[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www distros/common-distros.ar.html distros/dist...
|
From: |
GNUN |
|
Subject: |
www distros/common-distros.ar.html distros/dist... |
|
Date: |
Fri, 12 Jun 2015 09:58:18 +0000 |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: GNUN <gnun> 15/06/12 09:58:18
Modified files:
distros : common-distros.ar.html distros.ar.html
distros.lt.html distros.pt-br.html
distros.ro.html
distros/po : distros.ar-diff.html distros.pt-br-diff.html
distros.ro-diff.html
philosophy : selling.ar.html selling.cs.html selling.fa.html
selling.hr.html selling.ml.html selling.nl.html
selling.pt-br.html selling.sv.html
selling.tr.html
philosophy/po : selling.cs-diff.html selling.hr-diff.html
selling.nl-diff.html selling.sv-diff.html
Added files:
distros/po : common-distros.ar-diff.html
distros.lt-diff.html
philosophy/po : selling.ar-diff.html selling.fa-diff.html
selling.ml-diff.html selling.pt-br-diff.html
selling.tr-diff.html
Log message:
Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/distros/common-distros.ar.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.1&r2=1.2
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/distros/distros.ar.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.31&r2=1.32
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/distros/distros.lt.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.2&r2=1.3
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/distros/distros.pt-br.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.24&r2=1.25
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/distros/distros.ro.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.8&r2=1.9
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/distros/po/distros.ar-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.4&r2=1.5
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/distros/po/distros.pt-br-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.4&r2=1.5
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/distros/po/distros.ro-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.1&r2=1.2
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/distros/po/common-distros.ar-diff.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/distros/po/distros.lt-diff.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/selling.ar.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.22&r2=1.23
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/selling.cs.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.20&r2=1.21
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/selling.fa.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.3&r2=1.4
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/selling.hr.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.10&r2=1.11
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/selling.ml.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.19&r2=1.20
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/selling.nl.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.12&r2=1.13
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/selling.pt-br.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.8&r2=1.9
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/selling.sv.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.9&r2=1.10
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/selling.tr.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.16&r2=1.17
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/selling.cs-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.4&r2=1.5
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/selling.hr-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.1&r2=1.2
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/selling.nl-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.4&r2=1.5
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/selling.sv-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.4&r2=1.5
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/selling.ar-diff.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/selling.fa-diff.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/selling.ml-diff.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/selling.pt-br-diff.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/selling.tr-diff.html?cvsroot=www&rev=1.1
Patches:
Index: distros/common-distros.ar.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/distros/common-distros.ar.html,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -b -r1.1 -r1.2
--- distros/common-distros.ar.html 5 Feb 2015 15:57:02 -0000 1.1
+++ distros/common-distros.ar.html 12 Jun 2015 09:58:13 -0000 1.2
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/distros/common-distros.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/distros/po/common-distros.ar.po">
+ http://www.gnu.org/distros/po/common-distros.ar.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/distros/common-distros.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/distros/po/common-distros.ar-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2015-04-13" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/distros/common-distros.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.ar.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -12,6 +17,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/distros/po/common-distros.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.ar.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.ar.html" -->
<h2>Ø´Ø±Ø Ø§ÙدÙاÙع اÙÙاÙ
ÙØ© Ùراء عدÙ
تزÙÙتÙا
ÙÙØ£ÙظÙ
Ø© اﻷخرÙ</h2>
<!--#include virtual="/licenses/fsf-licensing.ar.html" -->
@@ -309,7 +315,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
تØدÙØ«:
-$Date: 2015/02/05 15:57:02 $
+$Date: 2015/06/12 09:58:13 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: distros/distros.ar.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/distros/distros.ar.html,v
retrieving revision 1.31
retrieving revision 1.32
diff -u -b -r1.31 -r1.32
--- distros/distros.ar.html 8 Nov 2014 21:59:57 -0000 1.31
+++ distros/distros.ar.html 12 Jun 2015 09:58:13 -0000 1.32
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/distros/distros.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/distros/po/distros.ar.po">
+ http://www.gnu.org/distros/po/distros.ar.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/distros/distros.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/distros/po/distros.ar-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2015-04-13" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/distros/distros.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.ar.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -11,6 +16,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/distros/po/distros.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.ar.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.ar.html" -->
<h2>تÙزÙعات غÙÙ/ÙÙÙÙس</h2>
<p>
@@ -162,7 +168,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
ØÙدÙثت:
-$Date: 2014/11/08 21:59:57 $
+$Date: 2015/06/12 09:58:13 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: distros/distros.lt.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/distros/distros.lt.html,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -b -r1.2 -r1.3
--- distros/distros.lt.html 15 Oct 2014 12:59:11 -0000 1.2
+++ distros/distros.lt.html 12 Jun 2015 09:58:13 -0000 1.3
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/distros/distros.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/distros/po/distros.lt.po">
+ http://www.gnu.org/distros/po/distros.lt.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/distros/distros.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/distros/po/distros.lt-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2015-04-13" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/distros/distros.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.lt.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -11,6 +16,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/distros/po/distros.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.lt.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.lt.html" -->
<h2>GNU/Linux distribucijos</h2>
<p>
@@ -183,7 +189,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Atnaujinta:
-$Date: 2014/10/15 12:59:11 $
+$Date: 2015/06/12 09:58:13 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: distros/distros.pt-br.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/distros/distros.pt-br.html,v
retrieving revision 1.24
retrieving revision 1.25
diff -u -b -r1.24 -r1.25
--- distros/distros.pt-br.html 13 Dec 2014 18:27:50 -0000 1.24
+++ distros/distros.pt-br.html 12 Jun 2015 09:58:13 -0000 1.25
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/distros/distros.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/distros/po/distros.pt-br.po">
+ http://www.gnu.org/distros/po/distros.pt-br.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/distros/distros.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/distros/po/distros.pt-br-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2015-04-13" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/distros/distros.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.pt-br.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -11,6 +16,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/distros/po/distros.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.pt-br.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.pt-br.html" -->
<h2>Distros GNU/Linux</h2>
<p>
@@ -183,7 +189,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Ãltima atualização:
-$Date: 2014/12/13 18:27:50 $
+$Date: 2015/06/12 09:58:13 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: distros/distros.ro.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/distros/distros.ro.html,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -b -r1.8 -r1.9
--- distros/distros.ro.html 19 Oct 2014 18:58:12 -0000 1.8
+++ distros/distros.ro.html 12 Jun 2015 09:58:13 -0000 1.9
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/distros/distros.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/distros/po/distros.ro.po">
+ http://www.gnu.org/distros/po/distros.ro.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/distros/distros.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/distros/po/distros.ro-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2015-04-13" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/distros/distros.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.ro.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -11,6 +16,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/distros/po/distros.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.ro.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.ro.html" -->
<h2>DistribuÈii de GNU+Linux</h2>
<p>
@@ -176,7 +182,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Actualizat la:
-$Date: 2014/10/19 18:58:12 $
+$Date: 2015/06/12 09:58:13 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: distros/po/distros.ar-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/distros/po/distros.ar-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -b -r1.4 -r1.5
--- distros/po/distros.ar-diff.html 12 Apr 2014 13:52:50 -0000 1.4
+++ distros/po/distros.ar-diff.html 12 Jun 2015 09:58:14 -0000 1.5
@@ -11,9 +11,9 @@
</style></head>
<body><pre>
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
-<!-- Parent-Version: <span
class="removed"><del><strong>1.75</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>1.77</em></ins></span> -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
<title>GNU/Linux Distros
-- GNU <span class="removed"><del><strong>Operating
System</title></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Project - Free Software
Foundation</title></em></ins></span>
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
<link rel="alternate" title="Free GNU/Linux distributions"
href="http://www.gnu.org/distros/distros.rss";
type="application/rss+xml" />
@@ -45,7 +45,22 @@
free distro rather that starting a new free distro.
</p>
-<h3 id="distroGuidelines">Free Distro Guidelines</h3>
+<h3 <span class="inserted"><ins><em>id="freeNonDistros">Free Non-GNU
Distros</h3>
+<p>
+These system distributions are free but quite different from GNU.
+Using them is not similar to using GNU/Linux. However, they satisfy
+the same ethical criteria that we apply to GNU/Linux distros.<br />
+<a href="/distros/free-non-gnu-distros.html">
+Free Non-GNU distributions</a>.</p>
+
+<p>
+All of these existing distros could use more development help. Thus,
+if you want to make an effective contribution in this area, we suggest
+that you join the development of an existing free distro rather that
+starting a new free distro.
+</p>
+
+<h3</em></ins></span> id="distroGuidelines">Free Distro
Guidelines</h3>
<p>
Here is the list of problems that can prevent a distro from being
considered entirely free:<br />
@@ -113,7 +128,7 @@
</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
<div id="footer">
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><div
class="unprintable"></em></ins></span>
+<div class="unprintable">
<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
<a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
@@ -138,7 +153,7 @@
href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
of this article.</p>
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em></div></em></ins></span>
+</div>
<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
@@ -157,7 +172,7 @@
There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright © <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2010</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2014</em></ins></span> Free Software Foundation,
Inc.</p>
+<p>Copyright © <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2014</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2014, 2015</em></ins></span> Free Software
Foundation, Inc.</p>
<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative
@@ -165,11 +180,9 @@
<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><p>Updated:</strong></del></span>
-
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p
class="unprintable">Updated:</em></ins></span>
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2014/04/12 13:52:50 $
+$Date: 2015/06/12 09:58:14 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: distros/po/distros.pt-br-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/distros/po/distros.pt-br-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -b -r1.4 -r1.5
--- distros/po/distros.pt-br-diff.html 12 Apr 2014 13:52:50 -0000 1.4
+++ distros/po/distros.pt-br-diff.html 12 Jun 2015 09:58:15 -0000 1.5
@@ -11,9 +11,9 @@
</style></head>
<body><pre>
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
-<!-- Parent-Version: <span
class="removed"><del><strong>1.75</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>1.77</em></ins></span> -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
<title>GNU/Linux Distros
-- GNU <span class="removed"><del><strong>Operating
System</title></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Project - Free Software
Foundation</title></em></ins></span>
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
<link rel="alternate" title="Free GNU/Linux distributions"
href="http://www.gnu.org/distros/distros.rss";
type="application/rss+xml" />
@@ -45,7 +45,22 @@
free distro rather that starting a new free distro.
</p>
-<h3 id="distroGuidelines">Free Distro Guidelines</h3>
+<h3 <span class="inserted"><ins><em>id="freeNonDistros">Free Non-GNU
Distros</h3>
+<p>
+These system distributions are free but quite different from GNU.
+Using them is not similar to using GNU/Linux. However, they satisfy
+the same ethical criteria that we apply to GNU/Linux distros.<br />
+<a href="/distros/free-non-gnu-distros.html">
+Free Non-GNU distributions</a>.</p>
+
+<p>
+All of these existing distros could use more development help. Thus,
+if you want to make an effective contribution in this area, we suggest
+that you join the development of an existing free distro rather that
+starting a new free distro.
+</p>
+
+<h3</em></ins></span> id="distroGuidelines">Free Distro
Guidelines</h3>
<p>
Here is the list of problems that can prevent a distro from being
considered entirely free:<br />
@@ -113,7 +128,7 @@
</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
<div id="footer">
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><div
class="unprintable"></em></ins></span>
+<div class="unprintable">
<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
<a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
@@ -138,7 +153,7 @@
href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
of this article.</p>
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em></div></em></ins></span>
+</div>
<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
@@ -157,7 +172,7 @@
There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright © <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2010</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2014</em></ins></span> Free Software Foundation,
Inc.</p>
+<p>Copyright © <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2014</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2014, 2015</em></ins></span> Free Software
Foundation, Inc.</p>
<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative
@@ -165,11 +180,9 @@
<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><p>Updated:</strong></del></span>
-
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p
class="unprintable">Updated:</em></ins></span>
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2014/04/12 13:52:50 $
+$Date: 2015/06/12 09:58:15 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: distros/po/distros.ro-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/distros/po/distros.ro-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -b -r1.1 -r1.2
--- distros/po/distros.ro-diff.html 4 Jun 2014 00:00:12 -0000 1.1
+++ distros/po/distros.ro-diff.html 12 Jun 2015 09:58:15 -0000 1.2
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
</style></head>
<body><pre>
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
-<!-- Parent-Version: <span
class="removed"><del><strong>1.76</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>1.77</em></ins></span> -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
<title>GNU/Linux Distros
- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
<link rel="alternate" title="Free GNU/Linux distributions"
@@ -45,7 +45,22 @@
free distro rather that starting a new free distro.
</p>
-<h3 id="distroGuidelines">Free Distro Guidelines</h3>
+<h3 <span class="inserted"><ins><em>id="freeNonDistros">Free Non-GNU
Distros</h3>
+<p>
+These system distributions are free but quite different from GNU.
