "
+"example, “Open Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not "
+"allow making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few "
+"programs use such licenses."
msgstr ""
"Praktikoje, atviras Å¡altinis atstovauja kriterijus, kurie yra Å¡iek tiek "
"silpnesni, nei laisvos programinÄs įrangos. Kiek mes žinome, visÄ
"
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.ml.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ml.po,v
retrieving revision 1.45
retrieving revision 1.46
diff -u -b -r1.45 -r1.46
--- open-source-misses-the-point.ml.po 1 Jan 2016 06:06:10 -0000 1.45
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.ml.po 1 Jan 2016 17:01:34 -0000 1.46
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html 1\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 05:56+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 16:55+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2010-07-13 08:18+0530\n"
"Last-Translator: Shyam Karanattu <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Swathanthra Malayalam Computing <address@hidden"
@@ -296,14 +296,14 @@
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
-"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those of "
-"free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would qualify "
-"as open source. Nearly all open source software is free software, but there "
-"are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so "
-"they do not qualify as free licenses. For example, “Open "
-"Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not allow making a "
-"modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such "
-"licenses."
+"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of "
+"free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
+"source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software "
+"is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source "
+"licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For "
+"example, “Open Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not "
+"allow making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few "
+"programs use such licenses."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <p>
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.nl-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.nl-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.21
retrieving revision 1.22
diff -u -b -r1.21 -r1.22
--- open-source-misses-the-point.nl-diff.html 1 Jan 2016 06:06:10 -0000
1.21
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.nl-diff.html 1 Jan 2016 17:01:35 -0000
1.22
@@ -106,14 +106,14 @@
<h3>Practical Differences between Free Software and Open
Source</h3>
-<p>In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than
-those of free software. As far as we know, all existing free software
-would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software is free
-software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source licenses
-are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For
-example, “Open Watcom” is nonfree because its license does
-not allow making a modified version and using it privately.
-Fortunately, few programs use such licenses.</p>
+<p>In practice, open source stands for criteria a little <span
class="removed"><del><strong>weaker</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>looser</em></ins></span> than
+those of free software. As far as we know, all existing <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>released</em></ins></span> free
+software <span class="inserted"><ins><em>source code</em></ins></span> would
qualify as open source. Nearly all open
+source software is free software, but there are exceptions. First,
+some open source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify
+as free licenses. For example, “Open Watcom” is nonfree
+because its license does not allow making a modified version and using
+it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such licenses.</p>
<p>Second, and more important in practice, many products containing
computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users
@@ -470,7 +470,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2016/01/01 06:06:10 $
+$Date: 2016/01/01 17:01:35 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.nl.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.nl.po,v
retrieving revision 1.33
retrieving revision 1.34
diff -u -b -r1.33 -r1.34
--- open-source-misses-the-point.nl.po 1 Jan 2016 06:06:11 -0000 1.33
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.nl.po 1 Jan 2016 17:01:35 -0000 1.34
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 05:56+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 16:55+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: \n"
"Last-Translator: Tom Uijldert <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Dutch\n"
@@ -218,15 +218,33 @@
msgstr "Praktische verschillen tussen Vrije Software en Open Source"
#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid ""
-"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those of "
-"free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would qualify "
-"as open source. Nearly all open source software is free software, but there "
-"are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so "
-"they do not qualify as free licenses. For example, “Open "
-"Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not allow making a "
-"modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such "
-"licenses."
+# | In practice, open source stands for criteria a little [-weaker-]
+# | {+looser+} than those of free software. As far as we know, all existing
+# | {+released+} free software {+source code+} would qualify as open source.
+# | Nearly all open source software is free software, but there are
+# | exceptions. First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so they
+# | do not qualify as free licenses. For example, “Open Watcom”
+# | is nonfree because its license does not allow making a modified version
+# | and using it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such licenses.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those "
+#| "of free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would "
+#| "qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software is free "
+#| "software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are "
+#| "too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For example, "
+#| "“Open Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not allow "
+#| "making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few "
+#| "programs use such licenses."
+msgid ""
+"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of "
+"free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
+"source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software "
+"is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source "
+"licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For "
+"example, “Open Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not "
+"allow making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few "
+"programs use such licenses."
msgstr ""
"Praktisch gesproken hanteert “open source” (nvdv: open broncode) "
"minder strikte criteria dan vrije software. Voor zover wij weten voldoet "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.pl.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pl.po,v
retrieving revision 1.61
retrieving revision 1.62
diff -u -b -r1.61 -r1.62
--- open-source-misses-the-point.pl.po 1 Jan 2016 06:06:11 -0000 1.61
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.pl.po 1 Jan 2016 17:01:35 -0000 1.62
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: Why Open Source misses the point of Free Software\n"
"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 05:56+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 16:55+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2015-10-31 20:44-0600\n"
"Last-Translator: Jan Owoc <jsowoc AT gmail.com>\n"
"Language-Team: Polish <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -236,15 +236,33 @@
"oprogramowaniem"
#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid ""
-"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those of "
-"free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would qualify "
-"as open source. Nearly all open source software is free software, but there "
-"are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so "
-"they do not qualify as free licenses. For example, “Open "
-"Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not allow making a "
-"modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such "
-"licenses."
+# | In practice, open source stands for criteria a little [-weaker-]
+# | {+looser+} than those of free software. As far as we know, all existing
+# | {+released+} free software {+source code+} would qualify as open source.
+# | Nearly all open source software is free software, but there are
+# | exceptions. First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so they
+# | do not qualify as free licenses. For example, “Open Watcom”
+# | is nonfree because its license does not allow making a modified version
+# | and using it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such licenses.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those "
+#| "of free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would "
+#| "qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software is free "
+#| "software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are "
+#| "too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For example, "
+#| "“Open Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not allow "
+#| "making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few "
+#| "programs use such licenses."
+msgid ""
+"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of "
+"free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
+"source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software "
+"is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source "
+"licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For "
+"example, “Open Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not "
+"allow making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few "
+"programs use such licenses."
msgstr ""
"W praktyce, otwarte oprogramowanie opowiada siÄ za kryteriami "
"nieco sÅabszymi od wolnego oprogramowania. Z tego, co wiemy, "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.pot
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pot,v
retrieving revision 1.39
retrieving revision 1.40
diff -u -b -r1.39 -r1.40
--- open-source-misses-the-point.pot 1 Jan 2016 06:06:11 -0000 1.39
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.pot 1 Jan 2016 17:01:35 -0000 1.40
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 05:56+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 16:55+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: YEAR-MO-DA HO:MI+ZONE\n"
"Last-Translator: FULL NAME <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: LANGUAGE <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -145,14 +145,14 @@
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
-"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those of "
-"free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would qualify "
-"as open source. Nearly all open source software is free software, but there "
-"are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so "
-"they do not qualify as free licenses. For example, “Open "
-"Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not allow making a "
-"modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such "
-"licenses."
+"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of "
+"free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
+"source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software "
+"is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source "
+"licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For "
+"example, “Open Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not "
+"allow making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few "
+"programs use such licenses."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <p>
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file:
/web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.25
retrieving revision 1.26
diff -u -b -r1.25 -r1.26
--- open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br-diff.html 1 Jan 2016 06:06:11
-0000 1.25
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br-diff.html 1 Jan 2016 17:01:35
-0000 1.26
@@ -109,14 +109,14 @@
<span class="inserted"><ins><em><h3>Practical Differences between Free
Software and Open Source</h3>
-<p>In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than
-those of free software. As far as we know, all existing free software
-would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software is free
-software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source licenses
-are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For
-example, “Open Watcom” is nonfree because its license does
-not allow making a modified version and using it privately.
-Fortunately, few programs use such licenses.</p>
+<p>In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than
+those of free software. As far as we know, all existing released free
+software source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open
+source software is free software, but there are exceptions. First,
+some open source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify
+as free licenses. For example, “Open Watcom” is nonfree
+because its license does not allow making a modified version and using
+it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such licenses.</p>
<p>Second, and more important in practice, many products containing
computers check signatures on their executable programs to block users
@@ -493,7 +493,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:</em></ins></span>
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2016/01/01 06:06:11 $
+$Date: 2016/01/01 17:01:35 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br.po,v
retrieving revision 1.26
retrieving revision 1.27
diff -u -b -r1.26 -r1.27
--- open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br.po 1 Jan 2016 06:06:11 -0000
1.26
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br.po 1 Jan 2016 17:01:35 -0000
1.27
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 05:56+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 16:55+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2012-05-29 15:01-0300\n"
"Last-Translator: Rafael Beraldo <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Brazilian Portuguese <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -229,14 +229,14 @@
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
-"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those of "
-"free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would qualify "
-"as open source. Nearly all open source software is free software, but there "
-"are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so "
-"they do not qualify as free licenses. For example, “Open "
-"Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not allow making a "
-"modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such "
-"licenses."
+"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of "
+"free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
+"source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software "
+"is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source "
+"licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For "
+"example, “Open Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not "
+"allow making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few "
+"programs use such licenses."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <p>
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.ro.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ro.po,v
retrieving revision 1.33
retrieving revision 1.34
diff -u -b -r1.33 -r1.34
--- open-source-misses-the-point.ro.po 1 Jan 2016 06:06:11 -0000 1.33
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.ro.po 1 Jan 2016 17:01:35 -0000 1.34
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 05:56+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 16:55+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2010-08-27 20:00+0300\n"
"Last-Translator: CÄtÄlin Frâncu <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Romanian <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -237,14 +237,14 @@
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
-"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those of "
-"free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would qualify "
-"as open source. Nearly all open source software is free software, but there "
-"are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so "
-"they do not qualify as free licenses. For example, “Open "
-"Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not allow making a "
-"modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such "
-"licenses."
+"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of "
+"free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
+"source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software "
+"is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source "
+"licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For "
+"example, “Open Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not "
+"allow making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few "
+"programs use such licenses."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <p>
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.ru.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ru.po,v
retrieving revision 1.80
retrieving revision 1.81
diff -u -b -r1.80 -r1.81
--- open-source-misses-the-point.ru.po 1 Jan 2016 13:12:47 -0000 1.80
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.ru.po 1 Jan 2016 17:01:35 -0000 1.81
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 05:56+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 16:55+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2016-01-01 17:17+0000\n"
"Last-Translator: Ineiev <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Russian <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"X-Outdated-Since: 2016-01-01 16:55+0000\n"
# type: Content of: <title>
#. type: Content of: <title>
@@ -240,15 +241,33 @@
"ÑекÑÑом"
#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid ""
-"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those of "
-"free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would qualify "
-"as open source. Nearly all open source software is free software, but there "
-"are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so "
-"they do not qualify as free licenses. For example, “Open "
-"Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not allow making a "
-"modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such "
-"licenses."
+# | In practice, open source stands for criteria a little [-weaker-]
+# | {+looser+} than those of free software. As far as we know, all existing
+# | {+released+} free software {+source code+} would qualify as open source.
+# | Nearly all open source software is free software, but there are
+# | exceptions. First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so they
+# | do not qualify as free licenses. For example, “Open Watcom”
+# | is nonfree because its license does not allow making a modified version
+# | and using it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such licenses.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those "
+#| "of free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would "
+#| "qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software is free "
+#| "software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are "
+#| "too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For example, "
+#| "“Open Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not allow "
+#| "making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few "
+#| "programs use such licenses."
+msgid ""
+"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of "
+"free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
+"source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software "
+"is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source "
+"licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For "
+"example, “Open Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not "
+"allow making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few "
+"programs use such licenses."
msgstr ""
"Ðа пÑакÑике оÑкÑÑÑÑй иÑÑ
однÑй ÑекÑÑ
ознаÑÐ°ÐµÑ Ð½ÐµÐ¼Ð½Ð¾Ð³Ð¾ более ÑлабÑе кÑиÑеÑии, "
"Ñем кÑиÑеÑии ÑвободнÑÑ
пÑогÑамм.
ÐаÑколÑко Ð¼Ñ Ð·Ð½Ð°ÐµÐ¼, вÑе ÑÑÑеÑÑвÑÑÑие "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.sq.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.sq.po,v
retrieving revision 1.59
retrieving revision 1.60
diff -u -b -r1.59 -r1.60
--- open-source-misses-the-point.sq.po 1 Jan 2016 06:06:12 -0000 1.59
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.sq.po 1 Jan 2016 17:01:35 -0000 1.60
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 05:56+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 16:55+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2015-10-01 12:08+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Besnik Bleta <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: LANGUAGE <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -220,15 +220,25 @@
msgstr "Dallime Praktike mes Software-it të Lirë dhe Burimit të Hapur"
#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid ""
-"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those of "
-"free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would qualify "
-"as open source. Nearly all open source software is free software, but there "
-"are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so "
-"they do not qualify as free licenses. For example, “Open "
-"Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not allow making a "
-"modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such "
-"licenses."
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those "
+#| "of free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would "
+#| "qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software is free "
+#| "software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are "
+#| "too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For example, "
+#| "“Open Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not allow "
+#| "making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few "
+#| "programs use such licenses."
+msgid ""
+"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of "
+"free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
+"source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software "
+"is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source "
+"licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For "
+"example, “Open Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not "
+"allow making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few "
+"programs use such licenses."
msgstr ""
"Në praktikë, burimi i hapur mishëron një kriter paksa më të dobët se
sa ato "
"të software-it të lirë. Me aq sa dimë, krejt software-i i lirë mund të
"
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.tr.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.tr.po,v
retrieving revision 1.34
retrieving revision 1.35
diff -u -b -r1.34 -r1.35
--- open-source-misses-the-point.tr.po 1 Jan 2016 06:06:12 -0000 1.34
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.tr.po 1 Jan 2016 17:01:36 -0000 1.35
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 05:56+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 16:55+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2010-05-16 16:54+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Tahir Emre Kalaycı <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Turkish <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -257,14 +257,14 @@
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
-"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those of "
-"free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would qualify "
-"as open source. Nearly all open source software is free software, but there "
-"are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so "
-"they do not qualify as free licenses. For example, “Open "
-"Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not allow making a "
-"modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such "
-"licenses."
+"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of "
+"free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
+"source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software "
+"is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source "
+"licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For "
+"example, “Open Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not "
+"allow making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few "
+"programs use such licenses."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <p>
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.uk.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.uk.po,v
retrieving revision 1.28
retrieving revision 1.29
diff -u -b -r1.28 -r1.29
--- open-source-misses-the-point.uk.po 1 Jan 2016 08:29:43 -0000 1.28
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.uk.po 1 Jan 2016 17:01:36 -0000 1.29
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 05:56+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 16:55+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2016-01-01 09:24+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Andriy Bandura <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Ukrainian <>\n"
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: ENCODINGLanguage: uk\n"
+"X-Outdated-Since: 2016-01-01 16:55+0000\n"
"Plural-Forms: nplurals=3; plural=(n%10==1 && n%100!=11 ? 0 : n%10>=2 && n"
"%10<=4 && (n%100<10 || n%100>=20) ? 1 : 2);\n"
"X-Generator: Lokalize 2.0\n"
@@ -224,15 +225,25 @@
"ÐÑакÑиÑÐ½Ñ Ð²ÑдмÑнноÑÑÑ Ð¼Ñж вÑлÑними
пÑогÑамами Ñ Ð²ÑдкÑиÑим виÑ
Ñдним кодом"
#. type: Content of: <p>
-msgid ""
-"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those of "
-"free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would qualify "
-"as open source. Nearly all open source software is free software, but there "
-"are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so "
-"they do not qualify as free licenses. For example, “Open "
-"Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not allow making a "
-"modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such "
-"licenses."
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those "
+#| "of free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would "
+#| "qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software is free "
+#| "software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are "
+#| "too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For example, "
+#| "“Open Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not allow "
+#| "making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few "
+#| "programs use such licenses."
+msgid ""
+"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of "
+"free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
+"source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software "
+"is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source "
+"licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For "
+"example, “Open Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not "
+"allow making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few "
+"programs use such licenses."
msgstr ""
"Ðа пÑакÑиÑÑ Ð²ÑдкÑиÑий виÑ
Ñдний ÑекÑÑ
ознаÑÐ°Ñ ÑÑоÑ
и ÑлабÑÑ ÐºÑиÑеÑÑÑ, Ñим "
"кÑиÑеÑÑÑ Ð²ÑлÑниÑ
пÑогÑам. ÐаÑкÑлÑки ми
знаÑмо, вÑÑ ÑÑнÑÑÑÑ Ð²ÑлÑÐ½Ñ Ð¿ÑогÑами "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.zh-cn-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file:
/web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.zh-cn-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.14
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -u -b -r1.14 -r1.15
--- open-source-misses-the-point.zh-cn-diff.html 1 Jan 2016 06:06:12
-0000 1.14
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.zh-cn-diff.html 1 Jan 2016 17:01:36
-0000 1.15
@@ -106,14 +106,14 @@
<h3>Practical Differences between Free Software and Open
Source</h3>
-<p>In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than
-those of free software. As far as we know, all existing free software
-would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software is free
-software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source licenses
-are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>For
-example, “Open Watcom” is nonfree because its license does
-not allow making a modified version and using it privately.</em></ins></span>
-Fortunately, few programs use <span
class="removed"><del><strong>those</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>such</em></ins></span> licenses.</p>
+<p>In practice, open source stands for criteria a little <span
class="removed"><del><strong>weaker</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>looser</em></ins></span> than
+those of free software. As far as we know, all existing <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>released</em></ins></span> free
+software <span class="inserted"><ins><em>source code</em></ins></span> would
qualify as open source. Nearly all open
+source software is free software, but there are exceptions. First,
+some open source licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify
+as free licenses. <span class="inserted"><ins><em>For example, “Open
Watcom” is nonfree
+because its license does not allow making a modified version and using
+it privately.</em></ins></span> Fortunately, few programs use <span
class="removed"><del><strong>those</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>such</em></ins></span> licenses.</p>
<p>Second, and more <span
class="removed"><del><strong>important,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>important in practice,</em></ins></span> many
products containing
computers
@@ -478,7 +478,7 @@
<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p
class="unprintable">Updated:</em></ins></span>
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2016/01/01 06:06:12 $
+$Date: 2016/01/01 17:01:36 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.zh-cn.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.zh-cn.po,v
retrieving revision 1.38
retrieving revision 1.39
diff -u -b -r1.38 -r1.39
--- open-source-misses-the-point.zh-cn.po 1 Jan 2016 06:06:14 -0000
1.38
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.zh-cn.po 1 Jan 2016 17:01:36 -0000
1.39
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: 1.0\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 05:56+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 16:55+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2013-06-14 19:24-0400\n"
"Last-Translator: Nan Deng <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Chinese (simplified)\n"
@@ -220,14 +220,14 @@
#| "too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. Fortunately, "
#| "few programs use those licenses."
msgid ""
-"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little weaker than those of "
-"free software. As far as we know, all existing free software would qualify "
-"as open source. Nearly all open source software is free software, but there "
-"are exceptions. First, some open source licenses are too restrictive, so "
-"they do not qualify as free licenses. For example, “Open "
-"Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not allow making a "
-"modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few programs use such "
-"licenses."