+Using them is not similar to using GNU/Linux. However, they satisfy
+the same ethical criteria that we apply to GNU/Linux distros.<br />
+<a href="/distros/free-non-gnu-distros.html">
+Free Non-GNU distributions</a>.</p>
+
+<p>
+All of these existing distros could use more development help. Thus,
+if you want to make an effective contribution in this area, we suggest
+that you join the development of an existing free distro rather that
+starting a new free distro.
+</p>
+
+<h3</em></ins></span> id="distroGuidelines">Free Distro
Guidelines</h3>
<p>
Here is the list of problems that can prevent a distro from being
considered entirely free:<br />
@@ -157,7 +172,7 @@
There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright © <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2010</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2014</em></ins></span> Free Software Foundation,
Inc.</p>
+<p>Copyright © <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2014</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2014, 2015</em></ins></span> Free Software
Foundation, Inc.</p>
<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative
@@ -165,11 +180,9 @@
<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
-<span
class="removed"><del><strong><p></p><p</strong></del></span>
-
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p</em></ins></span>
class="unprintable">Updated:
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2014/06/04 00:00:12 $
+$Date: 2015/06/12 09:58:15 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: philosophy/selling.ar.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/selling.ar.html,v
retrieving revision 1.22
retrieving revision 1.23
diff -u -b -r1.22 -r1.23
--- philosophy/selling.ar.html 8 Nov 2014 22:00:12 -0000 1.22
+++ philosophy/selling.ar.html 12 Jun 2015 09:58:15 -0000 1.23
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/selling.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/philosophy/po/selling.ar.po">
+ http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/selling.ar.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/selling.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/selling.ar-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2015-04-13" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/selling.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.ar.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -8,6 +13,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/selling.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.ar.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.ar.html" -->
<h2>بÙع اÙبرÙ
جÙات اÙØرة</h2>
<p><em><a href="/philosophy/selling-exceptions.html">بعض ÙجÙات
اÙÙظر ØÙ٠أÙÙار
@@ -232,7 +238,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
ØÙدÙثت:
-$Date: 2014/11/08 22:00:12 $
+$Date: 2015/06/12 09:58:15 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: philosophy/selling.cs.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/selling.cs.html,v
retrieving revision 1.20
retrieving revision 1.21
diff -u -b -r1.20 -r1.21
--- philosophy/selling.cs.html 21 Dec 2014 11:59:23 -0000 1.20
+++ philosophy/selling.cs.html 12 Jun 2015 09:58:15 -0000 1.21
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/selling.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/philosophy/po/selling.cs.po">
+ http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/selling.cs.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/selling.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/selling.cs-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2015-04-13" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/selling.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.cs.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -9,6 +14,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/selling.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.cs.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.cs.html" -->
<h2>Prodej svobodného softwaru</h2>
<p><em>Také si můžete pÅeÄÃst: <a
@@ -254,7 +260,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Aktualizováno:
-$Date: 2014/12/21 11:59:23 $
+$Date: 2015/06/12 09:58:15 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: philosophy/selling.fa.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/selling.fa.html,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -b -r1.3 -r1.4
--- philosophy/selling.fa.html 5 Mar 2015 09:56:53 -0000 1.3
+++ philosophy/selling.fa.html 12 Jun 2015 09:58:15 -0000 1.4
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/selling.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/philosophy/po/selling.fa.po">
+ http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/selling.fa.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/selling.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/selling.fa-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2015-04-13" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/selling.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.fa.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -8,6 +13,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/selling.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.fa.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.fa.html" -->
<h2>ÙرÙØ´ ÙرÙ
âاÙزار آزاد</h2>
<p><em><a href="/philosophy/selling-exceptions.html">برخÛ
دÛدگاÙâÙا در Ù
Ùرد
@@ -247,7 +253,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
آخرÛ٠ب٠رÙز رساÙÛ:
-$Date: 2015/03/05 09:56:53 $
+$Date: 2015/06/12 09:58:15 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: philosophy/selling.hr.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/selling.hr.html,v
retrieving revision 1.10
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -b -r1.10 -r1.11
--- philosophy/selling.hr.html 12 Apr 2014 13:57:45 -0000 1.10
+++ philosophy/selling.hr.html 12 Jun 2015 09:58:15 -0000 1.11
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/philosophy/po/selling.hr.po">
+ http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/selling.hr.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/selling.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/selling.hr-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2015-04-13" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.hr.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -10,6 +15,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/selling.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.hr.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.hr.html" -->
<h2>Prodaja slobodnog softvera</h2>
<p><em><a href="/philosophy/selling-exceptions.html"> </a> Dostupna su i </em>
@@ -252,7 +258,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Zadnji put promijenjeno:
-$Date: 2014/04/12 13:57:45 $
+$Date: 2015/06/12 09:58:15 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: philosophy/selling.ml.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/selling.ml.html,v
retrieving revision 1.19
retrieving revision 1.20
diff -u -b -r1.19 -r1.20
--- philosophy/selling.ml.html 10 May 2014 08:27:56 -0000 1.19
+++ philosophy/selling.ml.html 12 Jun 2015 09:58:15 -0000 1.20
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/selling.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/philosophy/po/selling.ml.po">
+ http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/selling.ml.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/selling.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/selling.ml-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2015-04-13" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/selling.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.ml.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -9,6 +14,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/selling.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.ml.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.ml.html" -->
<h2>à´¸àµà´µà´¤à´¨àµà´¤àµà´°
à´¸àµà´«àµà´±àµà´±àµà´µàµà´¯à´±à´¿à´¨àµà´±àµ
വിലàµâà´ªàµà´ªà´¨</h2>
<p><em><a href="/philosophy/selling-exceptions.html">à´àµà´¨àµ
à´à´¿à´ªà´¿à´à´²àµâ à´ªàµà´²àµà´¯àµà´³àµà´³
@@ -283,7 +289,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
à´ªàµà´¤àµà´àµà´à´¿à´¯à´¤àµàµ:
-$Date: 2014/05/10 08:27:56 $
+$Date: 2015/06/12 09:58:15 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: philosophy/selling.nl.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/selling.nl.html,v
retrieving revision 1.12
retrieving revision 1.13
diff -u -b -r1.12 -r1.13
--- philosophy/selling.nl.html 9 Feb 2015 21:03:01 -0000 1.12
+++ philosophy/selling.nl.html 12 Jun 2015 09:58:16 -0000 1.13
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/selling.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/philosophy/po/selling.nl.po">
+ http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/selling.nl.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/selling.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/selling.nl-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2015-04-13" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/selling.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.nl.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -8,6 +13,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/selling.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.nl.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.nl.html" -->
<h2>Verkopen van Vrije Software</h2>
<p><em><a href="/philosophy/selling-exceptions.html">Ideeën over de
@@ -251,7 +257,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Bijgewerkt:
-$Date: 2015/02/09 21:03:01 $
+$Date: 2015/06/12 09:58:16 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: philosophy/selling.pt-br.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/selling.pt-br.html,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -b -r1.8 -r1.9
--- philosophy/selling.pt-br.html 28 Apr 2015 04:48:35 -0000 1.8
+++ philosophy/selling.pt-br.html 12 Jun 2015 09:58:16 -0000 1.9
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/selling.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/philosophy/po/selling.pt-br.po">
+ http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/selling.pt-br.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/selling.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/selling.pt-br-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2015-04-13" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/selling.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.pt-br.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -8,6 +13,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/selling.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.pt-br.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.pt-br.html" -->
<h2>Vender Software Livre</h2>
<p><em><a href="/philosophy/selling-exceptions.html">Algumas considerações
@@ -253,7 +259,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Ãltima atualização:
-$Date: 2015/04/28 04:48:35 $
+$Date: 2015/06/12 09:58:16 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: philosophy/selling.sv.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/selling.sv.html,v
retrieving revision 1.9
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -b -r1.9 -r1.10
--- philosophy/selling.sv.html 29 Aug 2014 11:56:48 -0000 1.9
+++ philosophy/selling.sv.html 12 Jun 2015 09:58:16 -0000 1.10
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/selling.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/philosophy/po/selling.sv.po">
+ http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/selling.sv.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/selling.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/selling.sv-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2015-04-13" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/selling.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.sv.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -8,6 +13,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/selling.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.sv.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.sv.html" -->
<h2>Att Sälja Fri Mjukvara</h2>
<p><em><a href="/philosophy/selling-exceptions.html">Några åsikter om att
sälja
@@ -245,7 +251,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Uppdaterad:
-$Date: 2014/08/29 11:56:48 $
+$Date: 2015/06/12 09:58:16 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: philosophy/selling.tr.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/selling.tr.html,v
retrieving revision 1.16
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -u -b -r1.16 -r1.17
--- philosophy/selling.tr.html 12 Jul 2014 12:59:12 -0000 1.16
+++ philosophy/selling.tr.html 12 Jun 2015 09:58:16 -0000 1.17
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/selling.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/philosophy/po/selling.tr.po">
+ http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/selling.tr.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/selling.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/selling.tr-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2015-04-13" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/selling.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.tr.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
@@ -8,6 +13,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/selling.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.tr.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.tr.html" -->
<h2>Ãzgür Yazılımın Satılması</h2>
<p><em><a href="/philosophy/selling-exceptions.html">ÃrneÄin GNU GPL gibi
özgür
@@ -282,7 +288,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Son Güncelleme:
-$Date: 2014/07/12 12:59:12 $
+$Date: 2015/06/12 09:58:16 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: philosophy/po/selling.cs-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/selling.cs-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -b -r1.4 -r1.5
--- philosophy/po/selling.cs-diff.html 12 Apr 2014 13:59:47 -0000 1.4
+++ philosophy/po/selling.cs-diff.html 12 Jun 2015 09:58:16 -0000 1.5
@@ -11,21 +11,13 @@
</style></head>
<body><pre>
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><!-- Parent-Version: 1.77
--></em></ins></span>
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
<title>Selling Free Software
-- GNU Project - Free Software <span class="removed"><del><strong>Foundation
(FSF)</title></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Foundation</title></em></ins></span>
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/selling.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
<h2>Selling Free Software</h2>
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><!-- This document uses XHTML 1.0
Strict, but may be served as -->
-<!-- text/html. Please ensure that markup style considers -->
-<!-- appendex C of the XHTML 1.0 standard. See validator.w3.org. -->
-
-<!-- Please ensure links are consistent with Apache's MultiView. -->
-<!-- Change include statements to be consistent with the relevant -->
-<!-- language, where necessary. --></strong></del></span>
-
<p><em><a href="/philosophy/selling-exceptions.html">Some
views on the
ideas of selling exceptions to free software licenses, such as the GNU
GPL</a> are also available.</em></p>
@@ -33,14 +25,15 @@
<p>
Many people believe that the spirit of the GNU Project is that you
should not charge money for distributing copies of software, or that
-you should charge as little as <span class="removed"><del><strong>possible
— just</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>possible—just</em></ins></span> enough to cover
+you should charge as little as possible—just enough to cover
the cost. This is a misunderstanding.</p>
<p>
Actually, we encourage people who redistribute
-<a href="/philosophy/free-sw.html">free software</a>
-to charge as much as they wish or can. If this seems surprising to
-you, please read on.</p>
+<a href="/philosophy/free-sw.html">free software</a> to charge as
much
+as they wish or can. If <span class="inserted"><ins><em>a license does not
permit users to make
+copies and sell them, it is a nonfree license. If</em></ins></span> this seems
+surprising to you, please read on.</p>
<p>
The word “free” has two legitimate general meanings; it can refer
@@ -60,7 +53,7 @@
<a href="/philosophy/categories.html#ProprietarySoftware">Nonfree
programs</a>
are usually sold for a high price, but sometimes a store will give you
a copy at no charge. That doesn't make it free software, though.
-Price or no price, the program is nonfree because users don't have
+Price or no price, the program is nonfree because <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>its</em></ins></span> users <span
class="removed"><del><strong>don't have</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>are denied</em></ins></span>
freedom.</p>
<p>
@@ -95,7 +88,7 @@
People sometimes worry that a high distribution fee will put free
software out of range for users who don't have a lot of money. With
<a href="/philosophy/categories.html#ProprietarySoftware">proprietary
-software</a>, a high price does exactly <span
class="removed"><del><strong>that — but</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>that—but</em></ins></span> free software
+software</a>, a high price does exactly that—but free software
is different.</p>
<p>
@@ -124,7 +117,7 @@
users, or that a low price is likely to encourage users.</p>
<p>
-This is true for proprietary <span class="removed"><del><strong>software
— but</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>software—but</em></ins></span> free software is
+This is true for proprietary software—but free software is
different. With so many ways to get copies, the price of distribution
service has less effect on popularity.</p>
@@ -185,8 +178,8 @@
Without a limit on the fee for the source code, they would be able set
a fee too large for anyone to pay—such as a billion
dollars—and thus pretend to release source code while in truth
-concealing it. So <span class="removed"><del><strong>in</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em><a
href="/licenses/gpl.html#section6">in</em></ins></span> this case we
-have to limit the <span class="removed"><del><strong>fee</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>fee</a></em></ins></span> for source in
order
+concealing it. So <a href="/licenses/gpl.html#section6">in this case we
+have to limit the fee</a> for source in order
to ensure the user's freedom. In ordinary situations, however, there
is no such justification for limiting distribution fees, so we do not
limit them.</p>
@@ -200,32 +193,16 @@
distracted by side issues such as how much of a distribution fee is
charged. Freedom is the issue, the whole issue, and the only issue.</p>
-
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><!-- If needed, change the copyright
block at the bottom. In general, -->
-<!-- all pages on the GNU web server should have the section about -->
-<!-- verbatim copying. Please do NOT remove this without talking -->
-<!-- with the webmasters first. -->
-<!-- Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the document
-->
-<!-- and that it is like this "2001, 2002" not this "2001-2002."