+"In practice, open source stands for criteria a little looser than those of "
+"free software. As far as we know, all existing released free software "
+"source code would qualify as open source. Nearly all open source software "
+"is free software, but there are exceptions. First, some open source "
+"licenses are too restrictive, so they do not qualify as free licenses. For "
+"example, “Open Watcom” is nonfree because its license does not "
+"allow making a modified version and using it privately. Fortunately, few "
+"programs use such licenses."
msgstr ""
"å¨å®è·µä¸ï¼å¼æºçè¦æ±æ¯èªç±è½¯ä»¶å®½æ¾ä¸äºãæ®æ们æç¥ï¼å
ä¹ææçèªç±è½¯ä»¶é½æ¯å¼"
"æºè½¯ä»¶ã尽管大å¤æ°å¼æºè½¯ä»¶ä¹åæ
·æ¯èªç±è½¯ä»¶ï¼ä½ä¼æä¸äºä¾å¤ãé¦å
ï¼æäºå¼æºè®¸"
Index: who-does-that-server-really-serve.ar.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/who-does-that-server-really-serve.ar.po,v
retrieving revision 1.41
retrieving revision 1.42
diff -u -b -r1.41 -r1.42
--- who-does-that-server-really-serve.ar.po 17 Dec 2015 12:44:12 -0000
1.41
+++ who-does-that-server-really-serve.ar.po 1 Jan 2016 17:01:36 -0000
1.42
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: who-does-that-server-really-serve.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2015-12-17 12:39+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 16:55+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2010-09-06 19:35+0300\n"
"Last-Translator: Osama Khalid <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Arabic <>\n"
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@
msgid ""
"<strong>On the Internet, proprietary software isn't the only way to lose "
"your freedom. Service as a Software Substitute, or SaaSS, is another way to "
-"let someone else have power over your computing.</strong>"
+"give someone else power over your computing.</strong>"
msgstr ""
"<strong>Ùا تعد اÙبرÙ
جÙات اÙÙ
ØتÙرة اÙÙسÙÙØ©
اÙÙØÙدة ÙÙÙد اÙØرÙØ© عÙ٠اÙØ¥ÙترÙØªØ "
"ÙاÙبرÙ
جÙات اÙخدÙ
ÙØ© ÙسÙÙØ© أخر٠Ùإعطاء
اÙآخرÙ٠اÙتØÙÙ
بØÙسبتÙ.</strong>"
@@ -129,9 +129,9 @@
msgid ""
"With free software, we, the users, take back control of our computing. "
"Proprietary software still exists, but we can exclude it from our lives and "
-"many of us have done so. However, we now face a new threat to our control "
-"over our computing: Service as a Software Substitute (SaaSS). For our "
-"freedom's sake, we have to reject that too."
+"many of us have done so. However, we are now offered another tempting way "
+"to cede control over our computing: Service as a Software Substitute "
+"(SaaSS). For our freedom's sake, we have to reject that too."
msgstr ""
"ÙÙد استعدÙا عبر اÙبرÙ
جÙات اÙØرة اÙتØÙÙ
بØÙاسÙبÙا. صØÙØ Ø£Ù Ø§ÙبرÙ
جÙات اÙÙ
ØتÙرة "
"Ùا تزا٠Ù
ÙجÙØ¯Ø©Ø Ø¥Ùا Ø£ÙÙا ÙÙ
Ù٠أ٠ÙØ®Ùص
Ø£ÙÙسÙا Ù
ÙÙØ§Ø ÙÙÙد ÙاÙ
ÙØ«Ùر Ù
Ùا بذÙÙ. "
@@ -175,8 +175,8 @@
msgid ""
"The computing is <em>her own</em> because, by assumption, she could, in "
"principle, have done it by running a program on her own computer (whether or "
-"not that program is available to her at present). When this assumption is "
-"not so, it isn't SaaSS."
+"not that program is available to her at present). In cases where this "
+"assumption is not so, it isn't SaaSS."
msgstr ""
# type: Content of: <p>
@@ -275,6 +275,15 @@
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
+"Theoretically, homomorphic encryption might some day advance to the point "
+"where future SaaSS services might be constructed to be unable to understand "
+"some of the data that users send them. Such services <em>could</em> be set "
+"up not to snoop on users; this does not mean they <em>will</em> do no "
+"snooping."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
"Some proprietary operating systems have a universal back door, permitting "
"someone to remotely install software changes. For instance, Windows has a "
"universal back door with which Microsoft can forcibly change any software on "
@@ -508,7 +517,7 @@
msgid ""
"Rejecting SaaSS does not mean refusing to use any network servers run by "
"anyone other than you. Most servers are not SaaSS because the jobs they do "
-"are not the user's own computing."
+"are some sort of communication, rather than the user's own computing."
msgstr ""
"Ù٠رÙض اÙبرÙ
جÙات اÙخدÙ
ÙØ© ÙعÙ٠رÙض ÙÙ Ø®ÙادÙ
اÙشبÙØ©Ø Ø£Ø¨Ø¯ÙØ§Ø ÙÙÙس اÙØ£Ù
ر ÙØ°ÙÙ. "
"Ù
عظÙ
اÙØ®ÙادÙ
Ùا تسبب Ùذ٠اÙÙ
Ø´ÙÙØ© ÙØ£Ù
اÙÙظÙÙØ© اÙت٠تؤÙدÙا عÙÙÙا ÙÙست Ù
عاÙجة "
@@ -533,11 +542,11 @@
"The original idea of web servers wasn't to do computing for you, it was to "
"publish information for you to access. Even today this is what most web "
"sites do, and it doesn't pose the SaaSS problem, because accessing someone's "
-"published information isn't doing your own computing. Neither is publishing "
-"your own materials via a blog site or a microblogging service such as "
-"Twitter or StatusNet. (These services may have other problems, of course.) "
-"The same goes for other communication not meant to be private, such as chat "
-"groups."
+"published information isn't doing your own computing. Neither is use of a "
+"blog site to publish your own works, or usinga microblogging service such as "
+"Twitter or StatusNet. (These services may or may not have other problems, "
+"depending on details.) The same goes for other communication not meant to "
+"be private, such as chat groups."
msgstr ""
"إ٠غرض Ø®ÙادÙ
اÙÙب اÙأساس٠ÙÙ
ÙÙÙ Ù
عاÙجة
بÙاÙات٠ب٠Ùشر Ù
عÙÙÙ
ات Ùتص٠إÙÙÙا. "
"Ù
عظÙ
اÙÙ
ÙاÙع Ø¥Ù٠اÙÙÙÙ
تÙÙÙ
بذÙÙ ÙÙا تسبب Ù
Ø´ÙÙØ© اÙبرÙ
جÙات اÙخدÙ
ÙØ© Ùأ٠اÙÙصÙÙ "
@@ -965,7 +974,7 @@
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
#, fuzzy
#| msgid "Copyright © 2011, 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc."
-msgid "Copyright © 2010, 2013, 2015 Richard Stallman"
+msgid "Copyright © 2010, 2013, 2015, 2016 Richard Stallman"
msgstr ""
"Copyright © 2011, 2012 Ù
ؤسسة اÙبرÙ
جÙات اÙØرة Free
Software Foundation, "
"Inc."
Index: who-does-that-server-really-serve.es.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/who-does-that-server-really-serve.es.po,v
retrieving revision 1.50
retrieving revision 1.51
diff -u -b -r1.50 -r1.51
--- who-does-that-server-really-serve.es.po 18 Dec 2015 10:31:32 -0000
1.50
+++ who-does-that-server-really-serve.es.po 1 Jan 2016 17:01:36 -0000
1.51
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: who-does-that-server-really-serve.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2015-12-17 12:39+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 16:55+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2015-12-18 11:24+0100\n"
"Last-Translator: Javier Fdez. Retenaga <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Spanish <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"X-Outdated-Since: 2016-01-01 16:55+0000\n"
"Plural-Forms: nplurals=2; plural=(n!=1);\n"
"X-Poedit-Language: Spanish\n"
@@ -50,10 +51,19 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | <strong>On the Internet, proprietary software isn't the only way to lose
+# | your freedom. Service as a Software Substitute, or SaaSS, is another way
+# | to [-let-] {+give+} someone else [-have-] power over your
+# | computing.</strong>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "<strong>On the Internet, proprietary software isn't the only way to lose "
+#| "your freedom. Service as a Software Substitute, or SaaSS, is another way "
+#| "to let someone else have power over your computing.</strong>"
msgid ""
"<strong>On the Internet, proprietary software isn't the only way to lose "
"your freedom. Service as a Software Substitute, or SaaSS, is another way to "
-"let someone else have power over your computing.</strong>"
+"give someone else power over your computing.</strong>"
msgstr ""
"<strong>En Internet, el software privativo no es la única manera de perder "
"su libertad. El servicio sustitutivo del software (<abbr title=\"Service as "
@@ -129,12 +139,25 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | With free software, we, the users, take back control of our computing.
+# | Proprietary software still exists, but we can exclude it from our lives
+# | and many of us have done so. However, we {+are+} now [-face a new
+# | threat-] {+offered another tempting way+} to [-our-] {+cede+} control over
+# | our computing: Service as a Software Substitute (SaaSS). For our
+# | freedom's sake, we have to reject that too.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "With free software, we, the users, take back control of our computing. "
+#| "Proprietary software still exists, but we can exclude it from our lives "
+#| "and many of us have done so. However, we now face a new threat to our "
+#| "control over our computing: Service as a Software Substitute (SaaSS). "
+#| "For our freedom's sake, we have to reject that too."
msgid ""
"With free software, we, the users, take back control of our computing. "
"Proprietary software still exists, but we can exclude it from our lives and "
-"many of us have done so. However, we now face a new threat to our control "
-"over our computing: Service as a Software Substitute (SaaSS). For our "
-"freedom's sake, we have to reject that too."
+"many of us have done so. However, we are now offered another tempting way "
+"to cede control over our computing: Service as a Software Substitute "
+"(SaaSS). For our freedom's sake, we have to reject that too."
msgstr ""
"Con el software libre nosotros, los usuarios, recuperamos el control de "
"nuestras tareas informáticas. El software privativo aún existe, pero
podemos "
@@ -171,11 +194,21 @@
"y le devolverá el resultado o actuará directamente en nombre del usuario."
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | The computing is <em>her own</em> because, by assumption, she could, in
+# | principle, have done it by running a program on her own computer (whether
+# | or not that program is available to her at present). [-When-] {+In cases
+# | where+} this assumption is not so, it isn't SaaSS.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The computing is <em>her own</em> because, by assumption, she could, in "
+#| "principle, have done it by running a program on her own computer (whether "
+#| "or not that program is available to her at present). When this "
+#| "assumption is not so, it isn't SaaSS."
msgid ""
"The computing is <em>her own</em> because, by assumption, she could, in "
"principle, have done it by running a program on her own computer (whether or "
-"not that program is available to her at present). When this assumption is "
-"not so, it isn't SaaSS."
+"not that program is available to her at present). In cases where this "
+"assumption is not so, it isn't SaaSS."
msgstr ""
"La tarea de cómputo es <em>propia del usuario</em> porque se supone que, en "
"principio, el usuario habrÃa podido realizarla ejecutando una copia del "
@@ -269,6 +302,15 @@
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
+"Theoretically, homomorphic encryption might some day advance to the point "
+"where future SaaSS services might be constructed to be unable to understand "
+"some of the data that users send them. Such services <em>could</em> be set "
+"up not to snoop on users; this does not mean they <em>will</em> do no "
+"snooping."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
"Some proprietary operating systems have a universal back door, permitting "
"someone to remotely install software changes. For instance, Windows has a "
"universal back door with which Microsoft can forcibly change any software on "
@@ -523,10 +565,19 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | Rejecting SaaSS does not mean refusing to use any network servers run by
+# | anyone other than you. Most servers are not SaaSS because the jobs they
+# | do are [-not-] {+some sort of communication, rather than+} the user's own
+# | computing.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Rejecting SaaSS does not mean refusing to use any network servers run by "
+#| "anyone other than you. Most servers are not SaaSS because the jobs they "
+#| "do are not the user's own computing."
msgid ""
"Rejecting SaaSS does not mean refusing to use any network servers run by "
"anyone other than you. Most servers are not SaaSS because the jobs they do "
-"are not the user's own computing."
+"are some sort of communication, rather than the user's own computing."
msgstr ""
"Rechazar el SaaSS no significa que haya que evitar el uso de todos los "
"servidores de red establecidos por otros. La mayorÃa de los servidores no "
@@ -535,15 +586,34 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | The original idea of web servers wasn't to do computing for you, it was to
+# | publish information for you to access. Even today this is what most web
+# | sites do, and it doesn't pose the SaaSS problem, because accessing
+# | someone's published information isn't doing your own computing. Neither
+# | is [-publishing your own materials via-] {+use of+} a blog site {+to
+# | publish your own works,+} or [-a-] {+usinga+} microblogging service such
+# | as Twitter or StatusNet. (These services may {+or may not+} have other
+# | problems, [-of course.)-] {+depending on details.)+} The same goes for
+# | other communication not meant to be private, such as chat groups.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The original idea of web servers wasn't to do computing for you, it was "
+#| "to publish information for you to access. Even today this is what most "
+#| "web sites do, and it doesn't pose the SaaSS problem, because accessing "
+#| "someone's published information isn't doing your own computing. Neither "
+#| "is publishing your own materials via a blog site or a microblogging "
+#| "service such as Twitter or StatusNet. (These services may have other "
+#| "problems, of course.) The same goes for other communication not meant to "
+#| "be private, such as chat groups."
msgid ""
"The original idea of web servers wasn't to do computing for you, it was to "
"publish information for you to access. Even today this is what most web "
"sites do, and it doesn't pose the SaaSS problem, because accessing someone's "
-"published information isn't doing your own computing. Neither is publishing "
-"your own materials via a blog site or a microblogging service such as "
-"Twitter or StatusNet. (These services may have other problems, of course.) "
-"The same goes for other communication not meant to be private, such as chat "
-"groups."
+"published information isn't doing your own computing. Neither is use of a "
+"blog site to publish your own works, or usinga microblogging service such as "
+"Twitter or StatusNet. (These services may or may not have other problems, "
+"depending on details.) The same goes for other communication not meant to "
+"be private, such as chat groups."
msgstr ""
"La idea original de los servidores web no era realizar tareas de cómputo "
"sino publicar información para que se tuviese acceso a ella. Incluso hoy en "
@@ -973,7 +1043,10 @@
"de este sitio web."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-msgid "Copyright © 2010, 2013, 2015 Richard Stallman"
+# | Copyright © 2010, 2013, [-2015-] {+2015, 2016+} Richard Stallman
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid "Copyright © 2010, 2013, 2015 Richard Stallman"
+msgid "Copyright © 2010, 2013, 2015, 2016 Richard Stallman"
msgstr "Copyright © 2010, 2013, 2015 Richard Stallman"
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
Index: who-does-that-server-really-serve.fr.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/who-does-that-server-really-serve.fr.po,v
retrieving revision 1.52
retrieving revision 1.53
diff -u -b -r1.52 -r1.53
--- who-does-that-server-really-serve.fr.po 18 Dec 2015 08:26:49 -0000
1.52
+++ who-does-that-server-really-serve.fr.po 1 Jan 2016 17:01:36 -0000
1.53
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: who-does-that-server-really-serve.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2015-12-17 12:39+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 16:55+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2015-12-18 09:26+0100\n"
"Last-Translator: Thérèse Godefroy <godef.th AT free.fr>\n"
"Language-Team: French <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"X-Outdated-Since: 2016-01-01 16:55+0000\n"
"X-Generator: Gtranslator 2.91.5\n"
"Plural-Forms: \n"
@@ -42,10 +43,19 @@
"Review</cite></a>.)"
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | <strong>On the Internet, proprietary software isn't the only way to lose
+# | your freedom. Service as a Software Substitute, or SaaSS, is another way
+# | to [-let-] {+give+} someone else [-have-] power over your
+# | computing.</strong>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "<strong>On the Internet, proprietary software isn't the only way to lose "
+#| "your freedom. Service as a Software Substitute, or SaaSS, is another way "
+#| "to let someone else have power over your computing.</strong>"
msgid ""
"<strong>On the Internet, proprietary software isn't the only way to lose "
"your freedom. Service as a Software Substitute, or SaaSS, is another way to "
-"let someone else have power over your computing.</strong>"
+"give someone else power over your computing.</strong>"
msgstr ""
"<strong>Sur Internet, utiliser un logiciel privateur<a id=\"TransNote1-rev\" "
"href=\"#TransNote1\"><sup>1</sup></a> n'est pas le seul moyen de perdre "
@@ -120,12 +130,25 @@
"philosophy/free-sw.html\">définition du logiciel libre</a>)."
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | With free software, we, the users, take back control of our computing.
+# | Proprietary software still exists, but we can exclude it from our lives
+# | and many of us have done so. However, we {+are+} now [-face a new
+# | threat-] {+offered another tempting way+} to [-our-] {+cede+} control over
+# | our computing: Service as a Software Substitute (SaaSS). For our
+# | freedom's sake, we have to reject that too.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "With free software, we, the users, take back control of our computing. "
+#| "Proprietary software still exists, but we can exclude it from our lives "
+#| "and many of us have done so. However, we now face a new threat to our "
+#| "control over our computing: Service as a Software Substitute (SaaSS). "
+#| "For our freedom's sake, we have to reject that too."
msgid ""
"With free software, we, the users, take back control of our computing. "
"Proprietary software still exists, but we can exclude it from our lives and "
-"many of us have done so. However, we now face a new threat to our control "
-"over our computing: Service as a Software Substitute (SaaSS). For our "
-"freedom's sake, we have to reject that too."
+"many of us have done so. However, we are now offered another tempting way "
+"to cede control over our computing: Service as a Software Substitute "
+"(SaaSS). For our freedom's sake, we have to reject that too."
msgstr ""
"Avec le logiciel libre, nous, les utilisateurs, récupérons le contrôle de "
"notre informatique. Les logiciels privateurs continueront d'exister, mais "
@@ -160,11 +183,21 @@
"résultats ou les utilise directement à sa place."
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | The computing is <em>her own</em> because, by assumption, she could, in
+# | principle, have done it by running a program on her own computer (whether
+# | or not that program is available to her at present). [-When-] {+In cases
+# | where+} this assumption is not so, it isn't SaaSS.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The computing is <em>her own</em> because, by assumption, she could, in "
+#| "principle, have done it by running a program on her own computer (whether "
+#| "or not that program is available to her at present). When this "
+#| "assumption is not so, it isn't SaaSS."
msgid ""
"The computing is <em>her own</em> because, by assumption, she could, in "
"principle, have done it by running a program on her own computer (whether or "
-"not that program is available to her at present). When this assumption is "
-"not so, it isn't SaaSS."
+"not that program is available to her at present). In cases where this "
+"assumption is not so, it isn't SaaSS."
msgstr ""
"Ce traitement informatique est <em>le sien</em> car, par hypothèse, il "
"aurait pu en principe l'effectuer en exécutant un programme sur son propre "
@@ -252,6 +285,15 @@
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
+"Theoretically, homomorphic encryption might some day advance to the point "
+"where future SaaSS services might be constructed to be unable to understand "
+"some of the data that users send them. Such services <em>could</em> be set "
+"up not to snoop on users; this does not mean they <em>will</em> do no "
+"snooping."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
"Some proprietary operating systems have a universal back door, permitting "
"someone to remotely install software changes. For instance, Windows has a "
"universal back door with which Microsoft can forcibly change any software on "
@@ -497,10 +539,19 @@
"ordinateur est du SaaSS."
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | Rejecting SaaSS does not mean refusing to use any network servers run by
+# | anyone other than you. Most servers are not SaaSS because the jobs they
+# | do are [-not-] {+some sort of communication, rather than+} the user's own
+# | computing.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Rejecting SaaSS does not mean refusing to use any network servers run by "
+#| "anyone other than you. Most servers are not SaaSS because the jobs they "
+#| "do are not the user's own computing."
msgid ""
"Rejecting SaaSS does not mean refusing to use any network servers run by "
"anyone other than you. Most servers are not SaaSS because the jobs they do "
-"are not the user's own computing."
+"are some sort of communication, rather than the user's own computing."
msgstr ""
"Rejeter le SaaSS ne signifie pas refuser d'utiliser tout serveur réseau
géré "
"par quelqu'un d'autre que vous. La plupart des serveurs ne sont pas des "
@@ -508,15 +559,34 @@
"l'utilisateur."
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | The original idea of web servers wasn't to do computing for you, it was to
+# | publish information for you to access. Even today this is what most web
+# | sites do, and it doesn't pose the SaaSS problem, because accessing
+# | someone's published information isn't doing your own computing. Neither
+# | is [-publishing your own materials via-] {+use of+} a blog site {+to
+# | publish your own works,+} or [-a-] {+usinga+} microblogging service such
+# | as Twitter or StatusNet. (These services may {+or may not+} have other
+# | problems, [-of course.)-] {+depending on details.)+} The same goes for
+# | other communication not meant to be private, such as chat groups.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The original idea of web servers wasn't to do computing for you, it was "
+#| "to publish information for you to access. Even today this is what most "
+#| "web sites do, and it doesn't pose the SaaSS problem, because accessing "
+#| "someone's published information isn't doing your own computing. Neither "
+#| "is publishing your own materials via a blog site or a microblogging "
+#| "service such as Twitter or StatusNet. (These services may have other "
+#| "problems, of course.) The same goes for other communication not meant to "
+#| "be private, such as chat groups."
msgid ""
"The original idea of web servers wasn't to do computing for you, it was to "
"publish information for you to access. Even today this is what most web "
"sites do, and it doesn't pose the SaaSS problem, because accessing someone's "
-"published information isn't doing your own computing. Neither is publishing "
-"your own materials via a blog site or a microblogging service such as "
-"Twitter or StatusNet. (These services may have other problems, of course.) "
-"The same goes for other communication not meant to be private, such as chat "
-"groups."
+"published information isn't doing your own computing. Neither is use of a "
+"blog site to publish your own works, or usinga microblogging service such as "
+"Twitter or StatusNet. (These services may or may not have other problems, "
+"depending on details.) The same goes for other communication not meant to "
+"be private, such as chat groups."
msgstr ""
"Le concept originel de serveur web n'impliquait pas d'exécuter des "
"programmes pour vous, mais de publier de l'information pour que vous y "
@@ -947,7 +1017,10 @@
"README.translations.html\">guide de traduction</a>."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-msgid "Copyright © 2010, 2013, 2015 Richard Stallman"
+# | Copyright © 2010, 2013, [-2015-] {+2015, 2016+} Richard Stallman
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid "Copyright © 2010, 2013, 2015 Richard Stallman"
+msgid "Copyright © 2010, 2013, 2015, 2016 Richard Stallman"
msgstr "Copyright © 2010, 2013, 2015 Richard Stallman"
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
Index: who-does-that-server-really-serve.hr-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file:
/web/www/www/philosophy/po/who-does-that-server-really-serve.hr-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.15
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -b -r1.15 -r1.16
--- who-does-that-server-really-serve.hr-diff.html 17 Dec 2015 12:44:15
-0000 1.15
+++ who-does-that-server-really-serve.hr-diff.html 1 Jan 2016 17:01:36
-0000 1.16
@@ -30,8 +30,7 @@
<p><strong>On the Internet, proprietary software isn't the only
way to
lose your freedom. <span
class="removed"><del><strong>Software</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Service</em></ins></span> as a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>Service</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Software Substitute, or SaaSS,</em></ins></span> is
-another way to let someone else have power over your
-computing.</strong></p>
+another way to <span class="removed"><del><strong>let</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>give</em></ins></span> someone else <span
class="removed"><del><strong>have</strong></del></span> power over your
computing.</strong></p>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>SaaSS means using a service implemented by
someone else as a
substitute for running your copy of a program. The term is ours;
@@ -65,10 +64,11 @@
<p>With free software, we, the users, take back control of our
computing. Proprietary software still exists, but we can exclude it
-from our lives and many of us have done so. However, we now face a
-new threat to our control over our computing: <span
class="removed"><del><strong>Software</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Service</em></ins></span> as a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>Service.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Software
-Substitute (SaaSS).</em></ins></span> For our freedom's sake, we have to
reject that
-too.</p>
+from our lives and many of us have done so. However, we <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>are</em></ins></span> now <span
class="removed"><del><strong>face a
+new threat</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>offered another tempting way</em></ins></span>
to <span class="removed"><del><strong>our</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>cede</em></ins></span> control over our computing:
<span class="removed"><del><strong>Software</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>Service</em></ins></span> as a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>Service.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Software Substitute (SaaSS).</em></ins></span> For
our freedom's sake, we
+have to reject that too.</p>
<h3>How <span
class="removed"><del><strong>Software</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Service</em></ins></span> as a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>Service</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Software Substitute</em></ins></span> Takes Away Your
Freedom</h3>
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@
<p>The computing is <em>her own</em> because, by assumption,
she
could, in principle, have done it by running a program on her own
computer (whether or not that program is available to her at
-present). When this assumption is not so, it isn't
SaaSS.</p></em></ins></span>
+present). In cases where this assumption is not so, it isn't
SaaSS.</p></em></ins></span>
<p>These servers wrest control from the users even more inexorably
than proprietary software. With proprietary software, users typically
@@ -125,7 +125,13 @@
photos of her. Eventually
<a
href="http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/data_mine_1/2013/09/privacy_facebook_kids_don_t_post_photos_of_your_kids_on_social_media.html">
they
leaked from there</a>.
-</p></em></ins></span>
+</p>
+
+<p>Theoretically, homomorphic encryption might some day advance to the
+point where future SaaSS services might be constructed to be unable to
+understand some of the data that users send them. Such
+services <em>could</em> be set up not to snoop on users; this does
not
+mean they <em>will</em> do no snooping.</p></em></ins></span>
<p>Some proprietary <span class="removed"><del><strong>programs can
mistreat users under remote command.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>operating systems have a universal back door,
permitting someone to remotely install software changes.</em></ins></span> For
@@ -144,14 +150,12 @@
<p>With SaaSS,</em></ins></span> the server operator <span
class="removed"><del><strong>the power to</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>can</em></ins></span> change the software in <span
class="removed"><del><strong>use, or</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>use on</em></ins></span>
the <span class="removed"><del><strong>users' data being operated on. Once
again, no
-special code is needed</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>server. He ought to be able</em></ins></span> to do
<span class="removed"><del><strong>this.</p>
-
-<p>Thus, SaaS is</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>this, since it's his computer;
+special code is needed</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>server. He ought to be able</em></ins></span> to do
<span class="removed"><del><strong>this.</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>this, since it's his computer;
but the result is the same as using a proprietary application program
with a universal back door: someone has the power to silently impose
-changes in how the user's computing gets done.</p>
+changes in how the user's computing gets done.</p></em></ins></span>
-<p>Thus, SaaSS is</em></ins></span> equivalent to <span
class="removed"><del><strong>total</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>running proprietary software with</em></ins></span>
+<p>Thus, <span class="removed"><del><strong>SaaS</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>SaaSS</em></ins></span> is equivalent to <span
class="removed"><del><strong>total</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>running proprietary software with</em></ins></span>
spyware and a <span class="removed"><del><strong>gaping
wide</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>universal</em></ins></span> back
<span class="removed"><del><strong>door, and</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>door. It</em></ins></span> gives the server operator
unjust power over the <span class="removed"><del><strong>user. We
@@ -166,9 +170,9 @@
“SaaS”, which stands for “Software as a
Service”. It's a commonly used term for setting up software on a
server rather than offering copies of it to users, and we thought it
-described precisely</em></ins></span> the <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>cases where this problem occurs.</p>
+described precisely the cases where this problem occurs.</p>
-<p>Subsequently we became aware that the term</em></ins></span> SaaS
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>is sometimes used for
+<p>Subsequently we became aware that</em></ins></span> the <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>term</em></ins></span> SaaS <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>is sometimes used for
communication services—activities for which this issue is not
applicable. In addition, the term “Software as a Service”
doesn't explain <em>why</em> the practice is bad. So we coined
the term
@@ -217,22 +221,17 @@
<p>But</em></ins></span> none of these servers would give you control
over computing you
do on it, unless it's <em>your</em> <span
class="removed"><del><strong>server.
-The rest would</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>server
(one whose software load
-you control, regardless of whether the machine is your property). It
-may be OK to trust your friend's server for some jobs, just as you
+The rest would all be SaaS. SaaS always subjects</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>server (one whose software load</em></ins></span>
+you <span class="removed"><del><strong>to the power</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>control, regardless</em></ins></span> of <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>whether</em></ins></span> the <span
class="removed"><del><strong>server operator, and the only remedy is,
<em>Don't use SaaS!</em>
+Don't use someone else's server</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>machine is your property). It
+may be OK</em></ins></span> to <span
class="removed"><del><strong>do</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>trust</em></ins></span> your <span
class="removed"><del><strong>own</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>friend's server for some jobs, just as you
might let your friend maintain the software on your own computer.
-Outside of that,</em></ins></span> all <span class="inserted"><ins><em>these
servers would</em></ins></span> be <span class="removed"><del><strong>SaaS.
SaaS</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>SaaSS for you.
SaaSS</em></ins></span>
+Outside of that, all these servers would be SaaSS for you. SaaSS
always subjects you to the power of the server operator, and the only
-remedy is, <em>Don't use <span
class="removed"><del><strong>SaaS!</em></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>SaaSS!</em></em></ins></span> Don't use
someone else's server
-to do your own computing on data provided by you.</p>
-
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><h3>Distinguishing SaaS from Other
Network Services</h3>
-
-<p>Does avoiding SaaS mean you refuse to use any network servers run
-by anyone other than you? Not at all. Most servers do not raise this
-issue, because</strong></del></span>
+remedy is, <em>Don't use SaaSS!</em> Don't use someone else's
server
+to do your own</em></ins></span> computing on data provided by you.</p>
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p>This issue
demonstrates</em></ins></span> the <span class="removed"><del><strong>job you
do with them isn't your own</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>depth of the difference between
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p>This issue demonstrates the depth of
the difference between
“open” and “free”. Source code that is open
source <a href="/philosophy/free-open-overlap.html">is, nearly always,
free</a>. However, the idea of
@@ -245,14 +244,15 @@
that programs raise. To avoid confusion,
we <a href="/philosophy/network-services-arent-free-or-nonfree.html">
avoid describing a service as “free” or
-“proprietary.”</a></p>
+“proprietary.”</a></p></em></ins></span>
-<h3>Distinguishing SaaSS from Other Network Services</h3>
+<h3>Distinguishing <span
class="removed"><del><strong>SaaS</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>SaaSS</em></ins></span> from Other Network
Services</h3>
-<p>Which online services are SaaSS? The clearest example is a
+<span class="removed"><del><strong><p>Does avoiding SaaS
mean</strong></del></span>
+
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p>Which online services are SaaSS? The
clearest example is a
translation service, which translates (say) English text into Spanish
-text. Translating a text for you is</em></ins></span> computing
-<span class="removed"><del><strong>except</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>that is purely yours.
+text. Translating a text for you is computing that is purely yours.
You could do it by running a program on your own computer, if only you
had the right program. (To be ethical, that program should be free.)
The translation service substitutes for that program, so it is Service
@@ -261,46 +261,46 @@
<p>Another clear example is using a service such as Flickr or
Instagram to modify a photo. Modifying photos is an activity that
-people have done in their own computers for decades; doing
it</em></ins></span> in a <span class="removed"><del><strong>trivial
sense.</p></strong></del></span>
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em>server you don't control, rather than your own
computer, is SaaSS.</p>
+people have done in their own computers for decades; doing it in a
+server</em></ins></span> you <span
class="removed"><del><strong>refuse</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>don't control, rather than your own computer, is
SaaSS.</p>
-<p>Rejecting SaaSS does not mean refusing to use any network servers
-run by anyone other than you. Most servers are not SaaSS because the
-jobs they do are not the user's own computing.</p></em></ins></span>
+<p>Rejecting SaaSS does not mean refusing</em></ins></span> to use any
network servers
+run by anyone other than <span class="removed"><del><strong>you? Not at
all.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>you.</em></ins></span> Most servers <span
class="removed"><del><strong>do</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>are</em></ins></span> not <span
class="removed"><del><strong>raise this
+issue,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>SaaSS</em></ins></span> because the <span
class="removed"><del><strong>job you</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>jobs they</em></ins></span> do <span
class="removed"><del><strong>with them isn't your</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>are some sort of communication, rather than the
user's</em></ins></span>
+own <span class="removed"><del><strong>computing
+except in a trivial sense.</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>computing.</p></em></ins></span>
<p>The original <span
class="removed"><del><strong>purpose</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>idea</em></ins></span> of web servers wasn't to do
computing for you, it
was to publish information for you to access. Even today this is what
most web sites do, and it doesn't pose the <span
class="removed"><del><strong>SaaS</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>SaaSS</em></ins></span> problem, because
accessing someone's published information isn't <span
class="removed"><del><strong>a matter of</strong></del></span> doing your own
-computing. Neither is publishing your own materials via a blog site
-or a microblogging service such as Twitter or <span
class="removed"><del><strong>identi.ca.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>StatusNet. (These
-services may have other problems, of course.)</em></ins></span> The same goes
for <span class="inserted"><ins><em>other</em></ins></span>
-communication not meant to be private, such as chat
+computing. Neither is <span class="removed"><del><strong>publishing your own
materials via</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>use
of</em></ins></span> a blog site <span class="inserted"><ins><em>to publish
your own works,</em></ins></span>
+or <span class="removed"><del><strong>a</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>usinga</em></ins></span> microblogging service such
as Twitter or <span
class="removed"><del><strong>identi.ca.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>StatusNet. (These
+services may or may not have other problems, depending on
details.)</em></ins></span>
+The same goes for <span class="inserted"><ins><em>other</em></ins></span>
communication not meant to be private, such as
+chat
<span class="removed"><del><strong>groups. Social</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>groups.</p>
<p>In its essence, social</em></ins></span> networking <span
class="removed"><del><strong>can extend into SaaS; however, at root
it</strong></del></span> is <span
class="removed"><del><strong>just</strong></del></span> a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>method</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>form</em></ins></span> of communication and
publication, not <span class="removed"><del><strong>SaaS. If you
-use the</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>SaaSS. However,
a</em></ins></span> service <span class="removed"><del><strong>for minor
editing of what you're going to communicate,
-that</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>whose main
facility</em></ins></span> is <span
class="removed"><del><strong>not</strong></del></span>
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em>social networking can have features or
extensions which are SaaSS.</p>
-
-<p>If</em></ins></span> a <span class="removed"><del><strong>significant
issue.</p>
+use the</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>SaaSS. However,
a service whose main facility is
+social networking can have features or extensions which are SaaSS.</p>
-<p>Services such as search engines collect data from around the web
-and let you examine it. Looking through their collection of data
-isn't your own computing in the usual sense—you didn't
provide</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>service is not
SaaSS,</em></ins></span> that <span
class="removed"><del><strong>collection—so</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>does not mean it is OK. There are
+<p>If a</em></ins></span> service <span class="removed"><del><strong>for
minor editing of what you're going to communicate,
+that</strong></del></span> is not <span class="inserted"><ins><em>SaaSS, that
does not mean it is OK. There are
other ethical issues about services. For instance, Facebook
distributes video in Flash, which pressures users to run nonfree
software; it requires running nonfree JavaScript code; and it gives
-users a misleading impression of privacy while luring them into baring
+users</em></ins></span> a <span class="removed"><del><strong>significant
issue.</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>misleading impression of privacy while luring them
into baring
their lives to Facebook. Those are important issues, different from
the SaaSS issue.