--></strong></del></span>
-
</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
<div id="footer">
+<div class="unprintable">
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><p>
-Please</strong></del></span>
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><div class="unprintable">
-
-<p>Please</em></ins></span> send <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>general</em></ins></span> FSF & GNU inquiries to
-<a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="mailto:address@hidden"><em>address@hidden</em></a>.</strong></del></span>
<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</em></ins></span>
+<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
+<a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
-the FSF.
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><br />
-Please send broken</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Broken</em></ins></span> links and other corrections
or suggestions <span class="inserted"><ins><em>can be sent</em></ins></span>
-to <a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="mailto:address@hidden"><em>address@hidden</em></a>.
-</p>
-
-<p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a
href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
replace it with the translation of these two:
@@ -239,15 +216,11 @@
<p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
our web pages, see <a
href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
- README</a>. --></em></ins></span>
+ README</a>. -->
Please see the <a
href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
-of this <span class="removed"><del><strong>article.
-</p>
-
-<p>
-Copyright</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>article.</p>
+of this article.</p>
</div>
<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
@@ -267,23 +240,18 @@
There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright</em></ins></span> © 1996, 1997, 1998, 2001, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2007</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2007, 2013</em></ins></span>
-Free Software Foundation, <span class="removed"><del><strong>Inc.,
-</p>
-<address>51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110,
USA</address></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Inc.</p></em></ins></span>
+<p>Copyright © 1996, 1997, 1998, 2001, 2007, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2013</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2013, 2015</em></ins></span>
+Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative
-Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States <span
class="removed"><del><strong>License</a>.
-</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>License</a>.</p></em></ins></span>
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>.</p>
<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><p>Updated:</strong></del></span>
-
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p
class="unprintable">Updated:</em></ins></span>
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2014/04/12 13:59:47 $
+$Date: 2015/06/12 09:58:16 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: philosophy/po/selling.hr-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/selling.hr-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.1
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -b -r1.1 -r1.2
--- philosophy/po/selling.hr-diff.html 29 Nov 2013 22:59:04 -0000 1.1
+++ philosophy/po/selling.hr-diff.html 12 Jun 2015 09:58:17 -0000 1.2
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
</style></head>
<body><pre>
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
-<!-- Parent-Version: 1.75 -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
<title>Selling Free Software
- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/selling.translist" -->
@@ -25,14 +25,15 @@
<p>
Many people believe that the spirit of the GNU Project is that you
should not charge money for distributing copies of software, or that
-you should charge as little as possible — just enough to cover
+you should charge as little as possible—just enough to cover
the cost. This is a misunderstanding.</p>
<p>
Actually, we encourage people who redistribute
-<a href="/philosophy/free-sw.html">free software</a>
-to charge as much as they wish or can. If this seems surprising to
-you, please read on.</p>
+<a href="/philosophy/free-sw.html">free software</a> to charge as
much
+as they wish or can. If <span class="inserted"><ins><em>a license does not
permit users to make
+copies and sell them, it is a nonfree license. If</em></ins></span> this seems
+surprising to you, please read on.</p>
<p>
The word “free” has two legitimate general meanings; it can refer
@@ -52,7 +53,7 @@
<a href="/philosophy/categories.html#ProprietarySoftware">Nonfree
programs</a>
are usually sold for a high price, but sometimes a store will give you
a copy at no charge. That doesn't make it free software, though.
-Price or no price, the program is nonfree because users don't have
+Price or no price, the program is nonfree because <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>its</em></ins></span> users <span
class="removed"><del><strong>don't have</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>are denied</em></ins></span>
freedom.</p>
<p>
@@ -87,7 +88,7 @@
People sometimes worry that a high distribution fee will put free
software out of range for users who don't have a lot of money. With
<a href="/philosophy/categories.html#ProprietarySoftware">proprietary
-software</a>, a high price does exactly that — but free software
+software</a>, a high price does exactly that—but free software
is different.</p>
<p>
@@ -116,7 +117,7 @@
users, or that a low price is likely to encourage users.</p>
<p>
-This is true for proprietary software — but free software is
+This is true for proprietary software—but free software is
different. With so many ways to get copies, the price of distribution
service has less effect on popularity.</p>
@@ -177,8 +178,8 @@
Without a limit on the fee for the source code, they would be able set
a fee too large for anyone to pay—such as a billion
dollars—and thus pretend to release source code while in truth
-concealing it. So <span class="removed"><del><strong>in</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em><a
href="/licenses/gpl.html#section6">in</em></ins></span> this case we
-have to limit the <span class="removed"><del><strong>fee</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>fee</a></em></ins></span> for source in
order
+concealing it. So <a href="/licenses/gpl.html#section6">in this case we
+have to limit the fee</a> for source in order
to ensure the user's freedom. In ordinary situations, however, there
is no such justification for limiting distribution fees, so we do not
limit them.</p>
@@ -195,6 +196,7 @@
</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
<div id="footer">
+<div class="unprintable">
<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
<a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
@@ -219,6 +221,7 @@
href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
of this article.</p>
+</div>
<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
@@ -237,7 +240,7 @@
There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright © 1996, 1997, 1998, 2001, 2007, 2013
+<p>Copyright © 1996, 1997, 1998, 2001, 2007, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2013</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2013, 2015</em></ins></span>
Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
@@ -246,9 +249,9 @@
<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
-<p>Updated:
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2013/11/29 22:59:04 $
+$Date: 2015/06/12 09:58:17 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: philosophy/po/selling.nl-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/selling.nl-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -b -r1.4 -r1.5
--- philosophy/po/selling.nl-diff.html 12 Apr 2014 13:59:47 -0000 1.4
+++ philosophy/po/selling.nl-diff.html 12 Jun 2015 09:58:17 -0000 1.5
@@ -11,21 +11,13 @@
</style></head>
<body><pre>
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><!-- Parent-Version: 1.77
--></em></ins></span>
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
<title>Selling Free Software
-- GNU Project - Free Software <span class="removed"><del><strong>Foundation
(FSF)</title></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Foundation</title></em></ins></span>
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/selling.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
<h2>Selling Free Software</h2>
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><!-- This document uses XHTML 1.0
Strict, but may be served as -->
-<!-- text/html. Please ensure that markup style considers -->
-<!-- appendex C of the XHTML 1.0 standard. See validator.w3.org. -->
-
-<!-- Please ensure links are consistent with Apache's MultiView. -->
-<!-- Change include statements to be consistent with the relevant -->
-<!-- language, where necessary. --></strong></del></span>
-
<p><em><a href="/philosophy/selling-exceptions.html">Some
views on the
ideas of selling exceptions to free software licenses, such as the GNU
GPL</a> are also available.</em></p>
@@ -33,14 +25,15 @@
<p>
Many people believe that the spirit of the GNU Project is that you
should not charge money for distributing copies of software, or that
-you should charge as little as <span class="removed"><del><strong>possible
— just</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>possible—just</em></ins></span> enough to cover
+you should charge as little as possible—just enough to cover
the cost. This is a misunderstanding.</p>
<p>
Actually, we encourage people who redistribute
-<a href="/philosophy/free-sw.html">free software</a>
-to charge as much as they wish or can. If this seems surprising to
-you, please read on.</p>
+<a href="/philosophy/free-sw.html">free software</a> to charge as
much
+as they wish or can. If <span class="inserted"><ins><em>a license does not
permit users to make
+copies and sell them, it is a nonfree license. If</em></ins></span> this seems
+surprising to you, please read on.</p>
<p>
The word “free” has two legitimate general meanings; it can refer
@@ -60,7 +53,7 @@
<a href="/philosophy/categories.html#ProprietarySoftware">Nonfree
programs</a>
are usually sold for a high price, but sometimes a store will give you
a copy at no charge. That doesn't make it free software, though.
-Price or no price, the program is nonfree because users don't have
+Price or no price, the program is nonfree because <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>its</em></ins></span> users <span
class="removed"><del><strong>don't have</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>are denied</em></ins></span>
freedom.</p>
<p>
@@ -95,7 +88,7 @@
People sometimes worry that a high distribution fee will put free
software out of range for users who don't have a lot of money. With
<a href="/philosophy/categories.html#ProprietarySoftware">proprietary
-software</a>, a high price does exactly <span
class="removed"><del><strong>that — but</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>that—but</em></ins></span> free software
+software</a>, a high price does exactly that—but free software
is different.</p>
<p>
@@ -124,7 +117,7 @@
users, or that a low price is likely to encourage users.</p>
<p>
-This is true for proprietary <span class="removed"><del><strong>software
— but</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>software—but</em></ins></span> free software is
+This is true for proprietary software—but free software is
different. With so many ways to get copies, the price of distribution
service has less effect on popularity.</p>
@@ -185,8 +178,8 @@
Without a limit on the fee for the source code, they would be able set
a fee too large for anyone to pay—such as a billion
dollars—and thus pretend to release source code while in truth
-concealing it. So <span class="removed"><del><strong>in</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em><a
href="/licenses/gpl.html#section6">in</em></ins></span> this case we
-have to limit the <span class="removed"><del><strong>fee</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>fee</a></em></ins></span> for source in
order
+concealing it. So <a href="/licenses/gpl.html#section6">in this case we
+have to limit the fee</a> for source in order
to ensure the user's freedom. In ordinary situations, however, there
is no such justification for limiting distribution fees, so we do not
limit them.</p>
@@ -200,32 +193,16 @@
distracted by side issues such as how much of a distribution fee is
charged. Freedom is the issue, the whole issue, and the only issue.</p>
-
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><!-- If needed, change the copyright
block at the bottom. In general, -->
-<!-- all pages on the GNU web server should have the section about -->
-<!-- verbatim copying. Please do NOT remove this without talking -->
-<!-- with the webmasters first. -->
-<!-- Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the document
-->
-<!-- and that it is like this "2001, 2002" not this "2001-2002."
--></strong></del></span>
-
</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
<div id="footer">
+<div class="unprintable">
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><p>
-Please</strong></del></span>
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><div class="unprintable">
-
-<p>Please</em></ins></span> send <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>general</em></ins></span> FSF & GNU inquiries to
-<a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="mailto:address@hidden"><em>address@hidden</em></a>.</strong></del></span>
<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</em></ins></span>
+<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
+<a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
-the FSF.
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><br />
-Please send broken</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Broken</em></ins></span> links and other corrections
or suggestions <span class="inserted"><ins><em>can be sent</em></ins></span>
-to <a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="mailto:address@hidden"><em>address@hidden</em></a>.
-</p>
-
-<p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a
href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
replace it with the translation of these two:
@@ -239,15 +216,11 @@
<p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
our web pages, see <a
href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
- README</a>. --></em></ins></span>
+ README</a>. -->
Please see the <a
href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
-of this <span class="removed"><del><strong>article.
-</p>
-
-<p>
-Copyright</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>article.</p>
+of this article.</p>
</div>
<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
@@ -267,23 +240,18 @@
There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright</em></ins></span> © 1996, 1997, 1998, 2001, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2007</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2007, 2013</em></ins></span>
-Free Software Foundation, <span class="removed"><del><strong>Inc.,
-</p>
-<address>51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110,
USA</address></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Inc.</p></em></ins></span>
+<p>Copyright © 1996, 1997, 1998, 2001, 2007, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2013</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2013, 2015</em></ins></span>
+Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative
-Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States <span
class="removed"><del><strong>License</a>.