-</p>
+</p></em></ins></span>
<p>Services such as search engines collect data from around the web
and let you examine it. Looking through their collection of data
isn't your own computing in the usual sense—you didn't provide
-that collection—so</em></ins></span> using such a service to search the
web is not
+that collection—so using such a service to search the web is not
<span class="removed"><del><strong>SaaS. (However,</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>SaaSS. However,</em></ins></span> using
someone else's <span class="removed"><del><strong>search
engine</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>server</em></ins></span> to implement a search
facility for your own site <em>is</em> <span
class="removed"><del><strong>SaaS.)</p>
@@ -347,9 +347,9 @@
the game becomes more than just a game, the issue changes.</p>
<p>“Backend as</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>SaaSS. Likewise, using
-Instagram to post</em></ins></span> a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>Service”, or BaaS,</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>photo</em></ins></span> is <span
class="removed"><del><strong>a kind of SaaS, because it
-involves running your own web service on top of software that you
-can't control. If you set up a service</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>not SaaSS, but</em></ins></span> using <span
class="removed"><del><strong>BaaS,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>it to transform</em></ins></span> the <span
class="removed"><del><strong>BaaS platform
+Instagram to post</em></ins></span> a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>Service”, or BaaS,</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>photo</em></ins></span> is <span
class="removed"><del><strong>a kind of SaaS, because</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>not SaaSS, but using</em></ins></span> it
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>involves running your own web service on
top of software that you
+can't control. If you set up a service using BaaS,</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>to transform</em></ins></span> the <span
class="removed"><del><strong>BaaS platform
may well collect information about your users as well as you.</p>
<p>Which online services are SaaS? Google Docs</strong></del></span>
@@ -560,7 +560,7 @@
There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. --></em></ins></span>
-<p>Copyright © <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2010</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2010, 2013, 2015</em></ins></span> Richard <span
class="removed"><del><strong>Stallman
+<p>Copyright © <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2010</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2010, 2013, 2015, 2016</em></ins></span> Richard
<span class="removed"><del><strong>Stallman
<br />
This</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>Stallman</p>
@@ -576,7 +576,7 @@
<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p
class="unprintable">Updated:</em></ins></span>
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2015/12/17 12:44:15 $
+$Date: 2016/01/01 17:01:36 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: who-does-that-server-really-serve.hr.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/who-does-that-server-really-serve.hr.po,v
retrieving revision 1.13
retrieving revision 1.14
diff -u -b -r1.13 -r1.14
--- who-does-that-server-really-serve.hr.po 17 Dec 2015 12:44:15 -0000
1.13
+++ who-does-that-server-really-serve.hr.po 1 Jan 2016 17:01:37 -0000
1.14
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: who-does-that-server-really-serve.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2015-12-17 12:39+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 16:55+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2013-05-07 23:38+0100\n"
"Last-Translator: Marin Rameša <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: www-hr <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -57,8 +57,8 @@
#. type: Content of: <p>
# | <strong>On the Internet, proprietary software isn't the only way to lose
# | your freedom. [-Software-] {+Service+} as a [-Service-] {+Software
-# | Substitute, or SaaSS,+} is another way to let someone else have power over
-# | your computing.</strong>
+# | Substitute, or SaaSS,+} is another way to [-let-] {+give+} someone else
+# | [-have-] power over your computing.</strong>
#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "<strong>On the Internet, proprietary software isn't the only way to lose "
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@
msgid ""
"<strong>On the Internet, proprietary software isn't the only way to lose "
"your freedom. Service as a Software Substitute, or SaaSS, is another way to "
-"let someone else have power over your computing.</strong>"
+"give someone else power over your computing.</strong>"
msgstr ""
"<strong>Na internetu, vlasniÄki softver nije jedini naÄin da izgubite vaÅ¡u
"
"slobodu. Softver kao usluga je joÅ¡ jedan naÄin da dopustite nekom drugom da
"
@@ -132,10 +132,10 @@
#. type: Content of: <p>
# | With free software, we, the users, take back control of our computing.
# | Proprietary software still exists, but we can exclude it from our lives
-# | and many of us have done so. However, we now face a new threat to our
-# | control over our computing: [-Software-] {+Service+} as a [-Service.-]
-# | {+Software Substitute (SaaSS).+} For our freedom's sake, we have to
-# | reject that too.
+# | and many of us have done so. However, we {+are+} now [-face a new
+# | threat-] {+offered another tempting way+} to [-our-] {+cede+} control over
+# | our computing: [-Software-] {+Service+} as a [-Service.-] {+Software
+# | Substitute (SaaSS).+} For our freedom's sake, we have to reject that too.
#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "With free software, we, the users, take back control of our computing. "
@@ -146,9 +146,9 @@
msgid ""
"With free software, we, the users, take back control of our computing. "
"Proprietary software still exists, but we can exclude it from our lives and "
-"many of us have done so. However, we now face a new threat to our control "
-"over our computing: Service as a Software Substitute (SaaSS). For our "
-"freedom's sake, we have to reject that too."
+"many of us have done so. However, we are now offered another tempting way "
+"to cede control over our computing: Service as a Software Substitute "
+"(SaaSS). For our freedom's sake, we have to reject that too."
msgstr ""
"Sa slobodnim softverom, mi, korisnici, preuzimamo natrag kontrolu naših "
"raÄunalnih aktivnosti. VlasniÄki softver joÅ¡ uvijek postoji, ali ga
možemo "
@@ -206,8 +206,8 @@
msgid ""
"The computing is <em>her own</em> because, by assumption, she could, in "
"principle, have done it by running a program on her own computer (whether or "
-"not that program is available to her at present). When this assumption is "
-"not so, it isn't SaaSS."
+"not that program is available to her at present). In cases where this "
+"assumption is not so, it isn't SaaSS."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <p>
@@ -333,6 +333,15 @@
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
+"Theoretically, homomorphic encryption might some day advance to the point "
+"where future SaaSS services might be constructed to be unable to understand "
+"some of the data that users send them. Such services <em>could</em> be set "
+"up not to snoop on users; this does not mean they <em>will</em> do no "
+"snooping."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
"Some proprietary operating systems have a universal back door, permitting "
"someone to remotely install software changes. For instance, Windows has a "
"universal back door with which Microsoft can forcibly change any software on "
@@ -604,8 +613,8 @@
# | {+refusing+} to use any network servers run by anyone other than [-you?
# | Not at all.-] {+you.+} Most servers [-do-] {+are+} not [-raise this
# | issue,-] {+SaaSS+} because the [-job you-] {+jobs they+} do [-with them
-# | isn't your-] {+are not the user's+} own [-computing except in a trivial
-# | sense.-] {+computing.+}
+# | isn't your-] {+are some sort of communication, rather than the user's+}
+# | own [-computing except in a trivial sense.-] {+computing.+}
#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "Does avoiding SaaS mean you refuse to use any network servers run by "
@@ -615,7 +624,7 @@
msgid ""
"Rejecting SaaSS does not mean refusing to use any network servers run by "
"anyone other than you. Most servers are not SaaSS because the jobs they do "
-"are not the user's own computing."
+"are some sort of communication, rather than the user's own computing."
msgstr ""
"Da li izbjegavanje SaaS-a znaÄi da odbijate koristiti bilo koje mrežne "
"poslužitelje postavljene od strane bilo koga osim vas? Nimalo. VeÄina "
@@ -627,14 +636,15 @@
# | for you, it was to publish information for you to access. Even today this
# | is what most web sites do, and it doesn't pose the SaaS{+S+} problem,
# | because accessing someone's published information isn't [-a matter of-]
-# | doing your own computing. Neither is publishing your own materials via a
-# | blog site or a microblogging service such as Twitter or [-identi.ca.-]
-# | {+StatusNet. (These services may have other problems, of course.)+} The
-# | same goes for {+other+} communication not meant to be private, such as
-# | chat groups. [-Social networking can extend into SaaS; however, at root
-# | it is just a method of communication and publication, not SaaS. If you
-# | use the service for minor editing of what you're going to communicate,
-# | that is not a significant issue.-]
+# | doing your own computing. Neither is [-publishing your own materials
+# | via-] {+use of+} a blog site {+to publish your own works,+} or [-a-]
+# | {+usinga+} microblogging service such as Twitter or [-identi.ca.-]
+# | {+StatusNet. (These services may or may not have other problems,
+# | depending on details.)+} The same goes for {+other+} communication not
+# | meant to be private, such as chat groups. [-Social networking can extend
+# | into SaaS; however, at root it is just a method of communication and
+# | publication, not SaaS. If you use the service for minor editing of what
+# | you're going to communicate, that is not a significant issue.-]
#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "The original purpose of web servers wasn't to do computing for you, it "
@@ -652,11 +662,11 @@
"The original idea of web servers wasn't to do computing for you, it was to "
"publish information for you to access. Even today this is what most web "
"sites do, and it doesn't pose the SaaSS problem, because accessing someone's "
-"published information isn't doing your own computing. Neither is publishing "
-"your own materials via a blog site or a microblogging service such as "
-"Twitter or StatusNet. (These services may have other problems, of course.) "
-"The same goes for other communication not meant to be private, such as chat "
-"groups."
+"published information isn't doing your own computing. Neither is use of a "
+"blog site to publish your own works, or usinga microblogging service such as "
+"Twitter or StatusNet. (These services may or may not have other problems, "
+"depending on details.) The same goes for other communication not meant to "
+"be private, such as chat groups."
msgstr ""
"Izvorna namjena mrežnih poslužitelja nije bila da vrÅ¡e raÄunalne
aktivnosti "
"za vas, bila je objavljivanje informacija kojima vi pristupate. Äak i danas "
@@ -1189,10 +1199,10 @@
"prijevode</a>."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-# | Copyright © [-2010-] {+2010, 2013, 2015+} Richard Stallman
+# | Copyright © [-2010-] {+2010, 2013, 2015, 2016+} Richard Stallman
#, fuzzy
#| msgid "Copyright © 2010 Richard Stallman"
-msgid "Copyright © 2010, 2013, 2015 Richard Stallman"
+msgid "Copyright © 2010, 2013, 2015, 2016 Richard Stallman"
msgstr "Copyright © 2010 Richard Stallman"
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
Index: who-does-that-server-really-serve.it.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/who-does-that-server-really-serve.it.po,v
retrieving revision 1.17
retrieving revision 1.18
diff -u -b -r1.17 -r1.18
--- who-does-that-server-really-serve.it.po 18 Dec 2015 08:29:25 -0000
1.17
+++ who-does-that-server-really-serve.it.po 1 Jan 2016 17:01:37 -0000
1.18
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: who-does-that-server-really-serve.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2015-12-17 12:39+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 16:55+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2015-12-18 09:14+0100\n"
"Last-Translator: Andrea Pescetti <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Italian <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"X-Outdated-Since: 2016-01-01 16:55+0000\n"
"X-Generator: Poedit 1.5.4\n"
#. type: Content of: <title>
@@ -40,10 +41,19 @@
"www.bostonreview.net/richard-stallman-free-software-DRM\">Boston Review</a>."
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | <strong>On the Internet, proprietary software isn't the only way to lose
+# | your freedom. Service as a Software Substitute, or SaaSS, is another way
+# | to [-let-] {+give+} someone else [-have-] power over your
+# | computing.</strong>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "<strong>On the Internet, proprietary software isn't the only way to lose "
+#| "your freedom. Service as a Software Substitute, or SaaSS, is another way "
+#| "to let someone else have power over your computing.</strong>"
msgid ""
"<strong>On the Internet, proprietary software isn't the only way to lose "
"your freedom. Service as a Software Substitute, or SaaSS, is another way to "
-"let someone else have power over your computing.</strong>"
+"give someone else power over your computing.</strong>"
msgstr ""
"<strong>Su Internet il software non libero non è l'unico modo per perdere la
"
"vostra libertà : il servizio sostitutivo del software (Service as a Software "
@@ -115,12 +125,25 @@
"\">Definizione di software libero</a>."
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | With free software, we, the users, take back control of our computing.
+# | Proprietary software still exists, but we can exclude it from our lives
+# | and many of us have done so. However, we {+are+} now [-face a new
+# | threat-] {+offered another tempting way+} to [-our-] {+cede+} control over
+# | our computing: Service as a Software Substitute (SaaSS). For our
+# | freedom's sake, we have to reject that too.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "With free software, we, the users, take back control of our computing. "
+#| "Proprietary software still exists, but we can exclude it from our lives "
+#| "and many of us have done so. However, we now face a new threat to our "
+#| "control over our computing: Service as a Software Substitute (SaaSS). "
+#| "For our freedom's sake, we have to reject that too."
msgid ""
"With free software, we, the users, take back control of our computing. "
"Proprietary software still exists, but we can exclude it from our lives and "
-"many of us have done so. However, we now face a new threat to our control "
-"over our computing: Service as a Software Substitute (SaaSS). For our "
-"freedom's sake, we have to reject that too."
+"many of us have done so. However, we are now offered another tempting way "
+"to cede control over our computing: Service as a Software Substitute "
+"(SaaSS). For our freedom's sake, we have to reject that too."
msgstr ""
"Grazie al software libero noi utenti ci riprendiamo il controllo delle "
"nostre attività informatiche. Il software proprietario esiste ancora, ma, "
@@ -154,11 +177,21 @@
"restituirebbe il risultato all'utente, o eseguirebbe qualche azione per lui."
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | The computing is <em>her own</em> because, by assumption, she could, in
+# | principle, have done it by running a program on her own computer (whether
+# | or not that program is available to her at present). [-When-] {+In cases
+# | where+} this assumption is not so, it isn't SaaSS.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The computing is <em>her own</em> because, by assumption, she could, in "
+#| "principle, have done it by running a program on her own computer (whether "
+#| "or not that program is available to her at present). When this "
+#| "assumption is not so, it isn't SaaSS."
msgid ""
"The computing is <em>her own</em> because, by assumption, she could, in "
"principle, have done it by running a program on her own computer (whether or "
-"not that program is available to her at present). When this assumption is "
-"not so, it isn't SaaSS."
+"not that program is available to her at present). In cases where this "
+"assumption is not so, it isn't SaaSS."
msgstr ""
"L'attività è <em>propria dell'utente</em> poiché per ipotesi egli, in
linea "
"di principio, può eseguirla con un programma sul suo computer, a prescindere
"
@@ -241,6 +274,15 @@
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
+"Theoretically, homomorphic encryption might some day advance to the point "
+"where future SaaSS services might be constructed to be unable to understand "
+"some of the data that users send them. Such services <em>could</em> be set "
+"up not to snoop on users; this does not mean they <em>will</em> do no "
+"snooping."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
"Some proprietary operating systems have a universal back door, permitting "
"someone to remotely install software changes. For instance, Windows has a "
"universal back door with which Microsoft can forcibly change any software on "
@@ -478,10 +520,19 @@
"invece che sul vostro computer è SaaSS."
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | Rejecting SaaSS does not mean refusing to use any network servers run by
+# | anyone other than you. Most servers are not SaaSS because the jobs they
+# | do are [-not-] {+some sort of communication, rather than+} the user's own
+# | computing.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Rejecting SaaSS does not mean refusing to use any network servers run by "
+#| "anyone other than you. Most servers are not SaaSS because the jobs they "
+#| "do are not the user's own computing."
msgid ""
"Rejecting SaaSS does not mean refusing to use any network servers run by "
"anyone other than you. Most servers are not SaaSS because the jobs they do "
-"are not the user's own computing."
+"are some sort of communication, rather than the user's own computing."
msgstr ""
"Rifiutare il SaaSS non significa però rifiutare di usare qualsiasi server in
"
"rete che sia gestito da altri che da voi. La maggior parte dei server, "
@@ -489,15 +540,34 @@
"utenti."
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | The original idea of web servers wasn't to do computing for you, it was to
+# | publish information for you to access. Even today this is what most web
+# | sites do, and it doesn't pose the SaaSS problem, because accessing
+# | someone's published information isn't doing your own computing. Neither
+# | is [-publishing your own materials via-] {+use of+} a blog site {+to
+# | publish your own works,+} or [-a-] {+usinga+} microblogging service such
+# | as Twitter or StatusNet. (These services may {+or may not+} have other
+# | problems, [-of course.)-] {+depending on details.)+} The same goes for
+# | other communication not meant to be private, such as chat groups.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The original idea of web servers wasn't to do computing for you, it was "
+#| "to publish information for you to access. Even today this is what most "
+#| "web sites do, and it doesn't pose the SaaSS problem, because accessing "
+#| "someone's published information isn't doing your own computing. Neither "
+#| "is publishing your own materials via a blog site or a microblogging "
+#| "service such as Twitter or StatusNet. (These services may have other "
+#| "problems, of course.) The same goes for other communication not meant to "
+#| "be private, such as chat groups."
msgid ""
"The original idea of web servers wasn't to do computing for you, it was to "
"publish information for you to access. Even today this is what most web "
"sites do, and it doesn't pose the SaaSS problem, because accessing someone's "
-"published information isn't doing your own computing. Neither is publishing "
-"your own materials via a blog site or a microblogging service such as "
-"Twitter or StatusNet. (These services may have other problems, of course.) "
-"The same goes for other communication not meant to be private, such as chat "
-"groups."