-</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>License</a>.</p></em></ins></span>
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>.</p>
<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><p>Updated:</strong></del></span>
-
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p
class="unprintable">Updated:</em></ins></span>
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2014/04/12 13:59:47 $
+$Date: 2015/06/12 09:58:17 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: philosophy/po/selling.sv-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/selling.sv-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -b -r1.4 -r1.5
--- philosophy/po/selling.sv-diff.html 12 Apr 2014 13:59:48 -0000 1.4
+++ philosophy/po/selling.sv-diff.html 12 Jun 2015 09:58:17 -0000 1.5
@@ -11,21 +11,13 @@
</style></head>
<body><pre>
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><!-- Parent-Version: 1.77
--></em></ins></span>
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
<title>Selling Free Software
-- GNU Project - Free Software <span class="removed"><del><strong>Foundation
(FSF)</title></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Foundation</title></em></ins></span>
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/selling.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
<h2>Selling Free Software</h2>
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><!-- This document uses XHTML 1.0
Strict, but may be served as -->
-<!-- text/html. Please ensure that markup style considers -->
-<!-- appendex C of the XHTML 1.0 standard. See validator.w3.org. -->
-
-<!-- Please ensure links are consistent with Apache's MultiView. -->
-<!-- Change include statements to be consistent with the relevant -->
-<!-- language, where necessary. --></strong></del></span>
-
<p><em><a href="/philosophy/selling-exceptions.html">Some
views on the
ideas of selling exceptions to free software licenses, such as the GNU
GPL</a> are also available.</em></p>
@@ -33,14 +25,15 @@
<p>
Many people believe that the spirit of the GNU Project is that you
should not charge money for distributing copies of software, or that
-you should charge as little as <span class="removed"><del><strong>possible
— just</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>possible—just</em></ins></span> enough to cover
+you should charge as little as possible—just enough to cover
the cost. This is a misunderstanding.</p>
<p>
Actually, we encourage people who redistribute
-<a href="/philosophy/free-sw.html">free software</a>
-to charge as much as they wish or can. If this seems surprising to
-you, please read on.</p>
+<a href="/philosophy/free-sw.html">free software</a> to charge as
much
+as they wish or can. If <span class="inserted"><ins><em>a license does not
permit users to make
+copies and sell them, it is a nonfree license. If</em></ins></span> this seems
+surprising to you, please read on.</p>
<p>
The word “free” has two legitimate general meanings; it can refer
@@ -60,7 +53,7 @@
<a href="/philosophy/categories.html#ProprietarySoftware">Nonfree
programs</a>
are usually sold for a high price, but sometimes a store will give you
a copy at no charge. That doesn't make it free software, though.
-Price or no price, the program is nonfree because users don't have
+Price or no price, the program is nonfree because <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>its</em></ins></span> users <span
class="removed"><del><strong>don't have</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>are denied</em></ins></span>
freedom.</p>
<p>
@@ -95,7 +88,7 @@
People sometimes worry that a high distribution fee will put free
software out of range for users who don't have a lot of money. With
<a href="/philosophy/categories.html#ProprietarySoftware">proprietary
-software</a>, a high price does exactly <span
class="removed"><del><strong>that — but</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>that—but</em></ins></span> free software
+software</a>, a high price does exactly that—but free software
is different.</p>
<p>
@@ -124,7 +117,7 @@
users, or that a low price is likely to encourage users.</p>
<p>
-This is true for proprietary <span class="removed"><del><strong>software
— but</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>software—but</em></ins></span> free software is
+This is true for proprietary software—but free software is
different. With so many ways to get copies, the price of distribution
service has less effect on popularity.</p>
@@ -185,8 +178,8 @@
Without a limit on the fee for the source code, they would be able set
a fee too large for anyone to pay—such as a billion
dollars—and thus pretend to release source code while in truth
-concealing it. So <span class="removed"><del><strong>in</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em><a
href="/licenses/gpl.html#section6">in</em></ins></span> this case we
-have to limit the <span class="removed"><del><strong>fee</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>fee</a></em></ins></span> for source in
order
+concealing it. So <a href="/licenses/gpl.html#section6">in this case we
+have to limit the fee</a> for source in order
to ensure the user's freedom. In ordinary situations, however, there
is no such justification for limiting distribution fees, so we do not
limit them.</p>
@@ -200,32 +193,16 @@
distracted by side issues such as how much of a distribution fee is
charged. Freedom is the issue, the whole issue, and the only issue.</p>
-
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><!-- If needed, change the copyright
block at the bottom. In general, -->
-<!-- all pages on the GNU web server should have the section about -->
-<!-- verbatim copying. Please do NOT remove this without talking -->
-<!-- with the webmasters first. -->
-<!-- Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the document
-->
-<!-- and that it is like this "2001, 2002" not this "2001-2002."
--></strong></del></span>
-
</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
<div id="footer">
+<div class="unprintable">
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><p>
-Please</strong></del></span>
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><div class="unprintable">
-
-<p>Please</em></ins></span> send <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>general</em></ins></span> FSF & GNU inquiries to
-<a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="mailto:address@hidden"><em>address@hidden</em></a>.</strong></del></span>
<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</em></ins></span>
+<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
+<a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
-the FSF.
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><br />
-Please send broken</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Broken</em></ins></span> links and other corrections
or suggestions <span class="inserted"><ins><em>can be sent</em></ins></span>
-to <a <span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="mailto:address@hidden"><em>address@hidden</em></a>.
-</p>
-
-<p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a
href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
replace it with the translation of these two:
@@ -239,15 +216,11 @@
<p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
our web pages, see <a
href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
- README</a>. --></em></ins></span>
+ README</a>. -->
Please see the <a
href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
-of this <span class="removed"><del><strong>article.
-</p>
-
-<p>
-Copyright</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>article.</p>
+of this article.</p>
</div>
<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
@@ -267,23 +240,18 @@
There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright</em></ins></span> © 1996, 1997, 1998, 2001, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2007</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2007, 2013</em></ins></span>
-Free Software Foundation, <span class="removed"><del><strong>Inc.,
-</p>
-<address>51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110,
USA</address></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Inc.</p></em></ins></span>
+<p>Copyright © 1996, 1997, 1998, 2001, 2007, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2013</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2013, 2015</em></ins></span>
+Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative
-Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States <span
class="removed"><del><strong>License</a>.
-</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>License</a>.</p></em></ins></span>
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>.</p>
<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
-<span class="removed"><del><strong><p>Updated:</strong></del></span>
-
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p
class="unprintable">Updated:</em></ins></span>
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2014/04/12 13:59:48 $
+$Date: 2015/06/12 09:58:17 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: distros/po/common-distros.ar-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: distros/po/common-distros.ar-diff.html
diff -N distros/po/common-distros.ar-diff.html
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ distros/po/common-distros.ar-diff.html 12 Jun 2015 09:58:14 -0000
1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,357 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
+<!-- Generated by GNUN -->
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
+<title>/distros/common-distros.html-diff</title>
+<style type="text/css">
+span.removed { background-color: #f22; color: #000; }
+span.inserted { background-color: #2f2; color: #000; }
+</style></head>
+<body><pre>
+<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
+<title>Explaining Why We Don't Endorse Other Systems - GNU Project -
Free Software Foundation</title>
+<link rel="alternate" title="Free GNU/Linux distributions"
+ href="http://www.gnu.org/distros/distros.rss";
+ type="application/rss+xml" />
+<!--#include virtual="/distros/po/common-distros.translist" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
+<h2>Explaining Why We Don't Endorse Other Systems</h2>
+<!--#include virtual="/licenses/fsf-licensing.html" -->
+
+<p>We're often asked why we don't endorse a particular
+system—usually a popular GNU/Linux distribution. The short
+answer to that question is that they don't follow
+the <a href="/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html">free
+system distribution guidelines</a>. But since it isn't always obvious
+how a particular system fails to follow the guidelines, this list
+gives more information about the problems of certain well-known
+nonfree system distros.</p>
+
+<p>To learn more about the GNU/Linux systems that we do endorse, check
+out our list of <a href="/distros/free-distros.html">free GNU/Linux
+distributions</a>.</p>
+
+<p>Except where noted, all of the distributions listed on this page
+fail to follow the guidelines in at least two important ways:</p>
+
+<ul>
+<li><p>They do not have a policy of <em>only</em>
including free
+software, and removing nonfree software if it is discovered. Most of
+them have no clear policy on what software they'll accept or reject at
+all. The distributions that do have a policy unfortunately aren't
+strict enough, as explained below.</p></li>
+<li><p>The kernel that they distribute (in most cases, Linux)
includes
+“blobs”: pieces of object code distributed without source,
+usually firmware to run some device.</p></li>
+</ul>
+
+<p>Here is a list of some popular nonfree GNU/Linux distributions in
+alphabetical order, with brief notes about how they fall short. We do
+not aim for completeness; once we know some reasons we can't endorse a
+certain distro, we do not keep looking for all the reasons.
+</p>
+
+<p>A distro may have changed since we last updated information about
+it; if you think one of the problems mentioned here has been
+corrected, please <a href="mailto:address@hidden">let us know</a>.
+However, we will study and endorse a distro only if its developers ask
+for our endorsement.</p>
+
+<!-- Please keep this list sorted, first with all the GNU systems
+ alphabetically, then all the non-GNU systems alphabetically. -->
+
+<h3 id="Arch">Arch GNU/Linux</h3>
+
+<p>Arch has the two usual problems: there's no clear policy
+about what software can be included, and nonfree blobs are shipped with
+their kernel, Linux. Arch also has no policy about not distributing
+nonfree software through their normal channels.</p>
+
+<h3 id="Canaima">Canaima</h3>
+
+<p>Canaima GNU/Linux is a distribution made by Venezuela's government
+to distribute computers with GNU/Linux. While the overall plan is
+admirable, Canaima is flawed by the inclusion of nonfree software.</p>
+
+<p>Its main menu has an option, “Install nonfree
+software”, which installs all the nonfree drivers (even the
+ones that are not necessary). The distro also provides blobs for the
+kernel, Linux, and invites installing nonfree applications including
+Flash Player.</p>
+
+<h3 id="CentOS">CentOS</h3>
+
+<p>We're not aware of problems in CentOS aside from the two usual ones:
+there's no clear policy about what software can be included,
+and nonfree blobs are shipped with Linux, the kernel. Of course, with
+no firm policy in place, there might be other nonfree software
+included that we missed.</p>
+
+<h3 id="Debian">Debian GNU/Linux</h3>
+
+<p>Debian's Social Contract states the goal of making Debian entirely
+free software, and Debian conscientiously keeps nonfree software out
+of the official Debian system. However, Debian also provides a
+repository of nonfree software. According to the project, this
+software is “not part of the Debian system,” but the
+repository is hosted on many of the project's main servers, and people
+can readily learn about these nonfree packages by browsing Debian's
+online package database.</p>
+
+<p>There is also a “contrib” repository; its packages are
+free, but some of them exist to load separately distributed
+proprietary programs. This too is not thoroughly separated from the
+main Debian distribution.</p>
+
+<p>Previous releases of Debian included nonfree blobs with Linux, the
+kernel. With the release of Debian 6.0 (“squeeze”) in
+February 2011, these blobs have been moved out of the main
+distribution to separate packages in the nonfree repository. However,
+the problem partly remains: the installer in some cases recommends
+these nonfree firmware files for the peripherals on the machine.</p>
+
+<h3 id="Fedora">Fedora</h3>
+
+<p>Fedora does have a clear policy about what can be included in the
+distribution, and it seems to be followed carefully. The policy
+requires that most software and all fonts be available under a free
+license, but makes an exception for certain kinds of nonfree firmware.
+Unfortunately, the decision to allow that firmware in the policy keeps
+Fedora from meeting the free system distribution guidelines.</p>
+
+<h3 id="Gentoo">Gentoo GNU/Linux</h3>
+
+<p>Gentoo includes installation recipes for a number of nonfree
+programs in its primary package system.</p>
+
+<h3 id="Mandriva">Mandriva GNU/Linux</h3>
+
+<p>Mandriva does have a stated policy about what can be included in the
+main system. It's based on Fedora's, which means that it also allows
+certain kinds of nonfree firmware to be included. On top of that, it
+permits software released under the original Artistic License to be
+included, even though that's a nonfree license.</p>
+
+<p>Mandriva also provides nonfree software through dedicated
+repositories.</p>
+
+<h3 id="Mint">Mint GNU/Linux</h3>
+
+<p>Mint does not have a policy against including nonfree software, it
+includes nonfree binary blobs in drivers packaged with the kernel, and
+it includes nonfree programs in its repositories. It even includes
+proprietary codecs.</p>
+
+<h3 id="openSUSE">openSUSE</h3>
+
+<p>openSUSE offers a repository of nonfree software. This is an
+instance of
+how <a href="/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html">
+“open” is weaker than “free”</a>.</p>
+
+<h3 id="RedHat">Red Hat GNU/Linux</h3>
+
+<p>Red Hat's enterprise distribution primarily follows the same
+licensing policies as Fedora, with one exception. Thus, we don't
+endorse it for <a href="#Fedora">the same reasons</a>. In
addition to
+those, Red Hat has no policy against making nonfree software available
+for the system through supplementary distribution channels.</p>
+
+<h3 id="Slackware">Slackware</h3>
+
+<p>Slackware has the two usual problems: there's no clear policy about
+what software can be included, and nonfree blobs are included in
+Linux, the kernel. It also ships with the nonfree image-viewing
+program xv. Of course, with no firm policy against them, more nonfree
+programs could get in at any time. There is an
+<a href="http://freeslack.net/">unofficial list</a> of nonfree
software
+in Slackware.</p>
+
+<h3 id="SteamOS">SteamOS</h3>
+
+<p>SteamOS, a version of GNU/Linux to be distributed by Valve, is not
+actually released for download yet. At present, we can say that it is
+very unlikely to be an operating system which respects user freedom,
+because it is meant to work closely with the Steam service. Steam uses
+<a href="https://www.defectivebydesign.org/what_is_drm">Digital
Restrictions
+Management (DRM)</a> to impose
+restrictions on the software it distributes. SteamOS will have to
+contain the proprietary software necessary to enforce these
+restrictions. It will also be designed to promote and integrate with
+the Steam store, which promotes a large amount of proprietary
+software.</p>
+
+<h3 id="SUSE">SUSE GNU/Linux Enterprise</h3>
+
+<p>In addition to the usual two problems, several nonfree software
+programs are available for download from SUSE's official FTP site.</p>
+
+<h3 <span class="inserted"><ins><em>id="Tails">Tails</h3>
+
+<p>Tails uses the vanilla version of Linux, which contains nonfree
+firmware blobs.</p>
+
+<h3</em></ins></span> id="Ubuntu">Ubuntu GNU/Linux</h3>
+
+<p>Ubuntu provides specific repositories of nonfree software, and
+Canonical expressly promotes and recommends nonfree software under the
+Ubuntu name in some of their distribution channels. Ubuntu offers the
+option to install only free packages, which means it also offers the
+option to install nonfree packages too. In addition, the version of
+Linux, the kernel, included in Ubuntu contains firmware blobs.</p>
+
+<p>
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>Ubuntu's trademark policy prohibits
commercial redistribution of exact
+copies of Ubuntu, denying an important freedom.