+"published information isn't doing your own computing. Neither is use of a "
+"blog site to publish your own works, or usinga microblogging service such as "
+"Twitter or StatusNet. (These services may or may not have other problems, "
+"depending on details.) The same goes for other communication not meant to "
+"be private, such as chat groups."
msgstr ""
"L'idea iniziale dei server web non era di svolgere attività informatiche per
"
"voi, ma piuttosto di pubblicare informazioni cui darvi accesso. Questo è "
@@ -910,7 +980,10 @@
"traduzioni</a>."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-msgid "Copyright © 2010, 2013, 2015 Richard Stallman"
+# | Copyright © 2010, 2013, [-2015-] {+2015, 2016+} Richard Stallman
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid "Copyright © 2010, 2013, 2015 Richard Stallman"
+msgid "Copyright © 2010, 2013, 2015, 2016 Richard Stallman"
msgstr "Copyright © 2010, 2013, 2015 Richard Stallman"
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
Index: who-does-that-server-really-serve.ja.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/who-does-that-server-really-serve.ja.po,v
retrieving revision 1.27
retrieving revision 1.28
diff -u -b -r1.27 -r1.28
--- who-does-that-server-really-serve.ja.po 29 Dec 2015 06:27:09 -0000
1.27
+++ who-does-that-server-really-serve.ja.po 1 Jan 2016 17:01:37 -0000
1.28
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: who-does-that-server-really-serve.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2015-12-17 12:39+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 16:55+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2015-12-29 14:43+0900\n"
"Last-Translator: NIIBE Yutaka <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Japanese <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"X-Outdated-Since: 2016-01-01 16:55+0000\n"
#. type: Content of: <title>
msgid ""
@@ -39,10 +40,15 @@
"ãã¹ãã³ã»ã¬ãã¥ã¼</a>ã«æåã®ãã¼ã¸ã§ã³ãæ²è¼ããã¾ããã)"
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "<strong>On the Internet, proprietary software isn't the only way to lose "
+#| "your freedom. Service as a Software Substitute, or SaaSS, is another way "
+#| "to let someone else have power over your computing.</strong>"
msgid ""
"<strong>On the Internet, proprietary software isn't the only way to lose "
"your freedom. Service as a Software Substitute, or SaaSS, is another way to "
-"let someone else have power over your computing.</strong>"
+"give someone else power over your computing.</strong>"
msgstr ""
"<strong>ã¤ã³ã¿ã¼ãããã§ã¯ããããã©ã¤ã¨ã¿ãªãªã½ããã¦ã§ã¢ã
ããèªç±ã失ãå¯"
"ä¸ã®æ¹æ³ã§ã¯ããã¾ãããã½ããã¦ã§ã¢ä»£æ¿ã¨ãã¦ã®ãµã¼ãã¹(SaaSS)ã¯ãããªãã®ã³"
@@ -112,12 +118,19 @@
"ã¦ã§ã¢ã®å®ç¾©</a>ãã覧ãã ããã)"
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "With free software, we, the users, take back control of our computing. "
+#| "Proprietary software still exists, but we can exclude it from our lives "
+#| "and many of us have done so. However, we now face a new threat to our "
+#| "control over our computing: Service as a Software Substitute (SaaSS). "
+#| "For our freedom's sake, we have to reject that too."
msgid ""
"With free software, we, the users, take back control of our computing. "
"Proprietary software still exists, but we can exclude it from our lives and "
-"many of us have done so. However, we now face a new threat to our control "
-"over our computing: Service as a Software Substitute (SaaSS). For our "
-"freedom's sake, we have to reject that too."
+"many of us have done so. However, we are now offered another tempting way "
+"to cede control over our computing: Service as a Software Substitute "
+"(SaaSS). For our freedom's sake, we have to reject that too."
msgstr ""
"èªç±ã½ããã¦ã§ã¢ã§ãããããã¡ã¦ã¼ã¶ã¯ãããããã¡ã®ã³ã³ãã¥ã¼ãã£ã³ã°ã®ã³ã³"
"ããã¼ã«ãåãæ»ãã¾ãããããã©ã¤ã¨ã¿ãªãªã½ããã¦ã§ã¢ã¯ããªãåå¨ãã¾ããã"
@@ -152,11 +165,17 @@
"ãã"
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The computing is <em>her own</em> because, by assumption, she could, in "
+#| "principle, have done it by running a program on her own computer (whether "
+#| "or not that program is available to her at present). When this "
+#| "assumption is not so, it isn't SaaSS."
msgid ""
"The computing is <em>her own</em> because, by assumption, she could, in "
"principle, have done it by running a program on her own computer (whether or "
-"not that program is available to her at present). When this assumption is "
-"not so, it isn't SaaSS."
+"not that program is available to her at present). In cases where this "
+"assumption is not so, it isn't SaaSS."
msgstr ""
"ãã®ã³ã³ãã¥ã¼ãã£ã³ã°ã¯ã<em>ã¦ã¼ã¶èªèº«ã®ãã®</em>ã§ãããªããªããä»®å®ã«ãã"
"ã¦ãåççã«ãã¦ã¼ã¶èªèº«ã®ã³ã³ãã¥ã¼ã¿ã§ããã°ã©ã
ãå®è¡ãããã¨ã§ããããå®"
@@ -240,6 +259,15 @@
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
+"Theoretically, homomorphic encryption might some day advance to the point "
+"where future SaaSS services might be constructed to be unable to understand "
+"some of the data that users send them. Such services <em>could</em> be set "
+"up not to snoop on users; this does not mean they <em>will</em> do no "
+"snooping."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
"Some proprietary operating systems have a universal back door, permitting "
"someone to remotely install software changes. For instance, Windows has a "
"universal back door with which Microsoft can forcibly change any software on "
@@ -473,10 +501,15 @@
"ããªããµã¼ãã§ãããè¡ããã¨ã¯ãSaaSSã§ãã"
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Rejecting SaaSS does not mean refusing to use any network servers run by "
+#| "anyone other than you. Most servers are not SaaSS because the jobs they "
+#| "do are not the user's own computing."
msgid ""
"Rejecting SaaSS does not mean refusing to use any network servers run by "
"anyone other than you. Most servers are not SaaSS because the jobs they do "
-"are not the user's own computing."
+"are some sort of communication, rather than the user's own computing."
msgstr ""
"SaaSSãæé¤ããã¨ãããã¨ã¯ãèªå以å¤ã®èª°ãã«ãã£ã¦åãããã¦ããããããªã"
"ãããã¯ã¼ã¯ãµã¼ãã§ãããã®ä½¿ç¨ãæ絶ãããã¨ãããã¨ã§ã¯ããã¾ãããã»ã¨ã"
@@ -484,15 +517,25 @@
"ãã¥ã¼ãã£ã³ã°ã§ã¯ãªãããã§ãã"
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The original idea of web servers wasn't to do computing for you, it was "
+#| "to publish information for you to access. Even today this is what most "
+#| "web sites do, and it doesn't pose the SaaSS problem, because accessing "
+#| "someone's published information isn't doing your own computing. Neither "
+#| "is publishing your own materials via a blog site or a microblogging "
+#| "service such as Twitter or StatusNet. (These services may have other "
+#| "problems, of course.) The same goes for other communication not meant to "
+#| "be private, such as chat groups."
msgid ""
"The original idea of web servers wasn't to do computing for you, it was to "
"publish information for you to access. Even today this is what most web "
"sites do, and it doesn't pose the SaaSS problem, because accessing someone's "
-"published information isn't doing your own computing. Neither is publishing "
-"your own materials via a blog site or a microblogging service such as "
-"Twitter or StatusNet. (These services may have other problems, of course.) "
-"The same goes for other communication not meant to be private, such as chat "
-"groups."
+"published information isn't doing your own computing. Neither is use of a "
+"blog site to publish your own works, or usinga microblogging service such as "
+"Twitter or StatusNet. (These services may or may not have other problems, "
+"depending on details.) The same goes for other communication not meant to "
+"be private, such as chat groups."
msgstr ""
"ã¦ã§ããµã¼ãã®ãªãªã¸ãã«ã®èãæ¹ã¯ããªãã®ããã«ã³ã³ãã¥ã¼ãã£ã³ã°ãè¡ãã¨ã"
"ããã®ã§ã¯ããã¾ããã§ãããããã¯æ
å
±ãæä¾ããããªããã¢ã¯ã»ã¹ã§ããããã«"
@@ -888,7 +931,9 @@
"README.translations.html\">翻訳 README</a>ãã覧ãã ããã"
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-msgid "Copyright © 2010, 2013, 2015 Richard Stallman"
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid "Copyright © 2010, 2013, 2015 Richard Stallman"
+msgid "Copyright © 2010, 2013, 2015, 2016 Richard Stallman"
msgstr "Copyright © 2010, 2013, 2015 Richard Stallman"
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
Index: who-does-that-server-really-serve.ko-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file:
/web/www/www/philosophy/po/who-does-that-server-really-serve.ko-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.22
retrieving revision 1.23
diff -u -b -r1.22 -r1.23
--- who-does-that-server-really-serve.ko-diff.html 17 Dec 2015 12:44:16
-0000 1.22
+++ who-does-that-server-really-serve.ko-diff.html 1 Jan 2016 17:01:37
-0000 1.23
@@ -30,8 +30,7 @@
<p><strong>On the Internet, proprietary software isn't the only
way to
lose your freedom. <span
class="removed"><del><strong>Software</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Service</em></ins></span> as a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>Service</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Software Substitute, or SaaSS,</em></ins></span> is
-another way to let someone else have power over your
-computing.</strong></p>
+another way to <span class="removed"><del><strong>let</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>give</em></ins></span> someone else <span
class="removed"><del><strong>have</strong></del></span> power over your
computing.</strong></p>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>SaaSS means using a service implemented by
someone else as a
substitute for running your copy of a program. The term is ours;
@@ -65,10 +64,11 @@
<p>With free software, we, the users, take back control of our
computing. Proprietary software still exists, but we can exclude it
-from our lives and many of us have done so. However, we now face a
-new threat to our control over our computing: <span
class="removed"><del><strong>Software</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Service</em></ins></span> as a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>Service.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Software
-Substitute (SaaSS).</em></ins></span> For our freedom's sake, we have to
reject that
-too.</p>
+from our lives and many of us have done so. However, we <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>are</em></ins></span> now <span
class="removed"><del><strong>face a
+new threat</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>offered another tempting way</em></ins></span>
to <span class="removed"><del><strong>our</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>cede</em></ins></span> control over our computing:
<span class="removed"><del><strong>Software</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>Service</em></ins></span> as a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>Service.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Software Substitute (SaaSS).</em></ins></span> For
our freedom's sake, we
+have to reject that too.</p>
<h3>How <span
class="removed"><del><strong>Software</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Service</em></ins></span> as a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>Service</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Software Substitute</em></ins></span> Takes Away Your
Freedom</h3>
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@
<p>The computing is <em>her own</em> because, by assumption,
she
could, in principle, have done it by running a program on her own
computer (whether or not that program is available to her at
-present). When this assumption is not so, it isn't
SaaSS.</p></em></ins></span>
+present). In cases where this assumption is not so, it isn't
SaaSS.</p></em></ins></span>
<p>These servers wrest control from the users even more inexorably
than proprietary software. With proprietary software, users typically
@@ -125,7 +125,13 @@
photos of her. Eventually
<a
href="http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/data_mine_1/2013/09/privacy_facebook_kids_don_t_post_photos_of_your_kids_on_social_media.html">
they
leaked from there</a>.
-</p></em></ins></span>
+</p>
+
+<p>Theoretically, homomorphic encryption might some day advance to the
+point where future SaaSS services might be constructed to be unable to
+understand some of the data that users send them. Such
+services <em>could</em> be set up not to snoop on users; this does
not
+mean they <em>will</em> do no snooping.</p></em></ins></span>
<p>Some proprietary <span class="removed"><del><strong>programs can
mistreat users under remote command.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>operating systems have a universal back door,
permitting someone to remotely install software changes.</em></ins></span> For
@@ -144,14 +150,12 @@
<p>With SaaSS,</em></ins></span> the server operator <span
class="removed"><del><strong>the power to</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>can</em></ins></span> change the software in <span
class="removed"><del><strong>use, or</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>use on</em></ins></span>
the <span class="removed"><del><strong>users' data being operated on. Once
again, no
-special code is needed</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>server. He ought to be able</em></ins></span> to do
<span class="removed"><del><strong>this.</p>
-
-<p>Thus, SaaS</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>this, since it's his computer;
+special code is needed</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>server. He ought to be able</em></ins></span> to do
<span class="removed"><del><strong>this.</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>this, since it's his computer;
but the result is the same as using a proprietary application program
with a universal back door: someone has the power to silently impose
-changes in how the user's computing gets done.</p>
+changes in how the user's computing gets done.</p></em></ins></span>
-<p>Thus, SaaSS</em></ins></span> is equivalent to <span
class="removed"><del><strong>total</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>running proprietary software with</em></ins></span>
+<p>Thus, <span class="removed"><del><strong>SaaS</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>SaaSS</em></ins></span> is equivalent to <span
class="removed"><del><strong>total</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>running proprietary software with</em></ins></span>
spyware and a <span class="removed"><del><strong>gaping
wide</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>universal</em></ins></span> back
<span class="removed"><del><strong>door, and</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>door. It</em></ins></span> gives the server operator
unjust power over the <span class="removed"><del><strong>user. We
@@ -217,23 +221,17 @@
<p>But</em></ins></span> none of these servers would give you control
over computing you
do on it, unless it's <em>your</em> <span
class="removed"><del><strong>server.
-The rest would</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>server
(one whose software load
-you control, regardless of whether the machine is your property). It
-may be OK to trust your friend's server for some jobs, just as you
+The rest would all be SaaS. SaaS always subjects</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>server (one whose software load</em></ins></span>
+you <span class="removed"><del><strong>to the power</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>control, regardless</em></ins></span> of <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>whether</em></ins></span> the <span
class="removed"><del><strong>server operator, and the only remedy is,
<em>Don't use SaaS!</em>
+Don't use someone else's server</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>machine is your property). It
+may be OK</em></ins></span> to <span
class="removed"><del><strong>do</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>trust</em></ins></span> your <span
class="removed"><del><strong>own</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>friend's server for some jobs, just as you
might let your friend maintain the software on your own computer.
-Outside of that,</em></ins></span> all <span class="inserted"><ins><em>these
servers would</em></ins></span> be <span class="removed"><del><strong>SaaS.
SaaS</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>SaaSS for you.
SaaSS</em></ins></span>
+Outside of that, all these servers would be SaaSS for you. SaaSS
always subjects you to the power of the server operator, and the only
-remedy is, <em>Don't use <span
class="removed"><del><strong>SaaS!</em></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>SaaSS!</em></em></ins></span> Don't use
someone else's server
-to do your own computing on data provided by you.</p>
+remedy is, <em>Don't use SaaSS!</em> Don't use someone else's
server
+to do your own</em></ins></span> computing on data provided by you.</p>
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><h3>Distinguishing SaaS from Other
Network Services</h3>
-
-<p>Does avoiding SaaS mean you refuse to use any network servers run
-by anyone other than you? Not at all. Most servers do not raise this
-issue, because</strong></del></span>
-
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p>This issue
demonstrates</em></ins></span> the <span class="removed"><del><strong>job you
do with them isn't your own computing
-except</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>depth of the
difference between
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p>This issue demonstrates the depth of
the difference between
“open” and “free”. Source code that is open
source <a href="/philosophy/free-open-overlap.html">is, nearly always,
free</a>. However, the idea of
@@ -246,62 +244,63 @@
that programs raise. To avoid confusion,
we <a href="/philosophy/network-services-arent-free-or-nonfree.html">
avoid describing a service as “free” or
-“proprietary.”</a></p>
+“proprietary.”</a></p></em></ins></span>
+
+<h3>Distinguishing <span
class="removed"><del><strong>SaaS</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>SaaSS</em></ins></span> from Other Network
Services</h3>
-<h3>Distinguishing SaaSS from Other Network Services</h3>
+<span class="removed"><del><strong><p>Does avoiding SaaS
mean</strong></del></span>
-<p>Which online services are SaaSS? The clearest example is a
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p>Which online services are SaaSS? The
clearest example is a
translation service, which translates (say) English text into Spanish
text. Translating a text for you is computing that is purely yours.
You could do it by running a program on your own computer, if only you
had the right program. (To be ethical, that program should be free.)
The translation service substitutes for that program, so it is Service
as a Software Substitute, or SaaSS. Since it denies you control
-over your computing, it does you wrong.</p>
+over your computing, it does</em></ins></span> you <span
class="removed"><del><strong>refuse</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>wrong.</p>
<p>Another clear example is using a service such as Flickr or
Instagram to modify a photo. Modifying photos is an activity that
-people have done in their own computers for decades; doing
it</em></ins></span> in a <span class="removed"><del><strong>trivial
sense.</p></strong></del></span>
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em>server you don't control, rather than your own
computer, is SaaSS.</p>
+people have done in their own computers for decades; doing it in a
+server you don't control, rather than your own computer, is SaaSS.</p>
-<p>Rejecting SaaSS does not mean refusing to use any network servers
-run by anyone other than you. Most servers are not SaaSS because the
-jobs they do are not the user's own computing.</p></em></ins></span>
+<p>Rejecting SaaSS does not mean refusing</em></ins></span> to use any
network servers
+run by anyone other than <span class="removed"><del><strong>you? Not at
all.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>you.</em></ins></span> Most servers <span
class="removed"><del><strong>do</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>are</em></ins></span> not <span
class="removed"><del><strong>raise this
+issue,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>SaaSS</em></ins></span> because the <span
class="removed"><del><strong>job you</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>jobs they</em></ins></span> do <span
class="removed"><del><strong>with them isn't your</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>are some sort of communication, rather than the
user's</em></ins></span>
+own <span class="removed"><del><strong>computing
+except in a trivial sense.</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>computing.</p></em></ins></span>
<p>The original <span
class="removed"><del><strong>purpose</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>idea</em></ins></span> of web servers wasn't to do
computing for you, it
was to publish information for you to access. Even today this is what
most web sites do, and it doesn't pose the <span
class="removed"><del><strong>SaaS</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>SaaSS</em></ins></span> problem, because
accessing someone's published information isn't <span
class="removed"><del><strong>a matter of</strong></del></span> doing your own
-computing. Neither is publishing your own materials via a blog site
-or a microblogging service such as Twitter or <span
class="removed"><del><strong>identi.ca.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>StatusNet. (These
-services may have other problems, of course.)</em></ins></span> The same goes
for <span class="inserted"><ins><em>other</em></ins></span>
-communication not meant to be private, such as chat
+computing. Neither is <span class="removed"><del><strong>publishing your own
materials via</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>use
of</em></ins></span> a blog site <span class="inserted"><ins><em>to publish
your own works,</em></ins></span>
+or <span class="removed"><del><strong>a</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>usinga</em></ins></span> microblogging service such
as Twitter or <span
class="removed"><del><strong>identi.ca.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>StatusNet. (These
+services may or may not have other problems, depending on
details.)</em></ins></span>
+The same goes for <span class="inserted"><ins><em>other</em></ins></span>
communication not meant to be private, such as
+chat
<span class="removed"><del><strong>groups. Social</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>groups.</p>
<p>In its essence, social</em></ins></span> networking <span
class="removed"><del><strong>can extend into SaaS; however, at root
it</strong></del></span> is <span
class="removed"><del><strong>just</strong></del></span> a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>method</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>form</em></ins></span> of communication and
publication, not <span class="removed"><del><strong>SaaS. If you
-use the</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>SaaSS. However,
a</em></ins></span> service <span class="removed"><del><strong>for minor
editing of what you're going to communicate,
-that</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>whose main
facility</em></ins></span> is <span class="removed"><del><strong>not a
significant issue.</p>
+use the</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>SaaSS. However,
a service whose main facility is
+social networking can have features or extensions which are SaaSS.</p>
-<p>Services such as search engines collect data from around the web
-and let you examine it. Looking through their collection of data
-isn't your own computing in the usual sense—you didn't provide
-that collection—so using such</strong></del></span>
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em>social networking can have features or
extensions which are SaaSS.</p>
-
-<p>If a service is not SaaSS, that does not mean it is OK. There are
+<p>If a</em></ins></span> service <span class="removed"><del><strong>for
minor editing of what you're going to communicate,
+that</strong></del></span> is not <span class="inserted"><ins><em>SaaSS, that
does not mean it is OK. There are
other ethical issues about services. For instance, Facebook
distributes video in Flash, which pressures users to run nonfree
software; it requires running nonfree JavaScript code; and it gives
-users a misleading impression of privacy while luring them into baring
+users</em></ins></span> a <span class="removed"><del><strong>significant
issue.</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>misleading impression of privacy while luring them
into baring
their lives to Facebook. Those are important issues, different from
the SaaSS issue.
-</p>
+</p></em></ins></span>
<p>Services such as search engines collect data from around the web
and let you examine it. Looking through their collection of data
isn't your own computing in the usual sense—you didn't provide
-that collection—so using such</em></ins></span> a service to search the
web is not
+that collection—so using such a service to search the web is not
<span class="removed"><del><strong>SaaS. (However,</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>SaaSS. However,</em></ins></span> using
someone else's <span class="removed"><del><strong>search
engine</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>server</em></ins></span> to implement a search
facility for your own site <em>is</em> <span
class="removed"><del><strong>SaaS.)</p>
@@ -331,72 +330,74 @@
Fortunately, development hosting</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>server.</p>
-<p>Some</em></ins></span> sites <span class="removed"><del><strong>such
as Savannah</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>offer
multiple services,</em></ins></span> and
-<span class="removed"><del><strong>SourceForge don't
pose</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>if one is not SaaSS,
-another may be SaaSS. For instance,</em></ins></span> the <span
class="removed"><del><strong>SaaS problem, because what groups do
there</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>main service of
Facebook</em></ins></span> is <span class="removed"><del><strong>mainly
publication</strong></del></span>
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em>social networking,</em></ins></span> and <span
class="removed"><del><strong>public communication, rather than their own
+<p>Some</em></ins></span> sites <span class="removed"><del><strong>such
as Savannah and
+SourceForge don't pose the SaaS problem, because what groups do there
+is mainly publication</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>offer multiple services,</em></ins></span> and <span
class="removed"><del><strong>public communication, rather than their own
private computing.</p>
-<p>Multiplayer games</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>that is not SaaSS; however, it supports
-third-party applications, some of which</em></ins></span> are <span
class="removed"><del><strong>a group activity carried out on someone
-else's server,</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>SaaSS.
Flickr's main
-service is distributing photos,</em></ins></span> which <span
class="removed"><del><strong>makes them SaaS. But where the data
involved</strong></del></span> is
-<span class="removed"><del><strong>just the state of play and the score, the
worst wrong the operator
-might commit</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>not SaaSS,
but it also has
-features for editing photos, which</em></ins></span> is <span
class="removed"><del><strong>favoritism. You might well ignore that risk,
since</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>SaaSS. Likewise,
using
-Instagram to post a photo is not SaaSS, but using</em></ins></span> it
-<span class="removed"><del><strong>seems unlikely and very
little</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>to transform the
-photo</em></ins></span> is <span class="removed"><del><strong>at stake.
On</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>SaaSS.</p>
-
-<p>Google Docs shows how complex</em></ins></span> the <span
class="removed"><del><strong>other hand, when
+<p>Multiplayer games are a group activity carried out on someone
+else's server, which makes them SaaS. But where the data
involved</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>if
one</em></ins></span> is
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>just</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>not SaaSS,
+another may be SaaSS. For instance,</em></ins></span> the <span
class="removed"><del><strong>state</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>main service</em></ins></span> of <span
class="removed"><del><strong>play and the score, the worst wrong the operator
+might commit</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Facebook</em></ins></span> is <span
class="removed"><del><strong>favoritism. You might well ignore that risk,
since it
+seems unlikely</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>social networking,</em></ins></span> and <span
class="removed"><del><strong>very little</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>that</em></ins></span> is <span
class="removed"><del><strong>at stake. On the other hand, when
the game becomes more than just a game, the issue changes.</p>
-<p>Which online services are SaaS? Google Docs is</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>evaluation of</em></ins></span> a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>clear example.
-Its basic activity is editing, and Google encourages</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>single service
-can become. It invites</em></ins></span> people to <span
class="removed"><del><strong>use</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>edit a document by running a
+<p>Which online services</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>not SaaSS; however, it supports
+third-party applications, some of which</em></ins></span> are <span
class="removed"><del><strong>SaaS? Google Docs</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>SaaSS. Flickr's main
+service</em></ins></span> is <span class="removed"><del><strong>a clear
example.
+Its basic activity</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>distributing photos, which</em></ins></span> is <span
class="removed"><del><strong>editing, and Google encourages people to
use</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>not SaaSS,
but</em></ins></span> it <span class="inserted"><ins><em>also has
+features</em></ins></span> for <span class="removed"><del><strong>their own
editing; this is SaaS. It offers the added feature of
+collaborative editing, but adding participants doesn't alter the fact
+that</strong></del></span> editing <span class="removed"><del><strong>on the
server is SaaS. (In addition, Google Docs</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>photos, which</em></ins></span> is
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>unacceptable because it installs a large
nonfree JavaScript program
+into the users' browsers.) If</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>SaaSS. Likewise,</em></ins></span> using
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>Instagram to post</em></ins></span> a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>service for communication or
+collaboration requires doing substantial parts of your own computing
+with it too, that computing</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>photo</em></ins></span> is <span
class="removed"><del><strong>SaaS even if</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>not SaaSS, but using it to
transform</em></ins></span> the <span
class="removed"><del><strong>communication is
+not.</p>
+
+<p>Some sites offer multiple services, and if one</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>photo</em></ins></span> is <span
class="removed"><del><strong>not SaaS, another
+may be SaaS. For instance,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>SaaSS.</p>
+
+<p>Google Docs shows how complex</em></ins></span> the <span
class="removed"><del><strong>main service</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>evaluation</em></ins></span> of <span
class="removed"><del><strong>Facebook is social
+networking,</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>a single
service
+can become. It invites people to edit a document by running a
large <a href="/philosophy/javascript-trap.html">nonfree JavaScript
-program</a>, clearly wrong. However,</em></ins></span> it <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>offers an API</em></ins></span> for <span
class="removed"><del><strong>their own editing;</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>uploading
-and downloading documents in standard formats. A free software editor
-can do so through</em></ins></span> this <span class="inserted"><ins><em>API.
This usage scenario</em></ins></span> is <span
class="removed"><del><strong>SaaS. It offers the added feature of
-collaborative editing,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>not SaaSS, because
-it uses Google Docs as a mere repository. Showing all your data to a
-company is bad,</em></ins></span> but <span
class="removed"><del><strong>adding participants doesn't alter the
fact</strong></del></span> that <span
class="removed"><del><strong>editing</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>is a matter of privacy, not SaaSS;
depending</em></ins></span>
-on <span class="removed"><del><strong>the server</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>a service for access to your data</em></ins></span>
is <span class="removed"><del><strong>SaaS. (In addition, Google
Docs</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>bad, but
that</em></ins></span> is
-<span class="removed"><del><strong>unacceptable because it
installs</strong></del></span> a <span class="removed"><del><strong>large
nonfree JavaScript program
-into</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>matter of
-risk, not SaaSS. On</em></ins></span> the <span
class="removed"><del><strong>users' browsers.) If</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>other hand,</em></ins></span> using <span
class="removed"><del><strong>a</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>the</em></ins></span> service for <span
class="removed"><del><strong>communication or
-collaboration requires doing substantial parts of</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>converting
-document formats <em>is</em> SaaSS, because it's something you
could
-have done by running a suitable program (free, one hopes) in</em></ins></span>
your own <span class="removed"><del><strong>computing
-with</strong></del></span>
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em>computer.</p>
+program</a>, clearly wrong. However, it offers an API for
uploading</em></ins></span>
+and <span class="removed"><del><strong>that</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>downloading documents in standard formats. A free
software editor
+can do so through this API. This usage scenario</em></ins></span> is not
<span class="removed"><del><strong>SaaS; however,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>SaaSS, because</em></ins></span>
+it <span class="removed"><del><strong>supports third-party
+applications, some of which may be SaaS. Flickr's main
service</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>uses Google Docs
as a mere repository. Showing all your data to a
+company</em></ins></span> is
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>distributing photos,
which</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>bad, but
that</em></ins></span> is <span class="inserted"><ins><em>a matter of
privacy,</em></ins></span> not <span class="removed"><del><strong>SaaS, but it
also has features</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>SaaSS;
depending
+on a service</em></ins></span> for
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>editing photos, which</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>access to your data</em></ins></span> is <span
class="removed"><del><strong>SaaS.</p>
+
+<p>Some sites whose main service</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>bad, but that</em></ins></span> is <span
class="removed"><del><strong>publication and communication
+extend it with “contact management”: keeping
track</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>a
matter</em></ins></span> of
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>people</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>risk, not SaaSS. On the other hand, using the
service for converting
+document formats <em>is</em> SaaSS, because it's
something</em></ins></span> you <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>could</em></ins></span>
+have <span class="removed"><del><strong>relationships with. Sending mail to
those</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>done by running a
suitable program (free, one hopes) in your own
+computer.</p>
<p>Using Google Docs through a free editor is rare, of course. Most
-often, people use</em></ins></span> it <span class="removed"><del><strong>too,
that computing</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>through
the nonfree JavaScript program, which</em></ins></span> is <span
class="removed"><del><strong>SaaS even if</strong></del></span>
+often,</em></ins></span> people <span class="removed"><del><strong>for
+you</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>use it through the
nonfree JavaScript program, which</em></ins></span> is <span
class="removed"><del><strong>not SaaS, but keeping track</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>bad like any nonfree program. This scenario
might involve SaaSS, too;
-that depends on what part of</em></ins></span> the <span
class="removed"><del><strong>communication</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>editing</em></ins></span> is
-<span class="removed"><del><strong>not.</p>
+that depends on what part</em></ins></span> of <span
class="removed"><del><strong>your dealings with them, if
+substantial,</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>the
editing</em></ins></span> is <span class="removed"><del><strong>SaaS.</p>
-<p>Some sites offer multiple services,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>done in the JavaScript
-program</em></ins></span> and <span class="removed"><del><strong>if one is not
SaaS, another
-may be SaaS. For instance,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>what part in</em></ins></span> the <span
class="removed"><del><strong>main service of Facebook is social
-networking,</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>server. We
don't know, but since SaaSS</em></ins></span>
-and <span class="removed"><del><strong>that is not SaaS;
however,</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>proprietary
software do similar wrong to the user,</em></ins></span> it <span
class="removed"><del><strong>supports third-party
-applications, some of which may be SaaS. Flickr's main service is
-distributing photos, which</strong></del></span> is not <span
class="removed"><del><strong>SaaS, but it also has features for
-editing photos, which is SaaS.</p>
-
-<p>Some sites whose main service is publication and communication
-extend it with “contact management”: keeping track of
-people you have relationships with. Sending mail</strong></del></span>
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em>crucial</em></ins></span> to <span
class="removed"><del><strong>those people for
-you is</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>know.</p>
-
-<p>Publishing via someone else's repository does</em></ins></span> not
<span class="removed"><del><strong>SaaS,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>raise privacy
-issues,</em></ins></span> but <span class="removed"><del><strong>keeping track
of your dealings with them, if
-substantial, is SaaS.</p>
+<p>If a service</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>done in the JavaScript
+program and what part in the server. We don't know, but since SaaSS
+and proprietary software do similar wrong to the user, it</em></ins></span> is
not <span class="removed"><del><strong>SaaS, that</strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>crucial to know.</p>
-<p>If</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>publishing
through Google Docs has</em></ins></span> a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>service is not SaaS, that does not
mean</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>special
problem:</em></ins></span> it
+<p>Publishing via someone else's repository</em></ins></span> does not
<span class="removed"><del><strong>mean</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>raise privacy
+issues, but publishing through Google Docs has a special
problem:</em></ins></span> it
is <span class="removed"><del><strong>OK. There are
other bad things</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>impossible even to <em>view the text</em>
of</em></ins></span> a <span class="removed"><del><strong>service can do. For
instance, Facebook distributes
video</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>Google Docs
document</em></ins></span>
@@ -556,7 +557,7 @@
There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. --></em></ins></span>
-<p>Copyright © <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2010</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2010, 2013, 2015</em></ins></span> Richard <span
class="removed"><del><strong>Stallman
+<p>Copyright © <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2010</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2010, 2013, 2015, 2016</em></ins></span> Richard
<span class="removed"><del><strong>Stallman
<br />
This</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>Stallman</p>
@@ -572,7 +573,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:</em></ins></span>
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2015/12/17 12:44:16 $
+$Date: 2016/01/01 17:01:37 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: who-does-that-server-really-serve.ko.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/who-does-that-server-really-serve.ko.po,v
retrieving revision 1.20
retrieving revision 1.21
diff -u -b -r1.20 -r1.21
--- who-does-that-server-really-serve.ko.po 17 Dec 2015 12:44:16 -0000
1.20
+++ who-does-that-server-really-serve.ko.po 1 Jan 2016 17:01:37 -0000
1.21
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: who-does-that-server-really-serve.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2015-12-17 12:39+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 16:55+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2012-05-04 14:26+0900\n"
"Last-Translator: Chang-hun Song <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Korean <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@
msgid ""
"<strong>On the Internet, proprietary software isn't the only way to lose "
"your freedom. Service as a Software Substitute, or SaaSS, is another way to "
-"let someone else have power over your computing.</strong>"
+"give someone else power over your computing.</strong>"
msgstr ""
"<strong>ì¸í°ë·ìì ì¬ë¬ë¶ì ìì 를 ìê² íë ê²ì´ ë
ì
ìíí¸ì¨ì´ ë¿ì ìëë"
"ë¤. ìë¹ì¤í ìíí¸ì¨ì´(SaaS, Software as a Service)ë
ëêµ°ê°ìê² ì¬ë¬ë¶ì ì»´"
@@ -127,9 +127,9 @@
msgid ""
"With free software, we, the users, take back control of our computing. "
"Proprietary software still exists, but we can exclude it from our lives and "
-"many of us have done so. However, we now face a new threat to our control "
-"over our computing: Service as a Software Substitute (SaaSS). For our "
-"freedom's sake, we have to reject that too."
+"many of us have done so. However, we are now offered another tempting way "
+"to cede control over our computing: Service as a Software Substitute "
+"(SaaSS). For our freedom's sake, we have to reject that too."
msgstr ""
"ìì ìíí¸ì¨ì´ë¥¼ íµí´ ì°ë¦¬ ì¬ì©ìë¤ì ì»´í¨í° ì¬ì©ì
íµì ë ¥ì ëì°¾ì ì ììµ"
"ëë¤. ë
ì ìíí¸ì¨ì´ë ì¬ì í ì¡´ì¬íì§ë§ ì°ë¦¬ë
ì°ë¦¬ì ì¶ìì ê·¸ê²ì 몰ìë¼ "
@@ -172,8 +172,8 @@
msgid ""
"The computing is <em>her own</em> because, by assumption, she could, in "
"principle, have done it by running a program on her own computer (whether or "
-"not that program is available to her at present). When this assumption is "
-"not so, it isn't SaaSS."
+"not that program is available to her at present). In cases where this "
+"assumption is not so, it isn't SaaSS."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <p>
@@ -271,6 +271,15 @@
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
+"Theoretically, homomorphic encryption might some day advance to the point "
+"where future SaaSS services might be constructed to be unable to understand "
+"some of the data that users send them. Such services <em>could</em> be set "
+"up not to snoop on users; this does not mean they <em>will</em> do no "
+"snooping."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
"Some proprietary operating systems have a universal back door, permitting "
"someone to remotely install software changes. For instance, Windows has a "
"universal back door with which Microsoft can forcibly change any software on "
@@ -501,7 +510,7 @@
msgid ""
"Rejecting SaaSS does not mean refusing to use any network servers run by "
"anyone other than you. Most servers are not SaaSS because the jobs they do "
-"are not the user's own computing."
+"are some sort of communication, rather than the user's own computing."
msgstr ""
"SaaS를 ì¬ì©íì§ ìë ê²ì´ ë¤ë¥¸ ì¬ëì´ ì´ìíë ì´ë í
ë¤í¸ìí¬ ìë²ì ì¬ì©ë "
"ê±°ë¶íë ê²ì ì미í ê¹ì? ë¬¼ë¡ ìëëë¤. ëë¶ë¶ì
ìë²ë¤ì ì´ë¬í 문ì 를 ì¼ì¼"
@@ -526,11 +535,11 @@
"The original idea of web servers wasn't to do computing for you, it was to "
"publish information for you to access. Even today this is what most web "
"sites do, and it doesn't pose the SaaSS problem, because accessing someone's "
-"published information isn't doing your own computing. Neither is publishing "
-"your own materials via a blog site or a microblogging service such as "
-"Twitter or StatusNet. (These services may have other problems, of course.) "
-"The same goes for other communication not meant to be private, such as chat "
-"groups."