+</p>
+
+<p></strong></del></span>
+As of October 2012, Ubuntu
+<a
href="http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2012/10/does-ubuntus-amazon-lens-break-eu-law">
+sends personal data about users' searches</a> to a server belonging to
+Canonical, which sends back ads to buy things from Amazon. This does
+not, strictly speaking, affect whether Ubuntu is free software, but it
+is a violation of users' privacy. It also encourages buying from
+Amazon, a company <a href="http://DefectiveByDesign.org/">associated
+with DRM</a> as well as mistreatment of workers, authors and
publishers.</p>
+
+<p>This adware is one of the rare occasions in which a free software
+developer persists in keeping a malicious feature in its version of a
+program.</p>
+
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p>Ubuntu <a
href="http://www.ubuntu.com/legal/terms-and-policies/intellectual-property-policy#your-use-of-ubuntu">appears
+to permit commercial redistribution of exact copies with the
+trademarks</a>; removal of the trademarks is required only for
+modified versions. That is an acceptable policy for trademarks. The
+same page, further down, makes a vague and ominous statement about
+“Ubuntu patents,” without giving enough details to show
+whether that constitutes aggression or not.</p>
+
+<p>That page spreads confusion by using the misleading
+term <a href="/philosophy/not-ipr.html">“intellectual property
+rights”</a>, which falsely presumes that trademark law and patent
law
+and several other laws belong in one single conceptual framework. Use
+of that term is harmful, without exception, so after making a
+reference to someone else's use of the term, we should always reject
+it. However, that is not a substantive issue about Ubuntu as a
+GNU/Linux distribution.</p></em></ins></span>
+
+<h2>Some Other Distros</h2>
+
+<p>Here we discuss some <span
class="removed"><del><strong>systems</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>well-known or significant non-GNU/Linux system
+distros</em></ins></span> that <span
class="removed"><del><strong>are</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>do</em></ins></span> not <span
class="removed"><del><strong>GNU/Linux.</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>qualify as free.</p></em></ins></span>
+
+<h3 id="BSD">BSD systems</h3>
+
+<p>FreeBSD, NetBSD, and OpenBSD all include instructions for obtaining
+nonfree programs in their ports system. In addition, their kernels
+include nonfree firmware blobs.</p>
+
+<p>Nonfree firmware programs used with Linux, the kernel, are called
+“blobs”, and that's how we use the term. In BSD parlance,
+the term “blob” means something else: a nonfree driver.
+OpenBSD and perhaps other BSD distributions (called “projects” by
BSD
+developers) have the policy of not including those. That is the right
+policy, as regards drivers; but when the developers say these distributions
+“contain no blobs”, it causes a misunderstanding. They are not
+talking about firmware blobs.</p>
+
+<p>No BSD distribution has policies against proprietary binary-only
+firmware that might be loaded even by free drivers.</p>
+
+<h3 id="Haiku">Haiku</h3>
+
+<p>Haiku includes some software that you're not allowed to modify. It
+also includes nonfree firmware blobs.</p>
+
+<h3 <span class="inserted"><ins><em>id="Android">Android</h3>
+
+<p><a
href="/philosophy/android-and-users-freedom.html">Android</a> as
+released by Google contains many nonfree parts as well as many free
+parts. Most of the free parts are covered by a pushover license (not
+<a href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a>), so manufacturers
that
+distribute Android in a product sometimes make those parts nonfree as
+well.</p>
+
+<h3</em></ins></span> id="CyanogenMod">CyanogenMod</h3>
+
+<p>This modified version of Android contains nonfree libraries.
+It also explains how to install the nonfree applications that Google
+distributes with Android.</p>
+
+<h3 id="ReactOS">ReactOS</h3>
+
+<p>ReactOS is meant as a free binary compatible replacement for
+Windows. Allowing people to continue using the proprietary software
+and drivers meant for Windows is one of the stated goals of the
+project. </p>
+
+</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
+<div id="footer">
+<div class="unprintable">
+
+<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
+<a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
+There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
+the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a
href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+ replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+ We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+ translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+ Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+ to <a href="mailto:address@hidden">
+ <address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+ <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+ our web pages, see <a
+ href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+ README</a>. -->
+Please see the <a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
+of this article.</p>
+</div>
+
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND <span class="removed"><del><strong>3.0
US.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>4.0.</em></ins></span> Please do NOT change or
remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+
+<p>Copyright © <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2014</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2014, 2015</em></ins></span> Free Software
Foundation, Inc.</p>
+
+<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
+<span
class="removed"><del><strong>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative</strong></del></span>
+<span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative</em></ins></span>
+Commons <span class="removed"><del><strong>Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United
States</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0
International</em></ins></span> License</a>.</p>
+
+<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
+
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
+<!-- timestamp start -->
+$Date: 2015/06/12 09:58:14 $
+<!-- timestamp end -->
+</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+</body>
+</html>
+</pre></body></html>
Index: distros/po/distros.lt-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: distros/po/distros.lt-diff.html
diff -N distros/po/distros.lt-diff.html
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ distros/po/distros.lt-diff.html 12 Jun 2015 09:58:14 -0000 1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,192 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
+<!-- Generated by GNUN -->
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
+<title>/distros/distros.html-diff</title>
+<style type="text/css">
+span.removed { background-color: #f22; color: #000; }
+span.inserted { background-color: #2f2; color: #000; }
+</style></head>
+<body><pre>
+<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
+<title>GNU/Linux Distros
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
+<link rel="alternate" title="Free GNU/Linux distributions"
+ href="http://www.gnu.org/distros/distros.rss";
+ type="application/rss+xml" />
+<!--#include virtual="/distros/po/distros.translist" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
+<h2>GNU/Linux Distros</h2>
+
+<p>
+Free GNU/Linux system distributions (or “distros”) only
+include and only propose free software. They reject non-free
+applications, non-free programming platforms, non-free drivers,
+non-free firmware “blobs”, and any other non-free software
+and documentation. If they discover that by mistake some had been
+included, they remove it.
+</p>
+
+<h3 id="freeDistros">Free GNU/Linux Distros</h3>
+<p>
+We recommend that you use a free GNU/Linux system distribution, one that does
+not include proprietary software at all. That way you can be sure that you are
+not installing any non-free programs. Here is our list of such distros:<br
/>
+<a href="/distros/free-distros.html">
+Free GNU/Linux distributions</a>.</p>
+
+<p>
+All of these existing distros could use more development help. Thus,
+if you want to make an effective contribution to free GNU/Linux
+distributions, we suggest that you join the development of an existing
+free distro rather that starting a new free distro.
+</p>
+
+<h3 <span class="inserted"><ins><em>id="freeNonDistros">Free Non-GNU
Distros</h3>
+<p>
+These system distributions are free but quite different from GNU.
+Using them is not similar to using GNU/Linux. However, they satisfy
+the same ethical criteria that we apply to GNU/Linux distros.<br />
+<a href="/distros/free-non-gnu-distros.html">
+Free Non-GNU distributions</a>.</p>
+
+<p>
+All of these existing distros could use more development help. Thus,
+if you want to make an effective contribution in this area, we suggest
+that you join the development of an existing free distro rather that
+starting a new free distro.
+</p>
+
+<h3</em></ins></span> id="distroGuidelines">Free Distro
Guidelines</h3>
+<p>
+Here is the list of problems that can prevent a distro from being
+considered entirely free:<br />
+<a href="/distros/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html">
+Guidelines for free system distributions</a>.</p>
+
+<h3 id="otherDistros">Common Distros</h3>
+<p>
+Many common and well-known GNU/Linux software distributions don't meet
+our guidelines. You can read about their problems here:<br />
+<a href="/distros/common-distros.html">
+Why we can't endorse many well-known GNU/Linux distros</a>.</p>
+
+<p>
+We appeal to the developers of these distros to remove the non-free parts and
+thus make them entirely free software.
+</p>
+
+<h3 id="optionallyFree">Optionally Free Is Not Enough</h3>
+<p>
+Some GNU/Linux distributions allow the user the option of installing only free
software. You can read:<br />
+<a href="/distros/optionally-free-not-enough.html">
+Why optionally free is not enough.</a></p>
+
+<h3 id="whyImportant">Why Is This Important?</h3>
+<p>
+When a GNU/Linux distro includes nonfree software, it causes two kinds
+of problems:</p>
+
+<ul>
+<li>If you install it, you may install and use nonfree
software.</li>
+<li>It gives people the wrong idea of what the goal is.</li>
+</ul>
+
+<p>
+The first problem is a direct problem: it affects users of the
+distro, if they install the nonfree software. However, the second
+problem is the more important one, because it affects the community as
+a whole.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+The developers of nonfree distros don't say, “We apologize for
+the presence of nonfree components in our distribution. We don't know
+what possessed us to include them. We hope that next release we will
+keep our minds on freedom.” If they did, they would have less
+of a bad influence.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+Instead, they generally present the nonfree software in their systems
+as a positive feature; they say that their goal is “the best
+possible user experience”, or something like that, rather than
+freedom. In other words, they lead people to place convenience above
+freedom — working directly against our campaign to make freedom
+the primary goal.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+The fact that these distros don't deliver freedom is why we don't
+endorse them. That they teach people not to value freedom is why
+we are strongly concerned about this issue.
+</p>
+
+</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
+<div id="footer">
+<div class="unprintable">
+
+<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
+<a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
+There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
+the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a
href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+ replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+ We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+ translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+ Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+ to <a href="mailto:address@hidden">
+ <address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+ <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+ our web pages, see <a
+ href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+ README</a>. -->
+Please see the <a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
+of this article.</p>
+</div>
+
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US. Please do NOT change or remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+
+<p>Copyright © <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2014</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2014, 2015</em></ins></span> Free Software
Foundation, Inc.</p>
+
+<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>.</p>
+
+<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
+
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
+<!-- timestamp start -->
+$Date: 2015/06/12 09:58:14 $
+<!-- timestamp end -->
+</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+</body>
+</html>
+</pre></body></html>
Index: philosophy/po/selling.ar-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: philosophy/po/selling.ar-diff.html
diff -N philosophy/po/selling.ar-diff.html
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ philosophy/po/selling.ar-diff.html 12 Jun 2015 09:58:16 -0000 1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,261 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
+<!-- Generated by GNUN -->
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
+<title>/philosophy/selling.html-diff</title>
+<style type="text/css">
+span.removed { background-color: #f22; color: #000; }
+span.inserted { background-color: #2f2; color: #000; }
+</style></head>
+<body><pre>
+<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
+<title>Selling Free Software
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
+<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/selling.translist" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
+<h2>Selling Free Software</h2>
+
+<p><em><a href="/philosophy/selling-exceptions.html">Some
views on the
+ideas of selling exceptions to free software licenses, such as the GNU
+GPL</a> are also available.</em></p>
+
+<p>
+Many people believe that the spirit of the GNU Project is that you
+should not charge money for distributing copies of software, or that
+you should charge as little as possible—just enough to cover
+the cost. This is a misunderstanding.</p>
+
+<p>
+Actually, we encourage people who redistribute
+<a href="/philosophy/free-sw.html">free software</a> to charge as
much
+as they wish or can. If <span class="inserted"><ins><em>a license does not
permit users to make
+copies and sell them, it is a nonfree license. If</em></ins></span> this seems
+surprising to you, please read on.</p>
+
+<p>
+The word “free” has two legitimate general meanings; it can refer
+either to freedom or to price. When we speak of “free software”,
+we're talking about freedom, not price. (Think of “free speech”,
+not “free beer”.) Specifically, it means that a user is free to
run
+the program, change the program, and redistribute the program with or
+without changes.</p>
+
+<p>
+Free programs are sometimes distributed gratis, and sometimes for a
+substantial price. Often the same program is available in both ways
+from different places. The program is free regardless of the price,
+because users have freedom in using it.</p>
+
+<p>
+<a href="/philosophy/categories.html#ProprietarySoftware">Nonfree
programs</a>
+are usually sold for a high price, but sometimes a store will give you
+a copy at no charge. That doesn't make it free software, though.
+Price or no price, the program is nonfree because <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>its</em></ins></span> users <span
class="removed"><del><strong>don't have</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>are denied</em></ins></span>
+freedom.</p>
+
+<p>
+Since free software is not a matter of price, a low price doesn't make
+the software
+free, or even closer to free. So if you are redistributing copies of free
+software, you might as well charge a substantial fee and <em>make
+some money</em>. Redistributing free software is a good and
+legitimate activity; if you do it, you might as well make a profit
+from it.</p>
+
+<p>
+Free software is a community project, and everyone who depends on it
+ought to look for ways to contribute to building the community. For a
+distributor, the way to do this is to give a part of the profit to free
software development projects or to the
+<a href="/fsf/fsf.html">Free Software Foundation</a>. This way
you can
+advance the world of free software.</p>
+
+<p>
+<strong>Distributing free software is an opportunity to raise
+funds for development. Don't waste it!</strong></p>
+
+<p>
+In order to contribute funds, you need to have some extra. If you
+charge too low a fee, you won't have anything to spare to support
+development.</p>
+
+
+<h3>Will a higher distribution price hurt some users?</h3>
+
+<p>
+People sometimes worry that a high distribution fee will put free
+software out of range for users who don't have a lot of money. With
+<a href="/philosophy/categories.html#ProprietarySoftware">proprietary
+software</a>, a high price does exactly that—but free software
+is different.</p>
+
+<p>
+The difference is that free software naturally tends to spread around,
+and there are many ways to get it.</p>
+
+<p>
+Software hoarders try their damnedest to stop you from running a
+proprietary program without paying the standard price. If this price
+is high, that does make it hard for some users to use the program.</p>
+
+<p>
+With free software, users don't <em>have</em> to pay the
+distribution fee in order to use the software. They can copy the
+program from a friend who has a copy, or with the help of a friend who
+has network access. Or several users can join together, split the
+price of one CD-ROM, then each in turn can install the software. A high
+CD-ROM price is not a major obstacle when the software is free.</p>
+
+
+<h3>Will a higher distribution price discourage use of free
software?</h3>
+
+<p>
+Another common concern is for the popularity of free software. People
+think that a high price for distribution would reduce the number of
+users, or that a low price is likely to encourage users.</p>
+
+<p>
+This is true for proprietary software—but free software is
+different. With so many ways to get copies, the price of distribution
+service has less effect on popularity.</p>
+
+<p>
+In the long run, how many people use free software is determined
+mainly by <em>how much free software can do</em>, and how easy it
+is to use. Many users do not make freedom their priority; they
+may continue to use proprietary software if
+free software can't do all the jobs they want done. Thus, if we want
+to increase the number of users in the long run, we should above all
+<em>develop more free software</em>.</p>
+
+<p>
+The most direct way to do this is by writing needed
+<a href="http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/tasklist">free
software</a>
+or
+<a href="/doc/doc.html">manuals</a> yourself. But if you do
+distribution rather than writing, the best way you can help is by
+raising funds for others to write them.</p>
+
+
+<h3>The term “selling software” can be confusing
too</h3>
+
+<p>
+Strictly speaking, “selling” means trading goods for
+money. Selling a copy of a free program is legitimate, and we
+encourage it.</p>
+
+<p>
+However, when people think of
+<a href="/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#SellSoftware">“selling
software”</a>,
+they usually imagine doing it the way most companies do it: making the
+software proprietary rather than free.</p>
+
+<p>
+So unless you're going to draw distinctions carefully, the way this
+article does, we suggest it is better to avoid using the term
+“selling software” and choose some other wording instead.
+For example, you could say “distributing free software for a
+fee”—that is unambiguous.</p>
+
+
+<h3>High or low fees, and the GNU GPL</h3>
+
+<p>
+Except for one special situation, the
+<a href="/copyleft/gpl.html">GNU General Public License</a> (GNU
GPL)
+has no requirements about how much you can charge for distributing a
+copy of free software. You can charge nothing, a penny, a dollar, or
+a billion dollars. It's up to you, and the marketplace, so don't
+complain to us if nobody wants to pay a billion dollars for a
+copy.</p>
+
+<p>
+The one exception is in the case where binaries are distributed
+without the corresponding complete source code. Those who do this are
+required by the GNU GPL to provide source code on subsequent request.
+Without a limit on the fee for the source code, they would be able set
+a fee too large for anyone to pay—such as a billion
+dollars—and thus pretend to release source code while in truth
+concealing it. So <a href="/licenses/gpl.html#section6">in this case we
+have to limit the fee</a> for source in order
+to ensure the user's freedom. In ordinary situations, however, there
+is no such justification for limiting distribution fees, so we do not
+limit them.</p>
+
+<p>
+Sometimes companies whose activities cross the line stated in the GNU
+GPL plead for permission, saying that they “won't charge
+money for the GNU software” or such like. That won't get them anywhere
+with us. Free software is about freedom, and enforcing the GPL is
+defending freedom. When we defend users' freedom, we are not
+distracted by side issues such as how much of a distribution fee is
+charged. Freedom is the issue, the whole issue, and the only issue.</p>
+
+</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
+<div id="footer">
+<div class="unprintable">
+
+<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
+<a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
+There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
+the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a
href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+ replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+ We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+ translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+ Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+ to <a href="mailto:address@hidden">
+ <address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+ <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+ our web pages, see <a
+ href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+ README</a>. -->
+Please see the <a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
+of this article.</p>
+</div>
+
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US. Please do NOT change or remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+
+<p>Copyright © 1996, 1997, 1998, 2001, 2007, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2013</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2013, 2015</em></ins></span>
+Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+
+<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>.</p>
+
+<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
+
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
+<!-- timestamp start -->
+$Date: 2015/06/12 09:58:16 $
+<!-- timestamp end -->
+</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+</body>
+</html>
+</pre></body></html>
Index: philosophy/po/selling.fa-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: philosophy/po/selling.fa-diff.html
diff -N philosophy/po/selling.fa-diff.html
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ philosophy/po/selling.fa-diff.html 12 Jun 2015 09:58:16 -0000 1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,261 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
+<!-- Generated by GNUN -->
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
+<title>/philosophy/selling.html-diff</title>
+<style type="text/css">
+span.removed { background-color: #f22; color: #000; }
+span.inserted { background-color: #2f2; color: #000; }
+</style></head>
+<body><pre>
+<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
+<title>Selling Free Software
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
+<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/selling.translist" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
+<h2>Selling Free Software</h2>
+
+<p><em><a href="/philosophy/selling-exceptions.html">Some
views on the
+ideas of selling exceptions to free software licenses, such as the GNU
+GPL</a> are also available.</em></p>
+
+<p>
+Many people believe that the spirit of the GNU Project is that you
+should not charge money for distributing copies of software, or that
+you should charge as little as possible—just enough to cover
+the cost. This is a misunderstanding.</p>
+
+<p>
+Actually, we encourage people who redistribute
+<a href="/philosophy/free-sw.html">free software</a> to charge as
much
+as they wish or can. If <span class="inserted"><ins><em>a license does not
permit users to make
+copies and sell them, it is a nonfree license. If</em></ins></span> this seems
+surprising to you, please read on.</p>
+
+<p>
+The word “free” has two legitimate general meanings; it can refer
+either to freedom or to price. When we speak of “free software”,
+we're talking about freedom, not price. (Think of “free speech”,
+not “free beer”.) Specifically, it means that a user is free to
run
+the program, change the program, and redistribute the program with or
+without changes.</p>
+
+<p>
+Free programs are sometimes distributed gratis, and sometimes for a
+substantial price. Often the same program is available in both ways
+from different places. The program is free regardless of the price,
+because users have freedom in using it.</p>
+
+<p>
+<a href="/philosophy/categories.html#ProprietarySoftware">Nonfree
programs</a>
+are usually sold for a high price, but sometimes a store will give you
+a copy at no charge. That doesn't make it free software, though.
+Price or no price, the program is nonfree because <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>its</em></ins></span> users <span
class="removed"><del><strong>don't have</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>are denied</em></ins></span>
+freedom.</p>
+
+<p>
+Since free software is not a matter of price, a low price doesn't make
+the software
+free, or even closer to free. So if you are redistributing copies of free
+software, you might as well charge a substantial fee and <em>make
+some money</em>. Redistributing free software is a good and
+legitimate activity; if you do it, you might as well make a profit
+from it.</p>
+
+<p>
+Free software is a community project, and everyone who depends on it
+ought to look for ways to contribute to building the community. For a
+distributor, the way to do this is to give a part of the profit to free
software development projects or to the
+<a href="/fsf/fsf.html">Free Software Foundation</a>. This way
you can
+advance the world of free software.</p>
+
+<p>
+<strong>Distributing free software is an opportunity to raise
+funds for development. Don't waste it!</strong></p>
+
+<p>
+In order to contribute funds, you need to have some extra. If you
+charge too low a fee, you won't have anything to spare to support
+development.</p>
+
+
+<h3>Will a higher distribution price hurt some users?</h3>
+
+<p>
+People sometimes worry that a high distribution fee will put free
+software out of range for users who don't have a lot of money. With
+<a href="/philosophy/categories.html#ProprietarySoftware">proprietary
+software</a>, a high price does exactly that—but free software
+is different.</p>
+
+<p>
+The difference is that free software naturally tends to spread around,
+and there are many ways to get it.</p>
+
+<p>
+Software hoarders try their damnedest to stop you from running a
+proprietary program without paying the standard price. If this price
+is high, that does make it hard for some users to use the program.</p>
+
+<p>
+With free software, users don't <em>have</em> to pay the
+distribution fee in order to use the software. They can copy the
+program from a friend who has a copy, or with the help of a friend who
+has network access. Or several users can join together, split the
+price of one CD-ROM, then each in turn can install the software. A high
+CD-ROM price is not a major obstacle when the software is free.</p>
+
+
+<h3>Will a higher distribution price discourage use of free
software?</h3>
+
+<p>
+Another common concern is for the popularity of free software. People
+think that a high price for distribution would reduce the number of
+users, or that a low price is likely to encourage users.</p>
+
+<p>
+This is true for proprietary software—but free software is
+different. With so many ways to get copies, the price of distribution
+service has less effect on popularity.</p>
+
+<p>
+In the long run, how many people use free software is determined
+mainly by <em>how much free software can do</em>, and how easy it
+is to use. Many users do not make freedom their priority; they
+may continue to use proprietary software if
+free software can't do all the jobs they want done. Thus, if we want
+to increase the number of users in the long run, we should above all
+<em>develop more free software</em>.</p>
+
+<p>
+The most direct way to do this is by writing needed
+<a href="http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/tasklist">free
software</a>
+or
+<a href="/doc/doc.html">manuals</a> yourself. But if you do
+distribution rather than writing, the best way you can help is by
+raising funds for others to write them.</p>
+
+
+<h3>The term “selling software” can be confusing
too</h3>
+
+<p>
+Strictly speaking, “selling” means trading goods for
+money. Selling a copy of a free program is legitimate, and we
+encourage it.</p>
+
+<p>
+However, when people think of
+<a href="/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#SellSoftware">“selling
software”</a>,
+they usually imagine doing it the way most companies do it: making the
+software proprietary rather than free.</p>
+
+<p>
+So unless you're going to draw distinctions carefully, the way this
+article does, we suggest it is better to avoid using the term
+“selling software” and choose some other wording instead.
+For example, you could say “distributing free software for a
+fee”—that is unambiguous.</p>
+
+
+<h3>High or low fees, and the GNU GPL</h3>
+
+<p>
+Except for one special situation, the
+<a href="/copyleft/gpl.html">GNU General Public License</a> (GNU
GPL)
+has no requirements about how much you can charge for distributing a
+copy of free software. You can charge nothing, a penny, a dollar, or
+a billion dollars. It's up to you, and the marketplace, so don't
+complain to us if nobody wants to pay a billion dollars for a
+copy.</p>
+
+<p>
+The one exception is in the case where binaries are distributed
+without the corresponding complete source code. Those who do this are
+required by the GNU GPL to provide source code on subsequent request.