+"published information isn't doing your own computing. Neither is use of a "
+"blog site to publish your own works, or usinga microblogging service such as "
+"Twitter or StatusNet. (These services may or may not have other problems, "
+"depending on details.) The same goes for other communication not meant to "
+"be private, such as chat groups."
msgstr ""
"ì¹ ìë²ì ê³ ì í 목ì ì ì¬ë¬ë¶ì ìí´ ì»´í¨í° ìì
ì
ìííë ê²ì´ ìëììµë"
"ë¤. ê·¸ê²ì ì¬ë¬ë¶ì´ ì ê·¼í ì ìë ì 보를 ê²ìíë
ê²ì´ììµëë¤. ì¬ì§ì´ ì¤ë"
@@ -960,7 +969,7 @@
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
#, fuzzy
#| msgid "Copyright © 2010 Richard Stallman"
-msgid "Copyright © 2010, 2013, 2015 Richard Stallman"
+msgid "Copyright © 2010, 2013, 2015, 2016 Richard Stallman"
msgstr "Copyright © 2010 Richard Stallman"
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
Index: who-does-that-server-really-serve.pl.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/who-does-that-server-really-serve.pl.po,v
retrieving revision 1.62
retrieving revision 1.63
diff -u -b -r1.62 -r1.63
--- who-does-that-server-really-serve.pl.po 17 Dec 2015 12:44:17 -0000
1.62
+++ who-does-that-server-really-serve.pl.po 1 Jan 2016 17:01:37 -0000
1.63
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: 1.0\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2015-12-17 12:39+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 16:55+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2015-02-14 13:36-0600\n"
"Last-Translator: Jan Owoc <jsowoc AT gmail.com>\n"
"Language-Team: Polish <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -44,10 +44,19 @@
"richard-stallman-free-software-DRM\">Boston Review</a>.)"
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | <strong>On the Internet, proprietary software isn't the only way to lose
+# | your freedom. Service as a Software Substitute, or SaaSS, is another way
+# | to [-let-] {+give+} someone else [-have-] power over your
+# | computing.</strong>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "<strong>On the Internet, proprietary software isn't the only way to lose "
+#| "your freedom. Service as a Software Substitute, or SaaSS, is another way "
+#| "to let someone else have power over your computing.</strong>"
msgid ""
"<strong>On the Internet, proprietary software isn't the only way to lose "
"your freedom. Service as a Software Substitute, or SaaSS, is another way to "
-"let someone else have power over your computing.</strong>"
+"give someone else power over your computing.</strong>"
msgstr ""
"<strong>W Internecie, oprogramowanie wÅasnoÅciowe nie jest jedynÄ
"
"drogÄ
do utraty wolnoÅci. UsÅuga zastÄpujÄ
ca oprogramowanie "
@@ -119,12 +128,25 @@
"href=\"/philosophy/free-sw.html\">definicjÄ wolnego oprogramowania</a>.)"
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | With free software, we, the users, take back control of our computing.
+# | Proprietary software still exists, but we can exclude it from our lives
+# | and many of us have done so. However, we {+are+} now [-face a new
+# | threat-] {+offered another tempting way+} to [-our-] {+cede+} control over
+# | our computing: Service as a Software Substitute (SaaSS). For our
+# | freedom's sake, we have to reject that too.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "With free software, we, the users, take back control of our computing. "
+#| "Proprietary software still exists, but we can exclude it from our lives "
+#| "and many of us have done so. However, we now face a new threat to our "
+#| "control over our computing: Service as a Software Substitute (SaaSS). "
+#| "For our freedom's sake, we have to reject that too."
msgid ""
"With free software, we, the users, take back control of our computing. "
"Proprietary software still exists, but we can exclude it from our lives and "
-"many of us have done so. However, we now face a new threat to our control "
-"over our computing: Service as a Software Substitute (SaaSS). For our "
-"freedom's sake, we have to reject that too."
+"many of us have done so. However, we are now offered another tempting way "
+"to cede control over our computing: Service as a Software Substitute "
+"(SaaSS). For our freedom's sake, we have to reject that too."
msgstr ""
"DziÄki wolnemu oprogramowaniu, my - użytkownicy, odzyskujemy kontrolÄ
"
"nad przetwarzaniem naszych danych. Oprogramowanie wÅasnoÅciowe nadal "
@@ -162,11 +184,21 @@
"wykonuje dalsze kroki."
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | The computing is <em>her own</em> because, by assumption, she could, in
+# | principle, have done it by running a program on her own computer (whether
+# | or not that program is available to her at present). [-When-] {+In cases
+# | where+} this assumption is not so, it isn't SaaSS.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The computing is <em>her own</em> because, by assumption, she could, in "
+#| "principle, have done it by running a program on her own computer (whether "
+#| "or not that program is available to her at present). When this "
+#| "assumption is not so, it isn't SaaSS."
msgid ""
"The computing is <em>her own</em> because, by assumption, she could, in "
"principle, have done it by running a program on her own computer (whether or "
-"not that program is available to her at present). When this assumption is "
-"not so, it isn't SaaSS."
+"not that program is available to her at present). In cases where this "
+"assumption is not so, it isn't SaaSS."
msgstr ""
"Obliczenia sÄ
<em>dla niej</em> ponieważ, teoretycznie, ona mogÅaby
zrobiÄ "
"to samo uruchamiajÄ
c program na swoim komputerze (niezależnie od "
@@ -252,6 +284,15 @@
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
+"Theoretically, homomorphic encryption might some day advance to the point "
+"where future SaaSS services might be constructed to be unable to understand "
+"some of the data that users send them. Such services <em>could</em> be set "
+"up not to snoop on users; this does not mean they <em>will</em> do no "
+"snooping."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
"Some proprietary operating systems have a universal back door, permitting "
"someone to remotely install software changes. For instance, Windows has a "
"universal back door with which Microsoft can forcibly change any software on "
@@ -543,10 +584,19 @@
"na serwerze zamiast na wÅasnym komputerze jest SaaSS."
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | Rejecting SaaSS does not mean refusing to use any network servers run by
+# | anyone other than you. Most servers are not SaaSS because the jobs they
+# | do are [-not-] {+some sort of communication, rather than+} the user's own
+# | computing.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Rejecting SaaSS does not mean refusing to use any network servers run by "
+#| "anyone other than you. Most servers are not SaaSS because the jobs they "
+#| "do are not the user's own computing."
msgid ""
"Rejecting SaaSS does not mean refusing to use any network servers run by "
"anyone other than you. Most servers are not SaaSS because the jobs they do "
-"are not the user's own computing."
+"are some sort of communication, rather than the user's own computing."
msgstr ""
"Odrzucanie SaaSS nie oznacza odmawiania korzystania z jakichkolwiek "
"serwerów utrzymywanych przez osoby inne niż Wy. SaaS nie dotyczy "
@@ -554,15 +604,34 @@
"nie jest naszym prywatnym przetwarzaniem."
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | The original idea of web servers wasn't to do computing for you, it was to
+# | publish information for you to access. Even today this is what most web
+# | sites do, and it doesn't pose the SaaSS problem, because accessing
+# | someone's published information isn't doing your own computing. Neither
+# | is [-publishing your own materials via-] {+use of+} a blog site {+to
+# | publish your own works,+} or [-a-] {+usinga+} microblogging service such
+# | as Twitter or StatusNet. (These services may {+or may not+} have other
+# | problems, [-of course.)-] {+depending on details.)+} The same goes for
+# | other communication not meant to be private, such as chat groups.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The original idea of web servers wasn't to do computing for you, it was "
+#| "to publish information for you to access. Even today this is what most "
+#| "web sites do, and it doesn't pose the SaaSS problem, because accessing "
+#| "someone's published information isn't doing your own computing. Neither "
+#| "is publishing your own materials via a blog site or a microblogging "
+#| "service such as Twitter or StatusNet. (These services may have other "
+#| "problems, of course.) The same goes for other communication not meant to "
+#| "be private, such as chat groups."
msgid ""
"The original idea of web servers wasn't to do computing for you, it was to "
"publish information for you to access. Even today this is what most web "
"sites do, and it doesn't pose the SaaSS problem, because accessing someone's "
-"published information isn't doing your own computing. Neither is publishing "
-"your own materials via a blog site or a microblogging service such as "
-"Twitter or StatusNet. (These services may have other problems, of course.) "
-"The same goes for other communication not meant to be private, such as chat "
-"groups."
+"published information isn't doing your own computing. Neither is use of a "
+"blog site to publish your own works, or usinga microblogging service such as "
+"Twitter or StatusNet. (These services may or may not have other problems, "
+"depending on details.) The same goes for other communication not meant to "
+"be private, such as chat groups."
msgstr ""
"Pierwotnym pomysÅem dla serwerów sieciowych nie byÅo przetwarzanie "
"danych, lecz publikowanie informacji. Do dzisiaj wiÄkszoÅÄ
witryn "
@@ -980,7 +1049,10 @@
"translations.html\">tÅumaczeÅ</a>."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-msgid "Copyright © 2010, 2013, 2015 Richard Stallman"
+# | Copyright © 2010, 2013, [-2015-] {+2015, 2016+} Richard Stallman
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid "Copyright © 2010, 2013, 2015 Richard Stallman"
+msgid "Copyright © 2010, 2013, 2015, 2016 Richard Stallman"
msgstr "Copyright © 2010, 2013, 2015 Richard Stallman"
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
Index: who-does-that-server-really-serve.pot
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/who-does-that-server-really-serve.pot,v
retrieving revision 1.35
retrieving revision 1.36
diff -u -b -r1.35 -r1.36
--- who-does-that-server-really-serve.pot 17 Dec 2015 12:44:17 -0000
1.35
+++ who-does-that-server-really-serve.pot 1 Jan 2016 17:01:37 -0000
1.36
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: who-does-that-server-really-serve.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2015-12-17 12:39+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 16:55+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: YEAR-MO-DA HO:MI+ZONE\n"
"Last-Translator: FULL NAME <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: LANGUAGE <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
msgid ""
"<strong>On the Internet, proprietary software isn't the only way to lose "
"your freedom. Service as a Software Substitute, or SaaSS, is another way to "
-"let someone else have power over your computing.</strong>"
+"give someone else power over your computing.</strong>"
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: outside any tag (error?)
@@ -85,9 +85,9 @@
msgid ""
"With free software, we, the users, take back control of our computing. "
"Proprietary software still exists, but we can exclude it from our lives and "
-"many of us have done so. However, we now face a new threat to our control "
-"over our computing: Service as a Software Substitute (SaaSS). For our "
-"freedom's sake, we have to reject that too."
+"many of us have done so. However, we are now offered another tempting way "
+"to cede control over our computing: Service as a Software Substitute "
+"(SaaSS). For our freedom's sake, we have to reject that too."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <h3>
@@ -110,8 +110,8 @@
msgid ""
"The computing is <em>her own</em> because, by assumption, she could, in "
"principle, have done it by running a program on her own computer (whether or "
-"not that program is available to her at present). When this assumption is "
-"not so, it isn't SaaSS."
+"not that program is available to her at present). In cases where this "
+"assumption is not so, it isn't SaaSS."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <p>
@@ -162,6 +162,15 @@
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
+"Theoretically, homomorphic encryption might some day advance to the point "
+"where future SaaSS services might be constructed to be unable to understand "
+"some of the data that users send them. Such services <em>could</em> be set "
+"up not to snoop on users; this does not mean they <em>will</em> do no "
+"snooping."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
"Some proprietary operating systems have a universal back door, permitting "
"someone to remotely install software changes. For instance, Windows has a "
"universal back door with which Microsoft can forcibly change any software on "
@@ -315,7 +324,7 @@
msgid ""
"Rejecting SaaSS does not mean refusing to use any network servers run by "
"anyone other than you. Most servers are not SaaSS because the jobs they do "
-"are not the user's own computing."
+"are some sort of communication, rather than the user's own computing."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <p>
@@ -323,11 +332,11 @@
"The original idea of web servers wasn't to do computing for you, it was to "
"publish information for you to access. Even today this is what most web "
"sites do, and it doesn't pose the SaaSS problem, because accessing someone's "
-"published information isn't doing your own computing. Neither is publishing "
-"your own materials via a blog site or a microblogging service such as "
-"Twitter or StatusNet. (These services may have other problems, of course.) "
-"The same goes for other communication not meant to be private, such as chat "
-"groups."
+"published information isn't doing your own computing. Neither is use of a "
+"blog site to publish your own works, or usinga microblogging service such as "
+"Twitter or StatusNet. (These services may or may not have other problems, "
+"depending on details.) The same goes for other communication not meant to "
+"be private, such as chat groups."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <p>
@@ -579,7 +588,7 @@
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-msgid "Copyright © 2010, 2013, 2015 Richard Stallman"
+msgid "Copyright © 2010, 2013, 2015, 2016 Richard Stallman"
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
Index: who-does-that-server-really-serve.ro.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/who-does-that-server-really-serve.ro.po,v
retrieving revision 1.24
retrieving revision 1.25
diff -u -b -r1.24 -r1.25
--- who-does-that-server-really-serve.ro.po 17 Dec 2015 12:44:17 -0000
1.24
+++ who-does-that-server-really-serve.ro.po 1 Jan 2016 17:01:38 -0000
1.25
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: who-does-that-server-really-serve.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2015-12-17 12:39+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 16:55+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2010-12-03 22:18+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: CÄtÄlin Frâncu <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Romanian <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@
msgid ""
"<strong>On the Internet, proprietary software isn't the only way to lose "
"your freedom. Service as a Software Substitute, or SaaSS, is another way to "
-"let someone else have power over your computing.</strong>"
+"give someone else power over your computing.</strong>"
msgstr ""
"<strong>Pe Internet, software-ul privat nu este singurul mod în care ne "
"pierdem libertatea. Software-ul Ca Serviciu este un alt mod de a-i permite "
@@ -125,9 +125,9 @@
msgid ""
"With free software, we, the users, take back control of our computing. "
"Proprietary software still exists, but we can exclude it from our lives and "
-"many of us have done so. However, we now face a new threat to our control "
-"over our computing: Service as a Software Substitute (SaaSS). For our "
-"freedom's sake, we have to reject that too."
+"many of us have done so. However, we are now offered another tempting way "
+"to cede control over our computing: Service as a Software Substitute "
+"(SaaSS). For our freedom's sake, we have to reject that too."
msgstr ""
"Cu software-ul liber noi, utilizatorii, recâÈtigÄm controlul asupra "
"calculelor noastre. Software-ul privat continuÄ sÄ existe, dar îl putem "
@@ -172,8 +172,8 @@
msgid ""
"The computing is <em>her own</em> because, by assumption, she could, in "
"principle, have done it by running a program on her own computer (whether or "
-"not that program is available to her at present). When this assumption is "
-"not so, it isn't SaaSS."
+"not that program is available to her at present). In cases where this "
+"assumption is not so, it isn't SaaSS."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <p>
@@ -272,6 +272,15 @@
"datele. Le primeÈte fÄrÄ niciun efort special, prin natura Saas."
#. type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
+"Theoretically, homomorphic encryption might some day advance to the point "
+"where future SaaSS services might be constructed to be unable to understand "
+"some of the data that users send them. Such services <em>could</em> be set "
+"up not to snoop on users; this does not mean they <em>will</em> do no "
+"snooping."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "Some proprietary programs can mistreat users under remote command. For "
@@ -553,7 +562,7 @@
msgid ""
"Rejecting SaaSS does not mean refusing to use any network servers run by "
"anyone other than you. Most servers are not SaaSS because the jobs they do "
-"are not the user's own computing."
+"are some sort of communication, rather than the user's own computing."
msgstr ""
"DacÄ criticÄm SaaS, înseamnÄ sÄ refuzÄm toate serviciile de reÈea?
Nici "
"vorbÄ. Majoritatea serverelor nu ridicÄ aceastÄ problemÄ, deoarece treaba
pe "
@@ -578,11 +587,11 @@
"The original idea of web servers wasn't to do computing for you, it was to "
"publish information for you to access. Even today this is what most web "
"sites do, and it doesn't pose the SaaSS problem, because accessing someone's "
-"published information isn't doing your own computing. Neither is publishing "
-"your own materials via a blog site or a microblogging service such as "
-"Twitter or StatusNet. (These services may have other problems, of course.) "
-"The same goes for other communication not meant to be private, such as chat "
-"groups."
+"published information isn't doing your own computing. Neither is use of a "
+"blog site to publish your own works, or usinga microblogging service such as "
+"Twitter or StatusNet. (These services may or may not have other problems, "
+"depending on details.) The same goes for other communication not meant to "
+"be private, such as chat groups."
msgstr ""
"Scopul original al serverelor web nu era sÄ vÄ execute calculele, ci era
sÄ "
"publice informaÈii pe care sÄ le accesaÈi. Chiar Èi astÄzi, majoritatea
site-"
@@ -1030,7 +1039,7 @@
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
#, fuzzy
#| msgid "Copyright © 2010 Richard Stallman"
-msgid "Copyright © 2010, 2013, 2015 Richard Stallman"
+msgid "Copyright © 2010, 2013, 2015, 2016 Richard Stallman"
msgstr "Copyright © 2010 Richard Stallman"
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
Index: who-does-that-server-really-serve.ru.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/who-does-that-server-really-serve.ru.po,v
retrieving revision 1.48
retrieving revision 1.49
diff -u -b -r1.48 -r1.49
--- who-does-that-server-really-serve.ru.po 18 Dec 2015 06:30:38 -0000
1.48
+++ who-does-that-server-really-serve.ru.po 1 Jan 2016 17:01:38 -0000
1.49
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: who-does-that-server-really-serve.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2015-12-17 12:39+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 16:55+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2015-01-18 17:17+0000\n"
"Last-Translator: Ineiev <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Russian <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"X-Outdated-Since: 2016-01-01 16:55+0000\n"
# type: Content of: <title>
#. type: Content of: <title>
@@ -46,10 +47,19 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | <strong>On the Internet, proprietary software isn't the only way to lose
+# | your freedom. Service as a Software Substitute, or SaaSS, is another way
+# | to [-let-] {+give+} someone else [-have-] power over your
+# | computing.</strong>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "<strong>On the Internet, proprietary software isn't the only way to lose "
+#| "your freedom. Service as a Software Substitute, or SaaSS, is another way "
+#| "to let someone else have power over your computing.</strong>"
msgid ""
"<strong>On the Internet, proprietary software isn't the only way to lose "
"your freedom. Service as a Software Substitute, or SaaSS, is another way to "
-"let someone else have power over your computing.</strong>"
+"give someone else power over your computing.</strong>"
msgstr ""
"<strong>Ð ÐнÑеÑнеÑе Ð²Ñ Ð¼Ð¾Ð¶ÐµÑе поÑеÑÑÑÑ
ÑÐ²Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´Ñ Ð½Ðµ ÑолÑко Ñ Ð¿Ð¾Ð¼Ð¾ÑÑÑ "
"неÑвободнÑÑ
пÑогÑамм. “УÑлÑги вмеÑÑо
пÑогÑамм” — еÑе "
@@ -121,12 +131,25 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | With free software, we, the users, take back control of our computing.