+Without a limit on the fee for the source code, they would be able set
+a fee too large for anyone to pay—such as a billion
+dollars—and thus pretend to release source code while in truth
+concealing it. So <a href="/licenses/gpl.html#section6">in this case we
+have to limit the fee</a> for source in order
+to ensure the user's freedom. In ordinary situations, however, there
+is no such justification for limiting distribution fees, so we do not
+limit them.</p>
+
+<p>
+Sometimes companies whose activities cross the line stated in the GNU
+GPL plead for permission, saying that they “won't charge
+money for the GNU software” or such like. That won't get them anywhere
+with us. Free software is about freedom, and enforcing the GPL is
+defending freedom. When we defend users' freedom, we are not
+distracted by side issues such as how much of a distribution fee is
+charged. Freedom is the issue, the whole issue, and the only issue.</p>
+
+</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
+<div id="footer">
+<div class="unprintable">
+
+<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
+<a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
+There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
+the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a
href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+ replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+ We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+ translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+ Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+ to <a href="mailto:address@hidden">
+ <address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+ <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+ our web pages, see <a
+ href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+ README</a>. -->
+Please see the <a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
+of this article.</p>
+</div>
+
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US. Please do NOT change or remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+
+<p>Copyright © 1996, 1997, 1998, 2001, 2007, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2013</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2013, 2015</em></ins></span>
+Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+
+<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>.</p>
+
+<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
+
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
+<!-- timestamp start -->
+$Date: 2015/06/12 09:58:16 $
+<!-- timestamp end -->
+</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+</body>
+</html>
+</pre></body></html>
Index: philosophy/po/selling.ml-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: philosophy/po/selling.ml-diff.html
diff -N philosophy/po/selling.ml-diff.html
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ philosophy/po/selling.ml-diff.html 12 Jun 2015 09:58:17 -0000 1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,261 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
+<!-- Generated by GNUN -->
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
+<title>/philosophy/selling.html-diff</title>
+<style type="text/css">
+span.removed { background-color: #f22; color: #000; }
+span.inserted { background-color: #2f2; color: #000; }
+</style></head>
+<body><pre>
+<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
+<title>Selling Free Software
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
+<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/selling.translist" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
+<h2>Selling Free Software</h2>
+
+<p><em><a href="/philosophy/selling-exceptions.html">Some
views on the
+ideas of selling exceptions to free software licenses, such as the GNU
+GPL</a> are also available.</em></p>
+
+<p>
+Many people believe that the spirit of the GNU Project is that you
+should not charge money for distributing copies of software, or that
+you should charge as little as possible—just enough to cover
+the cost. This is a misunderstanding.</p>
+
+<p>
+Actually, we encourage people who redistribute
+<a href="/philosophy/free-sw.html">free software</a> to charge as
much
+as they wish or can. If <span class="inserted"><ins><em>a license does not
permit users to make
+copies and sell them, it is a nonfree license. If</em></ins></span> this seems
+surprising to you, please read on.</p>
+
+<p>
+The word “free” has two legitimate general meanings; it can refer
+either to freedom or to price. When we speak of “free software”,
+we're talking about freedom, not price. (Think of “free speech”,
+not “free beer”.) Specifically, it means that a user is free to
run
+the program, change the program, and redistribute the program with or
+without changes.</p>
+
+<p>
+Free programs are sometimes distributed gratis, and sometimes for a
+substantial price. Often the same program is available in both ways
+from different places. The program is free regardless of the price,
+because users have freedom in using it.</p>
+
+<p>
+<a href="/philosophy/categories.html#ProprietarySoftware">Nonfree
programs</a>
+are usually sold for a high price, but sometimes a store will give you
+a copy at no charge. That doesn't make it free software, though.
+Price or no price, the program is nonfree because <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>its</em></ins></span> users <span
class="removed"><del><strong>don't have</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>are denied</em></ins></span>
+freedom.</p>
+
+<p>
+Since free software is not a matter of price, a low price doesn't make
+the software
+free, or even closer to free. So if you are redistributing copies of free
+software, you might as well charge a substantial fee and <em>make
+some money</em>. Redistributing free software is a good and
+legitimate activity; if you do it, you might as well make a profit
+from it.</p>
+
+<p>
+Free software is a community project, and everyone who depends on it
+ought to look for ways to contribute to building the community. For a
+distributor, the way to do this is to give a part of the profit to free
software development projects or to the
+<a href="/fsf/fsf.html">Free Software Foundation</a>. This way
you can
+advance the world of free software.</p>
+
+<p>
+<strong>Distributing free software is an opportunity to raise
+funds for development. Don't waste it!</strong></p>
+
+<p>
+In order to contribute funds, you need to have some extra. If you
+charge too low a fee, you won't have anything to spare to support
+development.</p>
+
+
+<h3>Will a higher distribution price hurt some users?</h3>
+
+<p>
+People sometimes worry that a high distribution fee will put free
+software out of range for users who don't have a lot of money. With
+<a href="/philosophy/categories.html#ProprietarySoftware">proprietary
+software</a>, a high price does exactly that—but free software
+is different.</p>
+
+<p>
+The difference is that free software naturally tends to spread around,
+and there are many ways to get it.</p>
+
+<p>
+Software hoarders try their damnedest to stop you from running a
+proprietary program without paying the standard price. If this price
+is high, that does make it hard for some users to use the program.</p>
+
+<p>
+With free software, users don't <em>have</em> to pay the
+distribution fee in order to use the software. They can copy the
+program from a friend who has a copy, or with the help of a friend who
+has network access. Or several users can join together, split the
+price of one CD-ROM, then each in turn can install the software. A high
+CD-ROM price is not a major obstacle when the software is free.</p>
+
+
+<h3>Will a higher distribution price discourage use of free
software?</h3>
+
+<p>
+Another common concern is for the popularity of free software. People
+think that a high price for distribution would reduce the number of
+users, or that a low price is likely to encourage users.</p>
+
+<p>
+This is true for proprietary software—but free software is
+different. With so many ways to get copies, the price of distribution
+service has less effect on popularity.</p>
+
+<p>
+In the long run, how many people use free software is determined
+mainly by <em>how much free software can do</em>, and how easy it
+is to use. Many users do not make freedom their priority; they
+may continue to use proprietary software if
+free software can't do all the jobs they want done. Thus, if we want
+to increase the number of users in the long run, we should above all
+<em>develop more free software</em>.</p>
+
+<p>
+The most direct way to do this is by writing needed
+<a href="http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/tasklist">free
software</a>
+or
+<a href="/doc/doc.html">manuals</a> yourself. But if you do
+distribution rather than writing, the best way you can help is by
+raising funds for others to write them.</p>
+
+
+<h3>The term “selling software” can be confusing
too</h3>
+
+<p>
+Strictly speaking, “selling” means trading goods for
+money. Selling a copy of a free program is legitimate, and we
+encourage it.</p>
+
+<p>
+However, when people think of
+<a href="/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#SellSoftware">“selling
software”</a>,
+they usually imagine doing it the way most companies do it: making the
+software proprietary rather than free.</p>
+
+<p>
+So unless you're going to draw distinctions carefully, the way this
+article does, we suggest it is better to avoid using the term
+“selling software” and choose some other wording instead.
+For example, you could say “distributing free software for a
+fee”—that is unambiguous.</p>
+
+
+<h3>High or low fees, and the GNU GPL</h3>
+
+<p>
+Except for one special situation, the
+<a href="/copyleft/gpl.html">GNU General Public License</a> (GNU
GPL)
+has no requirements about how much you can charge for distributing a
+copy of free software. You can charge nothing, a penny, a dollar, or
+a billion dollars. It's up to you, and the marketplace, so don't
+complain to us if nobody wants to pay a billion dollars for a
+copy.</p>
+
+<p>
+The one exception is in the case where binaries are distributed
+without the corresponding complete source code. Those who do this are
+required by the GNU GPL to provide source code on subsequent request.
+Without a limit on the fee for the source code, they would be able set
+a fee too large for anyone to pay—such as a billion
+dollars—and thus pretend to release source code while in truth
+concealing it. So <a href="/licenses/gpl.html#section6">in this case we
+have to limit the fee</a> for source in order
+to ensure the user's freedom. In ordinary situations, however, there
+is no such justification for limiting distribution fees, so we do not
+limit them.</p>
+
+<p>
+Sometimes companies whose activities cross the line stated in the GNU
+GPL plead for permission, saying that they “won't charge
+money for the GNU software” or such like. That won't get them anywhere
+with us. Free software is about freedom, and enforcing the GPL is
+defending freedom. When we defend users' freedom, we are not
+distracted by side issues such as how much of a distribution fee is
+charged. Freedom is the issue, the whole issue, and the only issue.</p>
+
+</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
+<div id="footer">
+<div class="unprintable">
+
+<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
+<a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
+There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
+the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a
href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+ replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+ We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+ translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+ Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+ to <a href="mailto:address@hidden">
+ <address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+ <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+ our web pages, see <a
+ href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+ README</a>. -->
+Please see the <a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
+of this article.</p>
+</div>
+
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US. Please do NOT change or remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+
+<p>Copyright © 1996, 1997, 1998, 2001, 2007, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2013</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2013, 2015</em></ins></span>
+Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+
+<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>.</p>
+
+<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
+
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
+<!-- timestamp start -->
+$Date: 2015/06/12 09:58:17 $
+<!-- timestamp end -->
+</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+</body>
+</html>
+</pre></body></html>
Index: philosophy/po/selling.pt-br-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: philosophy/po/selling.pt-br-diff.html
diff -N philosophy/po/selling.pt-br-diff.html
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ philosophy/po/selling.pt-br-diff.html 12 Jun 2015 09:58:17 -0000
1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,261 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
+<!-- Generated by GNUN -->
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
+<title>/philosophy/selling.html-diff</title>
+<style type="text/css">
+span.removed { background-color: #f22; color: #000; }
+span.inserted { background-color: #2f2; color: #000; }
+</style></head>
+<body><pre>
+<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
+<title>Selling Free Software
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
+<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/selling.translist" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
+<h2>Selling Free Software</h2>
+
+<p><em><a href="/philosophy/selling-exceptions.html">Some
views on the
+ideas of selling exceptions to free software licenses, such as the GNU
+GPL</a> are also available.</em></p>
+
+<p>
+Many people believe that the spirit of the GNU Project is that you
+should not charge money for distributing copies of software, or that
+you should charge as little as possible—just enough to cover
+the cost. This is a misunderstanding.</p>
+
+<p>
+Actually, we encourage people who redistribute
+<a href="/philosophy/free-sw.html">free software</a> to charge as
much
+as they wish or can. If <span class="inserted"><ins><em>a license does not
permit users to make
+copies and sell them, it is a nonfree license. If</em></ins></span> this seems
+surprising to you, please read on.</p>
+
+<p>
+The word “free” has two legitimate general meanings; it can refer
+either to freedom or to price. When we speak of “free software”,
+we're talking about freedom, not price. (Think of “free speech”,
+not “free beer”.) Specifically, it means that a user is free to
run
+the program, change the program, and redistribute the program with or
+without changes.</p>
+
+<p>
+Free programs are sometimes distributed gratis, and sometimes for a
+substantial price. Often the same program is available in both ways
+from different places. The program is free regardless of the price,
+because users have freedom in using it.</p>
+
+<p>
+<a href="/philosophy/categories.html#ProprietarySoftware">Nonfree
programs</a>
+are usually sold for a high price, but sometimes a store will give you
+a copy at no charge. That doesn't make it free software, though.