+# | Proprietary software still exists, but we can exclude it from our lives
+# | and many of us have done so. However, we {+are+} now [-face a new
+# | threat-] {+offered another tempting way+} to [-our-] {+cede+} control over
+# | our computing: Service as a Software Substitute (SaaSS). For our
+# | freedom's sake, we have to reject that too.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "With free software, we, the users, take back control of our computing. "
+#| "Proprietary software still exists, but we can exclude it from our lives "
+#| "and many of us have done so. However, we now face a new threat to our "
+#| "control over our computing: Service as a Software Substitute (SaaSS). "
+#| "For our freedom's sake, we have to reject that too."
msgid ""
"With free software, we, the users, take back control of our computing. "
"Proprietary software still exists, but we can exclude it from our lives and "
-"many of us have done so. However, we now face a new threat to our control "
-"over our computing: Service as a Software Substitute (SaaSS). For our "
-"freedom's sake, we have to reject that too."
+"many of us have done so. However, we are now offered another tempting way "
+"to cede control over our computing: Service as a Software Substitute "
+"(SaaSS). For our freedom's sake, we have to reject that too."
msgstr ""
"СвободнÑе пÑогÑÐ°Ð¼Ð¼Ñ Ð¿Ð¾Ð·Ð²Ð¾Ð»ÑÑÑ Ð½Ð°Ð¼,
полÑзоваÑелÑм, Ñнова полÑÑиÑÑ ÐºÐ¾Ð½ÑÑÐ¾Ð»Ñ "
"над Ñвоими вÑÑиÑлениÑми. ÐеÑвободнÑе
пÑогÑÐ°Ð¼Ð¼Ñ Ð¿Ð¾-пÑÐµÐ¶Ð½ÐµÐ¼Ñ ÑÑÑеÑÑвÑÑÑ, но Ð¼Ñ "
@@ -164,11 +187,21 @@
"имени полÑзоваÑелÑ."
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | The computing is <em>her own</em> because, by assumption, she could, in
+# | principle, have done it by running a program on her own computer (whether
+# | or not that program is available to her at present). [-When-] {+In cases
+# | where+} this assumption is not so, it isn't SaaSS.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The computing is <em>her own</em> because, by assumption, she could, in "
+#| "principle, have done it by running a program on her own computer (whether "
+#| "or not that program is available to her at present). When this "
+#| "assumption is not so, it isn't SaaSS."
msgid ""
"The computing is <em>her own</em> because, by assumption, she could, in "
"principle, have done it by running a program on her own computer (whether or "
-"not that program is available to her at present). When this assumption is "
-"not so, it isn't SaaSS."
+"not that program is available to her at present). In cases where this "
+"assumption is not so, it isn't SaaSS."
msgstr ""
"ÐÑо <em>ÑобÑÑвеннÑе</em> вÑÑиÑлениÑ
полÑзоваÑÐµÐ»Ñ Ð¿Ð¾ÑÑолÑкÑ, поÑколÑÐºÑ "
"полÑзоваÑÐµÐ»Ñ Ð¼Ð¾Ð³ Ð±Ñ Ð² пÑинÑипе пÑовеÑÑи иÑ
, вÑполнÑÑ Ð¿ÑогÑÐ°Ð¼Ð¼Ñ Ð½Ð° Ñвоем "
@@ -261,6 +294,15 @@
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
+"Theoretically, homomorphic encryption might some day advance to the point "
+"where future SaaSS services might be constructed to be unable to understand "
+"some of the data that users send them. Such services <em>could</em> be set "
+"up not to snoop on users; this does not mean they <em>will</em> do no "
+"snooping."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
"Some proprietary operating systems have a universal back door, permitting "
"someone to remotely install software changes. For instance, Windows has a "
"universal back door with which Microsoft can forcibly change any software on "
@@ -508,10 +550,19 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | Rejecting SaaSS does not mean refusing to use any network servers run by
+# | anyone other than you. Most servers are not SaaSS because the jobs they
+# | do are [-not-] {+some sort of communication, rather than+} the user's own
+# | computing.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Rejecting SaaSS does not mean refusing to use any network servers run by "
+#| "anyone other than you. Most servers are not SaaSS because the jobs they "
+#| "do are not the user's own computing."
msgid ""
"Rejecting SaaSS does not mean refusing to use any network servers run by "
"anyone other than you. Most servers are not SaaSS because the jobs they do "
-"are not the user's own computing."
+"are some sort of communication, rather than the user's own computing."
msgstr ""
"ÐÑказ Ð¾Ñ Ð¿ÑогÑамм вмеÑÑо ÑÑлÑг не
ознаÑÐ°ÐµÑ Ð¾Ñказ Ð¾Ñ Ð¿Ð¾Ð»ÑÐ·Ð¾Ð²Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ Ð»ÑбÑми "
"ÑеÑевÑми ÑеÑвеÑами, коÑоÑÑе
конÑÑолиÑÑеÑе не вÑ. ÐÐ»Ñ Ð±Ð¾Ð»ÑÑинÑÑва
ÑеÑвеÑов "
@@ -520,15 +571,34 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <p>
+# | The original idea of web servers wasn't to do computing for you, it was to
+# | publish information for you to access. Even today this is what most web
+# | sites do, and it doesn't pose the SaaSS problem, because accessing
+# | someone's published information isn't doing your own computing. Neither
+# | is [-publishing your own materials via-] {+use of+} a blog site {+to
+# | publish your own works,+} or [-a-] {+usinga+} microblogging service such
+# | as Twitter or StatusNet. (These services may {+or may not+} have other
+# | problems, [-of course.)-] {+depending on details.)+} The same goes for
+# | other communication not meant to be private, such as chat groups.
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The original idea of web servers wasn't to do computing for you, it was "
+#| "to publish information for you to access. Even today this is what most "
+#| "web sites do, and it doesn't pose the SaaSS problem, because accessing "
+#| "someone's published information isn't doing your own computing. Neither "
+#| "is publishing your own materials via a blog site or a microblogging "
+#| "service such as Twitter or StatusNet. (These services may have other "
+#| "problems, of course.) The same goes for other communication not meant to "
+#| "be private, such as chat groups."
msgid ""
"The original idea of web servers wasn't to do computing for you, it was to "
"publish information for you to access. Even today this is what most web "
"sites do, and it doesn't pose the SaaSS problem, because accessing someone's "
-"published information isn't doing your own computing. Neither is publishing "
-"your own materials via a blog site or a microblogging service such as "
-"Twitter or StatusNet. (These services may have other problems, of course.) "
-"The same goes for other communication not meant to be private, such as chat "
-"groups."
+"published information isn't doing your own computing. Neither is use of a "
+"blog site to publish your own works, or usinga microblogging service such as "
+"Twitter or StatusNet. (These services may or may not have other problems, "
+"depending on details.) The same goes for other communication not meant to "
+"be private, such as chat groups."
msgstr ""
"ÐзнаÑалÑно Ð¸Ð´ÐµÑ ÑеÑвеÑов ÐнÑеÑнеÑа
ÑоÑÑоÑла не в Ñом, ÑÑÐ¾Ð±Ñ Ð¿ÑоизводиÑÑ Ð´Ð»Ñ "
"Ð²Ð°Ñ Ð²ÑÑиÑлениÑ, а в Ñом, ÑÑобÑ
пÑедоÑÑавлÑÑÑ Ð²Ð°Ð¼ доÑÑÑп к инÑоÑмаÑии.
Ðаже "
@@ -959,7 +1029,10 @@
# type: Content of: <div><p>
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-msgid "Copyright © 2010, 2013, 2015 Richard Stallman"
+# | Copyright © 2010, 2013, [-2015-] {+2015, 2016+} Richard Stallman
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid "Copyright © 2010, 2013, 2015 Richard Stallman"
+msgid "Copyright © 2010, 2013, 2015, 2016 Richard Stallman"
msgstr ""
"Copyright © 2010, 2013, 2015 Richard Stallman</p><p>Copyright © "
"2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc. (translation)"
Index: who-does-that-server-really-serve.uk.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/who-does-that-server-really-serve.uk.po,v
retrieving revision 1.14
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -u -b -r1.14 -r1.15
--- who-does-that-server-really-serve.uk.po 25 Dec 2015 15:52:03 -0000
1.14
+++ who-does-that-server-really-serve.uk.po 1 Jan 2016 17:01:38 -0000
1.15
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: who-does-that-server-really-serve.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2015-12-17 12:39+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-01-01 16:55+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2015-12-25 17:17+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Andriy Bandura <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Ukrainian <>\n"
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: ENCODINGLanguage: uk\n"
+"X-Outdated-Since: 2016-01-01 16:55+0000\n"
"Plural-Forms: nplurals=3; plural=(n%10==1 && n%100!=11 ? 0 : n%10>=2 && n"
"%10<=4 && (n%100<10 || n%100>=20) ? 1 : 2);\n"
"X-Generator: Lokalize 2.0\n"
@@ -42,10 +43,15 @@
"richard-stallman-free-software-DRM\"> âÐоÑÑон Ñев'Ñâ</a>"
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "<strong>On the Internet, proprietary software isn't the only way to lose "
+#| "your freedom. Service as a Software Substitute, or SaaSS, is another way "
+#| "to let someone else have power over your computing.</strong>"
msgid ""
"<strong>On the Internet, proprietary software isn't the only way to lose "
"your freedom. Service as a Software Substitute, or SaaSS, is another way to "
-"let someone else have power over your computing.</strong>"
+"give someone else power over your computing.</strong>"
msgstr ""
"<strong>Ð ÐнÑеÑнеÑÑ Ð²Ð¸ можеÑе вÑÑаÑиÑи
ÑÐ²Ð¾Ð±Ð¾Ð´Ñ Ð½Ðµ ÑÑлÑки з Ð´Ð¾Ð¿Ð¾Ð¼Ð¾Ð³Ð¾Ñ "
"невÑлÑниÑ
пÑогÑам. “ÐоÑлÑги замÑÑÑÑ
пÑогÑам” Ñе один "
@@ -113,12 +119,19 @@
"пÑогÑами</a>)."
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "With free software, we, the users, take back control of our computing. "
+#| "Proprietary software still exists, but we can exclude it from our lives "
+#| "and many of us have done so. However, we now face a new threat to our "
+#| "control over our computing: Service as a Software Substitute (SaaSS). "
+#| "For our freedom's sake, we have to reject that too."
msgid ""
"With free software, we, the users, take back control of our computing. "
"Proprietary software still exists, but we can exclude it from our lives and "
-"many of us have done so. However, we now face a new threat to our control "
-"over our computing: Service as a Software Substitute (SaaSS). For our "
-"freedom's sake, we have to reject that too."
+"many of us have done so. However, we are now offered another tempting way "
+"to cede control over our computing: Service as a Software Substitute "
+"(SaaSS). For our freedom's sake, we have to reject that too."
msgstr ""
"ÐÑлÑÐ½Ñ Ð¿ÑогÑами дозволÑÑÑÑ Ð½Ð°Ð¼,
коÑиÑÑÑваÑам, Ð·Ð½Ð¾Ð²Ñ Ð¾ÑÑимаÑи конÑÑÐ¾Ð»Ñ Ð½Ð°Ð´ "
"ÑвоÑми обÑиÑленнÑми. ÐевÑлÑÐ½Ñ Ð¿ÑогÑами,
Ñк Ñ ÑанÑÑе ÑÑнÑÑÑÑ, але ми можемо "
@@ -153,11 +166,17 @@
"безпоÑеÑеднÑо виконÑÑ Ð´ÑÑ Ð²Ñд ÑменÑ
коÑиÑÑÑваÑа."
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The computing is <em>her own</em> because, by assumption, she could, in "
+#| "principle, have done it by running a program on her own computer (whether "
+#| "or not that program is available to her at present). When this "
+#| "assumption is not so, it isn't SaaSS."
msgid ""
"The computing is <em>her own</em> because, by assumption, she could, in "
"principle, have done it by running a program on her own computer (whether or "
-"not that program is available to her at present). When this assumption is "
-"not so, it isn't SaaSS."
+"not that program is available to her at present). In cases where this "
+"assumption is not so, it isn't SaaSS."
msgstr ""
"ÐбÑиÑÐ»ÐµÐ½Ð½Ñ Ñ <em>влаÑними</em> обÑиÑленнÑми
коÑиÑÑÑваÑа за Ñмови, Ñо "
"коÑиÑÑÑÐ²Ð°Ñ Ð¼Ñг би в пÑинÑÐ¸Ð¿Ñ Ð¿ÑовеÑÑи ÑÑ
,
виконÑÑÑи пÑогÑÐ°Ð¼Ñ Ð½Ð° ÑвоÑÐ¼Ñ "
@@ -244,6 +263,15 @@
#. type: Content of: <p>
msgid ""
+"Theoretically, homomorphic encryption might some day advance to the point "
+"where future SaaSS services might be constructed to be unable to understand "
+"some of the data that users send them. Such services <em>could</em> be set "
+"up not to snoop on users; this does not mean they <em>will</em> do no "
+"snooping."
+msgstr ""
+
+#. type: Content of: <p>
+msgid ""
"Some proprietary operating systems have a universal back door, permitting "
"someone to remotely install software changes. For instance, Windows has a "
"universal back door with which Microsoft can forcibly change any software on "
@@ -474,10 +502,15 @@
"обÑобки на ÑеÑвеÑÑ Ð·Ð°Ð¼ÑÑÑÑ Ð²Ð°Ñого
комп'ÑÑеÑа Ñ Ð¿Ð¾ÑлÑÐ³Ð¾Ñ Ð·Ð°Ð¼ÑÑÑÑ Ð¿ÑогÑами."
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Rejecting SaaSS does not mean refusing to use any network servers run by "
+#| "anyone other than you. Most servers are not SaaSS because the jobs they "
+#| "do are not the user's own computing."
msgid ""
"Rejecting SaaSS does not mean refusing to use any network servers run by "
"anyone other than you. Most servers are not SaaSS because the jobs they do "
-"are not the user's own computing."
+"are some sort of communication, rather than the user's own computing."
msgstr ""
"ÐÑдмова вÑд пÑогÑам замÑÑÑÑ Ð¿Ð¾ÑлÑг не
ознаÑÐ°Ñ Ð²ÑÐ´Ð¼Ð¾Ð²Ñ Ð²Ñд коÑиÑÑÑÐ²Ð°Ð½Ð½Ñ Ð±ÑдÑ-"
"Ñкими меÑежевими ÑеÑвеÑами, ÑÐºÑ Ð½Ðµ
конÑÑолÑÑÑе ви. ÐÐ»Ñ Ð±ÑлÑÑоÑÑÑ ÑеÑвеÑÑв "
@@ -485,15 +518,25 @@
"виÑÑÑÑÑÑÑ, не Ñ Ð²Ð»Ð°Ñними обÑиÑленнÑми
коÑиÑÑÑваÑа. "
#. type: Content of: <p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The original idea of web servers wasn't to do computing for you, it was "
+#| "to publish information for you to access. Even today this is what most "
+#| "web sites do, and it doesn't pose the SaaSS problem, because accessing "
+#| "someone's published information isn't doing your own computing. Neither "
+#| "is publishing your own materials via a blog site or a microblogging "
+#| "service such as Twitter or StatusNet. (These services may have other "
+#| "problems, of course.) The same goes for other communication not meant to "
+#| "be private, such as chat groups."
msgid ""
"The original idea of web servers wasn't to do computing for you, it was to "
"publish information for you to access. Even today this is what most web "
"sites do, and it doesn't pose the SaaSS problem, because accessing someone's "
-"published information isn't doing your own computing. Neither is publishing "
-"your own materials via a blog site or a microblogging service such as "
-"Twitter or StatusNet. (These services may have other problems, of course.) "
-"The same goes for other communication not meant to be private, such as chat "
-"groups."
+"published information isn't doing your own computing. Neither is use of a "
+"blog site to publish your own works, or usinga microblogging service such as "
+"Twitter or StatusNet. (These services may or may not have other problems, "
+"depending on details.) The same goes for other communication not meant to "
+"be private, such as chat groups."
msgstr ""
"СпоÑаÑÐºÑ ÑÐ´ÐµÑ ÑеÑвеÑÑв ÐнÑеÑнеÑÑ
полÑгала не в ÑомÑ, Ñоб здÑйÑнÑваÑи Ð´Ð»Ñ Ð²Ð°Ñ "
"обÑиÑленнÑ, а в ÑомÑ, Ñоб надаваÑи доÑÑÑп
до ÑнÑоÑмаÑÑÑ. ÐавÑÑÑ ÑÑÐ¾Ð³Ð¾Ð´Ð½Ñ "
@@ -902,7 +945,9 @@
"translations.html\">“ÐоÑÑÐ±Ð½Ð¸ÐºÑ Ð·
пеÑекладє</a>."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-msgid "Copyright © 2010, 2013, 2015 Richard Stallman"
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid "Copyright © 2010, 2013, 2015 Richard Stallman"
+msgid "Copyright © 2010, 2013, 2015, 2016 Richard Stallman"
msgstr "Copyright © 2010, 2013, 2015 Ð ÑÑаÑд СÑолмен"
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
- www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point....,
GNUN <=