+Price or no price, the program is nonfree because <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>its</em></ins></span> users <span
class="removed"><del><strong>don't have</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>are denied</em></ins></span>
+freedom.</p>
+
+<p>
+Since free software is not a matter of price, a low price doesn't make
+the software
+free, or even closer to free. So if you are redistributing copies of free
+software, you might as well charge a substantial fee and <em>make
+some money</em>. Redistributing free software is a good and
+legitimate activity; if you do it, you might as well make a profit
+from it.</p>
+
+<p>
+Free software is a community project, and everyone who depends on it
+ought to look for ways to contribute to building the community. For a
+distributor, the way to do this is to give a part of the profit to free
software development projects or to the
+<a href="/fsf/fsf.html">Free Software Foundation</a>. This way
you can
+advance the world of free software.</p>
+
+<p>
+<strong>Distributing free software is an opportunity to raise
+funds for development. Don't waste it!</strong></p>
+
+<p>
+In order to contribute funds, you need to have some extra. If you
+charge too low a fee, you won't have anything to spare to support
+development.</p>
+
+
+<h3>Will a higher distribution price hurt some users?</h3>
+
+<p>
+People sometimes worry that a high distribution fee will put free
+software out of range for users who don't have a lot of money. With
+<a href="/philosophy/categories.html#ProprietarySoftware">proprietary
+software</a>, a high price does exactly that—but free software
+is different.</p>
+
+<p>
+The difference is that free software naturally tends to spread around,
+and there are many ways to get it.</p>
+
+<p>
+Software hoarders try their damnedest to stop you from running a
+proprietary program without paying the standard price. If this price
+is high, that does make it hard for some users to use the program.</p>
+
+<p>
+With free software, users don't <em>have</em> to pay the
+distribution fee in order to use the software. They can copy the
+program from a friend who has a copy, or with the help of a friend who
+has network access. Or several users can join together, split the
+price of one CD-ROM, then each in turn can install the software. A high
+CD-ROM price is not a major obstacle when the software is free.</p>
+
+
+<h3>Will a higher distribution price discourage use of free
software?</h3>
+
+<p>
+Another common concern is for the popularity of free software. People
+think that a high price for distribution would reduce the number of
+users, or that a low price is likely to encourage users.</p>
+
+<p>
+This is true for proprietary software—but free software is
+different. With so many ways to get copies, the price of distribution
+service has less effect on popularity.</p>
+
+<p>
+In the long run, how many people use free software is determined
+mainly by <em>how much free software can do</em>, and how easy it
+is to use. Many users do not make freedom their priority; they
+may continue to use proprietary software if
+free software can't do all the jobs they want done. Thus, if we want
+to increase the number of users in the long run, we should above all
+<em>develop more free software</em>.</p>
+
+<p>
+The most direct way to do this is by writing needed
+<a href="http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/tasklist">free
software</a>
+or
+<a href="/doc/doc.html">manuals</a> yourself. But if you do
+distribution rather than writing, the best way you can help is by
+raising funds for others to write them.</p>
+
+
+<h3>The term “selling software” can be confusing
too</h3>
+
+<p>
+Strictly speaking, “selling” means trading goods for
+money. Selling a copy of a free program is legitimate, and we
+encourage it.</p>
+
+<p>
+However, when people think of
+<a href="/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#SellSoftware">“selling
software”</a>,
+they usually imagine doing it the way most companies do it: making the
+software proprietary rather than free.</p>
+
+<p>
+So unless you're going to draw distinctions carefully, the way this
+article does, we suggest it is better to avoid using the term
+“selling software” and choose some other wording instead.
+For example, you could say “distributing free software for a
+fee”—that is unambiguous.</p>
+
+
+<h3>High or low fees, and the GNU GPL</h3>
+
+<p>
+Except for one special situation, the
+<a href="/copyleft/gpl.html">GNU General Public License</a> (GNU
GPL)
+has no requirements about how much you can charge for distributing a
+copy of free software. You can charge nothing, a penny, a dollar, or
+a billion dollars. It's up to you, and the marketplace, so don't
+complain to us if nobody wants to pay a billion dollars for a
+copy.</p>
+
+<p>
+The one exception is in the case where binaries are distributed
+without the corresponding complete source code. Those who do this are
+required by the GNU GPL to provide source code on subsequent request.
+Without a limit on the fee for the source code, they would be able set
+a fee too large for anyone to pay—such as a billion
+dollars—and thus pretend to release source code while in truth
+concealing it. So <a href="/licenses/gpl.html#section6">in this case we
+have to limit the fee</a> for source in order
+to ensure the user's freedom. In ordinary situations, however, there
+is no such justification for limiting distribution fees, so we do not
+limit them.</p>
+
+<p>
+Sometimes companies whose activities cross the line stated in the GNU
+GPL plead for permission, saying that they “won't charge
+money for the GNU software” or such like. That won't get them anywhere
+with us. Free software is about freedom, and enforcing the GPL is
+defending freedom. When we defend users' freedom, we are not
+distracted by side issues such as how much of a distribution fee is
+charged. Freedom is the issue, the whole issue, and the only issue.</p>
+
+</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
+<div id="footer">
+<div class="unprintable">
+
+<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
+<a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
+There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
+the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a
href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+ replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+ We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+ translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+ Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+ to <a href="mailto:address@hidden">
+ <address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+ <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+ our web pages, see <a
+ href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+ README</a>. -->
+Please see the <a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
+of this article.</p>
+</div>
+
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US. Please do NOT change or remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+
+<p>Copyright © 1996, 1997, 1998, 2001, 2007, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2013</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2013, 2015</em></ins></span>
+Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+
+<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>.</p>
+
+<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
+
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
+<!-- timestamp start -->
+$Date: 2015/06/12 09:58:17 $
+<!-- timestamp end -->
+</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+</body>
+</html>
+</pre></body></html>
Index: philosophy/po/selling.tr-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: philosophy/po/selling.tr-diff.html
diff -N philosophy/po/selling.tr-diff.html
--- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
+++ philosophy/po/selling.tr-diff.html 12 Jun 2015 09:58:18 -0000 1.1
@@ -0,0 +1,261 @@
+<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
+ "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";>
+<!-- Generated by GNUN -->
+<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
+<head>
+<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
+<title>/philosophy/selling.html-diff</title>
+<style type="text/css">
+span.removed { background-color: #f22; color: #000; }
+span.inserted { background-color: #2f2; color: #000; }
+</style></head>
+<body><pre>
+<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
+<title>Selling Free Software
+- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
+<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/selling.translist" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
+<h2>Selling Free Software</h2>
+
+<p><em><a href="/philosophy/selling-exceptions.html">Some
views on the
+ideas of selling exceptions to free software licenses, such as the GNU
+GPL</a> are also available.</em></p>
+
+<p>
+Many people believe that the spirit of the GNU Project is that you
+should not charge money for distributing copies of software, or that
+you should charge as little as possible—just enough to cover
+the cost. This is a misunderstanding.</p>
+
+<p>
+Actually, we encourage people who redistribute
+<a href="/philosophy/free-sw.html">free software</a> to charge as
much
+as they wish or can. If <span class="inserted"><ins><em>a license does not
permit users to make
+copies and sell them, it is a nonfree license. If</em></ins></span> this seems
+surprising to you, please read on.</p>
+
+<p>
+The word “free” has two legitimate general meanings; it can refer
+either to freedom or to price. When we speak of “free software”,
+we're talking about freedom, not price. (Think of “free speech”,
+not “free beer”.) Specifically, it means that a user is free to
run
+the program, change the program, and redistribute the program with or
+without changes.</p>
+
+<p>
+Free programs are sometimes distributed gratis, and sometimes for a
+substantial price. Often the same program is available in both ways
+from different places. The program is free regardless of the price,
+because users have freedom in using it.</p>
+
+<p>
+<a href="/philosophy/categories.html#ProprietarySoftware">Nonfree
programs</a>
+are usually sold for a high price, but sometimes a store will give you
+a copy at no charge. That doesn't make it free software, though.
+Price or no price, the program is nonfree because <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>its</em></ins></span> users <span
class="removed"><del><strong>don't have</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>are denied</em></ins></span>
+freedom.</p>
+
+<p>
+Since free software is not a matter of price, a low price doesn't make
+the software
+free, or even closer to free. So if you are redistributing copies of free
+software, you might as well charge a substantial fee and <em>make
+some money</em>. Redistributing free software is a good and
+legitimate activity; if you do it, you might as well make a profit
+from it.</p>
+
+<p>
+Free software is a community project, and everyone who depends on it
+ought to look for ways to contribute to building the community. For a
+distributor, the way to do this is to give a part of the profit to free
software development projects or to the
+<a href="/fsf/fsf.html">Free Software Foundation</a>. This way
you can
+advance the world of free software.</p>
+
+<p>
+<strong>Distributing free software is an opportunity to raise
+funds for development. Don't waste it!</strong></p>
+
+<p>
+In order to contribute funds, you need to have some extra. If you
+charge too low a fee, you won't have anything to spare to support
+development.</p>
+
+
+<h3>Will a higher distribution price hurt some users?</h3>
+
+<p>
+People sometimes worry that a high distribution fee will put free
+software out of range for users who don't have a lot of money. With
+<a href="/philosophy/categories.html#ProprietarySoftware">proprietary
+software</a>, a high price does exactly that—but free software
+is different.</p>
+
+<p>
+The difference is that free software naturally tends to spread around,
+and there are many ways to get it.</p>
+
+<p>
+Software hoarders try their damnedest to stop you from running a
+proprietary program without paying the standard price. If this price
+is high, that does make it hard for some users to use the program.</p>
+
+<p>
+With free software, users don't <em>have</em> to pay the
+distribution fee in order to use the software. They can copy the
+program from a friend who has a copy, or with the help of a friend who
+has network access. Or several users can join together, split the
+price of one CD-ROM, then each in turn can install the software. A high
+CD-ROM price is not a major obstacle when the software is free.</p>
+
+
+<h3>Will a higher distribution price discourage use of free
software?</h3>
+
+<p>
+Another common concern is for the popularity of free software. People
+think that a high price for distribution would reduce the number of
+users, or that a low price is likely to encourage users.</p>
+
+<p>
+This is true for proprietary software—but free software is
+different. With so many ways to get copies, the price of distribution
+service has less effect on popularity.</p>
+
+<p>
+In the long run, how many people use free software is determined
+mainly by <em>how much free software can do</em>, and how easy it
+is to use. Many users do not make freedom their priority; they
+may continue to use proprietary software if
+free software can't do all the jobs they want done. Thus, if we want
+to increase the number of users in the long run, we should above all
+<em>develop more free software</em>.</p>
+
+<p>
+The most direct way to do this is by writing needed
+<a href="http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/tasklist">free
software</a>
+or
+<a href="/doc/doc.html">manuals</a> yourself. But if you do
+distribution rather than writing, the best way you can help is by
+raising funds for others to write them.</p>
+
+
+<h3>The term “selling software” can be confusing
too</h3>
+
+<p>
+Strictly speaking, “selling” means trading goods for
+money. Selling a copy of a free program is legitimate, and we
+encourage it.</p>
+
+<p>
+However, when people think of
+<a href="/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html#SellSoftware">“selling
software”</a>,
+they usually imagine doing it the way most companies do it: making the
+software proprietary rather than free.</p>
+
+<p>
+So unless you're going to draw distinctions carefully, the way this
+article does, we suggest it is better to avoid using the term
+“selling software” and choose some other wording instead.
+For example, you could say “distributing free software for a
+fee”—that is unambiguous.</p>
+
+
+<h3>High or low fees, and the GNU GPL</h3>
+
+<p>
+Except for one special situation, the
+<a href="/copyleft/gpl.html">GNU General Public License</a> (GNU
GPL)
+has no requirements about how much you can charge for distributing a
+copy of free software. You can charge nothing, a penny, a dollar, or
+a billion dollars. It's up to you, and the marketplace, so don't
+complain to us if nobody wants to pay a billion dollars for a
+copy.</p>
+
+<p>
+The one exception is in the case where binaries are distributed
+without the corresponding complete source code. Those who do this are
+required by the GNU GPL to provide source code on subsequent request.
+Without a limit on the fee for the source code, they would be able set
+a fee too large for anyone to pay—such as a billion
+dollars—and thus pretend to release source code while in truth
+concealing it. So <a href="/licenses/gpl.html#section6">in this case we
+have to limit the fee</a> for source in order
+to ensure the user's freedom. In ordinary situations, however, there
+is no such justification for limiting distribution fees, so we do not
+limit them.</p>
+
+<p>
+Sometimes companies whose activities cross the line stated in the GNU
+GPL plead for permission, saying that they “won't charge
+money for the GNU software” or such like. That won't get them anywhere
+with us. Free software is about freedom, and enforcing the GPL is
+defending freedom. When we defend users' freedom, we are not
+distracted by side issues such as how much of a distribution fee is
+charged. Freedom is the issue, the whole issue, and the only issue.</p>
+
+</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
+<div id="footer">
+<div class="unprintable">
+
+<p>Please send general FSF & GNU inquiries to
+<a href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.
+There are also <a href="/contact/">other ways to contact</a>
+the FSF. Broken links and other corrections or suggestions can be sent
+to <a
href="mailto:address@hidden"><address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+<p><!-- TRANSLATORS: Ignore the original text in this paragraph,
+ replace it with the translation of these two:
+
+ We work hard and do our best to provide accurate, good quality
+ translations. However, we are not exempt from imperfection.
+ Please send your comments and general suggestions in this regard
+ to <a href="mailto:address@hidden">
+ <address@hidden></a>.</p>
+
+ <p>For information on coordinating and submitting translations of
+ our web pages, see <a
+ href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+ README</a>. -->
+Please see the <a
+href="/server/standards/README.translations.html">Translations
+README</a> for information on coordinating and submitting translations
+of this article.</p>
+</div>
+
+<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
+ files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
+ be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US. Please do NOT change or remove this
+ without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
+ Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
+ document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
+ document was modified, or published.
+
+ If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
+ Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
+ years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
+ year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
+ being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
+ There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
+ Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
+
+<p>Copyright © 1996, 1997, 1998, 2001, 2007, <span
class="removed"><del><strong>2013</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>2013, 2015</em></ins></span>
+Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+
+<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/">Creative
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>.</p>
+
+<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
+
+<p class="unprintable">Updated:
+<!-- timestamp start -->
+$Date: 2015/06/12 09:58:18 $
+<!-- timestamp end -->
+</p>
+</div>
+</div>
+</body>
+</html>
+</pre></body></html>
| [Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- www distros/common-distros.ar.html distros/dist...,
GNUN <=